Barriers to Pediatric Health Information Exchange

Provider participation in the Florida Medicaid Promoting Interoperability program: Practice characteristics, meaning use attestations, and incentive payments

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to quantify the rate of provider participation beyond year 1 incentive in the Florida Medicaid Promoting Interoperability (PI) program, formerly the Electronic Health Record Incentive program, and identify the provider and practice characteristics associated with Meaningful Use attestations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2011-2018 records from the PI program, Provider Participation Database. Bivariate associations between Meaningful Use and categorical and ordinal variables were tested using Chi-square and Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square, respectively, with results informing logistic regressions. Adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals are reported.

RESULTS

We found that 42.56 % of Florida Medicaid providers achieved Meaningful Use after receiving first-year incentives. Logistic regression showed that pediatricians represented the largest percentage of providers who achieved Meaningful Use (65.06 %) while dentists had the lowest Meaningful Use (7.78 %). We also found that certain geographic areas and various EHR vendors were associated with higher rates of providers Meaningful Use attestation.

DISCUSSION

Although the PI program successfully influenced the adoption of a basic EHR system, low Meaningful Use attestations have inadvertently created a digital "advanced use" divide among providers who serve large numbers of Medicaid patients. This is concerning because advanced EHR functions are necessary precursors to address unmet socioeconomic needs to reduce health disparities.

CONCLUSION

Florida has distributed over $100 million to Medicaid providers who ultimately did not achieve Meaningful Use after collecting their first-year incentive. Policy interventions that can promote advanced EHR use functions are necessary to optimize technology in low-resourced practice settings where the potential benefits are greater.

Trends in Use of Electronic Health Records in Pediatric Office Settings

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and functionalities of electronic health records (EHRs) and pediatricians' perceptions of EHRs.

STUDY DESIGN

An 8-page self-administered questionnaire sent to 1619 randomly selected nonretired US American Academy of Pediatrics members in 2016 was completed by 709 (43.8%). Responses were compared with surveys in 2009 and 2012.

RESULTS

The percent of pediatricians who were using EHRs increased from 58% in 2009 and 79% in 2012 to 94% in 2016. Those with fully functional EHRs, including pediatric functionality, more than doubled from 8.2% in 2012 to 16.9% in 2016 (P = .01). Fully functional EHRs lacking pediatric functionality increased slightly from 7.8% to 11.1% (P = .3), and the percentage of pediatricians with basic EHRs remained stable (30.4% to 31.0%; P < .3). The percentage of pediatricians who lacked basic EHR functionality or who reported no EHR decreased (from 53.6% to 41.0%; P < .001). On average, pediatricians spent 3.4 hours per day documenting care.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the adoption of EHRs has increased, >80% of pediatricians are working with EHRs that lack optimal functionality and 41% of pediatricians are not using EHRs with even basic functionality. EHRs lacking pediatric functionality impact the health of children through increased medical errors, missed diagnoses, lack of adherence to guidelines, and reduced availability of child-specific information. The pediatric certification outlined in the 21st Century Cures Act may result in improved EHR products for pediatricians.

A Brief Survey on Six Basic and Reduced eHealth Indicators in Seven Countries in 2017

Background  Holistic, ubiquitous support of patient-centered health care (eHealth) at all health care institutions and in patients' homes through information processing is increasingly supplementing institution-centered care. While eHealth indicators may measure the transition from institution-centered (e.g., hospital-centered) information processing to patient-centered information processing, collecting relevant and timely data for such indicators has been difficult.

Objectives  This article aims to design some basic eHealth indicators, which are easily collected and measure how well information processing supports holistic patient-centered health care, and to evaluate penetrance of patient-centered health as measured by the indicators internationally via an expert survey.

Methods  We identified six basic indicators that measure access of health care professionals, patients, and caregivers to the patient's health record data and the ability of providers, patients, and caregivers to add information in the patient's record. In a survey of international informatics experts, these indicators' penetrance were evaluated for Austria, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, South Korea, Sweden, and the United States in the summer of 2017.

Results  The eHealth status measured by the indicators varied significantly between these seven countries. In Finland, most practices measured by the indicators were fully implemented whereas in Germany only one practice was partially realized.

Conclusion  Progress in the implementation of practices that support patient-centered care could mainly be observed in those countries where the “political will” focused on achieving patient-centered care as opposed to an emphasis on institution-centered care. The six eHealth indicators seem to be useful for measuring national progress in patient-centered care. Future work will extend the number of countries analyzed.

Consensus Statement: Feature and Function Recommendations to Optimize Clinician Usability of Direct Interoperability to Enhance Patient Care

Background  Secure clinical messaging and document exchange utilizing the Direct Protocol (Direct interoperability) has been widely implemented in health information technology (HIT) applications including electronic health records (EHRs) and by health care providers and organizations in the United States. While Direct interoperability has allowed clinicians and institutions to satisfy regulatory requirements and has facilitated communication and electronic data exchange as patients transition across care environments, feature and function enhancements to HIT implementations of the Direct Protocol are required to optimize the use of this technology.

Objective  To describe and address this gap, we developed a prioritized list of recommended features and functions desired by clinicians to utilize Direct interoperability for improved quality, safety, and efficiency of patient care. This consensus statement is intended to inform policy makers and HIT vendors to encourage further development and implementation of system capabilities to improve clinical care.

Methods  An ad hoc group of interested clinicians came together under the auspices of DirectTrust to address challenges of usability and create a consensus recommendation. This group drafted a list of desired features and functions that was published online. Comments were solicited from interested parties including clinicians, EHR and other HIT vendors, and trade organizations. Resultant comments were collected, reviewed by the authors, and incorporated into the final recommendations.

Results  This consensus statement contains a list of 57 clinically desirable features and functions categorized and prioritized for support by policy makers, development by HIT vendors, and implementation and use by clinicians.

Conclusion  Fully featured, standardized implementation of Direct interoperability will allow clinicians to utilize Direct messaging more effectively as a component of HIT and EHR interoperability to improve care transitions and coordination.