1
|
Use of Biosimilars in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Updated Position Statement of the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68:144-153. [PMID: 30169454 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Biologic therapies have changed the outcome of both adult and pediatric patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). In September 2013, the first biosimilar of infliximab was introduced into the pharmaceutical market. In 2015, a first position paper on the use of biosimilars in pediatric IBD was published by the ESPGHAN IBD Porto group. Since then, more data have accumulated for both adults and children demonstrating biosimilars are an effective and safe alternative to the originator. In this updated position statement, we summarize current evidence and provide joint consensus statements regarding the recommended practice of biosimilar use in children with IBD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW After expiry of the patent of originator anti-tumor necrosis factor drug infliximab (Remicade), CT-P13 was in 2013 the first infliximab biosimilar to be approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for the same indications as the reference drug, including paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The approval was based on extrapolation, after extensive in-vitro studies and clinical experience in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. The extrapolation of CT-P13 to IBD and to paediatric patients raised concerns among paediatric IBD specialists. RECENT FINDINGS Now, almost 4 years later, we can conclude that those concerns have been resolved. There are a growing number of postmarketing studies and real-life data, so far mostly in adults and some in children with IBD. These studies show reassuring comparable efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between CT-P13 and the reference Infliximab. CONCLUSION In Europe, biosimilars are increasingly regularly prescribed drugs in paediatric IBD. Due to their lower cost, treatment expenses have gone down considerably (up to 30% or more in some countries) and patient access has improved. However, additional well designed studies to investigate long term follow-up of biosimilars in children are still needed. In addition, clinical studies addressing pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and optimal use of infliximab (originator as well as biosimilar) are still desirable.
Collapse
|
3
|
Joseph PD, Craig JC, Tong A, Caldwell PHY. Researchers', Regulators', and Sponsors' Views on Pediatric Clinical Trials: A Multinational Study. Pediatrics 2016; 138:peds.2016-1171. [PMID: 27940891 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The last decade has seen dramatic changes in the regulatory landscape to support more trials involving children, but child-specific challenges and inequitable conduct across income regions persist. The goal of this study was to describe the attitudes and opinions of stakeholders toward trials in children, to inform additional strategies to promote more high-quality, relevant pediatric trials across the globe. METHODS Key informant semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders (researchers, regulators, and sponsors) who were purposively sampled from low- to middle-income countries and high-income countries. The transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-five stakeholders from 10 countries were interviewed. Five major themes were identified: addressing pervasive inequities (paucity of safety and efficacy data, knowledge disparities, volatile environment, double standards, contextual relevance, market-driven forces, industry sponsorship bias and prohibitive costs); contending with infrastructural barriers (resource constraints, dearth of pediatric trial expertise, and logistical complexities); navigating complex ethical and regulatory frameworks ("draconian" oversight, ambiguous requirements, exploitation, excessive paternalism and precariousness of coercion versus volunteerism); respecting uniqueness of children (pediatric research paradigms, child-appropriate approaches, and family-centered empowerment); and driving evidence-based child health (advocacy, opportunities, treatment access, best practices, and research prioritization). CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders acknowledge that changes in the regulatory environment have encouraged more trials in children, but they contend that inequities and political, regulatory, and resource barriers continue to exist. Embedding trials as part of routine clinical care, addressing the unique needs of children, and streamlining regulatory approvals were suggested. Stakeholders recommended increasing international collaboration, establishing centralized trials infrastructure, and aligning research to child health priorities to encourage trials that address global child health care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pathma D Joseph
- Centre for Kidney Research and .,The Pharmacy Department, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia; and.,Discipline of Adolescent and Child Health and
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research and.,School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research and.,School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tabor E. Food and Drug Administration Requirements for Clinical Studies in Pediatric Patients. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2015; 49:666-672. [PMID: 30227036 DOI: 10.1177/2168479015596021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Many drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adults lack adequate data on safety and efficacy in pediatric patients, a potential source of unintended harm to pediatric patients. Through a series of laws, regulations, and guidance documents, the US Congress and FDA have created a program both to encourage and mandate clinical studies in pediatric patients to develop evidence-based dosing, safety, and efficacy information. A "Pediatric Study Plan" (PSP) is required for every new drug. FDA provides incentives for the voluntary conduct of clinical trials in pediatric patients, including opportunities for added marketing exclusivity and for obtaining a "priority review voucher." FDA also mandates that clinical studies for new drugs be conducted in each pediatric age group (newborns, infants, children, and adolescents), except in circumstances where a waiver or a deferral of studies can be justified. Sometimes this mandate can be met by extrapolation from studies in adults, or from patients in one pediatric age group to another, for evidence of efficacy. However, separate studies of safety and dosing are usually required for each pediatric age group. The package insert for each new drug now must address the use in pediatric patients. In addition, the FDA website displays all changes in drug labeling related to pediatric patients (excerpted from the labels for easy access), summaries of all pediatric studies that have led to labeling changes, links to FDA medical reviews of pediatric studies, summaries of all pediatric safety issues presented to the FDA Pediatric Advisory Committee (with links to the meeting materials and transcripts), and details of deferred pediatric studies with their timelines and progress. These measures reflect the increasing attention by FDA and the medical community to the importance of clinical studies in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ashish N, Bamman MM, Cerny FJ, Cooper DM, D'Hemecourt P, Eisenmann JC, Ericson D, Fahey J, Falk B, Gabriel D, Kahn MG, Kemper HCG, Leu SY, Liem RI, McMurray R, Nixon PA, Olin JT, Pianosi PT, Purucker M, Radom-Aizik S, Taylor A. The clinical translation gap in child health exercise research: a call for disruptive innovation. Clin Transl Sci 2014; 8:67-76. [PMID: 25109386 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In children, levels of play, physical activity, and fitness are key indicators of health and disease and closely tied to optimal growth and development. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides clinicians with biomarkers of disease and effectiveness of therapy, and researchers with novel insights into fundamental biological mechanisms reflecting an integrated physiological response that is hidden when the child is at rest. Yet the growth of clinical trials utilizing CPET in pediatrics remains stunted despite the current emphasis on preventative medicine and the growing recognition that therapies used in children should be clinically tested in children. There exists a translational gap between basic discovery and clinical application in this essential component of child health. To address this gap, the NIH provided funding through the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program to convene a panel of experts. This report summarizes our major findings and outlines next steps necessary to enhance child health exercise medicine translational research. We present specific plans to bolster data interoperability, improve child health CPET reference values, stimulate formal training in exercise medicine for child health care professionals, and outline innovative approaches through which exercise medicine can become more accessible and advance therapeutics across the broad spectrum of child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Ashish
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lionetti G, Kimura Y, Schanberg LE, Beukelman T, Wallace CA, Ilowite NT, Winsor J, Fox K, Natter M, Sundy JS, Brodsky E, Curtis JR, Del Gaizo V, Iyasu S, Jahreis A, Meeker-O’Connell A, Mittleman BB, Murphy BM, Peterson ED, Raymond SC, Setoguchi S, Siegel JN, Sobel RE, Solomon D, Southwood TR, Vesely R, White PH, Wulffraat NM, Sandborg CI. Using registries to identify adverse events in rheumatic diseases. Pediatrics 2013; 132:e1384-94. [PMID: 24144710 PMCID: PMC3813393 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The proven effectiveness of biologics and other immunomodulatory products in inflammatory rheumatic diseases has resulted in their widespread use as well as reports of potential short- and long-term complications such as infection and malignancy. These complications are especially worrisome in children who often have serial exposures to multiple immunomodulatory products. Post-marketing surveillance of immunomodulatory products in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus is currently based on product-specific registries and passive surveillance, which may not accurately reflect the safety risks for children owing to low numbers, poor long-term retention, and inadequate comparators. In collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), patient and family advocacy groups, biopharmaceutical industry representatives and other stakeholders, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) have developed a novel pharmacosurveillance model (CARRA Consolidated Safety Registry [CoRe]) based on a multicenter longitudinal pediatric rheumatic diseases registry with over 8000 participants. The existing CARRA infrastructure provides access to much larger numbers of subjects than is feasible in single-product registries. Enrollment regardless of medication exposure allows more accurate detection and evaluation of safety signals. Flexibility built into the model allows the addition of specific data elements and safety outcomes, and designation of appropriate disease comparator groups relevant to each product, fulfilling post-marketing requirements and commitments. The proposed model can be applied to other pediatric and adult diseases, potentially transforming the paradigm of pharmacosurveillance in response to the growing public mandate for rigorous post-marketing safety monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldina Lionetti
- Chief, Pediatric Rheumatology, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, 30 Prospect Ave, Hackensack, NJ 07601.
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- Department of Pediatrics, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Laura E. Schanberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Timothy Beukelman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Carol A. Wallace
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Norman T. Ilowite
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York
| | - Jane Winsor
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kathleen Fox
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Marc Natter
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John S. Sundy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric Brodsky
- Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey R. Curtis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Vincent Del Gaizo
- Friends of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey
| | - Solomon Iyasu
- Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Soko Setoguchi
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey N. Siegel
- Friends of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey
| | | | - Daniel Solomon
- Department of Rheumatology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Taunton R. Southwood
- School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Nico M. Wulffraat
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|