1
|
Anderson C, Iampieri A, Franklin L, Daniels A, Diehl K, Law JK. Re-Consenting Pediatric Research Participants as Legal Adulthood Approaches: Lessons from the SPARK Autism Study. J Autism Dev Disord 2024; 54:18-32. [PMID: 36323994 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05774-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
To explore issues surrounding re-consenting youth in longitudinal studies as they reach legal adulthood interviews were conducted with 46 parents plus 13 autistic teens enrolled in the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge (SPARK) study. Qualitative analysis focused on family sensitivities regarding guardianship decisions, transition concerns, and the re-consenting process. Questions regarding guardianship were difficult for parents unsure of a teen's future status. Mothers were key facilitators of re-consenting for soon-to-be-independent teens. As legal adulthood approached, parents were willing to assist teens with re-consenting but needed support, asking for multiple contacts, transition resources, and explanatory materials from the research team. Most teens were not cognizant of SPARK but willing to continue participation once made aware.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connie Anderson
- Department of Health Sciences, Towson University, 8000 York Road - CHP Dean's Office, Towson, MD, 21252, USA.
| | - Alan Iampieri
- Department of Health Sciences, Towson University, 8000 York Road - CHP Dean's Office, Towson, MD, 21252, USA
| | - Leah Franklin
- Department of Health Sciences, Towson University, 8000 York Road - CHP Dean's Office, Towson, MD, 21252, USA
| | - Amy Daniels
- Simons Foundation, 160 5th Avenue, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | | | - J Kiely Law
- Simons Foundation, 160 5th Avenue, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gutierrez AM, Robinson JO, Raesz-Martinez R, Canfield I, Majumder MA, Scollon S, Desrosiers LR, Hsu RL, Allen-Rhoades W, Parsons DW, Plon SE, McGuire AL, Malek J. Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:773-781. [PMID: 36595372 PMCID: PMC10611971 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: With increased use of genomic testing in cancer research and clinical care, it is important to understand the perspectives and decision-making preferences of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and their treating oncologists. Methods: We conducted an interview substudy of the BASIC3 Study, which enrolled newly diagnosed cancer patients <18 years of age with assent. Of 32 young adults (YAs) with cancer who reached the age of majority (AOM; 18 years) while on study, 12 were successfully approached and all consented to study continuation at AOM. Of those, seven completed an interview. Patients' oncologists, who enrolled and participated in return of clinical genomic results, were also interviewed (n = 12). Interviews were transcribed, deidentified, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: YAs cited the possibility of helping others and advancing science as major reasons for their assent to initial study enrollment and their willingness to consent at AOM. YAs thought obtaining informed consent from research participants for study continuation at AOM was a good idea in case they changed their minds or wanted to make their own decisions, and to keep them aware of study activities. There was diversity in what YAs understood and learned from genomic testing: some recalled specific findings, while some remembered minimal information about their results. Oncologists varied in their assessment of adolescents' engagement with the study and understanding of their results. Conclusion: Given the different ways AYAs engage with genomic information, careful assessment of AYAs' diverse communication and decision-making preferences is needed to tailor interactions accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M. Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill O. Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robin Raesz-Martinez
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel Canfield
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary A. Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren R. Desrosiers
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wendy Allen-Rhoades
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D. Williams Parsons
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sharon E. Plon
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kasperbauer TJ, Halverson C. Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:686264. [PMID: 34307413 PMCID: PMC8301072 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Research biobanks that enroll minors face important practical, ethical, and regulatory challenges in reconsenting participants when they reach the age of 18. Federal regulations governing research in the United States provide minimal guidance and allow for a range of practices, including waiving the requirement to obtain reconsent. Some commentators have argued that institutional review boards should indeed grant such waivers, given the low risks of biobank-based research and the impracticality of contacting all participants when they turn 18. There is also significant ethical debate about the age at which adolescents can make authentic, autonomous decisions regarding their research participation. This paper reviews these issues in detail, describes the current state of the ethical discussion, and outlines evidence-based policies for enrolling minors into research biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. J. Kasperbauer
- Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tucker ER, George S, Angelini P, Bruna A, Chesler L. The Promise of Patient-Derived Preclinical Models to Accelerate the Implementation of Personalised Medicine for Children with Neuroblastoma. J Pers Med 2021; 11:248. [PMID: 33808071 PMCID: PMC8065808 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-derived preclinical models are now a core component of cancer research and have the ability to drastically improve the predictive power of preclinical therapeutic studies. However, their development and maintenance can be challenging, time consuming, and expensive. For neuroblastoma, a developmental malignancy of the neural crest, it is possible to establish patient-derived models as xenografts in mice and zebrafish, and as spheroids and organoids in vitro. These varied approaches have contributed to comprehensive packages of preclinical evidence in support of new therapeutics for neuroblastoma. We discuss here the ethical and technical considerations for the creation of patient-derived models of neuroblastoma and how their use can be optimized for the study of tumour evolution and preclinical therapies. We also discuss how neuroblastoma patient-derived models might become avatars for personalised medicine for children with this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R. Tucker
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK; (E.R.T.); (S.G.)
| | - Sally George
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK; (E.R.T.); (S.G.)
| | - Paola Angelini
- Children and Young People’s Unit, The Royal Marsden, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK;
| | - Alejandra Bruna
- Preclinical Paediatric Cancer Evolution, Centre for Cancer Drug Discovery, The Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK;
| | - Louis Chesler
- Paediatric Tumour Biology, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, London SM2 5NG, UK; (E.R.T.); (S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Villanueva AG, Majumder MA. Hashtag who's missing? Lessons for genomic databases. Disabil Health J 2020; 14:100945. [PMID: 32788131 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Genomic databases support research intended to advance understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of disease. Utility is linked to diversity, and initiatives are seeking to enroll traditionally underrepresented groups such as people with disabilities. Commentators have called for adoption of a participant-centric approach to build trust and address barriers to inclusion. Complexities emerge, however, when minors are enrolled and whose perspective on their condition may with time diverge from their parents' perspective. Public response to MSSNG, a genomic database focused on autism, and public discourse regarding neurodiversity reveal division regarding autism as a difference or identity versus a disease. We explore what it means for genomic databases enrolling individuals, particularly minors, with disabilities to be participant-centric when affected individuals disagree about the nature of their condition and research priorities, offering recommendations for participant engagement and measures when enrolling minors with conditions that are the subject of difference-disease debates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela G Villanueva
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 310D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Mary A Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 310D, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|