State-of-the-art Structural Interventions in Heart Failure

Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Structural Interventions

Structural valvular interventions have skyrocketed in the past decade with new devices becoming available and indications for patients who would previously have been deemed inoperable. Furthermore, while echocardiography is the main imaging tool and the first line for patient screening, cardiac magnetic resonance and CT are now essential tools in pre-planning and post-procedural follow-up. This review aims to address imaging modalities and their scope in aortic, mitral and tricuspid structural valvular interventions, including multimodality imaging. Pulmonary valve procedures, which are mostly carried out in patients with congenital problems, are discussed. This article presents a guide on individualised imaging approcahes on each of the available interventional procedures.

The management of paravalvular leaks post aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is uncommon but can lead to severe complications after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Conditions associated with PVLs such as heart failure, hemolysis, and infective endocarditis can lead to catastrophic results if not treated promptly; the therapeutic goals differ according to the presentation. It is vital that PVLs are diagnosed early using various imaging modalities. Different approaches have been studied in managing PVLs; there is an increased interest in the transcatheter aortic valve closure procedure as it is minimally invasive and decreases the occurrence of further reinterventions.

AIM

To discuss the classification of PVLs, diagnostic approaches, and available management options.

METHOD

A literature review was performed using 28 studies.

RESULTS

This review evaluated the relationship between the time of diagnosis, management of PVL and the resulting outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Patients with PVL should be assessed through a multidisciplinary team approach and a patient-selective plan should be in place.

CONCLUSION

Open surgical intervention is reserved for complex cases where minimally invasive techniques cannot be utilized.

Structural Heart Disease Emergencies

Structural heart disease (SHD) emergencies include acute deterioration of a stable lesion or development of a new critical lesion. Structural heart disease emergencies can produce heart failure and cardiogenic shock despite preserved systolic function that may not respond to standard medical therapy and typically necessitate surgical or percutaneous intervention. Comprehensive Doppler echocardiography is the initial diagnostic modality of choice to determine the cause and severity of the underlying SHD lesion. Patients with chronic SHD lesions which deteriorate due to intercurrent illness (eg, infection or arrhythmia) may not require urgent intervention, whereas patients with an acute SHD lesion often require definitive therapy. Medical stabilization prior to definitive intervention differs substantially between stenotic lesions (aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction) and regurgitant lesions (aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal defect). Patients with regurgitant lesions typically require aggressive afterload reduction and inotropic support, whereas patients with stenotic lesions may paradoxically require β-blockade and vasoconstrictors. Emergent cardiac surgery for patients with decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock carries a substantial mortality risk but may be necessary for patients who are not eligible for catheter-based percutaneous SHD intervention. This review explores initial medical stabilization and subsequent definitive therapy for patients with SHD emergencies.