Outcomes of Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Role of conservative management of acute appendicitis in pediatric age: a monocentric experience

Historically, appendectomy was the standard treatment for acute appendicitis (AA). Recently, interest has grown in conservative management of uncomplicated AA (UA). This study compared outcomes between non-operative management (NOM) and appendectomy, exploring preoperative factors to guide optimal UA management. In a monocentric retrospective study, we reviewed data on 774 pediatric patients with a primary diagnosis of AA from July 2017 to July 2022. We analyzed demographic, clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound data at first and last admission. Operated patients were stratified by management type and surgery timing. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. Of the 530 children (68.5%) who underwent surgery at first admission, 316 had UA and 214 had CA. The 244 patients (31.5%) not indicated for surgery received intravenous antibiotics. Of these, 104 underwent appendectomy at second admission, with 9 presenting CA, requiring multiple antibiotic therapy and a hospital stay of 9.1 ± 3.1 days. Twenty-eight underwent surgery at their third admission and 112 never underwent surgery. In conclusion, more invasive approach may be preferable for patients with significant clinical signs at first presentation, minimizing hospital stay, costs, antibiotic use, and complications. Further studies on NOM in acute appendicitis are essential to optimize its use.

Conservative Management of Pediatric Patients With Appendicolith Appendicitis Versus Non-appendicolith Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Up to one-third of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis present with radiological evidence of appendicoliths. However, whether appendicolith presence influences prognosis under conservative management compared to non-appendicolith appendicitis remains uncertain.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing pediatric appendicolith and non-appendicolith appendicitis managed conservatively with antibiotics, fluids, and percutaneous drainage. Outcomes included the initial success of conservative management and recurrence rates. A random-effects model was applied for all analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve observational studies with 814 patients were included. Of these, 282 (35 %) had appendicoliths, and 532 (65 %) did not. The average age ranged from 2 to 11 years, with follow-up between 1 week and 2 years. Overall, there is no significant difference in the initial success of conservative management was observed between the two groups (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.28-1.78; p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis revealed lower success rates for appendicolith-associated simple appendicitis (OR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.21-0.84; p = 0.01), but no difference in complicated appendicitis (OR 1.01; 95 % CI 0.24-4.31; p = 0.99). Recurrence rates were significantly higher in appendicolith appendicitis across both groups (OR 2.75; 95 % CI 1.05-7.20; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Appendicolith presence reduces conservative management success in simple appendicitis, supporting early appendectomy. Although appendicoliths do not predict treatment failure in complicated appendicitis, interval appendectomy may be advisable due to the higher recurrence risk in both groups.

TYPE OF STUDY

Meta-analysis and systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Compare the Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Non-operative Management With Early Operative Management of Simple Appendicitis in Children After the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management (NOM) of simple appendicitis is becoming an increasingly researched treatment option. This systematic review aims to describe the short and long-term failure rates of NOM and the complication rate of appendicectomy in children with simple appendicitis.

METHODS

The systematic review was registered a priori (CRD42022322149). Study inclusion criteria are: participants aged ≤ 18 years of age; groups undergoing both NOM and appendicectomy for simple appendicitis; outcomes including one or more of: NOM failure rate at 30 days or 1 year and beyond; study design: RCT or case control study. Four databases were searched and 3 reviewers determined study eligibility and data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis was performed using Stata.

RESULTS

The database search identified 2731 articles, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria; 4 RCTs and 10 case controlled studies. All studies had moderate-serious risk of bias. There were no deaths in either group in any study. Meta-analysis demonstrated a 30 day failure rate of 20 % (95 % CI 11-29 %) and 11 studies reported failure rate at 1 year or beyond at 32 % (95 % CI 25-38 %). Rates of significant complications of appendicectomy was 1 % (95 % CI 0-1 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-operative management of simple appendicitis in children is safe, with moderate early success. The failure rate increases over time, resulting in eventual appendicectomy in a third of the children diagnosed with appendicitis. These data will enable clinicians to have an informed discussion with children and their parents about their treatment options for simple appendicitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

SAGES guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is an extremely common disease with a variety of medical and surgical treatment approaches. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and patients in decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted from 2010 to 2022 to answer 8 key questions relating to the diagnosis of appendicitis, operative or nonoperative management, and specific technical and post-operative issues for appendectomy. The results of this systematic review were then presented to a panel of adult and pediatric surgeons. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts.

RESULTS

Conditional recommendations were made in favor of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis being managed operatively, either delayed (>12h) or immediate operation (<12h), either suction and lavage or suction alone, no routine drain placement, treatment with short-term antibiotics postoperatively for complicated appendicitis, and complicated appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively undergoing interval appendectomy. A conditional recommendation signals that the benefits of adhering to a recommendation probably outweigh the harms although it does also indicate uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to current controversies in appendicitis. The panel also highlighted future research opportunities where the evidence base can be strengthened.

Appendicitis in Children

The management of pediatric appendicitis continues to advance with the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms and a recent shift toward patient-centered treatment approaches. Further research should focus on development of standardized institution-specific diagnostic algorithms to minimize rates of missed diagnosis and appendiceal perforation and refinement of evidence-based clinical treatment pathways that reduce complication rates and minimize health care resource utilization.

Acute appendicitis in children: Reexamining indications for conservative treatment - A large prospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Conservative antibiotic treatment (CAT) for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AUA) in children has been proven safe and efficacious. However, as data accumulate, high rates of recurrent appendicitis and subsequent appendectomy have been reported. This prospective longitudinal study evaluated risk-factors for recurrent AUA after CAT in a large cohort, with long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children ages 5 to 16 years admitted to the Department of Pediatric Surgery from 2014 through 2018, diagnosed with AUA were eligible for CAT. We recorded their age, appendix outer diameter, white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein and other related signs and symptoms associated with AUA. Clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up was carried out until follow-up data collection ceased according to the study design (2014-2019).

RESULTS

The cohort included 646 children who were initially treated successfully with CAT. Among them, 180 (28%) were readmitted for recurrent acute appendicitis during the follow-up period and 138 (21%) eventually had appendectomy. Overall success of 79% for CAT was recorded in this cohort. A multivariable model including; age, sex, appendiceal diameter, WBC and CRP, found the factors of older age, larger outer appendiceal diameter and high WBC counts significantly related to appendectomy during the follow-up period. We offer a decision tree model to predict appendectomy probabilities for patients based on their prognostic measurements.

CONCLUSION

CAT in AUA in children should consider older age, larger outer appendiceal diameter and high WBC counts as risk-factors for recurrent AUA and subsequent appendectomy. The proposed decision tree model may help both clinicians and parents before CAT is chosen.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

New Criteria Could Improve the Success Rate of Non-operative Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children

Background: Most studies addressing non-operative management for acute appendicitis have focused on adults, and there are limited data available for children. We aimed to evaluate the results of successful non-operative management in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis with our “additional criteria” and find which factors could be affecting the success rate and which cases could be candidates for non-operative management.

Materials and methods: A total of 54 patients who were diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and received non-operative management were re-evaluated retrospectively. Defining uncomplicated appendicitis was based on the duration of symptoms (<24 hours), clinical history, and radiologic findings. The radiologic evaluation was based on ultrasonography and computed tomography. The patients received an intravenous antibiotic combination (sulbactam/ampicillin, gentamicin, clindamycin) for five days at the hospital; the treatment was completed after 10 days with an oral antibiotic combination (amoxicillin/clavulanate, metronidazole). The cases have a follow-up period of up to two years.

Results: The mean patient age and follow-up time were 13.0 ± 4 years and 41.6 ± 13 months, respectively. The mean leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and appendix diameter values were 15.48 ± 6.4 × 109/L, 11.79 ± 24.5 mg/dL, and 7.76 ± 1.4 mm on admission, and 6.86 ± 12.4 × 109/L, 4.17 ± 10.3 mg/dL, and 5.82 ± 1.6 mm on the second day, respectively. This decrease in WBC/CRP values and appendix diameter was statistically significant (p < 0.001). None of the patients had an early failure, complication, or adverse event. Recurrent appendicitis occurred in only five cases (9%) that were treated by laparoscopic appendectomy during the follow-up.

Conclusion: Non-operative management for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children regarding long-term outcomes with our criteria was satisfactory and initial success rates were excellent.

Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Several studies have revealed the success of nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Large studies of current NOM utilization and its outcomes in children are lacking.

METHODS

We queried the Pediatric Health Information System database to identify children <19 years of age with a diagnosis code for appendicitis. We used linear trend analysis to assess the subsequent utilization and outcomes of NOM in children with nonperforated appendicitis over time. We calculated the proportion of children experiencing treatment failure, defined as either a subsequent appendectomy or hospitalization with a diagnosis code of perforated appendicitis.

RESULTS

We identified 117 705 children with appendicitis over the 9-year study period. Of the 73 544 children with nonperforated appendicitis, 10 394 (14.1%) underwent NOM. The odds of NOM significantly increased (odds ratio 1.10 per study quarter, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.15). The 1-year and 5-year failure rates were 18.6% and 23.3%, respectively. Children who experienced failure of NOM had higher rates of perforation at the time of failure than did the general cohort at the time of initial presentation (45.7% vs 37.5%, P < .001). Patients undergoing NOM had higher rates of subsequent related emergency department visits (8.0% vs 5.1%, P < .001) and hospitalizations (4.2% vs 1.4%, P < .001) over a 12-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

NOM of nonperforated appendicitis in children is increasing. Although the majority of children who undergo NOM remain recurrence-free years later, they carry a substantial risk of perforation at the time of recurrence and may experience a higher rate of postoperative complications than children undergoing an immediate appendectomy.

Diagnosing and managing acute abdominal pain in children

ABSTRACT

Acute abdominal pain is a common complaint in children. The care of these patients is challenging for clinicians because presentation, diagnosis, and treatment are different in children than adults. This article describes the presentation, physical examination, diagnosis, and treatment of common causes of acute abdominal pain in children and discusses emerging trends in diagnosis and treatment.

Economic Trends of Racial Disparities in Pediatric Postappendectomy Complications

BACKGROUND

Despite unparalleled advances in perioperative medicine, surgical outcomes remain poor for racial minority patients relative to their white counterparts. Little is known about the excess costs to the health care system related to these disparities.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2001 and 2018. We included children younger than 18 years admitted with appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy during their hospital stay. We examined the inflation-adjusted hospital costs attributable to the racial disparities in surgical complications and perforation status, focusing on differences between non-Hispanic white patients and non-Hispanic Black patients.

RESULTS

We included 100 639 children who underwent appendectomy, of whom 89.9% were non-Hispanic white and 10.1% were non-Hispanic Black. Irrespective of perforation status at presentation, surgical complications were consistently higher for Black compared with white children, with no evidence of narrowing of the racial disparity gap over time. Black children consistently incurred higher hospital costs (median difference: $629 [95% confidence interval: $500-$758; P < .01). The total inflation-adjusted hospital costs for Black children were $518 658 984, and $59 372 044 (11.41%) represented the excess because of the racial disparities in perforation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all patients had a progressive decline in post appendectomy complications, Black children consistently had higher rates of complications and perforation, imposing a significant economic burden. We provide an empirical economic argument for sustained efforts to reduce racial disparities in pediatric surgical outcomes, notwithstanding that eliminating these disparities is simply the right thing to do.

A Systematic Review Comparing Nonoperative Management to Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children

More than a century after its introduction, appendectomy has remained the gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis. In adults with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, nonoperative management (NOM) has been shown to be a viable treatment option. To date, there has been relatively limited data on the nonoperative management of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the available literature in the pediatric population and compare the efficacy and recurrence between initial nonoperative treatment strategy and appendectomy in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. In July 2021, we conducted systematic searches of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. We only included full-text comparative original studies published within the last decade, and we excluded articles that solely examined NOM without comparing it to appendectomy. Two writers worked independently on the data collection and analysis. It was found that NOM had a high initial success rate and a low rate of recurrent appendicitis. After months of follow-up, the vast majority of patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis who received initial nonoperative treatment did not require surgical intervention. Furthermore, the rate of complication was comparable in both treatment groups, and NOM did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of complications. The most significant drawback stemmed from the fact that the included articles in this study had a wide range of study designs and inclusion criteria. According to current evidence, NOM is feasible and cost-effective. Antibiotic therapy can be given safely in a small subset of individuals with uncomplicated appendicitis. To optimize outcomes, physicians should evaluate the clinical presentation and the patient's desire when selecting those to be managed nonoperatively. Again, more research, preferably large randomized trials, is required to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of NOM with appendicectomy. Finally, additional research is required to establish the characteristics of patients who are the best candidates for nonoperative treatment.

Non-operative treatment versus appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: A randomized controlled trial

Objectives:

To compare the outcome of non-operative treatment (NOT) with antibiotics versus surgical management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children.

Methods:

This randomized clinical trial (NCT 04030741) was carried out in Pediatric Surgery Department, Mayo Hospital from September 2018 to September 2019. Total sample size was 180, and after informed consent patients were randomly allocated in two groups. All children between 5 and 15 years of age and having pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) >7 were included. Patients with previous abdominal surgery, peritonitis, appendicular mass, or intra-abdominal abscess were excluded. Children in NOT group (Group A) were given intravenous Meropenem and Metronidazole for 48 hours and after starting oral, antibiotics were continued orally for 7 days. In Group B, children underwent appendectomy. Failure of NOT was labeled if there was abscess formation or peri-appendiceal fluid collection on ultrasound, development of peritonitis or recurrence of appendicitis.

Results:

In Group A, mean age was 9.56±1.8 years and in Group B 10.11±1.8 years. There were 123 male and 57 female patients. Group B had 100% successful outcome. NOT (Group A) had successful outcome in 75 patients (83.3%) and failure was noted in 15 (16.7%). Five needed operation within 48 hours, all had appendicolith, and 10 patients presented within 6 months. Raised total leukocyte count (p value < 0.0001) and C reactive protein (p value < 0.04) levels were noted with failure of NOT.

Conclusions:

In this study, success of NOT was 84% so a trial of NOT in cases of uncomplicated appendicitis should be considered in children.

Defining treatment strategy for uncomplicated appendicitis based on patient satisfaction feedback: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Two surgical strategies are available for appendicitis: emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and interval laparoscopic appendectomy. However, timing of surgical intervention remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and interval laparoscopic appendectomy and conduct a questionnaire survey to investigate the use of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and patient satisfaction with regard to treatment.

METHODS

We included 162 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our hospital. Outcomes were assessed by operation time, blood loss, postoperative fasting time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate. Patient satisfaction was measured by questionnaire addressing degree of satisfaction, presurgery anxiety, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 162 patients, 74 (46%) and 88 (54%) received emergency and interval laparoscopic appendectomy, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rate. Among 66 patients who responded to the questionnaire (28 emergency, 38 interval), a significant difference was observed only in the degree of satisfaction regarding the timing of the surgical intervention (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes of emergency and interval appendectomy were equivalent; however, patient satisfaction favored emergency appendectomy, suggesting it is a preferable approach for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis.

Management of Acute Appendicitis during COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Acute appendicitis is the most common reason for abdominal surgery in children. Though appendectomy considered the gold standard there are a lot of complications related to it. Conservative management of acute appendicitis is not new to medical science. In pandemic like COVID-19 when all the health systems were about to shut-down because of lack of manpower and resources, we started a trial of non-operative management. The main aim of this study is to find out the management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care centre. Data collection was done from the record section which included the patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis from February 2020 to July 2020 after obtaining ethical clearance from Institutional Review Committee. Cases of appendicular lump, appendicular abscess, appendicular perforations have been excluded. Data was collected and entry was done in Statistical Package for the Social Science software version 20, point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data.

RESULTS

The conservative management of acute appendicitis was done in 44 cases (55.7%) while 35 cases (44.3%) had to undergo appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 can complicate the perioperative course as a result of direct lung injury and multiple organ dysfunctions and can also bring serious threats to the safety of medical staffs involved in managing the acute appendicitis case operatively, so conservative management can be considered as an alternative way of management of acute appendicitis in the pandemic outbreak.

Predictive Value of Alvarado Score and Pediatric Appendicitis Score in the Success of Nonoperative Management for Simple Acute Appendicitis in Children

INTRODUCTION

 During the past decade, nonoperative management (NOM) for simple acute appendicitis (SAA) in children has been proven safe with noninferior complications rate. The aim of this study was to examine Alvarado score and pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) together with other factors in predicting failure of NOM in children presenting with SAA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Patients aged 5 to 18 years admitted to our department between 2017 and 2019 diagnosed with SAA were given a choice between surgical management and NOM. We divided the NOM patients into two groups: successful treatment and failed NOM, comparing their files for Alvarado score and PAS and other clinical and demographic factors, with a mean follow-up of 7 months. Failure was determined as need for appendectomy following conservative treatment due to any reason.

RESULTS

 A total of 85 patients answered criteria and chose NOM. Overall failure rate was 32.9%. We found no difference in the mean Alvarado score and PAS as well as in each component of both scores between success and failed NOM groups. However, when using the risk classification of the scores, we found a significant correlation between high-risk Alvarado score and failed NOM. After adjusting for age, gender, duration of symptoms, diagnosis of tip appendicitis, and presence of appendicolith, the odds of failure were four times higher among high-risk Alvarado group.

CONCLUSION

 Alvarado score of 7 or higher, older age, and diagnosis of an appendicolith on imaging are possible predictors for failure of NOM for SAA in children.

Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT

BACKGROUND

Although non-operative treatment is known to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children, randomised trial data comparing important outcomes of non-operative treatment with those of appendicectomy are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway with appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

DESIGN

This was a mixed-methods study, which included a feasibility randomised controlled trial, embedded and parallel qualitative and survey studies, a parallel health economic feasibility study and the development of a core outcome set.

SETTING

This study was set in three specialist NHS paediatric surgical units in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Children (aged 4-15 years) clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis participated in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. Children, their families, recruiting clinicians and other health-care professionals involved in caring for children with appendicitis took part in the qualitative study. UK specialist paediatric surgeons took part in the survey. Specialist paediatric surgeons, adult general surgeons who treat children, and children and young people who previously had appendicitis, along with their families, took part in the development of the core outcome set.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants in the feasibility randomised controlled trial were randomised to a non-operative treatment pathway (broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation) or appendicectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited to the feasibility trial.

DATA SOURCES

Data were sourced from NHS case notes, questionnaire responses, transcribed audio-recordings of recruitment discussions and qualitative interviews.

RESULTS

Overall, 50% (95% confidence interval 40% to 59%) of 115 eligible patients approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. There was high acceptance of randomisation and good adherence to trial procedures and follow-up (follow-up rates of 89%, 85% and 85% at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, respectively). More participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated. Qualitative work enabled us to communicate about the trial effectively with patients and families, to design and deliver bespoke training to optimise recruitment and to understand how to optimise the design and delivery of a future trial. The health economic study indicated that the main cost drivers are the ward stay cost and the cost of the operation; it has also informed quality-of-life assessment methods for future work. A core outcome set for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people was developed, containing 14 outcomes. There is adequate surgeon interest to justify proceeding to an effectiveness trial, with 51% of those surveyed expressing a willingness to recruit with an unchanged trial protocol.

LIMITATIONS

Because the feasibility randomised controlled trial was performed in only three centres, successful recruitment across a larger number of sites cannot be guaranteed. However, the qualitative work has informed a bespoke training package to facilitate this. Although survey results suggest adequate clinician interest to make a larger trial possible, actual participation may differ, and equipoise may have changed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

A future effectiveness trial is feasible, following limited additional preparation, to establish appropriate outcome measures and case identification. It is recommended to include a limited package of qualitative work to optimise recruitment, in particular at new centres.

FUTURE WORK

Prior to proceeding to an effectiveness trial, there is a need to develop a robust method for distinguishing children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from those with more advanced appendicitis, and to reach agreement on a primary outcome measure and effect size that is acceptable to all stakeholder groups involved.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15830435.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an emerging endoscopic treatment modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) supported by several case series. However, to date, systematic studies have not been conducted in children and the prospective comparative data are lacking. Moreover, due to a concern for future malignancy risk in children from ionizing radiation, we used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) instead of endoscopic retrograde appendiceal radiography (ERAR). Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized control clinical trial to compare the modified ERAT (mERAT) to antibiotic therapy in children with AUA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility and of mERAT in the treatment of hospitalized children with AUA.

METHODS

Children with AUA, confirmed by ultrasonography and or abdominal computed tomography, were consecutively enrolled from October 2018 to February, 2020. They were randomly assigned to receive mERAT or routine antibiotic treatment. Patients were followed until May, 2020. Th primary outcome variable was the duration of relief of the abdominal pain after treatment. We collected patient's demographics, ultrasonic imaging findings, colonoscopy findings, and treatment outcomes of the mERAT and adverse even associated with mERAT.

RESULTS

A total of 83 children were enrolled. 36 were randomized to mERAT and 47 to antibiotics treatment. All children in the mERAT group had endoscopic confirmed acute uncomplicated appendicitis, and there were no significant complications. However, 9 of patients in antibiotic group were poor responsive to treatment and switched to mERAT. The overall success rate of treatment with mERAT (100%) was significantly higher than that of antibiotics (80.9%) (P = 0.004). The median time to discharge was significantly shorter in mERAT group than in antibiotics treatment group [6.0 ± 1.76 days] (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

mERAT provide a new alternative therapeutic option for childhood with AUA, especially for families who are reluctant to undergo an appendectomy.

Appendectomy or Not? An Update on the Evidence for Antibiotics Only Versus Surgery for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Children

Appendicitis is a common diagnosis in children being evaluated in the emergency department. After diagnosis, standard treatment has been surgical appendectomy; however, in recent years there is a growing body of evidence evaluating the possibility of nonoperative management in both children and adults. This review will present the current state of the pediatric literature that suggests patients may be successfully treated with antibiotics alone (ie, without surgery), but that a proportion of these patients will have recurrent appendicitis. Given that the literature regarding the option of antibiotic-only management compared with surgery is not yet definitive, there are many factors for providers to discuss with families and patients when considering treatment for acute appendicitis.

Nonoperative treatment for nonperforated appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Nonoperative treatment of nonperforated acute appendicitis in children is an alternative to appendectomy. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the outcomes of nonoperative treatment of nonperforated acute appendicitis in children in the literature. Databases were searched to identify abstracts, using predefined search terms. The abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers and articles were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by the two reviewers and analyzed. The literature search yielded 2743 abstracts. Twenty-one articles were selected for analysis. The study design was heterogenous, with only one randomized controlled study. The symptoms resolved in 92% [95% CI (88; 96)] of the nonoperatively treated patients. Meta-analysis showed that an additional 16% (95% CI 10; 22) of patients underwent appendectomy after discharge from initial hospital stay. Complications and length of hospital stay was not different among patients treated with antibiotics compared with those who underwent appendectomy. Nonoperative treatment of nonperforated acute appendicitis children is safe and efficient. There is a lack of large randomized controlled trials to compare outcomes of nonoperative treatment with appendectomy.

Perforation in pediatric non-complicated appendicitis treated by antibiotics: the real incidence

PURPOSE

The incidence of perforation during antibiotic therapy (AT) of children triaged as non-complicated acute appendicitis (NC-Ap) was investigated.

METHODS

Abdominal ultrasonography (US) and/or computed tomography (CT) scans from cases of perforation identified at appendectomy for failed AT were reassessed blindly by a panel of board-certified specialists for any evidence of pre-AT morbidity suggestive of perforation.

RESULTS

Of 521 cases triaged as NC-Ap, symptoms resolved with AT in 452 cases (86.8%). All 69/521 (13.2%) cases with persistent symptoms had urgent appendectomy, and 12/521 (2.3%) were found to have perforated. Blind reassessment of US and/or CT scans from these cases identified seven with evidence of perforation when they were triaged as NC-Ap. Thus, the actual incidence of perforation during AT for NC-Ap was actually 12-7 = 5/521 (0.95%).

CONCLUSIONS

Perforation is generally believed to be a complication of AT, but inappropriate triaging of cases for AT can bias results by artificially inflating the number of perforations, in this study, by more than double. We are the first to assess the unbiased incidence of perforation during AT for NC-Ap, by reassessing pre-AT US and/or CT scans. The incidence of perforation during AT is actually negligible.

Comparison of conservative treatment with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis: a meta-analysis

Aim: We aimed to compare conservative treatment with surgery for uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis to estimate effectiveness and safety. Methods: Data recorded until September 2018 were searched, and relevant academic articles from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and other libraries were selected. STATA version 13.0 (Stata Corporation, TX, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results: We identified nine eligible papers. The study reported a significant difference in the success rate of treatment in 1 month and in 1 year, and no difference in the incidence of complications. The patients with fecaliths showed low treatment efficacy in conservative treatment group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Standardized conservative treatment as inpatients for pediatric appendicitis is safe and feasible. Appendectomy was the better choice for patients with fecaliths.

Pus Samples in Complicated Appendicitis: An Important Investigation or a Waste of Resources: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:

Appendicitis is a common presentation to hospital with appendectomy being the treatment of choice. Pre-operative administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is common, but obtaining intra-abdominal pus samples is not. After an initial 6-month retrospective audit and departmental teaching on the importance of intra-peritoneal pus sampling, we aimed to determine whether intra-operative pus samples changed antibiotic management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Following the initial audit cycle, a 6-month prospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data were collected on a predetermined proforma to assess the effectiveness of the intervention and antibiotic prescribing practice. The data collected during the whole 1-year period was analyzed.

RESULTS:

During the 1-year period, 440 patients were identified as undergoing a laparoscopic procedure. After exclusion, 261 patients were identified as undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies, of which 141 (54%) were classified as complicated laparoscopic appendectomies. A total of 35 out of 141 (25%) pus samples were sent of which 24 (17%) resulted in positive cultures, with only nine of these positive cultures reported prior to the patient being discharged. No patient had their antibiotic regimen changed as a result of the culture results. There were three cases of cultures resistant to local antibiotics, but without significant clinical outcome. One of these patients developed a post-operative complication, but the antibiotic regimen was changed to broad spectrum rather than a specific antibiotic based on culture sensitivity. Of the 141 patients with complicated laparoscopic appendectomies, five (3.5%) developed post-operative complications: one readmission requiring a laparoscopic washout for pelvic collection, three (2%) cases of pelvic collections managed conservatively, and one case of prolonged paralytic ileus managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSION:

Overall, none of the patients with positive cultures had a change in prescribed antibiotics based on culture results. Hence, the routine practice of intra-peritoneal pus sampling following complicated appendicitis remains of little clinical value.

Operative versus non-operative therapy for acute phlegmon of the appendix: Is it safer? A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There is no clear standardized approach to complicated appendicitis associated with abscess or phlegmon, with treatment varying from immediate appendectomy versus non-operative management with antibiotics and possible interval appendectomy. This case report reviews a presentation of complicated appendicitis failing non-operative therapy and reviews the literature on complicated appendicitis.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 19 year-old male presented with right lower quadrant pain, leukocytosis, and fever. He had been seen at an outside hospital, diagnosed with complicated appendicitis, treated non-operatively, and discharged on antibiotics. CT confirmed persistent complicated appendicitis; he was again treated non-operatively with resolution of symptoms. He was discharged but returned with recurrent pain/leukocytosis. The patient was determined to have failed non-operative management, underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Post-operatively he improved was doing well in follow up.

DISCUSSION

Historically, the therapy for acute appendicitis has been surgical. However, immediate surgical management of complicated appendicitis is often associated with increased complications. Non-operative management with antibiotics and interval appendectomy in cases of complicated appendicitis is an option. Literature shows that non-operative management of complicated appendicitis is not entirely innocuous. Non-operative management carries a significant failure rate. Patients that undergo immediate appendectomy may have a better health-related quality of life. Non-operative management of complicated appendicitis may lead to worse outcomes and higher healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management of complicated appendicitis has significant failure rates, increased healthcare costs, and perhaps increased morbidity when compared to immediate surgical management. Immediate surgical management of complicated appendicitis remains the gold standard and should be used in most patients.

Non-operative management of appendicitis in children

While appendicectomy has been considered the mainstay of treatment for children with acute appendicitis for many decades, there has been a great deal of recent interest in non-operative treatment (NOT) with antibiotics alone. Initial results suggest that many children with appendicitis can indeed be safely treated with NOT and can be spared the surgeon's knife. Many as yet unanswered questions remain, however, before NOT can be considered a realistic and reliable alternative to surgery. This review summaries current knowledge and understanding of the role of NOT in children with appendicitis and outlines and discusses the outstanding knowledge gaps.

Biomarkers to estimate the probability of complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND

The conventional paradigm that all children with appendicitis require an appendectomy is being challenged by the idea that some patients may be successfully managed non-operatively. The study aimed to determine if matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs) are candidate biomarkers for estimating the probability of complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The study was a single-institution, prospective cohort study. MMP and TIMP serum protein concentrations were measured in patients with suspected appendicitis. Three hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled with appendicitis. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to determine the combination of candidate biomarkers that best predicted complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

The CART-generated decision tree for the derivation cohort included WBC count, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, TIMP-2, and TIMP-4 and had the following test characteristics for estimating the probability of complicated appendicitis (95% CI): AUC 0.86 (0.81-0.90); sensitivity 91% (83-96); specificity 61% (53-68); positive predictive value 58% (50-66); negative predictive value 92% (84-96); positive likelihood ratio (LR) 2.3 (1.9-2.8); and negative LR 0.15 (0.08-0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

MMPs and TIMPs have the potential to serve as biomarkers to estimate the probability of complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients. The multi-biomarker-based decision tree has test characteristics suggesting clinical utility for decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II: Study of Diagnostic Test.