Disparities in Racial, Ethnic, and Payer Groups for Pediatric Safety Events in US Hospitals

Association between Unmet Social Need and Ambulatory Quality of Care for US Children

OBJECTIVES

Children who experience socioeconomic adversity often have worse health; however, less is known about their quality of care. We sought to evaluate the association between parent/caregiver-reported socioeconomic adversity and quality of pediatric primary, acute, and chronic ambulatory care on a national level.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 5368 representative US children (1-17 years) in the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Socioeconomic adversity was defined as parent/caregiver-reported food, housing, transportation, or utility insecurity in the past 12 months. Outcomes included 10 quality measures of primary, acute, and chronic care, and experience of care measured through parent/caregiver survey. We described variation in socioeconomic adversity and used multivariable regression to examine associations with quality outcomes.

RESULTS

One-third of parent/caregivers reported socioeconomic adversity. Food insecurity (23.6%) was most common followed by utility (19.5%), housing (15.0%), and transportation (4.7%) insecurity. Black (53.2%) and Hispanic (46.9%) parent/caregivers experienced the highest rates of socioeconomic adversity. Children with socioeconomic adversity received lower quality of care for four quality measures, including more frequent Emergency Department visits (Odds Ratio (OR)= 1.69 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.28-2.23]), less favorable asthma medication ratio (OR=0.04 [95% CI: 0.01-0.31]), and less frequent well child (OR=0.73 [95% CI: 0.59-0.90]) and dental care (OR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94], P < .05 for all). There were no statistically significant differences in experience of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic adversity is common among US children with disproportionate impact on Black and Hispanic families. There are significant disparities in pediatric primary, acute, and chronic care quality, based on parent/caregiver-reported socioeconomic adversity, highlighting the need for systems-level interventions.

Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated with Neonatal Blood Stream Infection in Inpatient Care: Insights from the 2019 HCUP KID Database

BACKGROUND

This study explores the associations between pediatric adverse events (PAEs) and both hospital and patient characteristics within the inpatient hospital setting, specifically focusing on Neonatal Blood Stream Infection (NBSI) as defined by pediatric quality indicators (PDIs) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). This research aims to answer questions regarding the relationship between hospital characteristics and patient demographics with the occurrence of NBSI.

METHODS

This study utilized discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Databases (KID) for the year 2019. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze patient-level encounters of NBSIs. The analysis examined various factors including hospital size, location, and teaching status, as well as patient-specific variables such as gender, age, race, service lines, payment sources, and major operating room procedures.

RESULTS

The results indicate that Public and Private not-for-profit hospitals showed significantly lower odds of experiencing NBSIs when compared to Private investor-owned hospitals, as did smaller, rural, and nonteaching hospitals when compared to large hospitals. Additionally, individual factors such as gender, age, race, service lines, payment sources, and types of major operating room procedures were found to have varying levels of significance in relation to NBSI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides important insights into PAEs within the inpatient hospital setting, particularly focusing on NBSIs within the PDI framework. The findings highlight critical areas for the development of evidence-based interventions and guidelines, which are essential for clinicians and policymakers. Ultimately, this study contributes to the understanding and improvement of pediatric patient safety by emphasizing the necessity for targeted strategies to mitigate the risk of NBSI.

Use of central venous access devices outside of the pediatric intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Central venous access devices (CVAD) are associated with central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). We identified trends in non-intensive care unit (ICU) CVAD utilization, described complication rates, and compared resources between low and high CVAD sites.

METHODS

We combined data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database and surveys from included hospitals. We analyzed 10-year trends in CVAD encounters for non-ICU children between 01/2012-12/2021 and described variation and complication rates between 01/2017-12/2021. Using Fisher's exact test, we compared resources between low and high CVAD users.

RESULTS

CVAD use decreased from 6.3% to 3.8% of hospitalizations over 10 years. From 2017-2021, 67,830 encounters with CVAD were identified. Median age was 7 (IQR 2-13) years; 46% were female. Significant variation in CVAD utilization exists (range 1.4-16.9%). Rates of CLABSI and VTE were 4.0% and 3.4%, respectively. Survey responses from 33/41 (80%) hospitals showed 91% had vascular access teams, 30% used vascular access selection guides, and 70% used midline/long peripheral catheters. Low CVAD users were more likely to have a team guiding device selection (100% vs 43%, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

CVAD utilization decreased over time. Significant variation in CVAD use remains and may be associated with hospital resources.

IMPACT

Central venous access device (CVAD) use outside of the ICU is trending down; however, significant variation exists between institutions. Children with CVADs hospitalized on the acute care units had a CLABSI rate of 4% and VTE rate of 3.4%. 91% of surveyed institutions have a vascular access team; however, the services provided vary between institutions. Even though 70% of the surveyed institutions have the ability to place midline/long peripheral catheters, the majority use these catheters less than a few times per month. Institutions with low CVAD use are more likely to have a vascular access team that guides device selection.