Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid for pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: systematic review

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for management of urinary tract infection and primary vesicoureteric reflux

We present updated, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines from the Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology (ISPN) for the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) and primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) in children. These guidelines conform to international standards; Institute of Medicine and AGREE checklists were used to ensure transparency, rigor, and thoroughness in the guideline development. In view of the robust methodology, these guidelines are applicable globally for the management of UTI and VUR. Seventeen recommendations and 18 clinical practice points have been formulated. Some of the key recommendations and practice points are as follows. Urine culture with > 104 colony forming units/mL is considered significant for the diagnosis of UTI in an infant if the clinical suspicion is strong. Urine leukocyte esterase and nitrite can be used as an alternative screening test to urine microscopy in a child with suspected UTI. Acute pyelonephritis can be treated with oral antibiotics in a non-toxic infant for 7-10 days. An acute-phase DMSA scan is not recommended in the evaluation of UTI. Micturating cystourethrography (MCU) is indicated in children with recurrent UTI, abnormal kidney ultrasound, and in patients below 2 years of age with non-E. coli UTI. Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan (DMSA scan) is indicated only in children with recurrent UTI and high-grade (3-5) VUR. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated in children with a normal urinary tract after UTI. Prophylaxis is recommended to prevent UTI in children with bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) and those with high-grade VUR. In children with VUR, prophylaxis should be stopped if the child is toilet trained, free of BBD, and has not had a UTI in the last 1 year. Surgical intervention in high-grade VUR can be considered for parental preference over antibiotic prophylaxis or in children developing recurrent breakthrough febrile UTIs on antibiotic prophylaxis.

The correlation between ureteric orifice morphology and primary vesicoureteral reflux grade and the impact on the effectiveness of endoscopic reflux correction

INTRODUCTION

Early diagnosis and treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) are essential for preserving renal function.

OBJECTIVES

The study explored whether preoperative cystoscopic grading of refluxing ureteric orifices (UO) correlated with their shape in an institution with non-performance of hydrodistention of the UO in the diagnosis and grading of VUR. We also assessed the relationship between the UO shape and VUR grade with the effectiveness of endoscopic correction of primary VUR in children.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients ≤15 years treated for primary VUR. The reflux grade was based on the results of preoperative voiding cystourethrography as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with 77 renal refluxing units (RRU) underwent endoscopic treatment with Deflux®. VUR was bilateral in 51 % of patients. VUR was mild in 13 %, moderate in 53 %, and severe in 34 % of cases. The patients with mild and moderate VUR had stadium-shaped UOs in 60 % and 54 % RRUs, respectively. Horseshoe-shaped UOs constituted 42 % of UOs in patients with severe VUR, followed by 31 % of golf-hole UOs. The reflux resolution rate after the first endoscopic injection was 84 %. The preoperative VUR grade correlated with UOs shape (p < 0.001). No significant correlation between UOs configuration and the outcome of endoscopic treatment was seen (p = 0.452). The preoperative VUR grade negatively correlated with a favorable endoscopic treatment (p = 0.043).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our data indicate ureteral orifice shapes are closely related to preoperative VUR grade. There was no correlation between the UO configuration and the success rate of endoscopic treatment of VUR, in contrast to the significant negative correlation between the VUR grade and the success rate of endoscopic treatment.

Vantris vs. deflux for treatment of paediatric vesicoureteral reflux: Efficacy and obstruction risk

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) injections and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha) injections for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

MATERIAL

This retrospective cohort study included 189 young patients who had endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux from January 2012 to December 2019 in our center. Among them, 101 had PCC injections and 88 had Dx/Ha injections. Indications for treatment were vesicoureteral reflux with breakthrough urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux with renal scarring on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Endoscopic injection was performed under the ureteral meatus. Early complications, recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux after endoscopic injection, ureteral obstruction and reintervention were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90.1% of patients who had PPC injection and in 82% of patients who had Dx/Ha injection. Four patients presented a chronic ureteral obstruction after PPC injection, one with a complete loss of function of the dilated kidney. One patient in the Dx/Ha group presented a postoperative ureteral dilatation after 2 injections.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar success rate after PPC and Dx/Ha injections for endoscopic treatment of VUR, there may be a greater risk of postoperative ureteral obstruction after PPC injections. The benefit of using PPC to prevent febrile UTI and renal scarring in children with low-grade VUR does not seem to outweigh the risk of chronic ureteral obstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Vesicoureteral Reflux: Current Care Trends and Future Possibilities

Although investigations over the past 2 decades have improved our understanding of the natural history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and helped identify those at higher risk of both VUR itself as well as its potential severe sequelae, debate exists regarding key aspects of care, including when to perform diagnostic imaging and which patients benefit from continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to distill large volumes of granular data into practical tools that clinicians can use to guide diagnosis and management decisions. Surgical treatment, when indicated, remains highly effective and is associated with low morbidity.

Transvesicoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Does Prior Failed Endoscopic Injection Impact Outcome?

Purpose: Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TVUR) for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a technically demanding operation. The technical difficulty is further increased by previous failed endoscopic injection, which causes intense fibrosis around the ureter. In this study, we compared primary TVUR with TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection for VUR. Materials and Methods: The records of all children undergoing TVUR by a single surgeon over a 4-year period were analyzed. The children were divided into group 1 (primary TVUR, n = 50) and group 2 (TVUR after previous failed endoscopic treatment of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid, n = 7). Demographic, clinical, radiologic, operative and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. The results were analyzed by statistical software; Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate, and P < .05 was considered significant. Results: Both the groups were comparable with respect to age and mean VUR grade. The mean VUR grade was significantly higher in group 1 and mean operative time per ureter was significantly more for group 2 than group 1. The postoperative hospital stay, success of TVUR, and complications were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind. TVUR after previous failed endoscopic injection could be done safely with good success, but with longer operative time than primary TVUR even in expert hands. Hence, previous failed endoscopic injection is not a contraindication to TVUR.

Vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation with a modified Glenn-Anderson technique for vesicoureteral reflux

INTRODUCTION

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), commonly referred to as urinary reflux, is one of the most common congenital urological anomaly to occur during childhood. Historically, open vesicoureteral reimplantation has been the gold standard in the surgical treatment of VUR. Currently, vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation is used as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation. Most vesicoscopic procedures are performed using the transtrigonal Cohen technique. As a non-transtrigonal technique, the vesicoscopic Politano-Leadbetter technique is also performed, but requires dissection outside the bladder under a narrow surgical field, and in boy carries a risk of vas deferens injury.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated surgical outcomes and perioperative findings for vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation using a modified Glenn-Anderson technique in children with VUR.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighteen consecutive children who underwent vesicoureteral ureteral reimplantation using a modified Glenn-Anderson technique were included in this study. The surgical procedure was explained and surgical outcomes and perioperative findings were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients comprised 9 boys and 9 girls with 29 cases of ureteral reflux (7 unilateral cases, 11 bilateral cases). All procedures were performed laparoscopically, with no cases requiring conversion to open surgery. Median operative time was 143 min for unilateral VUR and 194 min for bilateral VUR. Only one case showed a complication (Clavien-Dindo grade 1). The remaining 17 cases showed no complications, with removal of the urethral catheter and discharge 2 days postoperatively. Seventeen of the 18 cases underwent postoperative voiding cystourethrography, showing no VUR in all cases.

DISCUSSION

Vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, with most procedures performed using a transtrigonal Cohen technique. Regardless of whether the surgery is open or laparoscopic, a disadvantage of the Cohen technique is that postoperative transureteral treatment may not be possible. The Politano-Leadbetter technique has been reported as a non-transtrigonal technique. However, this requires dissection outside the bladder under a narrow surgical field, and carries a risk of vas deferens injury in boys. In this study, vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation using a modified Glenn-Anderson technique provided good surgical outcomes with minimal perioperative complications and easy manipulation under a wide field of view.

CONCLUSION

Although many minimally invasive treatments are available, vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation using a modified Glenn-Anderson technique is safe and effective for patients with VUR 4 years old. To demonstrate the further utility of this procedure, long-term outcomes and safety evaluations are needed in a larger number of cases.

Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature

In the last 20 years, endoscopic injection (EI) has affirmed as a valid alternative to open surgery for management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study aimed to investigate and discuss some debated aspects such as indications, bulking agents and comparison, techniques of injection and comparison, predictive factors of success, use in specific situations. EI is minimally invasive, well accepted by patients and families, with short learning curve and low-morbidity profile. It provides reflux resolution rates approaching those of open reimplantation, ranging from 69 to 100%. Obviously, the success rate may be influenced by several factors. Recently, it is adopted as first-line therapy also in high grade reflux or complex anatomy such as duplex, bladder diverticula, ectopic ureters. The two most used materials for injection are Deflux and Vantris. The first is absorbable, easier to inject, has lower risk of obstruction, but can lose efficacy over time. The second is non-absorbable, more difficult to inject, has higher risk of obstruction, but it is potentially more durable. The two main techniques are STING and HIT. To date, the ideal material and technique of injection has not yet clearly established, but the choice remains dependent on surgeon's preference and experience.

Comparative study of open, laparoscopic and endoscopic treatments of intermediate grade vesicoureteral reflux in children

BACKGROUND

Low-grade vesicoureteral-reflux (VUR) are rather treated by endoscopic injection, whereas open or laparoscopic procedures are mainly performed for high-grade VURs. Management of intermediate grades is controversial and no study focused on grade III to date. This study aims to compare the results of open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic approaches in children with grade III VUR.

METHODS

A multicenter comparative retrospective study included children with grade III VUR operated for febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) from 2007 to 2016. Children without UTI, with reflux of other grades, neurological bladder, duplex system, posterior urethral valves, and bladder exstrophy were excluded. Success was defined as no recurrence of febrile UTI and was presented as event-free survival curves.

RESULTS

Out of 806 children operated of VUR, 171 met the inclusion criteria (114 females). Seventy-seven children (45%) underwent an open Cohen procedure, 35 (21%) a laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir and 59 (34%) a submucosal endoscopic injection according to the centers' preference. The mean follow-up was 64 months (24-132). Groups were not different for age, sex, and circumcision status. Compared to Cohen procedure, recurrences of febrile UTI were more frequent after laparoscopic treatment (p = 0,02, 8/35) and endoscopic treatment (p = 0.001, 16/59). Redosurgery was also more frequent after laparoscopy (n = 2) and endoscopic injection (n = 14) than after open surgery (n = 0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Recurrent febrile UTIs and redosurgery are more frequent after endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures in grade III VUR than open reimplantation. Whether the lower morbidity of laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches balances the risk of recurrent febrile UTI remains to be determined for intermediate grade reflux.

A systematic review & meta-analysis comparing outcomes of endoscopic treatment of primary vesico ureteric reflux in children with polyacrylate poly alcohol copolymer versus dextranomer hyaluranic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of bulking agents for vesico ureteric reflux (VUR). In this meta-analysis we have compared the outcomes of endoscopic treatment with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA).

METHODS

A systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2020 was conducted covering databases like PUBMED, MEDLINE etc. for (endoscopic treatment) AND (VUR) AND (PPC OR DxHA) AND (recurrence OR complications). PRISMA guidelines were followed and only comparative studies were included. Outcomes were early success defined as absence of VUR in voiding cystourethrogram at 3-months followup, urinary tract infections (UTI) and occurrence of vesico-ureteric-junction obstruction (VUJO). Risk of bias was analysed with Robvis tool and odds-ratios were compared with Revman-3.0.

RESULTS

Among nine studies (heterogeneity; I 2 69-79%) all cleared the risk of bias assessment. There was no significant difference in high grade VUR (p = 0.94) between PPC (40%) and DxHA (43%). Success rate after single injection was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) at 86% (477/555) for PPC vs 69% (474/685) for DxHA. UTI rate between PPC (12%) and DxHA (14.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). VUJO rate between PPC (3.9%) and DxHA (0.8%) was also not significantly different (p = 0.47). Significantly lesser volume (p = 0.02) was used for PPC (0.7 ml) compared to DxHA (0.9 ml).

CONCLUSION

Reflux resolution was significantly higher with PPC than DxHA. Postinjection UTI/VUJO incidence was not significantly different between them. Limitation of this meta-analysis was heterogeneity & small number of articles. Further studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Does pre-fellowship experience alter success rates of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux during pediatric urology fellowship?

INTRODUCTION

Learning curve is a well-known factor that affects the success rate of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

OBJECTIVE

To our knowledge, the significance of pre-fellowship training has not been studied. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the effect of pre-fellowship training on the endoscopic treatment success rates of pediatric urology fellows.

DESIGN

A total of 78 patients aged 2-16 years (132 renal units) who underwent subureteric injection for the treatment of primary VUR by four pediatric urology fellows between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Fellows were grouped into two as experienced and non-experienced according to the presence of pre-fellowship experience (defined as a minimum of 20 procedures). Patients in both groups were divided into two subgroups as non-dilating (grade I-II) and dilating VUR (grade III-V). Also, the change in success rate throughout the fellowship was analyzed. HIT or Double HIT method was used in all interventions.

RESULTS

Experienced fellows carried out subureteric injection in 54 (40.9%) renal units while non-experienced fellows performed in 78 (59.1%). There was no success rate difference between experienced and non-experienced fellow groups in non-dilating VUR (100% vs. 88%, respectively p = 0.268), whereas the success rate of the experienced group was significantly higher in dilated VUR (78.9% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.006). Moreover, the amount of material used in the treatment of non-dilating VUR were similar between two fellow groups (0.6 ml vs. 0.6 ml, p = 0.500), while experienced group achieved higher success rates in dilating VUR by statistically significant less amount of injected volume (0.7 ml vs. 0.9 ml, p = 0.026).Overall complete VUR resolution rates were similar throughout the fellowship period in the experienced fellows (81.5% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.444), while it significantly increased in the non-experienced group implicating the completion of the learning curve (51.3% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.035).

DISCUSSION

There has been no published reports on the effect of pre-fellowship experience on subureteric injection success. While many researchers reported on the importance of learning curve, various studies assessed the effect of injected volume on success rate implicating contradictory results. Furthermore, others indicated that the ideal technique providing accurate needle placement and obtaining proper depth during injection which is associated with surgical experience is more important than the injected volume in achieving success.

CONCLUSION

Our results implicate that similar success rates in non-dilating VUR can be achieved regardless of previous subureteric injection training. However, higher failure rates may be expected when the procedures are performed by non-experienced pediatric urology fellows at the beginning of their fellowship in dilating VUR.

Vesicoscopic Cross-Trigonal Ureteral Reimplantation for Vesicoureteral Reflux: Intermediate Results

For the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux, the introduction of vesicoscopic procedures offers new perspectives for improving patient comfort and quality. Our aim was to examine whether minimally invasive vesicoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation (VCUR) would meet expectations. Between 2012 and 2021, 99 girls and 35 boys with high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) underwent VCUR. For two boys, we failed to establish the pneumovesicum, leading to conversion to open surgery. The mean age was 4.5 years, ranging from 10 months to 18 years. VCUR was successfully performed in 132 patients, including 75 patients with bilateral VUR and 12 children with double ureters with unilateral or bilateral VUR, corresponding to a total of 229 operated ureters. The mean time of operation was 151 min for all patients. There were no perioperative complications, with the exception of three cases of pneumoperitoneum without consequences. Postoperatively, we recognized three cases of acute hydronephrosis, two of them required transient drainage. Three patients developed extravasation of urine after the postoperative removal of the transurethral catheter, rapidly resolved by new drainage. In two patients, we combined VCUR with laparoscopic heminephrectomy and opposite laparoscopic nephrectomy, respectively. Overall, mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days. We observed recurrent VUR in seven ureters, resulting in a success rate for VCUR of 96.9%. These results demonstrate the feasibility of VCUR and its potential to displace open surgery with high safety and wide applicability.

Deflux® Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) in Japan

Introduction

The aim of this study is to present the results of a multi-institutional outcome analysis conducted to determine the extent of endoscopic Deflux® injection for treating primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan.

Methods

A 22-question survey was distributed to 174 certified pediatric urologists (Ninteii in Japanese) and councilors of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Urology working at 140 centers to determine the usage and clinical efficacy of Deflux® for treating primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan.

Results

Forty-three of 140 (30.7%) centers participated, which exceeded participation rates of 27.9 and 18.0% for similar surveys conducted in America in 2006 and 2014, respectively. Deflux® was administered at 43 centers using subureteral transurethral injection (n = 19; 44.2%), hydrodistention implantation (n = 5; 11.6%), or double hydrodistention implantation (n = 19; 44.2%) and was the first-line treatment for primary vesicoureteral reflux at 39 (90.7%) centers. Overall, 1,563 ureters were treated in 1,076 patients. The male:female ratio was 527:549; mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range: 3.2-8 years); mean age at diagnosis of primary vesicoureteral reflux was 4.2 years, and mean age at first Deflux® treatment was 6.2 years. Overall cure rates were 65.3% after one Deflux® treatment, 75.3% after two, and 77.3% after three.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-institutional outcome analysis of Deflux® usage for primary vesicoureteral reflux in Japan.

Factors affecting endoscopic treatment’s failure for primary vesicoureteral reflux in the paediatric population

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to identify which factors could determine endoscopic therapy’s failure in the paediatric patients with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

Methods:

We reviewed data from patients who underwent endoscopic surgery for primary reflux. We performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis considering factors conditioning therapeutic failure. All the tests were performed considering significant values of p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 19.0 program. Study sample was homogenised by just including patients with primary reflux and excluding both patients with secondary reflux and patients with functional lower urinary conditions.

Results:

A total of 96 patients were included for review. Median age at surgery was 28 months. The overall success rate of endoscopic surgery for vesicoureteral reflux was 57%. Female sex, age under 24 months at the time of surgical intervention and having suffered a urinary tract infection (UTI) despite antibiotic prophylaxis are statistically significant risk factors for therapy failure.

Conclusions:

Nonetheless, differences between series could explain these differences in success rates. The lack of standardisation of the definition of ‘success’, the heterogeneity of patients included, and variables such as the degree of reflux, the presence of dysfunctional voiding, age or follow-up make it difficult to compare the success rate between series. Therefore, homogenisation of study samples assessing the evolution of primary reflux and response to endoscopic therapy is warranted.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable

Magnetic Agarose Microspheres/Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel as a Trackable Bulking Agent for Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatment

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common congenital anomalies in the kidney and the urinary tract. Endoscopic subureteral injection of a bulking agent has become popular in VUR treatment due to its high success rates, few complications, and a straightforward procedure. In this study, a novel magnetic bulking agent was prepared by embedding Fe₃O₄ magnetic nanoparticles in cross-linked agarose microspheres with diameters of 80–250 μm and dispersing the magnetic microspheres in a hyaluronic acid hydrogel. The bulking agent has good biocompatibility and biosecurity validated by the tests of cytotoxicity, in vitro genotoxicity, animal irritation, skin sensitization, acute systemic toxicity, and pathological analysis after the injection of the bulking agent extract solution into healthy mice as well as injection of the bulking agent into VUR rabbits. The VUR rabbits were created by incising the roof of the intravesical ureter to enlarge the ureteral orifice. The success rate of the bulking agent in treating VUR rabbits using a subureteral transurethral injection technique was 67% (4/6) or 80% (4/5, excluding the unfinished rabbit), and no migrated particles were found in the organs of the rabbits. The transverse relaxation rate of the bulking agent was 104 mM⁻¹s⁻¹. After injection, the bulking agent was long-term trackable through magnetic resonance imaging that can help clinicians to inspect the VUR treatment effect. For the first time, this study demonstrates that the bulking agent with a long-term stable tracer is promising for endoscopic VUR treatment.

Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid/Dextranomer Gel (NASHA/Dx, Deflux) for Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: What Have We Learned Over the Last 20 Years?

Non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel (Deflux; NASHA/Dx) was developed as a treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in the 1990s. To mark 20 years since the US approval of this agent, we reviewed its properties, best practice for application, and the available clinical safety and efficacy data. Long-term or randomized, controlled studies of treatment with NASHA/Dx have reported VUR resolution rates of 59%-100% with low rates of febrile urinary tract infection post-treatment (4%-25%), indicating long-term protection of the kidneys. An individualized approach VUR management is advocated, and NASHA/Dx is a viable option for many patients requiring intervention.

Armamentarium to treat primary vesicoureteral reflux in children

Primary vesicoureteral reflux often spontaneously resolves in children. However, in select patients, untreated reflux can contribute to recurrent pyelonephritis leading to irreversible renal damage. Management is therefore based on a given child's likelihood of recurrent urinary tract infections and risk of subsequent renal parenchymal injury. Therapeutic options for urinary reflux are diverse, ranging from observation with or without continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis to a variety of operative interventions.

Assessment of distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction visualization on contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CEVUS) uses intravesically administered microbubble contrast to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urethral anomalies with ultrasound. Multiple studies have suggested CEVUS can replace voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) as a radiation-free alternative. Analysis of the ureterovesical junction and ureters on VCUG documenting the ureterovesical junction position, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles is important as anatomical variations may affect management and surgical approach.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess distal ureteral and ureterovesical junction region visualization in children with VUR detected on CEVUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CEVUS studies performed between June 2018 and March 2019 with reported VUR were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric radiologists to confirm VUR and to qualitatively assess the ureterovesical junction region for each renal moiety using a 3-point scale for clear, limited or absent visualization of the distal ureter, ureterovesical junction, ureteral duplication, periureteral diverticula and ureteroceles.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies with VUR on CEVUS were identified. Sixty-seven renal moieties were evaluated including a solitary kidney in one child. VUR was detected in 52 moieties by reader 1 and in 53 by reader 2. A single moiety with discrepancy between readers regarding VUR was excluded from statistical analysis. No diverticula were detected by either reader and one ureterocele was detected by both readers. Visualization of the ureterovesical junction was described as clear in 5/52, limited in 14/52 and absent in 33/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 12/52, limited in 20/52 and absent in 20/52 by reader 2. The ureterovesical junction was clearly visualized in 5/52 (9.6%) by reader 1 and 12/52 (23.1%) by reader 2. The Kappa value of -0.29 (confidence interval [CI] -0.25, 0.21) reveals a lack of agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent ureterovesical junction visualization. Distal ureteral visualization was described as clear in 14/52, limited in 16/52 and absent in 22/52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 27/52, limited in 7/52 and absent in 18/52 by reader 2. The distal ureter was clearly visualized in 14/52 (26.9%) by reader 1 and 27/52 (51.9%) by reader 2. The Kappa of 0.43 (CI 0.22, 0.64) reveals moderate agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent distal ureteral visualization. Duplication of the renal collecting system was identified in 13/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 1 and 11/52 refluxing kidneys by reader 2. Visualization of ureteral duplication was described as clear in 9, limited in 4 and absent in 39 of 52 refluxing renal moieties by reader 1 and as clear in 9, limited in 2 and absent in 41 by reader 2. Ureteral duplication was clearly visualized in 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 1 and 9/52 (17.3%) by reader 2. Kappa of 0.87 (CI 0.68, 1) reveals high agreement between the readers for clear versus limited or absent identification of ureteral duplication.

CONCLUSION

The distal ureter and ureterovesical junction region frequently are not clearly visualized in refluxing renal moieties on CEVUS. Awareness of this limitation is important as there may be implications when evaluating patients for surgical management of VUR.

Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling

INTRODUCTION

Vesicoureteral reflux is a common pediatric urologic condition that often has several reasonable treatment options depending on condition severity. In order to choose the best treatment for their child, parents are expected to make judgements that weigh attributes such as treatment cost, effectiveness, and complication rate. Prior research has shown that factors such as treating hospital and surgeon also influence patient treatment choice.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates parental preferences for reflux treatment using profile case best-worst scaling, an emerging technique in both urologic and health care preference estimation. The study also uses latent class analysis (LCA) to identify parental sub-classes with different preferences.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were collected from a community sample of parents via a multimedia best-worst scaling survey instrument published to Amazon's Mechanical Turk online community. After extensive review of the literature, reflux attributes and attribute levels were selected to correspond with available treatments. The profile case best-worst scaling exercise elicited preferences for granular attributes of reflux treatments. Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression and class analysis to distinguish preference heterogeneity. Probability scaled values (PSVs) reflected the order of desirability of the attributes. Attribute preference importance was rescaled into dollar units for comparison as well.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 248 respondents. The highest treatment effectiveness was more desirable than all other leveled treatment attributes (PSV 17.8, all p < 0.01) (Table). Low complication rate and doctor recommendation were amongst the other most desirable treatment attributes (PSV 11.3 and 9.0, respectively). Latent class analysis identified a class with more extreme preferences, for whom doctor recommendation and avoiding hospitalization were particularly desirable.

DISCUSSION

In this community-based sample, high treatment effectiveness and low complication rate were the most desirable treatment attributes to parents, though parents likely have heterogenous treatment preference structures. Shared parent-physician decision-making that incorporates parental preferences will likely allow more effective, targeted decision-making in the future.

Endoscopic Injection Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Meeting with the Factors Involved in the Success Rate

The challenges and controversies in vesicoureteral reflux intervention guidelines resulted in a more individualized treatment planning. Endoscopic injection therapy is now widely used and is considered preferable, but still remains less successful than ureteral reimplantation. Τhe endoscopic vesicoureteral reflux approach should be risk-adapted to current knowledge, so more experience and longer-term follow-up are needed. The precise of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that affecting endoscopic injection therapy success rates and outcome have not yet been clearly determined. The aim of this study was to investigate these associated factors. Although the reflux grade is the most well-known factor that can affect the success of the procedure, there is no agreement on which factors are the most influential for the efficacy of endoscopic reflux treatment. So, we carried out a broad review of published papers on this topic, and we presented all the potential predictive variables of endoscopic reflux resolution in children.

Primary Bilateral High-Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Management Perspective

Objective

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common finding in the pediatric population with the risk of repeated infections and renal damage. There is little is known about the natural history of primary bilateral high-grade reflux. Herein we present our experience in the management of primary high-grade bilateral VUR and the long-term outcome of renal function in this specific group of patients.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated all patients with congenital bilateral VUR between 2006 and 2014. Records were reviewed for patient age at diagnosis, antenatal history, clinical presentation, the grade of VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), presence of scars on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan, indications for surgical intervention, and surgical approaches. Clinical and radiological outcomes of this subgroup of patients were assessed.

Results

A total of 67 patients with bilateral VUR were identified, of whom 31 (20 boys and 11 girls) had primary high-grade (grade IV and V) bilateral VUR. The mean age at diagnosis was seven months. DMSA scans showed renal scars in 19 patients (61%) and eight of them were bilateral. Surgical intervention was necessary for 81% of patients with a success rate of 58% after endoscopic correction and 100% after reimplantation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) developed in 13 patients (42%) after a mean follow-up of eight years.

Conclusions

Primary bilateral high-grade VUR carries a high rate of surgical intervention. The endoscopic correction has an acceptable success rate and efficient long-term outcome. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients progresses to CKD even after VUR management.

Mid-Term Safety and Efficacy of the Modified Double Hydrodistention Implantation Technique (HIT), Termed Systematic Multi-Site HIT (SMHIT), for Patients with Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux

Purpose

To evaluate the treatment outcomes and postoperative complications associated with the systematic multi-site hydrodistention implantation technique (SMHIT) for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and to determine its mid-term efficacy and safety.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data for 17 ureters from 12 consecutive children, aged ≥1 year, with grade II-IV reflux and a history of febrile urinary tract infections (FUTI), who underwent a single-session of SMHIT. The primary outcome was the absence of postoperative FUTI (clinical success). The secondary outcome was improvement in reflux to grade 0-I on postoperative voiding cystourethrography (radiographic success).

Results

Five and 7 children had bilateral and unilateral reflux, respectively. Reflux was categorized as grade II, III, and IV reflux in 2, 12, and 3 ureters, respectively. Seven of 10 (70%) toilet-trained children had bladder-bowel dysfunction (BBD) preoperatively. The SMHIT was performed for all patients, after which BBD improved. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 6 years and 9 months. The clinical success rate was 100%. Radiographic success was achieved in 16/17 ureters (94%) at 3-4 months, 17/17 (100%) ureters at 1 year, and 17/17 (100%) ureters at 3 years postoperatively. Major complications did not develop postoperatively.

Conclusion

When prioritizing treatment of concomitant BBD in children with primary VUR and avoiding dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection therapy in contraindicated children according to the Food and Drug Administration recommendations, a single-session of SMHIT may be as effective and safe in the mid-term as performing open anti-reflux surgery.

Do Volume of Injection and Learning Curve Influence the Results of Endoscopic Correction of Vesicoureteric Reflux Using Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid? A Single Surgeon Experience

Background: Available reports regarding the technical factors for successful endoscopic treatment (ET) of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer are inconclusive. We studied single-surgeon data to evaluate the association of injected volume and surgeon experience with success after ET for VUR. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight children (87 ureters) with grades 2-4 primary VUR were included. Success was defined as complete resolution of reflux on follow-up imaging. Volume of injection between success and failed groups was analyzed; volume of injection was further studied using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Patients were then divided into two groups: group 1 (early experience) and group 2 (later experience). Both groups were compared for age, grade of reflux, volume of injection, and success. Results: Overall success of one injection was 76%. The mean volume of injection was significantly larger in successful ureters than failed ureters (P = .008). On ROC analysis, the volume of 0.75 mL (area under curve 0.747, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.89) had a good discriminative ability to predict success of the injection procedure. Furthermore, a volume cutoff of 0.8 mL demonstrated significant influence on success (success 14/25 ureters for <0.8 mL and 36/42 ureters for 0.8 mL or more volume of injection, P = .0097), whereas no difference in success was observed with a cutoff volume of 0.9 mL (P = .2480). When the patients were divided into two groups based on surgeon experience, group 2 demonstrated better success than group 1 (84% versus 65%, P = .04). Both groups were comparable for age (P = .09), grade of reflux (0.46) and the median volume of injection was similar (0.8 mL) in both the groups. Conclusions: We found that a minimal volume of 0.75 mL dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection may be required to achieve success of ET in moderate grade primary VUR. Success also improved with increasing surgeon experience.

Evolving surgical management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: is open ureteral reimplantation still the 'Gold Standard'?

Vesicoureteral reflux, the retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tract, is one of the most common urologic diagnoses in the pediatric population. Once detected, therapeutic options for urinary reflux are diverse, ranging from observation with or without continuous low-dose prophylactic antibiotics to a variety of operative interventions. While a standardized algorithm is lacking, it is generally accepted that management be tailored to individual patients based on various factors including age, likelihood of spontaneous resolution, risk of subsequent urinary tract infections with renal parenchymal injury, and parental preference. Anti-reflux surgery may be necessary in children with persistent reflux, renal scarring or recurrent pyelonephritis after optimization of bladder and bowel habits. Open, laparoscopic/robot-assisted and endoscopic approaches are all successful in correcting reflux and have been shown to reduce the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections.

Risk factors for obstructive complications after endoscopic correction of vesico-ureteral reflux using polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer

Use of polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) after endoscopic correction (EC) of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is highly effective but is associated with a higher risk of obstructive complications (OC) compared with other implants. We undertook a STROBE compliant retrospective investigation and studied the OC risk factors to increase the practical safety of PPC.Overall, 798 patients (464 [58.1%] girls and 334 [41.9%]) boys) from 5 hospitals in whom PPC was routinely used were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were subdivided into 2 groups. Group I consisted of 754 (94.5%) children (449 [59.5%] girls and 305 [40.5%] boys) without OC. Median age was 41 months [Q1: 18.0; Q3: 81.0]. Group II comprised 44 (5.5%) patients (29 [65.9%] boys and 15 [34.1%] girls) experiencing OC, and their median age was 21.5 months [Q1: 12.0; Q3: 43.0]. Clinical and renal ultrasound examinations were carried out 1 day and 1 month after EC, and then every 6 months after EC. At the follow-up examination approximately 6 months after EC, voiding cysto-urethrography (VCUG) was performed. All patients with OC underwent diuretic renography.OC occurred in 44 (5.5%) of 798 children, in some cases as late as 60 months after endoscopic injection of the bulking agent PPC for correction of VUR. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age (P < .001), higher grade of VUR (P < .001), male gender (P < .001), second injection (P = .003), and EC injection using hydrodistension implantation technique (HIT; P < .001) represented significant risk factors. At multivariate analysis, only male gender (P = .0078), younger age (P = .0044), HIT technique (P < .0001), and second injection (P = .04) represented significant risk factors for the occurrence of OC.We identified young age, male gender, high reflux grade, HIT technique, and second endoscopic injections as factors associated with the risk of OC after EC of VUR using PPC as a bulking agent. Thus, patients who have undergone EC with PPC must be monitored sonographically for occurrence of OC for at least 60 months after the intervention.

The promise of regenerative medicine in the treatment of urogenital disorders

Polymers and scaffolds are the most significant tools in regenerative medicine. Urogenital disorders are an important group of diseases that greatly affect the patient's life expectancy and quality. Reconstruction of urogenital defects is one of the current challenges in regenerative medicine. Regenerative medicine, as well as tissue engineering, may offer suitable approaches, while the tools needed are appropriate materials and cells. Autologous urothelial cells obtained from biopsy, bone marrow-derived stem cells, adipose stem cells and urine-derived stem cells that expressed mesenchymal cell markers are the cells that mainly used. In addition, two main types of biomaterials mainly exist; synthetic polymers and composite scaffolds that are biodegradable polymers with controllable properties and naturally derived biomaterials such as extracellular matrix components and acellular tissue matrices. In this review, we present and evaluate the most appropriate and suitable scaffolds (naturally derived and synthetic polymers) and cells applied in urogenital reconstruction.

A review of novel STING bulking agents

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the literature to compare the efficacy and complications of polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG) with the current standard of care, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA), when used to treat VUR in the paediatric population.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. Keywords included Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), endoscopic; endoscopic injection, endoscopic treatment, dulking material, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer, polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer, Deflux, Dexell, Vantris, Bulkamid, outcome, treatment and children. Prospective or retrospective studies comparing PAHG/PPC directly with Dx/HA were included for review.

RESULTS

Four studies were identified comparing PPC with Dx/HA. All studies showed superior efficacy (on micturating cystourethrogram (MCUG) at 3 months) of PPC over Dx/HA. However, 1 study identified a significantly higher rate of vesicoureteric junction obstruction (VUJO) in the PPC group. One study was identified comparing PAHG with Dx/HA which showed similar efficacy on 3-month MCUG.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data suggest PPC confers a higher resolution rate of VUR and PAHG confers comparable resolution rates for VUR compared with Dx/HA in the paediatric population. However, the incidence of late-onset VUJO in one study is concerning, and high-quality randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed before making further recommendations.

Parental Preferences for Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatment: A Crowd-sourced, Best-worst Scaling Study

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively evaluate parental preferences for the various treatments for vesicoureteral reflux using crowd-sourced best-worst scaling, a novel technique in urologic preference estimation.

METHODS

Preference data were collected from a community sample of parents via 2 best-worst scaling survey instruments published to Amazon's Mechanical Turk online community. Attributes and attribute levels were selected following extensive review of the reflux literature. Respondents completed an object case best-worst scaling exercise to prioritize general aspects of reflux treatments and multiprofile case best-worst scaling to elicit their preferences for the specific differences in reflux treatments. Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Results from the object-case provided probability scaled values (PSV) that reflected the order of importance of attributes.

RESULTS

We analyzed data for 248 and 228 respondents for object and multiprofile case BWS, respectively. When prioritizing general aspects of reflux treatment, effectiveness (PSV = 20.37), risk of future urinary tract infection (PSV = 14.85), and complication rate (PSV = 14.55) were most important to parents. Societal cost (PSV = 1.41), length of hospitalization (PSV = 1.09), and cosmesis (PSV = 0.91) were least important. Parents perceived no difference in preference for the cosmetic outcome of open vs minimally invasive surgery (P = .791). Bundling attribute preference weights, parents in our study would choose open surgery 74.9% of the time.

CONCLUSION

High treatment effectiveness was the most important and preferred attribute to parents. Alternatively, cost and cosmesis were among the least important. Our findings serve to inform shared parent-physician decision-making for vesicoureteral reflux.

Managing vesicoureteral reflux in children: making sense of all the data

Current management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is the result of a steady albeit controversial evolution of data and thinking related to the clinical impact of VUR and urinary tract infection (UTI) in children, the value of clinical screening, and the relative impact of testing and interventions for VUR. While controversy continues, there is consensus on the importance of bladder dysfunction on VUR outcomes, the likelihood of VUR resolution, and the fact that not all children with VUR require active treatment. Early efforts to define risk stratification hold the most promise to provide more patient-specific treatment of UTI and VUR in children.

Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery in Pediatric Patients with Vesicoureteral Reflux: Urinary Tract Infection, Renal Scarring, and Predictive Factors for Success

BACKGROUND

To report the long-term outcomes of endoscopic surgery (ES) in pediatric patients with vesicoureteral reflux in terms of success rate, urinary tract infection, and renal function.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 73 pediatric patients (110 ureters) who underwent ES for vesicoureteral reflux. Ultrasonography was performed 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 3 months postoperatively and repeated after 1 year if vesicoureteral reflux persisted. Success was defined as the absence of reflux at the first voiding cystourethrography. Renal scans were performed at least 12 months postoperatively. Renal function deterioration was defined as a new scar or a greater than 5% decrease in function.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 24 (12-118) months. The overall success was 65.6%, while it was 78.9%, 87.0%, 62.5%, 37.5%, 66.7% for grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. In multivariate analyses, significant predictive factors for success were vesicoureteral reflux grade (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; P < 0.001) and mound detection at the first postoperative ultrasonography (OR, 13.53; P < 0.001). Renal function deterioration was found in 8 (15.3%) ureters and was less common in those with successful surgeries than in those with failures (9.5% vs. 40.0%; P = 0.035). No significant predictive factor for renal function deterioration or urinary tract infection was found.

CONCLUSION

Successful short-term outcomes of ES are expected in low-grade vesicoureteral reflux, especially when a mound is detected by postoperative ultrasonography. However, unpredictable long-term renal deterioration warrants continued follow-up.

New bulking agent for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: Polymethylmethacrylate/dextranomer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to report preliminary results of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with a single injection of a new bulking agent, cross-linked dextran and polymethylmethacrylate mixture.

Materials and Methods

We performed a single-center, single surgeon, prospective, off-label study using polymethylmethacrylate/dextranomer to treat vesicoureteral reflux. All patients underwent endoscopic injection, followed by renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram at 3 months postoperatively to identify de novo or worsening hydronephrosis and vesicoureteral reflux correction (to Grade 0 or I).

Results

Eighteen patients underwent injection of polymethylmethacrylate/dextranomer at our institution between April 2013 and December 2013. Ten were males and eight were females, with a median age of 58 months (range, 6 months to 5 years). Vesicoureteral reflux was unilateral in three patients and bilateral in 15, for a total of 33 renal refluxing units. Vesicoureteral reflux was Grade I in one renal refluxing unit, Grade II in 12, Grade III in 16, and Grade IV in four. Mean injected volume was 0.86 mL. Reflux was corrected in 23 renal refluxing units (69.7%) according to the 3-month voiding cystourethrogram. Complications included urinary retention in one patient. Mild pyelectasis was noted in one patient at 3 months, which spontaneously resolved 3 months later.

Conclusions

Our short-term data show that polymethylmethacrylate/dextranomer injection can be used to treat vesicoureteral reflux with comparable efficacy to other substances currently used and a low rate of complications. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm the usefulness of this material in treating vesicoureteral reflux.

Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid as First Line Treatment in 851 Consecutive Children with High Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux: Efficacy and Long-Term Results

PURPOSE

Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid is widely acknowledged as first line treatment of lower grade vesicoureteral reflux. We demonstrate its long-term efficacy and safety in eradicating high grade reflux.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 518 girls and 333 boys with a median age of 2.3 years (range 2 months to 13.7 years) underwent endoscopic correction of high grade vesicoureteral reflux using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid. Reflux was unilateral in 415 cases and bilateral in 436, comprising 1,287 refluxing units. Reflux was grade IV in 1,153 ureters (89.6%) and grade V in 134 (10.4%). ^99mTechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy identified renal scarring in 317 patients (37.3%). Followup ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram were performed 3 months after intervention and renal ultrasound yearly thereafter. Median followup was 8.5 years (range 6 months to 16 years).

RESULTS

Overall resolution rate after the first endoscopic injection was 69.5% (895 of 1,287 cases), with resolution in 70.4% of grade IV and 61.9% of grade V cases. Reflux resolved after a second injection in 259 cases (20.1%) and after a third injection in 133 (10.4%). Persistent reflux after initial treatment was significantly more common in patients younger than age 1 year and in individuals with renal scarring. No significant postoperative complications were observed and no patient required ureteral reimplantation. Following reflux resolution febrile urinary tract infection developed in 43 children (5.1%), including 24 (55.8%) during the first year, 15 (34.9%) during the second year and 4 (9.3%) during year 3 or later. Of these patients 6 had reflux recurrence and 8 had neocontralateral grade III reflux, which was successfully treated with a single endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid is an efficient and safe long-term treatment for grade IV and V vesicoureteral reflux, and can easily be repeated in patients with treatment failure with a high subsequent resolution rate.

Endoscopic injection for primary vesicoureteric reflux: Predictors of resolution and long term efficacy

AIM

We investigated the efficacy of endoscopic-Deflux-injection in treating primary-vesicoureteric-reflux (VUR) and identified factors to predict resolution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of children treated with Deflux for primary-VUR from 1995 to 2016 were reviewed, and outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight ureters (35 bilateral, 18 unilateral) in 53 children underwent 124 injections. Thirty-five (66%) patients had single injection (13 unilateral, 22 bilateral). Fifteen (28%), two (37%), and one (2%) patients had two, three, and four injections, respectively. Overall success rate by ureters was 57% after single injection. Complete resolution occurred in 65% of ureters with VUR below grade III, 63% of grade III, 40% of grade IV, and 70% of grade V VUR. Four patients had reimplantation. The median follow up duration was 60months (range 20-216months). Univariate analysis showed that lower VUR grade (p=0.03) and absent renal scars (p=0.04) were statistically significant predictors of resolution. In multivariate analysis, absent renal scars were statistically significant (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated efficacy of endoscopic-Deflux-injection as the first line treatment for primary-VUR. Absent renal scar and lower VUR grade were statistically significant predictors of resolution after single injection.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case-Control / Retrospective Comparative Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris): 5-years of prospective follow-up

Introduction

The endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is a currently well accepted therapy in many pediatric urology centers. Polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC), namely Vantris^®, is one of the tissue-augmenting substances used for endoscopic reflux therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results with PPC in children.

Material and methods

From 2012 to 2016, 125 children (73 girls and 52 boys) aged 0.6–17.9 years (mean 4.9 ±3.58) were treated with PPC. VUR was unilateral in 64 and bilateral in 61 patients, comprising 197 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 72, III in 50, IV in 33 and V in 42. Of these primary reflux was present in 132 RRUs and 65 were complex cases. Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was done 3 months after procedure.

Results

Follow-up was completed in 89.6% of patients (112 children), and 89.8% of RRUs (177 out of 197). Reflux resolved in 86.4% of RRUs after single injection, in 99.4% after second and in 100% after the third. The only significant, but serious complication observed was late ureteral obstruction after PPC injection correcting high grade reflux, which required ureteral re-implantation. This complication was found in 9 out of 112 children (8%), and in 11 out of 177 RRUs (6.2%), 1.1 -2.9 years (mean 2 ±0.7) after the PPC injection. The longest follow-up reaches 4.5 years.

Conclusions

Our data show that the PPC injection is an effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with high success rate. However, because of the possibility of late ureteral obstruction, which requires ureteroneocystostomy, long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative outcomes of EI vs UNC.

STUDY DESIGN

This study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using generalized estimating equation (GEE) to adjust for hospital-level clustering.

RESULTS

The study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P < 0.001), male (30 vs 20%, P < 0.001), and publicly insured (34 vs 29%, P < 0.001). As shown in Summary Figure, compared with EI, UNC patients had lower rates of additional anti-reflux procedures within 12 months (25 (1.0) vs 121 (6.1%), P < 0.001), but a higher rate of 30-day and 90-day readmissions and ER visits. On multivariate analysis, patients treated by UNC remained at higher odds of being readmitted (OR = 4.45; 2.69 in 30 days; 90 days, P < 0.001) and to have postoperative ER visits (OR = 3.33; 2.26 in 30 days; 90 days, P < 0.001); however, EI had significantly higher odds of repeat anti-reflux procedures in the subsequent year (OR = 7.12, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSIONS

Endoscopic injection constituted nearly half of initial anti-reflux procedures in children. However, patients treated with UNC had significantly lower odds of requiring re-treatment in the first year relative to those treated with EI. By contrast, patients treated with UNC had more than twice the odds of being readmitted or visiting an ER postoperatively. Although the available data were amongst the largest and most well validated, the major limitation was the retrospective nature of the administrative database. The practice setting may not be generalizable to states not included in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative readmissions and ER visits were uncommon after any surgical intervention for VUR, but were more common among children undergoing UNC. The EI patients had a more than seven-fold increased risk of surgical re-treatment within 1 year.

Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted approach for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children

PURPOSE

Despite minimal invasiveness and high success rate, guidelines still prescribe voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG) after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. The aim of this paper was to analyze whether intraoperative ultrasound (IO-US) could improve surgical accuracy and perioperative counseling, thus potentially decreasing the need for postoperative VCUG.

METHODS

We selected children treated for moderate to high grade VUR, renal scarring or repeated infections under antibiotic prophylaxis from January to December 2015. Endoscopic injection was combined with IO-US to detect optimal needle placement and to guide mound formation. IO-US findings were compared to surgeon opinion and postoperative VCUG, performed 3months after surgery. All patients were followed-up for 1year.

RESULTS

A significant relationship was found between IO-US mound height (p=0.003) or localization (p<0.0005) and VCUG. Success of endoscopic treatment vs persistence of reflux groups had a mean mound height of 10.62±1.36mm and 8.39±1.08mm respectively (p<0.0005). Height maintained a significant correlation with success in simple and multivariable regression analysis. ROC curve determined ≥9.8mm as predictor of reflux resolution (95% CI 0.825 to 0.998; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

IO-US facilitates pediatric urologists to find an optimal location, to reach a volcano mound morphology and height, thus increasing intraoperative accuracy. IO-US also helps evaluating high-risk recurrence and guiding prognostic counseling.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Contemporary Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux

CONTEXT

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) remains the most interesting topic of pediatric urology due to the dynamic nature of recent controversial publications. Starting from the need for a diagnosis to the necessity and effectiveness of treatment in preventing scars, VUR remains in the mist. Although recent strong evidence helped as fog lights in this blurriness, more data are required for achieving crystal clearance. This article aims to summarize and discuss the current state of the evidence regarding VUR management.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the main evidence in the literature on the current and contemporary management of VUR in children; to discuss conservative management with continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP), especially its effectiveness and safety; and to review the current evidence regarding contemporary surgical techniques.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a nonsystematic review of the literature using the recent guidelines and PubMed database regarding surveillance, CAP, endoscopic, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted ureteral surgical treatment.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Despite the striking results of previous studies revealing the ineffectiveness of CAP, more recent studies and their two fresh meta-analyses revealed a positive role for CAP in the contemporary management of VUR. One of the most interesting findings is the redundant rising of endoscopic correction and its final settlement to real indicated cases. Patient individualization in the contemporary management of VUR seems to be the keyword. The evidence in the literature showed a safe and effective use of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic reimplantations.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of VUR treatment is to prevent the occurrence of febrile urinary tract infections and formation of scars in the renal parenchyma. The approach should be risk adapted and individualized according to current knowledge. Individual risk is influenced by the presentation age, sex, history of pyelonephritis and renal damage, grade of reflux, bladder bowel dysfunction, and circumcision status.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Vesicoureteral reflux is a nonphysiological reflux of urine from the bladder through the ureters to the kidney. Treatment depends on the presentation of the vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Therapeutic options range from watchful waiting to open surgery. This article aims to summarize and discuss the current state of the evidence regarding VUR management.

Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Infants. Can We Do It and Should We Do It?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) performed on infants, and to discuss the possible role of this approach in selected cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the patients who underwent endoscopic injection of a bulking substance for VUR in our institution, and a comparison was made with patients treated during infancy and those treated later in life.

RESULTS

A total of 463 ureteral units were included (296 children), of whom 47 were patients less than 1 year of age (infants, INF group); the remaining 416 were included in a second group (children, CHL). In this study, the percentage of high-grade VUR and presence of reflux nephropathy were significantly higher in younger patients. Both early failure and recurrence rate were significantly higher in the INF group when compared with the CHL group. No complications were observed in the INF group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of VUR is feasible in patients less than 1 year of age. The effectiveness is lower than when patients are treated at a later age but was still over 80% in our series. There were no complications reported related to the procedure itself or to the general anesthesia. Once it is known that endoscopic treatment of VUR can be performed, controversy arises about the indication of treating patients with VUR. Careful selection of VUR cases that are less likely to spontaneously resolve, presence of breakthrough infections, and parental preference, all play a role in the decision-making process.

Endoscopic injection therapy

Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux, endoscopic injection therapy using Deflux has become a popular alternative to open surgery and continuous antibiotic prophylaxis. Endoscopic correction with Deflux is minimally invasive, well tolerated, and provides cure rates approaching those of open surgery (i.e., approximately 80% in several studies). However, in recent years a less stringent approach to evaluating urinary tract infections (UTIs) and concerns about long-term efficacy and complications associated with endoscopic injection have limited the use of this therapy. In addition, there is little evidence supporting the efficacy of endoscopic injection therapy in preventing UTIs and vesicoureteral reflux-related renal scarring. In this report, we reviewed the current literature regarding endoscopic injection therapy and provided an updated overview of this topic.

Vesicoureteral reflux: From prophylaxis to surgery

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common pathologies encountered in pediatric urology. Better understanding of the evolution of VUR and new endoscopic surgical techniques in the last decades have led to major changes in the management of this pathology. However, the treatment algorithm remains complex and is composed of a wide variety of options, from active surveillance to surgical treatment. Herein, we propose to review treatment options for VUR in order to help clinicians make the right treatment decision for the right patient.

[Secondary megaureter: A rare complication of Deflux® endoscopic management of vesicoureteral reflux in children]

Endoscopic management is the gold standard for symptomatic low-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children. Deflux^® (hyaluronic acid/dextranomer) injection is highly effective and has very few complications. We report on two cases of secondary megaureter after Deflux^® injections. In the first case, a boy presented with Grade 4 VUR. He received a bilateral Deflux^® injection with a total of three syringes. The postoperative ultrasound was normal. However, a check-up ultrasound 3 years later showed a significant ureteropyelocalyceal dilatation, with stasis and decreased renal function on scintigraphy, the reason why antireflux surgery (Cohen procedure) was performed. In the second case, a girl diagnosed with bilateral VUR at birth received bilateral injections with one syringe on each side at the age of 12 months. One month later, the ultrasound showed a dilation of the distal ureters (diameter of the right ureter, up to 10mm; left ureter, up to 6.7mm). The child underwent surgery 8 months later (Cohen procedure) because of iterative pyelonephritis and persistent ureter dilatation. Only one previous case has been described in the literature. In our experience, this complication has occurred only twice in 452 injections (4‰). In conclusion, endoscopic treatment with hyaluronic acid/dextranomer injection is a minimally invasive procedure that improves the situation in cases of VUR. It has few complications. Other than failure, there is a low risk of secondary expansion requiring, in our opinion, ultrasound verification over the long term.

Subureteral Injection with Small-Size Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer: Is It Really Efficient?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of patients with vesicoureteral reflux, which were treated with subureteral injection of small-size (80–120 μm) dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA). Data of 75 children (105 renal units) who underwent STING procedure with small-size Dx/HA for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in our clinic between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative reflux grade and side, injection indication, postoperative urinary infections and urinary symptoms, voiding cystourethrogram, and renal scintigraphy results were evaluated. The success rate of the procedure was 100% in patients with grades 1 and 2 reflux, 91% in patients with grade 3 reflux, and 82.6% in patients with grade 4. Overall success rate of the treated patients was 97%. Endoscopic subureteric injection with Dx/HA procedure has become a reasonable minimally invasive alternative technique to open surgery, long-term antibiotic prophylaxis, and surveillance modalities in treatment of VUR in terms of easy application, low costs and complication rates, and high success rates. Injection material composed of small-size dextranomer microspheres seems superior to normal size Dx/HA, together with offering similar success with low cost.

Parental Preference Assessment for Vesicoureteral Reflux Management in Children

PURPOSE

Parents of children with vesicoureteral reflux are presented with a variety of management options, which in many cases offer a similar risk-benefit ratio. To facilitate shared decision making, parental preferences regarding vesicoureteral reflux treatment options need to be acknowledged. We aimed to characterize the clinical experience of parents and elicit core themes affecting decision making in regard to managing vesicoureteral reflux in their child.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A semistructured, qualitative interview script was developed and vetted by 25 pediatric urologists to discuss treatment options for vesicoureteral reflux. Additional patient interviews were conducted until new themes failed to arise. Content analysis was performed to extract all statements that described treatment options. Similar statements were combined until a final list of unique themes emerged.

RESULTS

A total of 26 interviews were performed, yielding 689 statements about overall parent experiences with managing vesicoureteral reflux in the child and 450 statements (65%) pertaining to treatment options. Of the 13 themes that emerged, those most commonly considered were the prevention of future urinary tract infections by 85% of parents, the efficacy rate of treatment options by 85%, the burden of daily maintenance or compliance by 77%, antibiotic resistance by 69%, chronic kidney damage by 62% and invasiveness by 58%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes that when choosing a treatment option for vesicoureteral reflux in their child, parent preferences regarding risks and benefits are variable. However, their chief concerns include whether a method decreases the risk of urinary tract infections, has an acceptable efficacy rate and aligns itself with the capabilities of the family. These themes help frame discussions between families and clinicians regarding vesicoureteral reflux management, and they can facilitate shared decision making.

STING versus HIT technique of endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of two endoscopic techniques used for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR): subureteral transurethral injection (STING) and hydrodistension implantation technique (HIT).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Google scholar, and Cochrane databases from 1984 to 2015. Meta-analysis of the selected studies was performed to compare the extent of reflux resolution following both techniques.

RESULTS

Six observational studies met the inclusion criteria for content. These comprised 632 ureters treated by STING and 895 ureters treated by HIT procedure. All included studies utilized dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Deflux) as the bulking agent. The overall resolution of VUR was significantly higher in HIT (82.5%) compared to STING (71.4%) [pooled odds ratio (OR)=0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-0.69; P<0.0001; I²=8%]. A subgroup analysis showed that HIT had better outcomes than STING for both lower grade (I-III) [OR=0.43; 95% CI 0.23-0.82; P=0.01; I²=0%] and high-grade VUR (IV-V) [OR=0.43; 95% CI 0.20-0.91; P=0.03; I²=0%]. However, there was no statistical difference in the requirement of additional injections between STING and HIT groups.

CONCLUSION

HIT is superior to STING technique for resolution of VUR after Deflux injection. However, more randomized trials with longer follow-up are necessary to demonstrate the benefit of HIT compared to STING procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative studies - level III.

Endoscopic treatment of grades IV and V vesicoureteral reflux with two bulking substances: Dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer in children

PURPOSE

We aimed at evaluating the efficacy and complications of two bulking substances: dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer(Dx/Ha;Dexell®) versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer(PPC;Vantris®) in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grades (grades IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux(VUR).

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of high grade VUR (January 2009-August 2015) were retrospectively investigated. Patients with high grade VUR caused by posterior urethral valve, duplex system, paraureteral diverticula and neurogenic bladder were excluded. Classical subureteric injection method (STING) was used. Seventy-three children (45 girls and 28 boys) who had 88 refluxing renal units (RRUs) with grades IV-V VUR (n=64/n=24) underwent endoscopic treatment using Dx/Ha (n=63 RRUs) and PPC (n=25 RRUs).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients in Dx/Ha and PPC groups were 6 (3) and 6 (3.75) year (p=0.81), and volumes of these substances given were 1.3 (1) and 1 (0.5) mL (p=0.003), respectively. Overall, for the first endoscopic injection, success rate of grades IV-V VUR per RRU was 53.9% with Dx/Ha, compared to 80% in PPC-injected group, (p=0.024). Late ureterovesical junction obstruction developed only in one patient in PPC-injected group. No ureteral obstruction was observed in Dx/Ha-injected group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic injection of PPC resulted in significantly higher success rate, compared to Dx/Ha in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grade VUR. However, the development of late ureterovesical junction obstruction should also be taken into account in PPC injection.

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel as a Bulking Agent for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux: Long-Term Results and Safety

PURPOSE

Polyacrylamide hydrogel has been shown to offer good short-term success for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. Our objective was to provide long-term results of its efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study using polyacrylamide hydrogel to treat all grades of vesicoureteral reflux. Every patient underwent endoscopic injection of polyacrylamide hydrogel followed by 3-month postoperative renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram. Renal ultrasound was repeated at 12 and 36 months. Treatment success was defined as the absence of de novo or worsening hydronephrosis and the absence of reflux. Safety elements included new or worsening hydronephrosis, calcifications of the injected material and urinary tract infections.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients (123 refluxing renal units) were assessed. Median age at surgery was 45 months and median followup was 36 months. Median injected volume of hydrogel per refluxing renal unit was 1.0 ml. The overall success rate 3 months after a single injection was 71%. During long-term followup 68 of 70 eligible patients underwent 12-month ultrasound and 40 of 46 underwent 36-month ultrasound. No upper tract deterioration or bulking agent calcifications were reported. Nine (12%) and 2 patients (3%) presented with nonfebrile and febrile urinary tract infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate of polyacrylamide hydrogel for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is comparable to published results of dextranomer hyaluronic acid. The long-term safety data and potential lower cost of polyacrylamide hydrogel provide further support for the use of this nonparticulate bulking agent to treat reflux.