Family Caregiver Partnerships in Palliative Care Research Design and Implementation

Everyday Ethics or Deference to Expertise: Experiences of Pediatric Palliative Care Teams with Ethics Consultancy

Background: Little is known about the extent to which pediatric palliative care (PPC) clinicians are engaged in ethics consults or how they perceive interactions with ethics consultants. Objective: Describe the extent to which PPC team members serve in pediatric health care ethics (PHCE) consultancy roles and to describe their experiences interacting with pediatric ethic consultant services. Design: Online survey distributed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Care pediatric and ethics section and special interest groups in the United States. Results: Eighty-six responses were obtained (response rate 45%) from PPC teams in 70 different children's hospitals located in 34 states. Almost all (97%) reported a functional ethics consult service such that PPC is not expected to meet the ethics need of the institution. A person involved on the PPC team also performed ethics consults in half (49%) of the settings, predominantly the PPC physician. Most respondents who perceive PPC teams engage in ethics-relevant work as part of their everyday PPC work. Formal ethics training was lacking among PPC members involved in ethics consults with few ethics degrees (15%), certifications (6%), or fellowships (2%). Discord (67%), conflict (49%), limitations to treatment (48%), and distress (41%) were cited as the most frequent reasons for which PPC teams consult ethics. PPC respondents identified role clarity, coordinated engagement, timely presence, and open communication as strong PHCE consultant practices. Conclusions: PPC team members performing ethics consults may benefit from additional ethics education and training. Further research is warranted to delineate scope of ethics consultancy relevant to PPC and role clarity.

Defining Neonatal Serious Illness

Background: One major challenge to the conduct of rigorous neonatal palliative care research is the lack of robust universally agreed upon definitions of key concepts central to pediatric and neonatal palliative care. Objective: We sought to define neonatal serious illness as a foundational concept for neonatal palliative care. Design: Survey study. Setting/Subjects: Practitioners in the United States with expertise in neonatal serious illness. Measurements: Participants ranked 15 components according to how important each would be to include in a conceptual definition of neonatal serious illness. Based on rankings and free text responses, a working definition was created and a follow-up survey was circulated. Participants then ranked the extent to which the proposed definition comprehensively defines neonatal serious illness. The definition was further refined based on responses to the second survey. Results: Eighty experts responded to our first survey. Definition components ranked as most important included "high risk of short term mortality" and "results in shortened lifespan." Analysis of free text responses revealed additional components viewed as important. We developed the following conceptual definition: "Neonatal serious illness 1) carries a high risk of short term mortality OR lifelong medical complexity with probable shortened lifespan, 2) may involve substantial prognostic uncertainty (especially in regard to neurodevelopment) that complicates medical decision-making, and 3) significantly impacts the patient and family's life now or in the future with strain related to treatments and care." Conclusion: We believe our definition of neonatal serious illness will facilitate future study essential to the advancement of care for this population.