Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy or MitraClip® Implantation for Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Left Bundle Branch Block?

Haemodynamic effects of percutaneous mitral valve edge-to-edge repair in patients with end-stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation

Aims

Functional mitral regurgitation is complicating end‐stage heart failure and potential heart transplantation by increasing pulmonary artery pressures. The aim of the present study was to investigate feasibility and haemodynamic effects of percutaneous mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair using the MitraClip™ device in patients with end‐stage heart failure awaiting heart transplantation.

Methods and results

In this retrospective study, we identified nine patients suffering from end‐stage heart failure listed for heart transplantation in whom moderate–severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation was recognized and treated with percutaneous mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair. Twenty‐two patients listed for heart transplantation and presenting with moderate–severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation treated in the pre‐MitraClip™ era served as controls. Patients were analysed at two separate time points: MitraClip™ group: pre‐procedure and post‐procedure (follow‐up: 215 ± 53 days) and control group: study entry with recognition of moderate–severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (follow‐up: 197 ± 47 days). Percutaneous mitral valve edge‐to‐edge repair with the MitraClip™ was feasible and safe in our high‐risk end‐stage heart failure population. The intervention resulted in significant reduction of mitral regurgitation (grade 3.0 [0.5] to 1.5 [0.5]; P = 0.009), left atrial diameter (51 mm [16] to 49 mm [4]; follow‐up MitraClip™ vs. control group P = 0.0497), pulmonary artery pressures (sPA 50 mmHg [15] to 45 mmHg [10]; P = 0.02; mPA 34 mmHg [8] to 30 mmHg [10]; P = 0.02), and New York Heart Association class (3.5 [1.0] to 3.0 [0.5]; P = 0.01) and improved mixed‐venous oxygen saturation (57% [11] to 55% [7]; follow‐up MitraClip™ vs. control group P = 0.02). No changes in the control group were observed.

Conclusions

MitraClip™ implantation as ‘bridge‐to‐transplant’ strategy in patients with end‐stage heart failure and severe functional mitral regurgitation awaiting heart transplantation is feasible and appears to result in favourable haemodynamic effects.

Therapeutic options for functional mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Mitral regurgitation is a common finding in patients with chronic heart failure and is associated with a progressive worsening of symptoms, reduced survival and increased cost of care. However, the use of mitral valve surgery for these patients remains controversial and has not been shown to improve survival. Consequently, research has been increasingly directed towards the nonsurgical management of this important co-morbidity of heart failure.

AREAS COVERED

The present review will describe the relevance of mitral regurgitation in people with chronic heart failure, the current options for percutaneous treatment and the evidence base for each of these.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Although at present there are few solid data to guide heart teams in deciding what degree of mitral regurgitation to treat, in which patients, and with what, this situation is likely to change over the next two years with the release of the first large randomised trials of percutaneous interventions.

Implantation of CARILLON® Mitral Contour System with transvenous left ventricular lead in place

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment option for chronic heart failure patients with left bundle branch block. Although a concomitant functional mitral regurgitation is often reduced by CRT, many patients need additional mitral valve repair. Placing a CARILLON^® Mitral Contour System (CMCS) over a transvenous CRT lead is currently not recommended, since both of them are implanted in the coronary sinus (CS). The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of sequential implantation of a transvenous LV lead followed by CMCS implantation, and to assess LV lead performance and possibility of extraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Standard transvenous LV leads were implanted in the CS of five female sheep. After establishing regular anatomical position with stable electrical parameters of the LV lead, a CMCS was additionally implanted in the CS. After an observation period of 100 days, lead performance and positions of lead and CMCS were studied. Sequential implantation of the two components was feasible in sheep. After 100 days, all leads showed regular measurements of impedance, threshold, and sensing. There was no migration of either the LV lead or the CMCS. In all cases, the LV lead could be completely extracted without migration of the CMCS. There were no acute or long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In an animal model of healthy adult sheep, implantation of CMCS with a transvenous LV lead already in place was feasible and without major problems with either the CMCS or the LV lead. Electrical performance of the LV leads was excellent. All LV leads could be extracted without migration of the CMCS.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy before and after MitraClip implantation: An advantageous upgrading to reduce mitral regurgitation

MitraClip therapy has been proposed as therapeutic option in selected patients with degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), leading to clinical and prognostic benefits. Previous studies demonstrated the safety and the efficacy of MitraClip therapy on symptoms and left ventricular remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-responder patients. We report a case of a CRT non-responder patient treated with MitraClip implantation followed by a new upgrading of the CRT for persistent FMR at the follow-up. The optimization of the interventricular delay, guided by echocardiographic parameters, resulted in a significant clinical and functional benefit. Echo-guided CRT upgrading can provide additive efficacy for patients in whom MitraClip implantation does not significantly improve FMR and symptoms.