Diagnostic Angiograms and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Pregnancy

Optimal Approaches for Pregnant Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States. Pregnancy is associated with increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and outcomes of pregnancy-associated AMI (PAMI) are poor. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is the most common cause of PAMI. Pregnancy is not a contraindication to invasive coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when indicated. When coronary angiography or PCI is needed, measures should be taken to minimize procedural and anesthetic risks specific to pregnancy. Multidisciplinary collaboration is imperative to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes associated with PAMI.

Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pregnancy

Cardiovascular disease, and particularly ischemic heart disease, is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. The incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been rising over the past two decades due to increasing maternal age and a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the pregnant population. Causes of AMI in pregnancy are diverse and may require specific considerations for their diagnosis and management. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of physiologic changes, risk factors, and etiologies leading to AMI in pregnancy, as well as diagnostic tools, reperfusion strategies, and pharmacological treatments for this complex population. In addition, we outline considerations for labor and delivery planning and long-term follow-up of patients with AMI in pregnancy.

Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: Risk Factors and Associated Comorbidities

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), despite a lower burden of coronary atherosclerosis, has a non-negligible prognostic impact. The label of MINOCA includes an array of different aetiologies and pathologic conditions, thus the identification of the underlying disease is crucial to patient management. Myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery disease and MINOCA share only some risk factors and comorbid conditions. While traditional cardiovascular risk factors have a lower prevalence in MINOCA patients, atypical ones—e.g., anxiety, depression, and autoimmune diseases—are much more frequent in this population. Other conditions—e.g., pregnancy, cancer, and anti-cancer therapy—can predispose to or even induce MINOCA through various mechanisms. The evidence of such risk factors for MINOCA is still scarce and contradicting, as no randomised controlled trials exist in this field. In our work, we performed a review of registries, clinical studies, and case reports of MINOCA, in order to summarise the available data and analyse its possibile pathogenic mechanisms.

Coronary Events in the Pregnant Patient: Who Is at Risk and How Best to Manage?

Coronary events in pregnancy are a rare but growing cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy presents unique challenges across a broad spectrum of disciplines and requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimise maternal and fetal outcomes. The early involvement of the "cardio-obstetrics" team in prepregnancy counselling, the antenatal period, delivery, and postpartum is vital to ensuring better outcomes for patients at high risk of coronary pathology. The overall risk for coronary events complicating pregnancy is increasing owing to a number of factors, including advancing maternal age and increases in traditional cardiac risk factors contributing to higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. The majority of pregnant women experiencing a coronary event do not have previous coronary disease, and the pathologic mechanisms involved are predominantly nonatherosclerotic. Diagnosis and management should follow standard guideline-based practices for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including the use of diagnostic coronary angiography to guide percutaneous intervention when needed. Management of ACS should not be delayed to facilitate delivery, which can proceed following stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy. The timing and mode of delivery should be based on assessment of maternal and fetal status, but vaginal delivery is preferred when possible. This review aims to provide an overview of the major etiologies, risk factors, diagnoses, and management strategies for patients at risk of or presenting with coronary events in pregnancy.

Pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction: a review of the recent literature

Pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction is a rare and potentially life-threatening cardiovascular event, the incidence of which is growing due to the heightened prevalence of several risk factors, including increased maternal age. Its main aetiology is spontaneous coronary artery dissection, which particularly occurs in pregnancy and may engender severe clinical scenarios. Therefore, despite frequently atypical and deceptive presentations, early recognition of such a dangerous complication of gestation is paramount. Notwithstanding diagnostic and therapeutic improvements, pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction often carries unfavourable outcomes, as emergent management is difficult owing to significant limitations in the use of ionising radiation-e.g. during coronary angiography, potentially harmful to the foetus even at low doses. Notably, however, maternal mortality has steadily decreased in recent decades, indicating enhanced awareness and major medical advances in this field. In our paper, we review the recent literature on pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction and highlight the key points in its management.