Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation for Which Patients?

Epicardial Ablation as a Treatment of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia Originating From a Left Ventricular Aneurysm: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Catheter ablation (CA) is an important therapeutic modality for the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT). In some patients, CA may be ineffective because of the inability to reach the effective target site from the endocardial surface. Partly, this is due to the effect of the transmural extent of the myocardial scars. The operator's ability to map and ablate the epicardial surface has enhanced our understanding of scar-related VT in various substrate states. A left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) that develops after myocardial infarction may increase the risk of VT. Endocardial ablation alone of LVA may be insufficient in preventing recurrent VT. Numerous studies have demonstrated greater freedom from recurrence with adjunctive epicardial mapping and ablation via a percutaneous subxiphoid technique. Currently, epicardial ablation is performed predominantly at high-volume tertiary referral centers via the percutaneous subxiphoid approach. In this review, we first report a case of a man in his 70s with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a large apical aneurysm, and recurrent VT status post-endocardial ablation who presented with incessant VT. The patient underwent successful epicardial ablation over the apical aneurysm. Second, our case showcases the percutaneous approach and underscores its clinical indications and potential complications.

Epicardial Ablation Complications

The percutaneous epicardial approach has become an adjunctive tool for electrophysiologists to treat disparate cardiac arrhythmias, including accessory pathways, atrial tachycardia, and particularly ventricular tachycardia. This novel technique prompted a strong impulse to perform epicardial access as an alternative strategy for pacing and defibrillation, left atrial appendage exclusion, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and genetically engineered tissue delivery. However, because of the incremental risk of major complications compared with stand-alone endocardial ablation, it is still practiced in a limited number of highly experienced centers across the world.

Comparing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial ablation in swine versus canine models

BACKGROUND

Choosing the appropriate animal model for development of novel technologies requires an understanding of anatomy and physiology of these different models. There are little data about the characteristics of different animal models for the study of technologies used for epicardial ablation. We aimed to compare the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during epicardial radiofrequency ablation between swine and canine models using novel epicardial ablation catheters.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using data obtained from epicardial ablation experiments performed on swine (Sus Scrofa) and canine (Canis familiaris) models. We compared the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during ablation between swine and canine using multivariate regression analysis. Six swine and six canine animals underwent successful epicardial radiofrequency ablation. A total of 103 ablation applications were recorded.

RESULTS

Ventricular arrhythmias requiring cardioversion occurred in 13.11% of radiofrequency ablation applications in swine and 9.75% in canine (relative risk: 117.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.97-164.69, animal-based odds ratio [OR]: .55, 95% CI: .23-61.33; P = .184). When adjusting for application position, duration of ablation and power, the odds of developing potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia in swine increased significantly compared to canine (OR: 3.60, 95% CI: 1.35-9.55; P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

The swine myocardium is more susceptible to developing ventricular arrhythmias compared to canine model during epicardial ablation. This issue should be carefully considered in future studies.