The pediatric subspecialty workforce: public policy and forces for change

Predictors of Subspecialty Appointment Scheduling and Completion for Patients Referred From a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic

Failure to complete subspecialty referrals decreases access to subspecialty care and may endanger patient safety. We conducted a retrospective analysis of new patient referrals made to the 14 most common referral departments at Boston Children's Hospital from January 1 to December 31, 2017. The sample included 2031 patient referrals. The mean wait time between referral and appointment date was 39.6 days. In all, 87% of referrals were scheduled and 84% of scheduled appointments attended, thus 73% of the original referrals were completed. In multivariate analysis, younger age, medical complexity, being a non-English speaker, and referral to a surgical subspecialty were associated with a higher likelihood of referral completion. Black and Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity, living in a Census tract with Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) ≥ 90th percentile, and longer wait times were associated with a lower likelihood of appointment attendance. Future interventions should consider both health care system factors such as appointment wait times and community-level barriers to referral completion.

Child Health Needs and the Pediatric Rheumatology Workforce: 2020-2040

The Pediatric Rheumatology (PRH) workforce supply in the United States does not meet the needs of children. Lack of timely access to PRH care is associated with poor outcomes for children with rheumatic diseases. This article is part of a Pediatrics supplement focused on anticipating the future pediatric subspecialty workforce supply. It draws on information in the literature, American Board of Pediatrics data, and findings from a model that estimates the future supply of pediatric subspecialists developed by the Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Strategic Modeling and Analysis Ltd., and the American Board of Pediatrics Foundation. PRH has a smaller workforce per capita of children than most other pediatric subspecialties. The model demonstrates that the clinical workforce equivalent of pediatric rheumatologists in 2020 was only 0.27 per 100 000 children, with a predicted increase to 0.47 by 2040. Although the model predicts a 72% increase in providers, this number remains inadequate to provide sufficient care given the number of children with rheumatic diseases, especially in the South and West regions. The likely reasons for the workforce shortage are multifactorial, including lack of awareness of the field, low salaries compared with most other medical specialties, concerns about working solo or in small group practices, and increasing provider retirement. Novel interventions are needed to increase the workforce size. The American College of Rheumatology has recognized the dire consequences of this shortage and has developed a workforce solutions initiative to tackle these problems.

Understanding Caregiver Perspectives on an Electronic Consultation and Referral System

This study examined caregiver impressions of an electronic consultation and referral (ECR) system. Participants included 56 caregivers of primary care patients referred through the ECR system. Semistructured interviews and surveys were conducted between August 2018 and April 2019. Transcripts were coded and themes developed using thematic content analysis. A total of 51% of caregivers stated that they would prefer to see their child's primary care provider (PCP) for a specialty issue if they could receive the same quality of care. All caregivers who received an electronic consult (n = 28) said that they would utilize that process again. Three themes emerged: (1) caregivers expect immediate action prior to or instead of a specialty referral; (2) caregiver preferences for PCP versus specialist are mediated by both child and provider characteristics; (3) caregiver attitudes toward the ECR system are influenced by external considerations and experiences with the system. Results suggest caregivers value enhanced communication and immediate access to specialty input facilitated by the ECR system.

Factors Influencing Career Decisions and Satisfaction Among Newly Practicing Ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

To describe the career choices of newly practicing ophthalmologists and explore factors influencing career decisions and satisfaction.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from an electronic survey of ophthalmologists who completed training within the prior 5 years. The survey included questions about demographic information, medical education, current practice, factors affecting career choices, and career satisfaction. Statistical comparisons were made based on gender, type of practice, subspecialty training, and practice area.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 696 (32%) newly practicing ophthalmologists, including 276 (40%) women, 179 (29%) academicians, and 465 (67%) subspecialists. A higher proportion of female respondents entered academics than male respondents (36% vs 26%, P = .009). Female and male respondents pursued fellowship training with similar frequency (64% vs 68%, P = .32), but men were more likely to seek vitreoretinal fellowships (30% vs 11%, P < .001) and women were more likely to undertake fellowships in pediatric ophthalmology (21% vs 8%, P < .001), uveitis (10% vs 2%, P = .002), and neuro-ophthalmology (6% vs 2%, P = .042). A total of 514 (83%) respondents reported being happy with work life.

CONCLUSIONS

The career choices of newly practicing ophthalmologists differ based on gender, type of practice, subspecialty training, and practice area. Many factors affect career decisions, and they have varying influence on subgroups within ophthalmology. Ophthalmologists have high levels of career satisfaction. This information may prove useful when developing workforce strategies to meet future eye care needs. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Diversity of the physician workforce: Specialty choice decisions during medical school

Background

Despite efforts to increase the overall diversity of the medical student body, some medical specialties have a less diverse applicant pool based on both gender and race than would be expected based on medical graduate demographics.

Objectives

To identify whether women and Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) medical students have baseline differences in their career interests or if their career plans change more during medical school when compared to men and non-URIM students.

Methods

Secondary data analyses of all medical students who applied through ERAS from 2005–2010 was conducted. Binary logistic regression models with the response being a planned career in one of four medical specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, OB/GYN, and general surgery/surgical specialties) at medical school entry and graduation. Regression models included demographics, student attitudes, debt, academic metrics, and medical school experiences.

Results

Comparatively, women were less likely to be interested in internal medicine and surgery and more interested in pediatrics and OB/GYN at matriculation. URiM students expressed more interest in OB/GYN and surgery when starting medical school. At graduation, women were less likely to plan for internal medicine and surgery and were more interested in pursuing OB/GYN and pediatrics. URiM students were more likely to plan for a career in internal medicine and less likely to choose pediatrics.

Conclusions

From matriculation to graduation, women have relatively stable preferences regarding planned medical specialties. In contrast, URiM students’ specialty plans shifted over time among the four specialties, with variation in preferences occurring between matriculation and graduation.

Top 10 Tips for Successfully Implementing a Diabetes Telehealth Program

Diabetes management is well suited to use of telehealth, and recent improvements in both diabetes technology and telehealth policy make this an ideal time for diabetes providers to begin integrating telehealth into their practices. This article provides background information, specific recommendations for effective implementation, and a vision for the future landscape of telehealth within diabetes care to guide interested providers and practices on this topic. Note: This article was written prior to the COVID19 pandemic, and does not include information about recent telehealth policy changes that occurred during or as a result of this public health crisis.

Electronic Consultation Systems: Impact on Pediatric Orthopaedic Care

BACKGROUND

The demand for pediatric orthopaedic surgery consultation has grown rapidly, leading to longer wait times for elective consultation in some regions. Some specialties are addressing this increased demand through electronic consultation services. We wanted to examine the impact of pediatric orthopaedic e-consultations in Canada's Eastern Ontario region.

METHODS

We developed a cross-sectional study of all the cases directed to a pediatric orthopaedic surgery specialist using the Champlain Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation (BASE) eConsult service over a 2-year period and examined their impact on in-person referrals, time of e-consultation and primary care satisfaction as well as types of clinical questions that were asked.

RESULTS

Electronic consultations avoided in-person appointments in 68% of the submitted cases. The median response by specialists received by the primary care providers (PCPs) was <20 hours. A total of 69% of consultations involve >1 type of clinical questions, most commonly about basic trauma/fracture care and management recommendations. Ninety-seven percent of the PCPs found the overall value for the care of the patients to be good or excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-sectional study demonstrates the effective and timely use of eConsult in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. It also shows a significant reduction in the number of in-person consultations required and demonstrates a high satisfaction rate by PCPs using the service.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In addition to the efficacy and time-sensitive care provided to the patients, the study shows that, professionally, 89% of PCPs found this service to be excellent or good. The broader implications of electronic consultation on overall quality of care, population health, and patient satisfaction requires further investigation.

Home Visits for Children and Adolescents with Uncontrolled Type 1 Diabetes

Background: Home-based video visits were provided over one year as a supplement to in-person care for pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients with suboptimal glycemic control. We hypothesized that the intervention would be feasible and satisfactory for the target population and would significantly improve hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and completion of recommended quarterly diabetes clinic visits. Methods: This was a nonrandomized clinical trial. Fifty-seven patients aged 3-17 years with known T1D and HbA1c ≥8% (64 mmol/mol) were recruited to receive the intervention. The study population was 49% adolescent (13-17 years old) and 58% publicly insured patients. Video visits were scheduled every 4, 6, or 8 weeks depending on the HbA1c level. HbA1c levels as well as frequencies of clinic visits and of diabetes-related emergency department (ED) and hospital encounters were compared before and after the study. Results: Thirty participants completed 12 months of video visits. The study cohort demonstrated significant improvement in mean HbA1c in both intention-to-treat (N = 57) analysis (10.8% [95 mmol/mol] to 10.0% [86 mmol/mol], P = 0.01) and per-protocol (N = 30) analysis (10.8% [95 mmol/mol] to 9.6% [81 mmol/mol], P = 0.004). Completion of ≥4 annual diabetes clinic visits improved significantly from 21% at baseline to 83% during the study period for the entire cohort, P < 0.0001. The frequency of diabetes-related ED and hospital encounters did not change significantly. Conclusions: Home-based video visits are a feasible supplement to in-person care for children and adolescents with T1D and suboptimal glycemic control and can successfully improve HbA1c levels and adherence to recommended frequency of care in this high-risk clinical population.

Home-based video visits for pediatric patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is labor-intensive, requiring multiple daily blood glucose measurements and insulin injections. Patients are seen quarterly by providers, but evidence suggests more frequent contact is beneficial. Current technology allows secure, remote sharing of diabetes data and video-conferencing between providers and patients in their home settings.

METHODS

Home-based video visits were provided for six months to pediatric T1D patients with poor glycemic control, indicated by a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥8% at enrollment. Video visits were conducted every 4-8 weeks in addition to regularly scheduled clinic visits. Dates of clinic visits and HbA1c values were abstracted from the medical record at baseline and six months. Patients were surveyed at video visits regarding technical issues, and after six months a standardized survey was administered to assess satisfaction with video-based care.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients enrolled and 36 completed six months of video visits. Patients completing six months averaged 4.0 video visits (SD 1.1). Their frequency of in-person care also increased from 3.2 clinic visits/year at baseline to 3.7 clinic visits/year during the study (P = 0.04). Mean HbA1c reduction among patients completing six months was 0.8% (95% CI 0.2-1.4%); 94% of these patients were "very satisfied" while 6% were "somewhat satisfied" with the experience.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that home-based video visits are feasible and satisfactory for pediatric patients with poorly controlled T1D. Furthermore, use of video visits can improve frequency of subspecialty care and resulting glycemic control in this population.

Inpatient burden of juvenile dermatomyositis among children in the United States

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes significant morbidity and quality of life impairment. Little is known about the inpatient burden of JDM in the US. Our goal was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for hospitalization with juvenile dermatomyositis and assess inpatient burden of JDM.

METHODS

Data on 14,401,668 pediatric hospitalizations from the 2002-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed. ICD-9-CM coding was used to identify hospitalizations with a diagnosis of JDM.

RESULTS

There were 909 and 495 weighted admissions with a primary or secondary diagnosis of JDM, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression models with stepwise selection, female sex (logistic regression; adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) (2.22 [2.05-2.42]), non-winter season (fall: 1.18[1.06-1.33]; spring (1.13 [1.01-1.27]; summer (1.53 [1.37-1.71]), non-Medicaid administered government insurance coverage (2.59 [2.26-2.97]), and multiple chronic conditions (2-5: 1.41[1.30-1.54]; 6+: 1.24[1.00-1.52]) were all associated with higher rates of hospitalization for JDM. The weighted total length of stay (LOS) and inflation-adjusted cost of care for patients with a primary inpatient diagnosis of JDM was 19,159 days and $49,339,995 with geometric means [95% CI] of 2.50 [2.27-2.76] days and $7350 [$6228-$8674], respectively. Costs of hospitalization in primary JDM and length of stay and cost in secondary JDM were significantly higher compared to those without JDM. Notably, race/ethnicity was associated with increased LOS (log-linear regression; adjusted beta [95% confidence interval]) (Hispanic: 0.28 [0.14-0.41]; other non-white: 0.59 [0.31-0.86]) and cost of care (Hispanic: 0.30 [0.05-0.55]).

CONCLUSION

JDM contributes to both increased length of hospitalization and inpatient cost of care. Non-Medicaid government insurance was associated with higher rates of hospitalization for JDM while Hispanic and other non-white racial/ethnic groups demonstrated increased LOS and cost of care.

Shared Care: Using an Electronic Consult Form to Facilitate Primary Care Provider-Specialty Care Coordination

OBJECTIVE

The quality of children's health is compromised by poor care coordination between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists. Our objective was to determine how an electronic consultation and referral system impacts referral patterns and PCP-specialist communication.

METHODS

The primary care clinic at Boston Children's Hospital piloted an electronic referral and consultation system with the neurology and gastroenterology departments from April 1, 2014, to October 31, 2016. PCPs completed an electronic consult form, and if needed, specialists replied with advice or facilitated expedited appointments. Specialist response times, referral rates, wait times, and completion rates for specialty visits were tracked. PCPs and specialists also completed a survey to evaluate feasibility and satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 82 PCPs placed 510 consults during the pilot period. Specialists responded to 88% of requests within 3 business days. Eighteen percent of specialty visits were deferred and 21% were expedited. Wait times for specialty appointments to both departments significantly decreased, from 48 to 34 days (P < .001), and completion rates improved from 58% to 70% (P < .01), but referral volumes remained stable (25 per month to 23 per month; P = .29). Most PCPs said the Shared Care system facilitated better communication with specialists (89%) and enabled them to provide superior patient care (92%). Specialists reported that the system required a minimal amount of time and enabled them to educate PCPs and triage referrals.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an electronic referral and consultation system was feasible and provided timely access to specialty care, but did not affect referral volume. This system could serve as a model for other health care organizations and specialties.

Timing and Stability of Fellowship Choices during Pediatric Residency: A Longitudinal Survey

OBJECTIVES

To determine, among pediatric residents, the timing and stability of decisions to pursue fellowship training and select a specific subspecialty, which can be used to inform strategies to better match the distribution of pediatric subspecialist with the needs of children.

STUDY DESIGN

A longitudinal survey administered with the General Pediatrics In-training Exam to pediatric residents in the US and Canada, 2010-2014. The study included residents who responded in each of their first 3 years of residency and indicated plans to enter fellowship or matriculated, 2013-2016, into 1 of the 14 medical subspecialty fellowships for which the American Board of Pediatrics grants a certificate. Descriptive and χ² statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 7580 residents who completed 3 annual surveys (response rate 99%) 4963 (65.5%) indicated plans to pursue fellowship training and 2843 (37.5%) matriculated into fellowship. Residents who did not enter fellowship were in smaller residency programs and programs with less interest in fellowship among interns. Most residents who matriculated into fellowship (68.4%) planned to do so as interns and maintained that plan throughout residency. In contrast, 22.7% had selected a specific subspecialty as interns. Fellowship decisions were made later in residency by female residents, American Medical Graduates, and residents in programs where <50% of interns planned to pursue fellowship training. Timing and stability of decisions varied across subspecialty fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the timing of pediatric medical subspecialty fellowship decisions could be used to shape medical education and, ultimately, the pediatric workforce.

The American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology workforce assessment: Part 1-Current state of the workforce

The American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) recognized recent changes in medical practice and the potential impact on pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) workforce. ASPHO surveyed society members and PHO Division Directors between 2010 and 2016 and studied PHO workforce data collected by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association to characterize the current state of the PHO workforce. The analysis of this information has led to a comprehensive description of PHO physicians, professional activities, and workplace. It is important to continue to collect data to identify changes in composition and needs of the PHO workforce.

General Pediatrician-Staffed Behavioral/Developmental Access Clinic Decreases Time to Evaluation of Early Childhood Developmental Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement project to decrease wait time to evaluation for children referred to Developmental Behavioral Pediatricians (DBPs).

METHODS

The authors created a Behavioral/Developmental Access Clinic (BDAC) staffed by a general pediatrician (GP) and pediatric psychologist. Clinicians in the BDAC provided comprehensive developmental evaluations for children in a discrete age range (<5 yr old). We describe the establishment of the BDAC along with referrals, diagnoses, and recommended follow-up for patients seen by the GP. We used 2-tailed t tests to compare the mean time with initial evaluation for patients seen in BDAC versus a DBP.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children were seen in BDAC over 6 months. Referrals from the BDAC included: physical/occupational/speech therapy (71%), psychology (35%), audiology (25%), genetics (14%), and neurology (8%). Five patients (8%) were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Compared with time to appointment with a DBP (327 d), mean time to developmental assessment was shorter for the 45 patients who accepted earlier appointments in the BDAC (159 d), and for the 18 children seen in the BDAC as new referrals (11 d), p < .001. Follow-up with a DBP was recommended for 9 (50%) of the new patient referrals evaluated in BDAC.

CONCLUSION

The BDAC allowed for earlier developmental assessment of young children, with potential for earlier diagnosis and treatment of developmental disorders, including ASD. Opportunity for initial evaluation in BDAC decreased the number of patients requiring evaluation by DBPs, improving access to this subspecialty in our institution.

Comparisons between Full-time and Part-time Pediatric Emergency Physicians in Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Pediatric emergency medicine is a young field that has established itself in recent decades. Many unanswered questions remain regarding how to deliver better pediatric emergency care. The implementation of full-time pediatric emergency physicians is a quality improvement strategy for child care in Taiwan. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of care under different physician coverage models in the pediatric emergency department (ED).

METHODS

The medical records of 132,398 patients visiting the pediatric ED of a tertiary care university hospital during January 2004 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Full-time pediatric emergency physicians are the group specializing in the pediatric emergency medicine, and they only work in the pediatric ED. Part-time pediatricians specializing in other subspecialties also can work an extra shift in the pediatric ED, with the majority working in their inpatient and outpatient services. We compared quality performance indicators, including: mortality rate, the 72-hour return visit rate, length of stay, admission rate, and the rate of being kept for observation between full-time and part-time pediatric emergency physicians.

RESULTS

An average of 3678 ± 125 [mean ± standard error (SE)] visits per month (with a range of 2487-6646) were observed. The trends in quality of care, observed monthly, indicated that the 72-hour return rate was 2-6% and length of stay in the ED decreased from 11.5 hours to 3.2 hours over the study period. The annual mortality rate within 48 hours of admission to the ED increased from 0.04% to 0.05% and then decreased to 0.02%, and the overall mortality rate dropped from 0.13% to 0.07%. Multivariate analyses indicated that there was no change in the 72-hour return visit rate for full-time pediatric emergency physicians; they were more likely to admit and keep patients for observation [odds ratio = 1.43 and odds ratio = 1.71, respectively], and these results were similar to those of senior physicians.

CONCLUSION

Full-time pediatric emergency physicians in the pediatric ED decreased the mortality rate and length of stay in the ED, but had no change in the 72-hour return visit rate. This pilot study shows that the quality of care in pediatric ED after the implementation of full-time pediatric emergency physicians needs further evaluation.

Trends in Health Care Spending for Children in Medicaid With High Resource Use

OBJECTIVES

To assess characteristics associated with health care spending trends among child high resource users in Medicaid.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 48 743 children ages 1 to 18 years continuously enrolled from 2009-2013 in 10 state Medicaid programs (Truven MarketScan Medicaid Database) also in the top 5% of all health care spending in 2010. Using multivariable regression, associations were assessed between baseline demographic, clinical, and health services characteristics (using 2009-2010 data) with subsequent health care spending (ie, transiently, intermittently, persistently high) from 2011-2013.

RESULTS

High spending from 2011-2013 was transient for 54.2%, persistent for 32.9%, and intermittent for 12.9%. Regarding demographic characteristics, the highest likelihood of persistent versus transient spending occurred in children aged 13 to 18 years versus 1 to 2 years in 2010 (odds ratio [OR], 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7-3.4]). Regarding clinical characteristics, the highest likelihoods were in children with ≥6 chronic conditions (OR, 4.8 [95% CI, 3.5-6.6]), a respiratory complex chronic condition (OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 2.2-2.8]), or a neuromuscular complex chronic condition (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 2.2-2.5]). Hospitalization and emergency department (ED) use in 2010 were associated with a decreased likelihood of persistent spending in 2011-2013 (hospitalization OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.7-0.7]); ED OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.8-0.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

Most children with high spending in Medicaid are without persistently high spending in subsequent years. Adolescent age, multiple chronic conditions, and certain complex chronic conditions increased the likelihood of persistently high spending; hospital and ED use decreased it. These data may help inform the development of new models of care and financing to optimize health and save resources in children with high resource use.

Use of Adult-Trained Medical Subspecialists by Children Seeking Medical Subspecialty Care

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the use of adult-trained medical subspecialists by children and to determine the association between geographic access to pediatric subspecialty care and the use of adult-trained subspecialists. Children with limited access to pediatric subspecialty care may seek care from adult-trained subspecialists, but data on this practice are limited.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified children aged <16 years in 2007-2012 Pennsylvania Medicaid claims. We categorized outpatient visits to 9 selected medical subspecialties as either pediatric or adult-trained subspecialty visits. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine the adjusted association between travel times to pediatric referral centers and use of pediatric vs adult-trained medical subspecialists for children with and without complex chronic conditions (CCCs).

RESULTS

Among 1.1 million children, 8% visited the examined medical subspecialists, with 10% of these children using adult-trained medical subspecialists. Compared with children with a ≤30-minute travel time to a pediatric referral center, children with a >90-minute travel time were more likely to use adult-trained subspecialists (without CCCs: relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.94, 95% CI, 1.79-2.11; with CCCs: RRR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.10-2.59) and less likely to use pediatric subspecialists (without CCCs: RRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.68; with CCCs: RRR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.73-0.79).

CONCLUSION

Among medical subspecialty fields with pediatric and adult-trained subspecialists, adult-trained subspecialists provided 10% of care to children overall and 18% of care to children living >90 minutes from pediatric referral centers. Future studies should examine consequences of adult-trained medical subspecialist use on pediatric health outcomes and identify strategies to increase access to pediatric subspecialists.

Jobs and Career Plans of New Pediatric Subspecialists

OBJECTIVES

The issues of importance in selecting a first job for new pediatric subspecialists, and their ability to find positions that match their professional and clinical goals, are unknown. The objectives were to (1) describe current employment patterns, practice characteristics, factors influencing choice of first position, and future work goals of new pediatric subspecialists; and (2) examine the relationship of these variables with the actual professional time allocation and clinical responsibilities compared with the desired first job.

METHODS

The authors surveyed 3010 individuals sitting for ≥1 of the 14 subspecialty certification exams. The main outcomes were (1) most important factors in choosing employment; (2) ability to gain employment in positions that matched their goals; and (3) variation in employment characteristics among men versus women, time since completion of training, and part-time versus full-time status.

RESULTS

Response rate was 97%. Lifestyle/spousal or family considerations was the factor identified as most important in the choice of first position after fellowship training for half of respondents (50%; n = 1277). There was a median of 75% of actual time spent in direct and/or consultative inpatient or outpatient care, with 5% in medical education, 5% in administration, and 5% in research. A majority (74%; n = 1825) reported this proportion to be approximately what they wanted. Most respondents (89%; n = 2194) reported that their allocation of patient care responsibilities (ie, inpatient versus outpatient) was approximately what they wanted.

CONCLUSION

A large majority of pediatric subspecialists found initial positions matching their goals for professional responsibilities and clinical care.

Population-based geographic access to endocrinologists in the United States, 2012

BACKGROUND

Increases in population and life expectancy of Americans may result in shortages of endocrinologists by 2020. This study aims to assess variations in geographic accessibility to endocrinologists in the US, by age group at state and county levels, and by urban/rural status, and distance.

METHODS

We used the 2012 National Provider Identifier Registry to obtain office locations of all adult and pediatric endocrinologists in the US. The population with geographic access to an endocrinologist within a series of 6 distance radii, centered on endocrinologist practice locations, was estimated using the US Census 2010 block-level population. We assumed that persons living within the same circular buffer zone of an endocrinologist location have the same geographic accessibility to that endocrinologist. The geographic accessibility (the percentage of the population with geographic access to at least one endocrinologist) and the population-to-endocrinologist ratio for each geographic area were estimated.

RESULTS

By using 20 miles as the distance radius, geographic accessibility to at least one pediatric/adult endocrinologist for age groups 0-17, 18-64, and ≥ 65 years was 64.1%, 85.4%, and 82.1%. The overall population-to-endocrinologist ratio within 20 miles was 39,492:1 for children, 29,887:1 for adults aged 18-64 years, and 6,194:1 for adults aged ≥ 65 years. These ratios varied considerably by state, county, urban/rural status, and distance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that there are geographic variations of accessibility to endocrinologists in the US. The areas with poorer geographic accessibility warrant further study of the effect of these variations on disease prevention, detection, and management of endocrine diseases in the US population. Our findings of geographic access to endocrinologists also may provide valuable information for medical education and health resources allocation.

Implementation of referral guidelines at the interface between pediatric primary and subspecialty care

BACKGROUND

In pediatric medicine, inadequate access to subspecialty care is widespread. Referral Guidelines are structured tools that describe criteria for subspecialty referral and may decrease medically unnecessary referrals and thereby improve access.

PROBLEM

Variation in referral rates and suboptimal communication around pediatric subspecialty referrals leads to inappropriate and ineffective use of scarce clinical resources.

GOALS

Connecticut Children׳s Medical Center prioritized the development of collaborative care tools at the interface between primary and subspecialty care, including Referral Guidelines.

STRATEGY

A comprehensive set of Referral Guidelines was developed and consisted of background information on a given condition, strategies for initial evaluation and management, instructions for how and when to refer, and what the patient and family could expect at the visit with the subspecialist. A key component of the initiative was the integral role of the PCP during development.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight Referral Guidelines have been developed among 15 subspecialty areas. A novel process for active dissemination of Referral Guidelines was piloted in one medical subspecialty area and led to a reduction in overall referrals and an increase in the proportion of referrals meeting the necessary criteria.

The effect of a non-surgical orthopaedic physician on wait times to see a paediatric orthopaedic surgeon

AIMS

High referral volumes to paediatric orthopaedic surgeons create long clinic waiting lists. The use of extended scope roles for doctors and health professionals is one strategy to address these wait times. We completed a 6-month trial of a non-surgical paediatric orthopaedic physician role (NSP) to help manage non-urgent referrals to our service from local general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

For a 6-month period, the majority of non-urgent GP referrals were assessed by a US-trained NSP. Wait times were compared between this period and the same time period in the previous year. Family and referrer satisfaction was determined through postal surveys.

RESULTS

Over the trial period, the NSP saw a total of 155 new patient referrals, which represented 49% of all non-urgent GP referrals for the period. Before the trial, only 75% of non-urgent referrals were seen within 131 days (19 weeks) with 10% waiting more than 215 days (31 weeks). By the end of the trial, 75% of referrals were seen within 55 days (8 weeks) and 90% within 61 days (9 weeks). The most common outcome was discharge with management advice. 12% of patients were referred on to an orthopaedic surgeon but only 1% went on to a surgical wait list. Families and referrers reported high levels of satisfaction and only three patients discharged by the NSP were referred back for orthopaedic surgeon review.

CONCLUSION

The NSP role was effective at reducing clinic wait times for patients with non-urgent paediatric orthopaedic conditions, while maintaining family and referrer satisfaction.

Pediatric nurse practitioners: influences on career choice

BACKGROUND

The demand for hiring pediatric nurse practitioners (PNPs) is strong. However, the number of newly educated PNPs has remained relatively flat during the past several years. Understanding the rationale and timing for the decision to pursue this profession is essential to having a positive impact on increasing the future workforce.

METHODS

A mail survey of all new PNPs certified between January 2009 and July 2011 (N = 1040) was conducted.

RESULTS

The response rate was 79.9%. Nearly half of all respondents (45%, N = 314) reported that they work in outpatient general pediatrics, 26% (N = 184) in outpatient subspecialty pediatrics, and 22% (N = 152) in inpatient settings. More than one third (36%, N = 253) spend most of their time in a private practice. Forty percent (N = 307) reported that they decided to pursue education as an advanced practice nurse while in practice as a registered nurse (RN), and 38% (N = 289) made the decision before pursuing RN education.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to increase the PNP pipeline will need to be directed both to students during their RN education and to creating opportunities for current RNs to pursue advanced practice nurse education that is focused on children.

Transition and transfer of adolescents and young adults with pediatric onset chronic disease: the patient and parent perspective

PURPOSE

To determine patients' and parents' perceptions regarding the delivery of transition education and perceived barriers to transfer to adult oriented care.

METHODS

A self-report survey was administered to a convenience sample of patients (16-25 years old) with various childhood onset chronic diseases. A similar survey was administered to their parents/guardians.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients and 104 parents participated in the study. The mean age of patients was 18.8 ± 2.3 years; 57% were female. Although most patients and parents reported receiving information and training about their medical condition, significant gaps in other aspects of transition education were identified. These included stated deficiencies in education regarding unprotected intercourse, health of future offspring, birth control, pregnancy, illicit drug use, and future career or vocation counseling. Commonly cited barriers to transfer were emotional attachments and lack of adult medicine specialty providers; however, the majority anticipated being ready to transfer to adult oriented care by age 25 years.

CONCLUSION

There are significant gaps in the delivery of transition education as perceived by patients and their parents. Standardization of transition education may help ensure that patients acquire the knowledge and skills for health care self-management in adulthood and successful transfer to adult oriented care.

Is procedural sedation with propofol acceptable for complex imaging? A comparison of short vs. prolonged sedations in children

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist in the community of non-anesthesiologist sedation providers regarding the appropriateness of prolonged sedations using propofol for outpatient procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate interventions required, completion rate and resource use in prolonged vs. short sedations using propofol in outpatients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively 213 children sedated with propofol by a non-anesthesiologist sedation service. Cohorts were composed a priori of children sedated for ≥1 h and <1 h. Comparisons were made regarding need for interventions, sedation duration, sedation completion to discharge time, and procedural completion rate.

RESULTS

Most sedations were for MRI (87.5% short vs. 94.5% prolonged) with no statistically significant difference in overall need for interventions (75.2% prolonged vs. 65.4% short) nor completion to discharge times (30.7 ± 11.5 min [prolonged] vs. 30.3 ± 11.7 min [short]) between both groups. One child failed to complete the intended scan. No one required endotracheal intubation or unplanned admission.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged outpatient sedations with propofol conducted by appropriately trained non-anesthesiology sedation providers appears effective for imaging procedures with no increase in interventions or increased resource burden compared to short sedations. This information can assist all stakeholders in determining scope of practice and guidelines for moderately longer pediatric sedations with propofol.

A new model to decrease time-to-appointment wait for gastroenterology evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to increase new-patient access and decrease time-to-appointment wait for gastroenterology care.

METHODS

We used a new model of care for gastroenterology evaluation. For specified clinical complaints, we offered new-patient appointments that were scheduled with a general pediatrician as an alternative to a subspecialist. A nurse navigator assisted in triaging patients. We analyzed all patient encounters over an 8-month period. To verify decreased time-to-appointment wait, mystery shoppers made semimonthly calls to centralized scheduling. We surveyed parents/families after visits with the pediatrician or subspecialists regarding satisfaction.

RESULTS

The "access" pediatrician evaluated and treated ∼40% of all new patients presenting to the division during the study period. Approximately 10% of new patients evaluated by the pediatrician (4% overall) were referred on to the subspecialist; fewer patients were reevaluated by the pediatrician in follow-up. The pediatrician ordered a minimal number of procedures. Semimonthly sampling revealed that overall new-patient access improved from an average time-to-appointment wait of 25 days to <1 day. Parent/family satisfaction was high for the patients evaluated by the pediatrician.

CONCLUSIONS

Embedding a general pediatrician within a subspecialty division, and navigating patients to this provider, can increase access to treatment of new low- to moderate-complexity patients. The access pediatrician can maintain patient satisfaction, provide high-quality care, and decrease need for subspecialist evaluation. The model, in the setting of a large academic medical center, may provide a solution for barriers to patient care such as lengthy time-to-appointment wait.

A quality improvement intervention to increase access to pediatric subspecialty practice

OBJECTIVE

To improve access to new pediatric endocrinology appointments in an urban academic hospital faculty-based practice.

METHODS

Three strategies were implemented to increase the number of appointment slots: new patient appointments were protected from conversion to follow-up appointments; all physicians, including senior faculty, were scheduled to see 3 to 4 new patients per session; and sessions devoted exclusively to follow-up appointments were added based on demand. The main outcomes for this quality improvement activity were waiting times for new and follow-up appointments, monthly visit volume, the per-provider visit volume, differences in the proportion of new visits, and clinic arrival rates pre- and postintervention.

RESULTS

Thirteen months after the intervention, average wait for a new patient appointment decreased from 11.4 to 1.7 weeks (P < .001) and follow-up appointment wait time decreased from 8.2 to 2.9 weeks (P < .001). Mean monthly total visit volume increased from 284 to 366 patient visits (P < .01) and mean monthly visit volume per provider increased from 36.8 to 41.0 patients (P = .08). New patients were 27% of the visit volume and 35% after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to our pediatric specialty care clinic was improved without increasing the number of providers by improved scheduling.

Pediatric training and career intentions, 2003-2009

OBJECTIVES

To examine trends in pediatric residents' training and job search experiences from 2003 through 2009.

METHODS

Annual national random samples of 500 graduating pediatric residents from 2003 through 2005 and 1000 from 2006 through 2009 were surveyed. Responses were compared across years to identify trends. We examined resident demographics, training, satisfaction, career intentions, and job search experiences. Overall response rate was 61%.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2009, there was an increase in the proportion of female graduating pediatric residents (69%-75%), residents from international medical schools (15%-23%), and levels of educational debt among the subgroup of residents with debt ($139 945 in 2003 to $166 972 in 2009). Residents consistently reported (>90% of residents) that they would choose pediatrics again if they had the choice. By 2009, the majority was very satisfied with the quality of their training in most areas, with ratings improving across years in caring for children with special health care needs, evidence-based medicine, and using information technology in practice. Although primary care remained the most common clinical practice goal, there was a modest decline in interest in primary care practice across survey years, whereas interest in subspecialty practice increased. Residents accepting both general pediatric practice and hospitalist positions reported less difficulty in their job search over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite continually changing demographics of pediatric training programs, residents overall remain very satisfied with their decision to become pediatricians. Pediatricians continue to face difficult financial challenges associated with rising debt, but they also report increasing job search success.

Policy challenges for the pediatric rheumatology workforce: Part I. Education and economics

For children with rheumatic conditions, the available pediatric rheumatology workforce mitigates their access to care. While the subspecialty experiences steady growth, a critical workforce shortage constrains access. This three-part review proposes both national and international interim policy solutions for the multiple causes of the existing unacceptable shortfall. Part I explores the impact of current educational deficits and economic obstacles which constrain appropriate access to care. Proposed policy solutions follow each identified barrier.Challenges consequent to obsolete, limited or unavailable exposure to pediatric rheumatology include: absent or inadequate recognition or awareness of rheumatic disease; referral patterns that commonly foster delays in timely diagnosis; and primary care providers' inappropriate or outdated perception of outcomes. Varying models of pediatric rheumatology care delivery consequent to market competition, inadequate reimbursement and uneven institutional support serve as additional barriers to care.A large proportion of pediatrics residency programs offer pediatric rheumatology rotations. However, a minority of pediatrics residents participate. The current generalist pediatrician workforce has relatively poor musculoskeletal physical examination skills, lacking basic competency in musculoskeletal medicine. To compensate, many primary care providers rely on blood tests, generating referrals that divert scarce resources away from patients who merit accelerated access to care for rheumatic disease. Pediatric rheumatology exposure could be enhanced during residency by providing a mandatory musculoskeletal medicine rotation that includes related musculoskeletal subspecialties. An important step is the progressive improvement of many providers' fixed referral and laboratory testing patterns in lieu of sound physical examination skills.Changing demographics and persistent reimbursement disparities will require workplace innovation and legislative reform. Reimbursement reform is utterly essential to extending patient access to subspecialty care. In practice settings characterized by a proportion of Medicaid-subsidized patients in excess of the national average (> 41%), institutional support is vital. Accelerating access to care will require the most efficient deployment of existing, limited resources. Practice redesign of such resources can also improve access, e.g., group appointments and an escalating role for physician extenders. Multidisciplinary, team-oriented care and telemedicine have growing evidence basis as solutions to limited access to pediatric rheumatology services.

Policy challenges for the pediatric rheumatology workforce: Part II. Health care system delivery and workforce supply

The United States pediatric population with chronic health conditions is expanding. Currently, this demographic comprises 12-18% of the American child and youth population. Affected children often receive fragmented, uncoordinated care. Overall, the American health care delivery system produces modest outcomes for this population. Poor, uninsured and minority children may be at increased risk for inferior coordination of services. Further, the United States health care delivery system is primarily organized for the diagnosis and treatment of acute conditions. For pediatric patients with chronic health conditions, the typical acute problem-oriented visit actually serves as a barrier to care. The biomedical model of patient education prevails, characterized by unilateral transfer of medical information. However, the evidence basis for improvement in disease outcomes supports the use of the chronic care model, initially proposed by Dr. Edward Wagner. Six inter-related elements distinguish the success of the chronic care model, which include self-management support and care coordination by a prepared, proactive team. United States health care lacks a coherent policy direction for the management of high cost chronic conditions, including rheumatic diseases. A fundamental restructure of United States health care delivery must urgently occur which places the patient at the center of care. For the pediatric rheumatology workforce, reimbursement policies and the actions of health plans and insurers are consistent barriers to chronic disease improvement. United States reimbursement policy and overall fragmentation of health care services pose specific challenges for widespread implementation of the chronic care model. Team-based multidisciplinary care, care coordination and self-management are integral to improve outcomes. Pediatric rheumatology demand in the United States far exceeds available workforce supply. This article reviews the career choice decision-making process at each medical trainee level to determine best recruitment strategies. Educational debt is an unexpectedly minor determinant for pediatric residents and subspecialty fellows. A two-year fellowship training option may retain the mandatory scholarship component and attract an increasing number of candidate trainees. Diversity, work-life balance, scheduling flexibility to accommodate part-time employment, and reform of conditions for academic promotion all need to be addressed to ensure future growth of the pediatric rheumatology workforce.

Evaluation of the United States pediatric urology workforce and fellowships: a series of surveys performed in 2006-2010

OBJECTIVE

In the US, there has been an evolution in the practice of pediatric urology from a primary academic sub-specialty focused on reconstruction of major congenital genitorurinary abnormalities to a mixed academic and private practice that serves as the primary care giver for all pediatric urologic concerns. The estimated manpower needs were unable to be resolved, due to our inability to determine the impact of sub-specialty certification on referral patterns, along with the failure to embrace the use of physician extenders. Here, we review a series of surveys performed in 2006-2010 regarding the sub-specialty of pediatric urology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The four surveys focused on workforce needs, appraised the financial impact of educational debt on the pediatric urology community, and evaluated concerns of the current fellows in training.

RESULTS

The median financial income for a pediatric urologist, the resident's educational debt load, and a desire of the fellows to have an open dialog with the urologic community regarding the merits of the research year are revealed.

CONCLUSION

We have identified that the ability to recruit fellows into our field is dependent upon a combination of factors: interest in the field, job availability in relationship to geographic locations, mentoring, concerns regarding financial/familial hardships encountered during a 2-year fellowship, and the lack of increased financial reimbursement for the extra training required.

Creating flexibility in pediatric resident education

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric residency programs must meet the challenge of producing graduates who are prepared to enter primary care, subspecialty fellowships or another career path. Meeting this challenge requires flexibility, which can be difficult to achieve. A program with 2 half days of continuity clinic that offers an option for residents to use 1 half day for advocacy or research projects may offer such flexibility.

OBJECTIVE

To describe 1 residency program's experience with an alternative half- day continuity clinic program.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of resident participation, project types, scholarly products, and test scores associated with alternative half day program participation.

RESULTS

Second- and third-year resident participation increased from 21% (7/33) in 2005 to 2006 to 41% (17/42) in 2008 to 2009. Forty-six residents undertook projects: 80% were research and 20% advocacy. The number of residents who presented abstracts at national meetings increased to 5 from a baseline of 4 per year. Four residents received advocacy grants. Three residents won national or regional research awards. The average score on the American Board of Pediatrics certifying examination was lower for residents in the alternative half day group, but pass rates remained high. All participants met the requirements for continuity clinic days and patient numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

This unique 2 half day continuity clinic program not only enhances the education of residents entering primary care but also allows opportunities for residents anticipating careers in research or advocacy. This approach allows programmatic flexibility without creating a track system.

The pediatric orthopaedics workforce demands, needs, and resources

The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Practice Management Committee evaluated current and future pediatric orthopaedic workforce needs. The resulting informational article summarizes its findings and makes recommendations for improvement of our workforce. Whereas policy decisions are often in the hands of the government with its emphasis on access and cost containment, the area that we can control, the quality of our workforce should be our primary effort. Specific recommendations include the prospective collection of accurate workforce data, increasing the interest of residents and students to enter our specialty, assisting members to improve practice efficiencies and assuming leadership in the musculoskeletal education of our primary care colleagues. We expect that by improving our workforce and professional work environment, we can make a difference for our young patients and for the society.

Money, lifestyle, or values? Why medical students choose subspecialty versus general pediatric careers

Although there are many published studies on factors associated with medical student career choice, few are specific to pediatric careers, and even fewer address the choice between general and subspecialty pediatric training. Fourth-year medical students surveyed at 2 schools reported their demographics, anticipated future income, the factors influencing their career choice, and their anticipated career. This study included the subset of 337 students planning pediatric careers. Results indicated that marital status, anticipated income, and career values are associated with pediatric career plans. Specifically, married students were more likely than unmarried students to pursue general pediatric careers (P < .01). Compared with students planning subspecialties, those intending to pursue general pediatric careers anticipated lower incomes ($110,906 vs $135,984; P < .001) and rated lifestyle, comprehensive patient care, and working with the poor as more important (P < .05) when choosing a career. Students planning subspecialty pediatric careers placed more value (P < .05) on prestige, income, and research opportunities.

Specialty choice in UK junior doctors: is psychiatry the least popular specialty for UK and international medical graduates?

BACKGROUND

In the UK and many other countries, many specialties have had longstanding problems with recruitment and have increasingly relied on international medical graduates to fill junior and senior posts. We aimed to determine what specialties were the most popular and desirable among candidates for training posts, and whether this differed by country of undergraduate training.

METHODS

We conducted a database analysis of applications to Modernising Medical Careers for all training posts in England in 2008. Total number of applications (as an index of popularity) and applications per vacancy (as an index of desirability) were analysed for ten different specialties. We tested whether mean consultant incomes correlated with specialty choice.

RESULTS

In, 2008, there were 80,949 applications for specialty training in England, of which 31,434 were UK graduates (39%). Among UK medical graduates, psychiatry was the sixth most popular specialty (999 applicants) out of 10 specialty groups, while it was fourth for international graduates (5,953 applicants). Among UK graduates, surgery (9.4 applicants per vacancy) and radiology (8.0) had the highest number of applicants per vacancy and paediatrics (1.2) and psychiatry (1.1) the lowest. Among international medical graduates, psychiatry had the fourth highest number of applicants per place (6.3). Specialty popularity for UK graduates was correlated with predicted income (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Based on the number of applicants per place, there was some consistency in the most popular specialties for both UK and international medical graduates, but there were differences in the popularity of psychiatry. With anticipated decreases in the number of new international medical graduates training in the UK, university departments and professional associations may need to review strategies to attract more UK medical graduates into certain specialties, particularly psychiatry and paediatrics.

Pediatric surgery workforce: supply and demand

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies report a shortage of pediatric surgeons in the United States. We surveyed members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) to estimate current workforce and demand and to provide data for workforce planning.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of 849 APSA members to provide workforce data on their communities as follows: the number of active, retired, or inactive APSA surgeons; non-APSA fellowship graduates; surgeons without accredited fellowship training; and the estimated demand for additional pediatric surgeons. Internet search engines identified surgeons and practices offering pediatric surgical services. The US Census Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) defined service areas with populations of 100,000 or more.

RESULTS

Of 137 MSAs with APSA members in practice, we obtained data from 113 (83%), with 247 (29%) of 849 surgeons responding. We estimate that the current pediatric surgical workforce consists of 1150 surgeons, with APSA members in active practice (60%) forming the single largest group, followed by general surgeons (21%). The percentage of active APSA surgeons was greater than the percentage of general surgeons in the 50 largest MSAs (76% vs 2%, respectively), whereas the opposite was observed in the smaller MSA ranked more than 51 in population (37% vs 46%, respectively). American Pediatric Surgical Association respondents estimated a national demand for 280 additional pediatric surgeons. Active APSA surgeons plan to delay retirement (8% of respondents) because it would leave their group or community shorthanded; 2% reported that retirement would leave the community without a pediatric surgeon.

DISCUSSION

Workforce shortage in pediatric surgery is a problem of number and distribution. Incentives to direct trainees to underserved areas are needed. General surgeons provide pediatric services in many communities. Surgical training should include additional training in pediatric surgery.

Access to the medical home: new findings from the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs

OBJECTIVE

This article reports new findings from the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN) regarding parental perceptions of the extent to which children with special health care needs (CSHCN) have access to a medical home.

METHODS

Five criteria were analyzed to describe the extent to which CSHCN receive care characteristic of the medical home concept. Data on 40840 children included in the NS-CSHCN were used to assess the presence of a medical home, as indicated by achieving each of the 5 criteria.

RESULTS

Results of the survey indicate that (1) approximately one half of CSHCN receive care that meets all 5 criteria established for a medical home; (2) access to a medical home is affected significantly by race/ethnicity, income, health insurance status, and severity of the child's condition; (3) parents of children who do have a medical home report significantly less delayed or forgone care and significantly fewer unmet needs for health care and family support services; and (4) limited improvements have occurred since success rates were first measured by using the 2001 NS-CSHCN.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that, although some components of the medical home concept have been achieved for most CSHCN, care synonymous with the principles underlying the medical home is not yet in place for a significant number of CSHCN and their families.

Report of colloquium I: the future of pediatric health care delivery and education--pondering imponderables to create an ideal residency in a world of critical uncertainties

Participants of the first colloquium of the Residency Review and Redesign in Pediatrics (R(3)P) Project considered possible scenarios affecting pediatric practice over the next 15 to 20 years and speculated about the knowledge and skills that pediatricians would need to care for children, adolescents, and young adults in the future. They concluded that the imponderables and complexity of that undertaking fell into the category of a "wicked problem" with no unique solutions. The specifics of the future cannot be predicted, but the themes important to thinking about the future are clear and must be incorporated into thinking about pediatric residency education.

A survey of ophthalmology residents' attitudes toward pediatric ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To assess the level of ophthalmology resident interest in pediatric ophthalmology.

METHODS

An 18-item 5-point Likert scale was used to determine interest in pediatric ophthalmology among ophthalmology residents in the United States.

RESULTS

The response rate was 23% (316 of 1,341). Of the respondents, 74% agreed they had a clinical role model in pediatric ophthalmology, 66% perceived a good job market for this field, and 67% cited liking strabismus surgery. The majority of residents (56%) found pediatric patients difficult to examine and 50% stated income levels for pediatric ophthalmologists are low.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most residents have an overall positive view about pediatric ophthalmology, few indicate interest in pursuing a fellowship. Specifically, most residents reported having a clinical role model in pediatric ophthalmology, perceiving a good job market, and liking strabismus surgery, whereas few residents had interest in further pediatric training and many found pediatric patients difficult to examine and income levels low.

General pediatrics resident perspectives on training decisions and career choice

OBJECTIVE

Little is known regarding at what point during the training period residents in pediatrics make decisions on their future career choices. As part of a dedicated process of reexamining the structure of residency training in pediatrics, the American Board of Pediatrics sought information to better understand the influences, process, and sequencing of both residency program selection and career decision-making among residents.

METHODS

All pediatrics resident physicians in all training programs in the United States and Canada (N = 8290) received the survey as part of the general pediatrics in-training examination. The survey focused on exploring how and when pediatrics residents make career choices and assessed perceived flexibility of their individual pediatrics residency program.

RESULTS

The response rate was 95%. Location was the most important factor in selecting a residency program for 42% of all residents. Almost half of the pediatrics residents planned to pursue fellowship training after residency, a proportion that changed little across the 3 training years (level 1: 47%; level 2: 49%; level 3: 47%). Those who planned to pursue a general pediatrics career (either with or without inpatient care) were more likely than those who intended to pursue fellowship training to report that lifestyle was the most important factor in their career choice (63% vs 21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Not surprisingly, different priorities motivate pediatricians to pursue specific programs for training and specific career options. The finding that those with the highest priority regarding lifestyle are more likely to pursue generalist training has implications for the generalist workforce, because those persons may also be more likely to seek part-time employment. Lifestyle concerns may need to be addressed in subspecialty training and subsequent subspecialty careers to ensure a continued flow of residents into fellowship training.

Recently trained pediatric subspecialists: perspectives on training and scope of practice

OBJECTIVES

Little is known regarding the factors influencing the decision to pursue pediatric subspecialty fellowship training and the timing of when such a decision is made. In addition, there is no information regarding whether the general pediatrics training received in residency is perceived as valuable by subspecialists. This study was conducted to characterize the strengths and weaknesses of residency and fellowship training from the perspective of recently trained pediatric subspecialists and to assess their current and future career goals and intended scope of practice.

METHODS

A random sample of 550 subspecialists whose initial application for pediatric subspecialty certification occurred between 2002 and 2003 (4-5 years out of training) and 550 subspecialists who applied for board certification between 2005 and 2006 (1-2 years out of training) received a structured questionnaire by mail. The survey focused on decision-making in selection of residency and fellowship programs, strength of residency training in preparation for clinical care provision, and scope of current practice.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 77%. More than half (54%) of the recently trained subspecialists would have shortened either their pediatric residency or fellowship training if given the opportunity, and 7% were unsure. More than one third of the respondents made the decision to pursue subspecialty training before the start of residency (36% [n = 198]), whereas approximately half of them made this decision during the first (19% [n = 106]) or second (27% [n = 150]) year of residency.

CONCLUSIONS

Many subspecialists would have been interested in modifications to their pediatric residency and fellowship training programs, which may reflect changing patterns of professional activities or the preferences of a younger generation of subspecialists. Given that a substantial proportion of subspecialists decide to pursue subspecialty training before or early in residency, greater flexibility in configuring some residency experiences to meet their career goals would be feasible.

Estimated savings from paid telephone consultations between subspecialists and primary care physicians

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric subspecialists are not routinely reimbursed by Medicaid or insurance payers for telephone consultations. Generally, access to pediatric subspecialists is limited because of the small number of providers, their concentration in academic medical centers, and increasing demand for their services. Little is known about the nature of such consults, the time required to provide them, or whether there is a positive economic impact for payers.

METHODS

Between March and October of 2007, pediatric subspecialists from 6 academic medical centers in North Carolina completed consultation reimbursement-request forms to prospectively track their telephone consultations with primary care physicians for the care of Medicaid patients<22 years of age. Data collected included the amount of time required per consult and consult outcomes in terms of service use and quality of care. Medicaid claims records and primary care physician surveys were used to validate the pediatric subspecialist consultation outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 47 pediatric subspecialists provided 306 consults regarding the care of 292 Medicaid-insured children over the 8 study months. Telephone consults were generally <15 minutes in length and exceeded 30 minutes in <7% of calls. Pediatric subspecialists reported that telephone consults led to avoidance of specialist visits (n=98), hospital transfers (n=35), hospital admissions (n=14), and emergency department visits (n=14). Medicaid claims data supported these reports; matched primary care physician surveys suggested even higher levels of service avoidance. After adjusting for the reimbursed costs of providing telephone consults, an estimated $477274 was saved ($39 per dollar spent).

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone consultations with pediatric subspecialists provide a valuable service to primary care physicians providing medical homes to Medicaid patients. Rewarding physicians for telephone consults seems to be cost-effective because of reduced use of costly services and reported improvements in quality of care.

Interstate variability of the statute of limitations for medical liability: a cause for concern?

BACKGROUND

Widespread variation in state laws produces significant differences in state-to-state liability risk and insurance cost. These variations may produce higher medical liability for certain pediatric practitioners because many states have a significantly longer period of potential liability for physicians caring for children. This study reviewed state laws for variability in the period of medical liability for pediatric and adult patients and considered some of the impacts resulting from such variability.

METHODS

Statutes of limitations applicable to claims for medical malpractice were reviewed for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as were laws that affect the statute of limitations based on a patient's age. For each state, the average, minimum, and maximum values for the statute of limitations in years were calculated for the following age groups: newborn, 6, 12, and 25 years.

RESULTS

In most states, the length of time a claimant has to bring a claim is longer for the youngest patients and decreases as patients get older. In the United States, the average time to bring a claim in years for a newborn and those aged 6, 12, and 25 years was 12, 8, 5, and 2 years, respectively. The maximum time to bring a claim in years for a newborn and those aged 6, 12, and 25 years was 23, 17, 11, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

States demonstrate significant variability in the duration and application of statutes of limitations, with younger patients typically having a longer period to file a liability lawsuit. In most regions, pediatric practitioners face increased liability risk based upon significantly longer limitation periods for minor patients. Studies have suggested that medical students are considering specialty liability risk when choosing careers. Increased liability risk faced by pediatric specialists may lead to fewer practitioners entering these fields. Extended periods of liability for pediatric specialists need additional study to evaluate the effects on liability insurance, specialty choice, and specialty care access.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Descriptive study (audit of existing laws), level of evidence 2.

Management of pediatric trauma

Injury is the number 1 killer of children in the United States. In 2004, injury accounted for 59.5% of all deaths in children younger than 18 years. The financial burden to society of children who survive childhood injury with disability continues to be enormous. The entire process of managing childhood injury is complex and varies by region. Only the comprehensive cooperation of a broadly diverse group of people will have a significant effect on improving the care and outcome of injured children. This statement has been endorsed by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Pediatric Surgical Association, National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, National Association of State EMS Officials, and Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Differences in characteristics among new pediatric neurology patients: the effect of a newly established private pediatric neurology practice

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in volume and characteristics of new patients referred when a private pediatric neurology practice (PP) opened in 2004 in an area served primarily by an academic medical center's (AMC) pediatric neurology practice.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of medical and billing records to examine changes in volume, diagnosis, and sociodemographic factors of new patients at the AMC from July 2004 to June 2005; the PP during the same period; and the AMC during the year before.

RESULTS

One year after the PP opened, 40% more new pediatric neurology patients were seen in this area than the year before. Compared with the AMC, PP saw a greater proportion of seizures (34% vs 26%, P < .05) and headaches (32% vs 17%, P < .001), and a lesser proportion of developmental delay/musculoskeletal disorders (12% vs 19%, P < .001) and congenital/metabolic disorders (<1% vs 2%, P < .001). Fewer PP patients lived >20 miles from the practice (32% vs 64%, P < .001), and fewer had public insurance (4% vs 33%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The establishment of the PP dramatically increased the volume of new pediatric neurology patients in this area. After the PP opened, the AMC continued to care for most patients with rare diseases and fewer financial resources. Future research should examine whether the increase in volume reflects relief of pent-up demand or increased referral rates due to eased access, and should elucidate how differences in patient populations at academic and private subspecialty practices relate to access to subspecialty care and financial well-being of academic practices.

Geographic distribution of childhood diabetes and obesity relative to the supply of pediatric endocrinologists in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine the geographic distribution of childhood diabetes and obesity relative to the supply of US pediatric endocrinologists.

STUDY DESIGN

Estimation of observed and "index" ratios of children with diabetes (by region and division) and obesity (body mass index >/=95th % for age and sex) (by region and state) to board-certified pediatric endocrinologists.

RESULTS

At the national level, the ratio of children with diabetes to pediatric endocrinologists is 290:1, and the ratio of obese children to pediatric endocrinologists is 17,741:1. Ratios of children with diabetes to pediatric endocrinologists in the Midwest (370:1), South (335:1), and West (367:1) are twice as high as in the Northeast (144:1). Across states, there is up to a 19-fold difference in the observed ratios of obese children to pediatric endocrinologists. Under conditions of equitably distributed endocrinologist supply, variation across states would be mitigated considerably.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of children with diabetes and obesity does not parallel the distribution of pediatric endocrinologists in the United States, due largely to geographic disparities in endocrinologist supply. Given the large burden of obese children to endocrinologists, multidisciplinary models of care delivery are essential for the US health care system to address the needs of children with diabetes and obesity.