Performance of User-Friendly Screening Tools for Elevated Blood Pressure in Children

Height-based equations as screening tools for high blood pressure in pediatric practice, the GENOBOX study

Due to the absence of easily applicable cut‐off points to determine high blood pressure or hypertension in children, as in the adult population, blood pressure is rarely measured in the pediatrician's clinical routine. This has led to an underdiagnosis of high blood pressure or hypertension in children. For this reason, the present study evaluate the utility of five equations for the screening of high blood pressure in children: blood pressure to height ratio, modified blood pressure to height ratio, new modified blood pressure to height ratio, new simple formula and height‐based equations. The authors evaluated 1599 children between 5 and 18 years. The performance of the five equations was analyzed using the receiver‐operating characteristics curves for identifying blood pressure above P90th according to the American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guideline 2017. All equations showed an area under the curve above 0.882. The new modified blood pressure to height ratio revealed a high sensitivity whereas the height‐based equations showed the best performance, with a positive predictive value above 88.2%. Finally, all equations showed higher positive predictive values in children with overweight or obesity. The height‐based equation obtained the highest PPV values above 71.1% in children with normal weight and above 90.2% in children with overweight or obesity. In conclusions, the authors recommend the use of the height‐based equations equation because it showed the best positive predictive values to identify children with elevated blood pressure, independently of their sex, pubertal and weight status.

Increased prevalence of hypertensive-level blood pressure using the American Academy of Pediatrics 2017 guidelines: a cross-sectional study in a primary school in Thailand

Background: In 2017, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) launched a new clinical practice guideline for diagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. The new cut-off values were 2-3 mmHg lower than those of the previous 2004 guidelines. Aims: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the new cut-off values on the prevalence of hypertensive-level blood pressure (BP) in children in a primary school in Bangkok, Thailand. Subjects and methods: BP, weight, height and waist circumference were recorded in 536 school children aged 8-13 years (270 boys, 50.3%) in grades 4-6. For analysis, BP was classified by the two different cut-off values (the 2004 AAP and the 2017 AAP guidelines). Demographic data for the children whose BP was hypertensive according to the 2017 guidelines but not the 2004 guidelines were compared with those of the children with normal BP according to both guidelines. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with hypertensive-level BP. Results: Fifty-eight children (10.8%) had hypertensive-level BP according to the 2017 guidelines but only 37 (6.9%) with the 2004 guidelines. Twenty-one children who would not have had hypertensive-level BP with the 2004 AAP guidelines had greater Z-scores for body mass index and a greater proportion had obesity than the normotensive children. Body mass index was the only independent factor associated with hypertensive-level BP. Conclusions: The prevalence of hypertensive-level BP in children was increased using the 2017 guidelines. Children with hypertensive-level BP using the 2017 AAP guidelines but not the 2004 AAP guidelines had greater BMI Z-scores and a greater proportion were obese than the in the normotensive children. Body mass index was the only independent factor associated with hypertensive-level BP. Abbreviations: AAP: American Academy of Pediatrics; BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; cm: centimeter; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; HT: hypertension; kg: kilograms; m: meter; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; ROC: receiver operating characteristic curve; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SBPHR: systolic blood pressure-to-height ratio; SD: standard deviation; WC: waist circumference; WHR: waist-to-height ratio.

Validation of recommended definition in identifying elevated blood pressure in adolescents

Recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended 120/80 mm Hg as thresholds for identifying elevated blood pressure (BP) in adolescents aged 13-17 years. The authors aimed to compare the performance of the new definition in identifying elevated BP with traditional percentile-based definition. Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2014, which included 7485 adolescents aged 13-17 years. Elevated BP was defined using the recommended (≥120/80 mm Hg) and traditional definition (≥90th percentile for sex, age, and height or 120/80 mm Hg) presented in AAP guideline. The prevalence of elevated BP was 15.7% and 17.2% using the recommended and traditional definition, respectively (P < .001). The recommended definition had high sensitivity (90.9%), perfect specificity (100.0%), perfect positive predictive value (100.0%), and very high negative predictive value (98.1%) compared with the traditional definition. The Kappa correlation coefficient between two definitions was 0.94 (P < .001). Similar results can be observed in subgroups across sex, age, and sex- and age-specific height percentile except for both sexes with young age and low height percentile. Generally, our results supported the use of the recommended definition for identifying elevated BP in adolescents.

A new simple formula built on the American Academy of Pediatrics criteria for the screening of hypertension in overweight/obese children

We evaluated the performance of a new simple formula (NSF) for the screening of hypertension by American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines 2017 (AAPG₂₀₁₇) in children with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). The performance of the NSF and the modified blood pressure to height ratio (MBPHR3) thresholds against AAPG₂₀₁₇ was evaluated; both methods were also compared to assess the association with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (cLVH). The study included 3259 OW/OB children (5-13 years). Two centers served as learning sample (LS) (n = 1428), four centers served as validation sample (VS) (n = 1831), and the echocardiographic evaluation was available in 409 children in VS. The NSF was [1.5 × systolic blood pressure (mmHg) + diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)] - [(26 × height (m)] - age (years). A cut-off of the NSF ≥ 193 mmHg showed sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 0.92, 0.93, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively, versus the standard procedure. Against AAPG₂₀₁₇, the NSF showed higher specificity and positive predictive values than the MBPHR3 thresholds. Among hypertensive children defined by AAPG₂₀₁₇, NSF, or MBPHR3, the odds ratio (95%CI) for cLVH was respectively 1.73 (1.06-2.83), 1.69 (1.05-2.75), and 1.18 (0.75-1.85).Conclusions: The NSF shows a very high performance for the screening of OW/OB children at risk of hypertension and cLVH. What is Known: • The American Academy of Pediatrics released updated guidelines (AAPG 2017) to classify hypertension (HTN) in children. • The process needs categorization of height percentiles and comparison of blood pressure versus gender and age-adjusted values. What is New: • A user-friendly formula built on the AAPG 2017 was validated for the categorization of HTN in children with overweight/obesity. • The formula showed high performance in identifying children with HTN versus the standard procedure (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.93) and similar ability in identifying hypertensive children with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy versus the standard procedure (40% and 39% respectively).