Relationship of serum S100B levels and intracranial injury in children with closed head trauma

Molecular biomarkers of diffuse axonal injury: recent advances and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse axonal injury (DAI), with high mortality and morbidity both in children and adults, is one of the most severe pathological consequences of traumatic brain injury. Currently, clinical diagnosis, disease assessment, disability identification, and postmortem diagnosis of DAI is mainly limited by the absent of specific molecular biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we first introduce the pathophysiology of DAI, summarized the reported biomarkers in previous animal and human studies, and then the molecular biomarkers such as β-Amyloid precursor protein, neurofilaments, S-100β, myelin basic protein, tau protein, neuron-specific enolase, Peripherin and Hemopexin for DAI diagnosis is summarized. Finally, we put forward valuable views on the future research direction of diagnostic biomarkers of DAI.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, the advanced technology has ultimately changed the research of DAI, and the numbers of potential molecular biomarkers was introduced in related studies. We summarized the latest updated information in such studies to provide references for future research and explore the potential pathophysiological mechanism on diffuse axonal injury.

Serum Markers of Brain Injury in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Defects Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Diagnostic and Prognostic Role

Introduction: The objectives of this study were to assess the role of neuromarkers like glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), protein S100 (pS100), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as diagnostic markers of acute brain injury and also as prognostic markers for short-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Methods: Pediatric patients with congenital heart defects (CHDs) undergoing elective cardiac surgery were included. Neurodevelopmental functioning was assessed preoperatively and 4-6 months postoperatively using the Denver Developmental Screening Test II. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. During surgery, regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation was monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Results: Forty-two patients were enrolled and dichotomized into cyanotic and non-cyanotic groups based on peripheric oxygen saturation. Nineteen patients (65.5%) had abnormal developmental scores in the non-cyanotic group and eleven (84.6%) in the cyanotic group. A good diagnostic model was observed between NIRS values and GFAP in the cyanotic CHD group (AUC = 0.7). A good predicting model was observed with GFAP and developmental scores in the cyanotic CHD group (AUC = 0.667). A correlation was found between NSE and developmental quotient scores (r = 0.09, p = 0.046). Conclusions: From all four neuromarkers studied, only GFAP was demonstrated to be a good diagnostic and prognostic factor in cyanotic CHD patients. NSE had only prognostic value.

Usefulness of serum neurofilament light in the assessment of neurologic outcome in the pediatric population: a systematic literature review

Children undergoing general anesthesia and surgery in the early years of life are exposed to the possible neurotoxicity of anesthetic agents. Prospective studies have shown deficits in behavior, executive function, social communication, and motor function in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Different biomarkers of neuronal injury have been evaluated neuronal injury in the pediatric population, among which neurofilaments represent a significant advantage as they are proteins exclusively expressed in neuronal tissue. Our aim was to evaluate the utility of serum neurofilament light (NfL) as a prognostic biomarker of neuronal injury in the pediatric population. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases in November 2022 for studies concerning serum NfL in the pediatric population in addition to a neurological assessment. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) prospective or retrospective studies, (2) studies including pediatric population until the age of 18 years, (3) serum NfL sampling, and (4) evaluation of neurological outcome. Data collection regarding study design, pediatric age, serum NfL levels, and results for neurological assessment were extracted from each study. Four manuscripts met the inclusion criteria and evaluated the prognostic utility of serum NfL in neonatal encephalopathy in correlation with the neurodevelopmental outcome that was assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development until the age of 2 years. Children with neonatal encephalopathy showed significantly higher serum NfL vs. healthy controls and high serum NfL levels predicted an adverse neurological outcome. The decrease of serum NfL to a nadir point between 10 and 15 years old reflects the brain growth in healthy controls. No studies were available in the perioperative period.  Conclusions: Serum NfL is a valuable biomarker in evaluating neuronal injury in the pediatric population. Further studies with perioperative serial sampling of serum NfL combined with standardized neurodevelopmental tests should be conducted to evaluate the neurotoxicity of anesthetic agents and monitor the effectiveness of specific neuroprotective strategies in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. What is Known: • Preclinical animal data have shown neurotoxicity of the anesthetic agents in the developing brain. • Data regarding anesthetic neurotoxicity in humans show limitations and no objective tools are available. What is New: • This systematic review showed that serum NfL is a valuable biomarker of neuronal injury in the pediatric population. • Perioperative use of serum NfL may be considered in future trials evaluating anesthetic neurotoxicity in the pediatric population and in monitoring neuroprotective strategies.

Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: An Update on Preclinical Models, Clinical Biomarkers, and the Implications of Cerebrovascular Dysfunction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. Recent studies suggest that children and adolescents have worse post-TBI outcomes and take longer to recover than adults. However, the pathophysiology and progression of TBI in the pediatric population are studied to a far lesser extent compared to the adult population. Common causes of TBI in children are falls, sports/recreation-related injuries, non-accidental trauma, and motor vehicle-related injuries. A fundamental understanding of TBI pathophysiology is crucial in preventing long-term brain injury sequelae. Animal models of TBI have played an essential role in addressing the knowledge gaps relating to pTBI pathophysiology. Moreover, a better understanding of clinical biomarkers is crucial to diagnose pTBI and accurately predict long-term outcomes. This review examines the current preclinical models of pTBI, the implications of pTBI on the brain’s vasculature, and clinical pTBI biomarkers. Finally, we conclude the review by speculating on the emerging role of the gut-brain axis in pTBI pathophysiology.

Biomarkers in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Despite decades of research, outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) remain highly variable. Brain biofluid-specific biomarkers from pTBI patients may allow us to diagnose and prognosticate earlier and with a greater degree of accuracy than conventional methods. This manuscript reviews the evidence surrounding current brain-specific biomarkers in pTBI and assesses the temporal relationship between the natural history of the traumatic brain injury (TBI) and measured biomarker levels.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the Ovid, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases seeking relevant publications. The study selection and screening process were documented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Extraction forms included developmental stages of patients, type and biofluid source of biomarkers, brain injury type, and other relevant data.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 443 articles, of which 150 examining the biomarkers of our interest were included. The references retrieved were examined thoroughly and discussed at length with a pediatric neurocritical care intensivist specializing in pTBI and a Ph.D. scientist with a high degree of involvement in TBI biomarker research, authoring a vast amount of literature in this field.

CONCLUSIONS

TBI biomarkers might serve as valuable tools in the diagnosis and prognosis of pTBI. However, while each biomarker has its advantages, they are not without limitations, and therefore, further research is critical in pTBI biomarkers.

Serum biomarkers in severe paediatric traumatic brain injury-a narrative review

Severe traumatic brain injury continues to present complex management and prediction challenges for the clinician. While there is some evidence that better systems of care can improve outcome, multiple multi-centre randomised controlled trials of specific therapies have consistently failed to show benefit. In addition, clinicians are challenged in attempting to accurately predict which children will recover well and which children will have severe and persisting neurocognitive deficits. Traumatic brain injury is vastly heterogeneous and so it is not surprising that one therapy or approach, when applied to a mixed cohort of children in a clinical trial setting, has yielded disappointing results. Children with severe traumatic brain injury have vastly different brain injury pathologies of widely varying severity, in any number of anatomical locations at what may be disparate stages of brain development. This heterogeneity may also explain why clinicians are unable to accurately predict outcome. Biomarkers are objective molecular signatures of injury that are released following traumatic brain injury and may represent a way of unifying the heterogeneity of traumatic brain injury into a single biosignature. Biomarkers hold promise to diagnose brain injury severity, guide intervention selection for clinical trials, or provide vital prognostic information so that early intervention and rehabilitation can be planned much earlier in the course of a child's recovery. Serum S100B and serum NSE levels show promise as a diagnostic tool with biomarker levels significantly higher in children with severe TBI including children with inflicted and non-inflicted head injury. Serum S100B and serum NSE also show promise as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome. The role of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury is an evolving field with the potential for clinical application within the next few years.

Serum Biomarkers of Regeneration and Plasticity are Associated with Functional Outcome in Pediatric Neurocritical Illness: An Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Pediatric neurocritical care survivorship is frequently accompanied by functional impairments. Lack of prognostic biomarkers is a barrier to early identification and management of impairment. We explored the association between blood biomarkers and functional impairment in children with acute acquired brain injury.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial evaluating early versus usual care rehabilitation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Forty-four children (17 [39%] female, median age 11 [interquartile range 6-13] years) with acute acquired brain injury admitted to the PICU were studied. A single center obtained serum samples on admission days 0, 1, 3, 5, and the day closest to hospital discharge. Biomarkers relevant to brain injury (neuron specific enolase [NSE], S100b), inflammation (interleukin [IL-6], C-reactive protein), and regeneration (brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) were collected. Biomarkers were analyzed using a Luminex® bioassay. Functional status scale (FSS) scores were abstracted from the medical record. New functional impairment was defined as a (worse) FSS score at hospital discharge compared to pre-PICU (baseline). Individual biomarker fluorescence index (FI) values for each sample collection day were correlated with new functional impairment using Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Trends in repeated measures of biomarker FI over time were explored graphically, and the association between repeated measures of biomarker FI and new functional impairment was analyzed using covariate adjusted linear mixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Functional impairment was inversely correlated with markers of regeneration and plasticity including BDNF at day 3 (ρ =  - 0.404, p = .015), day 5 (ρ =  - 0.549, p = 0.005) and hospital discharge (ρ =  - 0.420, p = 0.026) and VEGF at day 1 (ρ =  - 0.282, p = 0.008) and hospital discharge (ρ =  - 0.378, p = 0.047), such that lower levels of both markers at each time point were associated with greater impairment. Similarly, repeated measures of BDNF and VEGF were inversely correlated with new functional impairment (B =  - 0.001, p = 0.001 and B =  - 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). NSE, a biomarker of acute brain injury, showed a positive correlation between day 0 levels and new functional impairment (ρ = 0.320, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Blood-based biomarkers of regeneration and plasticity may hold prognostic utility for functional impairment among pediatric patients with neurocritical illness and warrant further investigation.

Impact of routine S100B protein assay on CT scan use in children with mild traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of implementing a modified Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule including the S100B protein assay for managing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children.

METHODS

A before-and-after study was conducted in a paediatric emergency department of a French University Hospital from 2013 to 2015. We retrospectively included all consecutive children aged 4 months to 15 years who presented mTBI and were at intermediate risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We compared the proportions of CT scans performed and of in-hospital observations before (2013-2014) and after (2014-2015) implementation of a modified PECARN rule including the S100B protein assay.

RESULTS

We included 1,062 children with mTBI (median age 4.5 years, sex ratio [F/M] 0.73) who were at intermediate risk for ciTBI: 494 (46.5%) during 2013-2014 and 568 (53.5%) during 2014-2015. During 2014-2015, S100B protein was measured in 451 (79.4%) children within 6 h after mTBI. The proportion of CT scans and in-hospital observations significantly decreased between the two periods, from 14.4 to 9.5% (p=0.02) and 73.9-40.5% (p<0.01), respectively. The number of CT scans performed to identify a single ciTBI was reduced by two-thirds, from 18 to 6 CT scans, between 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. All children with ciTBI were identified by the rules.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a modified PECARN rule including the S100B protein assay significantly decreased the proportion of CT scans and in-hospital observations for children with mTBI who were at intermediate risk for ciTBI.

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Modulates the Kinetic Profile of the Inflammatory Response of Markers for Neuronal Damage

The inflammatory response plays an important role in the pathophysiology of multiple injuries. This study examines the effects of severe trauma and inflammatory response on markers of neuronal damage. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in 445 trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16) is provided. Levels of neuronal biomarkers (calcium-binding Protein B (S100b), Enolase2 (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)) and Interleukins (IL-6, IL-10) in severely injured patients (with polytrauma (PT)) without traumatic brain injury (TBI) or with severe TBI (PT+TBI) and patients with isolated TBI (isTBI) were measured upon arrival until day 5. S100b, NSE, GFAP levels showed a time-dependent decrease in all cohorts. Their expression was higher after multiple injuries (p = 0.038) comparing isTBI. Positive correlation of marker level after concomitant TBI and isTBI (p = 0.001) was noted, while marker expression after PT appears to be independent. Highest levels of IL-6 and -10 were associated to PT und lowest to isTBI (p < 0.001). In all groups pro-inflammatory response (IL-6/-10 ratio) peaked on day 2 and at a lower level on day 4. Severe TBI modulates kinetic profile of inflammatory response by reducing interleukin expression following trauma. Potential markers for neuronal damage have a limited diagnostic value after severe trauma because undifferentiated increase.

Clinical Use of the Calcium-Binding S100B Protein, a Biomarker for Head Injury

S100B is a calcium-binding protein most abundant in neuronal tissue. It is expressed in glial cells and Schwann cells and exerts both intra- and extracellular effects. Depending on the concentration, secreted S100B exerts either trophic or toxic effects. Its functions have been extensively studied but are still not fully understood. It can be measured in cerebrospinal fluid and in blood, and increased S100B level in blood can be seen after, e.g., traumatic brain injury, certain neurodegenerative disorders, and malignant melanoma. This chapter provides a short background of protein S100B, commercially available methods of analysis, and its clinical use, especially as a biomarker in minor head injury.

The Biomarker S100B and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The usefulness of S100B has been noted as a biomarker in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in adults. However, S100B efficacy as a biomarker in children has previously been relatively unclear.

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis is conducted to assess the prognostic value of S100B in predicting intracerebral lesions in children after mTBI.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies including children suffering mTBI who underwent S100B measurement and computed tomography (CT) scans were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Of 1030 articles screened, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98%-100%) and 34% (95% CI: 30%-38%), respectively. A second analysis was based on the collection of 373 individual data points from 4 studies. Sensitivity and specificity results, obtained from reference ranges in children with a sampling time <3 hours posttrauma, were 97% (95% CI: 84.2%-99.9%) and 37.5% (95% CI: 28.8%-46.8%), respectively. Only 1 child had a low S100B level and a positive CT scan result without clinically important traumatic brain injury.

LIMITATIONS

Only patients undergoing both a CT scan and S100B testing were selected for evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

S100B serum analysis as a part of the clinical routine could significantly reduce the number of CT scans performed on children with mTBI. Sampling should take place within 3 hours of trauma. Cutoff levels should be based on pediatric reference ranges.

Intérêt clinique des concentrations sériques de la protéine S100β dans l’évaluation des patients traumatisés crâniens

Les recommandations de la Société française de médecine d’urgence concernant la prise en charge des patients traumatisés crâniens légers ont été éditées en 2012, complétées par des recommandations sur la bonne utilisation du biomarqueur S100β deux ans plus tard. Grâce à son excellente valeur prédictive négative, la protéine S100β utilisée à travers des règles strictes de prescription a été définie comme une alternative solide à la tomodensitométrie. Cependant, plusieurs questions restent en suspens concernant le délai maximum de réalisation du prélèvement par rapport à l’heure du traumatisme, l’impact médicoéconomique, les variations en rapport avec l’âge du patient, l’impact des agents anticoagulants ou antiagrégants plaquettaires et l’utilité du dosage sérique de cette protéine dans d’autres cadres nosologiques.

Review of the potential use of blood neuro-biomarkers in the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury

Head injury is a common presenting complaint amongst emergency department patients. To date, there has been no widespread utilization of neuro-biomarkers to aid the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. This review article explores which neuro-biomarkers could be used in the emergency department in aiding the clinical diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury. Based on the available evidence, the most promising neuro-biomarkers appear to be Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase Isozyme L1 (UCH-L1) as these show significant rises in peripheral blood levels shortly after injury and these have been demonstrated to correlate with long-term clinical outcomes. Treatment strategies for minor traumatic brain injury in the emergency department setting are not well developed. The introduction of blood neuro-biomarkers could reduce unnecessary radiation exposure and provide an opportunity to improve the care of this patient group.

Finding effective biomarkers for pediatric traumatic brain injury

As traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to affect children and young adults worldwide, research on reliable biomarkers grows as a possible aid in determining the severity of injury. However, many studies have revealed that diverse biomarkers such as S100B and myelin basic protein (MBP) have many limitations, such as their elevated normative concentrations in young children. Therefore, the results of these studies have yet to be translated to clinical applications. However, despite the setbacks of research into S100B and MBP, investigators continue to research viable biomarkers, notably glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), as possible aids in medical decision making. Studies have revealed that GFAP and UCH-L1 actually are better predictors of injury progression than the before-mentioned biomarkers S100B and MBP. In addition, UCH-L1 has demonstrated an ability to detect injury while CT is negative, suggesting an ability to detect acute intracranial lesions. Here, we evaluate research testing levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 on children diagnosed with TBI and compare our results to those of other tested biomarkers. In a recent study done by Hayes et al., GFAP and UCH-L1 demonstrated the potential to recognize children with the possibility of poor outcome, allowing for more specialized treatments with clinical and laboratory applications. Although studies on GFAP and UCH-L1 have for the most part warranted positive results, further studies will be needed to confirm their role as reliable markers for pediatric TBI.

Serum Concentrations of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective reliable markers to assess traumatic brain injury (TBI) and predict outcome soon after injury are a highly needed tool for optimizing management of pediatric TBI. We assessed serum concentrations of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in a cohort of 45 children with clinical diagnosis of TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 3–15) and 40 healthy subjects, evaluated their associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes, and compared their performance to previously published data on two well-studied blood biomarkers, S100B and MBP. We observed higher serum levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in brain-injured children compared with controls and also demonstrated a step-wise increase of biomarker concentrations over the continuum of severity from mild to severe TBI. Furthermore, while we found that only the neuronal biomarker UCH-L1 holds potential to detect acute intracranial lesions as assessed by computed tomography (CT), both markers were substantially increased in TBI patients even with a normal CT suggesting the presence of undetected microstructural injuries. Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP concentrations also strongly predicted poor outcome and performed better than S100B and MBP. Our results point to a role of GFAP and UCH-L1 as candidate biomarkers for pediatric TBI. Further studies are warranted.

Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minor and moderate head trauma in children

BACKGROUND

The management of minor and moderate head trauma in children differs widely between countries. Presently, there are no existing guidelines for management of these children in Scandinavia. The purpose of this study was to produce new evidence-based guidelines for the initial management of head trauma in the paediatric population in Scandinavia. The primary aim was to detect all children in need of neurosurgical intervention. Detection of any traumatic intracranial injury on CT scan was an important secondary aim.

METHODS

General methodology according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used. Systematic evidence-based review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and based upon relevant clinical questions with respect to patient-important outcomes. Quality ratings of the included studies were performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 and Centre of Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM)-2 tools. Based upon the results, GRADE recommendations, a guideline, discharge instructions and in-hospital observation instructions were drafted. For elements with low evidence, a modified Delphi process was used for consensus, which included relevant clinical stakeholders.

RESULTS

The guidelines include criteria for selecting children for CT scans, in-hospital observation or early discharge, and suggestions for monitoring routines and discharge advice for children and guardians. The guidelines separate mild head trauma patients into high-, medium- and low-risk categories, favouring observation for mild, low-risk patients as an attempt to reduce CT scans in children.

CONCLUSIONS

We present new evidence and consensus based Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines for initial management of minor and moderate head trauma in children. These guidelines should be validated before extensive clinical use and updated within four years due to rapid development of new diagnostic tools within paediatric neurotrauma.

In Children and Youth with Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Out-Performs S100β in Detecting Traumatic Intracranial Lesions on Computed Tomography

In adults, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has been shown to out-perform S100β in detecting intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study examined the ability of GFAP and S100β to detect intracranial lesions on CT in children and youth involved in trauma. This prospective cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of children and youth at two pediatric and one adult Level 1 trauma centers following trauma, including both those with and without head trauma. Serum samples were obtained within 6 h of injury. The primary outcome was the presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan. There were 155 pediatric trauma patients enrolled, 114 (74%) had head trauma and 41 (26%) had no head trauma. Out of the 92 patients who had a head CT, eight (9%) had intracranial lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for distinguishing head trauma from no head trauma for GFAP was 0.84 (0.77-0.91) and for S100β was 0.64 (0.55-0.74; p<0.001). Similarly, the AUC for predicting intracranial lesions on CT for GFAP was 0.85 (0.72-0.98) versus 0.67 (0.50-0.85) for S100β (p=0.013). Additionally, we assessed the performance of GFAP and S100β in predicting intracranial lesions in children ages 10 years or younger and found the AUC for GFAP was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.00) and for S100β was 0.72 (0.36-1.00). In children younger than 5 years old, the AUC for GFAP was 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00) and for S100β 0.62 (0.15-1.00). In this population with mild TBI, GFAP out-performed S100β in detecting head trauma and predicting intracranial lesions on head CT. This study is among the first published to date to prospectively compare these two biomarkers in children and youth with mild TBI.

[Biomarkers in pediatric polytrauma]

BACKGROUND

Trauma represents one of the leading causes of death in children. Beside an injury pattern that differs from adult trauma patients, children seem to develop multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) less frequently. Compared to adult MODS, pediatric MODS has also been described to occur earlier in the posttraumatic course.

METHOD

Biomarkers for early identification of patients at high-risk for posttraumatic complications are of high clinical relevance. However, little is known from clinical studies about the relevance of biomarkers during the posttraumatic course.

AIM

Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge on this topic in order to investigate the prognostic significance of different parameters.

Diagnostic performance of S100B protein serum measurement in detecting intracranial injury in children with mild head trauma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of S100B serum level to detect intracranial injury in children with mild traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study was carried out in the paediatric emergency departments of three tertiary hospitals in Switzerland between January 2009 and December 2011. Participants included children aged <16 years with a mild traumatic brain injury (GCS ≥13) for whom a head CT was requested by the attending physician. Venous blood was obtained within 6 h of the trauma in all children for S100B measurement before a head CT was performed. As the S100B value was not available during the acute care period, the patient's management was not altered. The main measures were protein S100B value and the CT result.

RESULTS

20/73 (27.4%) included children had an intracranial injury detected on CT. S100B receiver operating characteristics area under the curve was 0.73 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.86). With a 0.14 µg/L cut-off point, S100B reached an excellent sensitivity of 95% (95% CI 77% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI 81% to 100%) in all children and in children aged >2 years, respectively. The specificity, however, was 34% (95% CI 27% to 36%) and 37% (95% CI 30% to 37%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S100B has an excellent sensitivity but poor specificity. It is therefore an accurate tool to help rule out an intracranial injury but cannot be used as the sole marker owing to its specificity. Used with clinical decision rules, S100B may help to reduce the number of unnecessary CT scans.

S100B protein as a screening tool for computed tomography findings after mild traumatic brain injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether S100B protein in serum can predict intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

RESEARCH DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis Methods and procedures: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, CINAHL, SUMSearch, Bandolier, Trip databases, bibliographies from identified articles and review article references. Eligible articles were defined as observational studies including patients with MTBI who underwent post-traumatic head CT scan and assessing the screening role of S100B protein.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

There was a significant positive association between S100B protein concentration and positive CT scan (22 studies, SMD = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.45, I² = 100%; p < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for a cut-point range = 0.16-0.20 µg L^-1 were 98.65 (95% CI = 95.53-101.77; I² = 0.0%) and 50.69 (95% CI = 40.69-60.69; I² = 76.3%), respectively. The threshold for serum S100B protein with 99.63 (95% CI = 96.00-103.25; I² = 0.0%) sensitivity and 46.94 (95% CI = 39.01-54.87; I² = 95.5%) specificity was > 0.20 µg L^-1.

CONCLUSIONS

After MTBI, serum S100B protein levels are significantly associated with the presence of intracranial lesions on CT scan. Measuring the protein could be useful in screening high risk MTBI patients and decreasing unnecessary CT examinations.

Minor and repetitive head injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability in the young, active population and expected to be the third leading cause of death in the whole world until 2020. The disease is frequently referred to as the silent epidemic, and many authors highlight the "unmet medical need" associated with TBI.The term traumatically evoked brain injury covers a heterogeneous group ranging from mild/minor/minimal to severe/non-salvageable damages. Severe TBI has long been recognized to be a major socioeconomical health-care issue as saving young lives and sometimes entirely restituting health with a timely intervention can indeed be extremely cost efficient.Recently it has been recognized that mild or minor TBI should be considered similarly important because of the magnitude of the patient population affected. Other reasons behind this recognition are the association of mild head injury with transient cognitive disturbances as well as long-term sequelae primarily linked to repeat (sport-related) injuries.The incidence of TBI in developed countries can be as high as 2-300/100,000 inhabitants; however, if we consider the injury pyramid, it turns out that severe and moderate TBI represents only 25-30 % of all cases, while the overwhelming majority of TBI cases consists of mild head injury. On top of that, or at the base of the pyramid, are the cases that never show up at the ER - the unreported injuries.Special attention is turned to mild TBI as in recent military conflicts it is recognized as "signature injury."This chapter aims to summarize the most important features of mild and repetitive traumatic brain injury providing definitions, stratifications, and triage options while also focusing on contemporary knowledge gathered by imaging and biomarker research.Mild traumatic brain injury is an enigmatic lesion; the classification, significance, and its consequences are all far less defined and explored than in more severe forms of brain injury.Understanding the pathobiology and pathomechanisms may aid a more targeted approach in triage as well as selection of cases with possible late complications while also identifying the target patient population where preventive measures and therapeutic tools should be applied in an attempt to avoid secondary brain injury and late complications.

GFAP out-performs S100β in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury and those with extracranial lesions

Both glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100β are found in glial cells and are released into serum following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, the clinical utility of S100β as a biomarker has been questioned because of its release from bone. This study examined the ability of GFAP and S100β to detect intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in trauma patients and also assessed biomarker performance in patients with fractures and extracranial injuries on head CT. This prospective cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of adult trauma patients at a Level I trauma center with and without mild or moderate traumatic brain injury (MMTBI). Serum samples were obtained within 4 h of injury. The primary outcome was the presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan. There were 397 general trauma patients enrolled: 209 (53%) had a MMTBI and 188 (47%) had trauma without MMTBI. Of the 262 patients with a head CT, 20 (8%) had intracranial lesions. There were 137 (35%) trauma patients who sustained extracranial fractures below the head to the torso and extremities. Levels of S100β were significantly higher in patients with fractures, compared with those without fractures (p<0.001) whether MMTBI was present or not. However, GFAP levels were not significantly affected by the presence of fractures (p>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for predicting intracranial lesions on CT for GFAP was 0.84 (0.73-0.95) and for S100β was 0.78 (0.67-0.89). However, in the presence of extracranial fractures, the AUC for GFAP increased to 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and for S100β decreased to 0.75 (0.61-0.88). In a general trauma population, GFAP out-performed S100β in detecting intracranial CT lesions, particularly in the setting of extracranial fractures.

[New recommendations for the management of children after minor head trauma]

Minor head trauma is a common cause for pediatric emergency department visits. In 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) published a clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI) and for reducing CT use because of malignancy induced by ionizing radiation. The prediction rule for ciTBI was derived and validated on 42,412 children in a prospective cohort study. The Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (French Emergency Medicine Society) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (French-Language Pediatric Emergency Care Group) recommend this algorithm for the management of children after minor head trauma. Based on clinical variables (history, symptoms, and physical examination findings), the algorithm assists in medical decision-making: CT scan, hospitalization for observation or discharge, according to three levels of ciTBI risk (high, intermediate, or low risk). The prediction rule sensitivity for children younger than 2 years is 100 % [86.3-100] and for those aged 2 years and older it is 96.8 % [89-99.6]. Our aim is to present these new recommendations for the management of children after minor head trauma.

Serum biomarkers of brain injury to classify outcome after pediatric cardiac arrest*

OBJECTIVES

Morbidity and mortality in children with cardiac arrest largely result from neurologic injury. Serum biomarkers of brain injury can potentially measure injury to neurons (neuron-specific enolase), astrocytes (S100b), and axons (myelin basic protein). We hypothesized that serum biomarkers can be used to classify outcome from pediatric cardiac arrest.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Single tertiary pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-three children with cardiac arrest.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We measured serum neuron-specific enolase, S100b, and myelin basic protein on days 1-4 and 7 after cardiac arrest. We recorded demographics, details of the cardiac arrest and resuscitation, and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge and 6 months. We analyzed the association of biomarker levels at 24, 48, and 72 hours with favorable (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category 1-3) or unfavorable (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category 4-6) outcome and mortality. Forty-three children (49% female; mean age of 5.9 ± 6.3) were enrolled and 17 (40%) died. Serum S100b concentrations peaked earliest, followed by neuron-specific enolase and finally myelin basic protein. Serum neuron-specific enolase and S100b concentrations were increased in the unfavorable versus favorable outcome group and in subjects who died at all time points (all p < 0.05). Serum myelin basic protein at 24 and 72 hours correctly classified survival but not good versus poor outcome. Using best specificity, serum S100b and neuron-specific enolase had optimal positive and negative predictive values at 24 hours to classify both favorable versus unfavorable outcome and survival, whereas serum myelin basic protein's best accuracy occurred at 48 hours. Receiver operator curves for serum S100b and neuron-specific enolase to classify favorable versus unfavorable outcome at 6 months were superior to clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data show that serum S100b, neuron-specific enolase, and myelin basic protein may aid in outcome classification of children surviving cardiac arrest.

The challenge of mild traumatic brain injury: role of biochemical markers in diagnosis of brain damage

During the past decade there has been an increasing recognition of the incidence of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and a better understanding of the subtle neurological and cognitive deficits that may result from it. A substantial, albeit suboptimal, effort has been made to define diagnostic criteria for mTBI and improve diagnostic accuracy. Thus, biomarkers that can accurately and objectively detect brain injury after mTBI and, ideally, aid in clinical management are needed. In this review, we discuss the current research on serum biomarkers for mTBI including their rationale and diagnostic performances. Sensitive and specific biomarkers reflecting brain injury can provide important information regarding TBI pathophysiology and serve as candidate markers for predicting abnormal computed tomography findings and/or the development of residual deficits in patients who sustain an mTBI. We also outline the roles of biomarkers in settings of specific interest including pediatric TBI, sports concussions and military injuries, and provide perspectives on the validation of such markers for use in the clinic. Finally, emerging proteomics-based strategies for identifying novel markers will be discussed.

Systematic review of clinical research on biomarkers for pediatric traumatic brain injury

Abstract The objective was to systematically review the medical literature and comprehensively summarize clinical research performed on biomarkers for pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to summarize the studies that have assessed serum biomarkers acutely in determining intracranial lesions on CT in children with TBI. The search strategy included a literature search of PubMed,(®) MEDLINE,(®) and the Cochrane Database from 1966 to August 2011, as well as a review of reference lists of identified studies. Search terms used included pediatrics, children, traumatic brain injury, and biomarkers. Any article with biomarkers of traumatic brain injury as a primary focus and containing a pediatric population was included. The search initially identified 167 articles. Of these, 49 met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were critically reviewed. The median sample size was 58 (interquartile range 31-101). The majority of the articles exclusively studied children (36, 74%), and 13 (26%) were studies that included both children and adults in different proportions. There were 99 different biomarkers measured in these 49 studies, and the five most frequently examined biomarkers were S100B (27 studies), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) (15 studies), interleukin (IL)-6 (7 studies), myelin basic protein (MBP) (6 studies), and IL-8 (6 studies). There were six studies that assessed the relationship between serum markers and CT lesions. Two studies found that NSE levels ≥15 ng/mL within 24 h of TBI was associated with intracranial lesions. Four studies using serum S100B were conflicting: two studies found no association with intracranial lesions and two studies found a weak association. The flurry of research in the area over the last decade is encouraging but is limited by small sample sizes, variable practices in sample collection, inconsistent biomarker-related data elements, and disparate outcome measures. Future studies of biomarkers for pediatric TBI will require rigorous and more uniform research methodology, common data elements, and consistent performance measures.

Clinical use of the calcium-binding S100B protein

S100B is a calcium-binding protein most abundant in neuronal tissue. It is expressed in glia cells and Schwann cells and exerts both intra- and extracellular effects. Depending on the concentration, secreted S100B exerts either trophic or toxic effects. Its functions have been extensively studied but are still not fully understood. It can be measured in cerebrospinal fluid and blood, and increased S100B level in blood can be seen after, e.g., traumatic brain injury, certain neurodegenerative disorders and malignant melanoma. This chapter provides a short background of protein S100B, commercially available methods of analysis, and its clinical use.

Neuron-specific enolase, but not S100B or myelin basic protein, increases in peripheral blood corresponding to lesion volume after cortical impact in piglets

A peripheral indicator of the presence and magnitude of brain injury has been a sought-after tool by clinicians. We measured neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myelin basic protein (MBP), and S100B, prior to and after scaled cortical impact in immature pigs, to determine if these purported markers increase after injury, correlate with the resulting lesion volume, and if these relationships vary with maturation. Scaled cortical impact resulted in increased lesion volume with increasing age. Concentrations of NSE, but not S100B or MBP, increased after injury in all age groups. The high variability of S100B concentrations prior to injury may have precluded detection of an increase due to injury. Total serum markers were estimated, accounting for the allometric growth of blood volume, and resulted in a positive correlation of both NSE and S100B with lesion volume. Even with allometric scaling of blood volume and a uniform mechanism of injury, NSE had only a fair to poor predictive value. In a clinical setting, where the types of injuries are varied, more investigation is required to yield a panel of serum markers that can reliably predict the extent of injury. Allometric scaling may improve estimation of serum marker release in pediatric populations.

Serum S100B Determination in the Management of Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

The place of serum S100B measurement in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) management is still controversial. Our prospective study aimed to evaluate its utility in the largest child cohort described to date.

METHODS

Children younger than 16 years presenting at a pediatric emergency department within 3 h after TBI were enrolled prospectively for blood sampling to determine serum S100B concentrations. The following information was collected: TBI severity determined by using the Masters classification [1: minimal or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15, 2: mild or GCS 13–15, and 3: severe or GCS &lt;13]; whether hospitalized or not; good or bad clinical evolution (CE); whether cranial computed tomography (CCT) was prescribed; and related presence (CCT+) or absence (CCT−) of lesions.

RESULTS

For the 446 children enrolled, the median concentrations of S100B were 0.21, 0.31, and 0.44 μg/L in Masters groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between these groups (P &lt; 0.05). In Masters group 2, 65 CCT scans were carried out. Measurement of S100B identified patients as CCT+ with 100% (95% CI 85–100) sensitivity and 33% (95% CI 20–50) specificity. Of the 424 children scored Masters 1 or 2, 21 presented “bad CE.” S100B identified bad CE patients with 100% (95% CI 84–100) sensitivity and 36% (95% CI 31–41) specificity. Of the 242 children hospitalized, 81 presented an S100B concentration within the reference interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum S100B determination during the first 3 h of management of children with mTBI has the potential to reduce the number of CCT scans, thereby avoiding unnecessary irradiation, and to save hospitalization costs.

Acute evaluation of pediatric patients with minor traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on minor traumatic brain injury (TBI), evaluates the most recent literature regarding clinical prediction rules for the use of cranial computed tomography (CT) in children presenting with minor TBI, reviews the evidence on the need for hospitalization in children with minor TBI, and evaluates the role of S100B testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

The majority of children presenting to an emergency department (ED) after TBI have a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 14-15, and the rate of clinically significant intracranial injury is exceedingly rare. Nevertheless, the number of cranial CTs performed in the US has increased dramatically over the past two decades. Several clinical prediction rules have been developed to aid the clinician in identifying children with low-risk TBI, but only the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rules have been sufficiently validated to warrant clinical application. Two recent studies provide evidence that children with low-risk TBI can be safely discharged from the ED and do not require prolonged hospitalization for neurologic observation. Lastly, studies evaluating the diagnostic utility of S100B in patients with TBI have shown that it may be a useful adjunct to the clinical evaluation and aid in minimizing neuroimaging.

SUMMARY

Clinical prediction rules, most notably the PECARN rules, can be applied to determine children with low-risk TBI and help decrease unnecessary CT use and hospitalizations. S100B testing requires further investigation, but may serve as an adjunct in determining children with low-risk TBI.

Protein S100B in Traumatic Brain Injury

Protein S100B is a small calcium-binding protein expressed in astroglial cells in the central nervous system. Its concentration increases in cerebrospinal fluid and blood after traumatic brain injury. There are several commercially available methods for analyzing serum S100B. The clinical use of serum S100B is mainly in minor head injury, as a complement to existing guidelines in order to help clinicians to determine who could safely be discharged without a previous CT scan. S100B in severe TBI is still being studied as a marker for secondary neurological complications, but has not yet had an impact in this specific area. Recent research on the clinical use of S100B in pediatric TBI has shown promising results, and the introduction of S100B in minor head injuries could have even greater impact than for adults. However, more research needs to be done before a biomarker can be clinically used in pediatric TBI.

Serum concentrations of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and αII-spectrin breakdown product 145 kDa correlate with outcome after pediatric TBI

Predicting outcome after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important for providing information to families and prescribing rehabilitation services. Previously published studies evaluating the ability of serum biomarkers to predict outcome after pediatric TBI have focused on three markers: neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100B, and myelin-basic protein (MBP), all of which have important limitations. The study objectives were to measure serum concentrations of two novel serum biomarkers, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) and αII-spectrin breakdown product 145 kDa (SBDP145), in children with TBI and healthy controls and to assess the ability of these markers to predict outcome as assessed by a dichotomous Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. We also sought to compare the predictive ability of UCH-L1 and SBDP145 to that of the clinical gold standard, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and to that of the well-accepted biomarkers NSE, S100B, and MBP. Serum UCH-L1 and SBDP145 concentrations were significantly greater in subjects than in controls. The increase in UCH-L1 and SBDP145 was exclusively seen in subjects with moderate and severe TBI; there was no increase after mild TBI. Both markers had a significant negative partial correlation with the GCS after controlling for age. Both UCH-L1 and SBDP145 were correlated with GOS, and this correlation was stronger than the correlations with NSE, S100B, or MBP. These results suggest that these two markers may be useful in assessing outcome after moderate and severe pediatric TBI.

Can low serum levels of S100B predict normal CT findings after minor head injury in adults?: an evidence-based review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low levels of S100B in serum can predict normal computed tomography (CT) findings after minor head injury (MHI) in adults.

PARTICIPANTS

Not applicable.

DESIGN

Systematic evidence-based review of the peer-reviewed literature with meta-analytical interpretation.

PRIMARY MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

We identified 12 eligible articles that specifically studied adult MHI patients with S100B and cranial CT scans in the acute phase after injury, comprising a total of 2466 separate patients. Individual negative predictive values of 90% to 100% were found for the ability of a negative (under cutoff) S100B level to predict a normal CT scan. A total of 6 patients included in the studies had low S100B levels and positive CT scans (0.26%) and only 1 of these patients (0.04%) had a clinically relevant CT finding. The pooled negative predictive value for all studies was more than 99% (95% CI 98%-100%), with an average prevalence for any CT finding at 8%. The studies are consistently classed as level 2 and level 3 grades of evidence, suggesting a grade B recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Low serum S100B levels accurately predict normal CT findings after MHI in adults. S100B sampling should be considered in MHI patients with no focal neurological deficit, an absence of significant extracerebral injury, should be taken within 3 hours of injury, and the cutoff for omitting CT set at less than 0.10 microg/L. Care givers should also be aware of other clinical factors predictive of intracranial complications after MHI.