Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aortic Dissections: Panacea or Panic?

Patient-specific compliant simulation framework informed by 4DMRI-extracted pulse wave Velocity: Application post-TEVAR

We introduce a new computational framework that utilises Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) extracted directly from 4D flow MRI (4DMRI) to inform patient-specific compliant computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of a Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD), post-thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The thoracic aortic geometry, a 3D inlet velocity profile (IVP) and dynamic outlet boundary conditions are derived from 4DMRI and brachial pressure patient data. A moving boundary method (MBM) is applied to simulate aortic wall displacement. The aortic wall stiffness is estimated through two methods: one relying on area-based distensibility and the other utilising regional pulse wave velocity (RPWV) distensibility, further fine-tuned to align with in vivo values. Predicted pressures and outlet flow rates were within 2.3 % of target values. RPWV-based simulations were more accurate in replicating in vivo hemodynamics than the area-based ones. RPWVs were closely predicted in most regions, except the endograft. Systolic flow reversal ratios (SFRR) were accurately captured, while differences above 60 % in in-plane rotational flow (IRF) between the simulations were observed. Significant disparities in predicted wall shear stress (WSS)-based indices were observed between the two approaches, especially the endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP). At the isthmus, the RPWV-driven simulation indicated a mean ECAP>1.4 Pa-1 (critical threshold), indicating areas potentially prone to thrombosis, not captured by the area-based simulation. RPWV-driven simulation results agree well with 4DMRI measurements, validating the proposed pipeline and facilitating a comprehensive assessment of surgical decision-making scenarios and potential complications, such as thrombosis and aortic growth.

Patient-Specific Haemodynamic Analysis of Virtual Grafting Strategies in Type-B Aortic Dissection: Impact of Compliance Mismatch

INTRODUCTION

Compliance mismatch between the aortic wall and Dacron Grafts is a clinical problem concerning aortic haemodynamics and morphological degeneration. The aortic stiffness introduced by grafts can lead to an increased left ventricular (LV) afterload. This study quantifies the impact of compliance mismatch by virtually testing different Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) surgical grafting strategies in patient-specific, compliant computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A post-operative case of TBAD was segmented from computed tomography angiography data. Three virtual surgeries were generated using different grafts; two additional cases with compliant grafts were assessed. Compliant CFD simulations were performed using a patient-specific inlet flow rate and three-element Windkessel outlet boundary conditions informed by 2D-Flow MRI data. The wall compliance was calibrated using Cine-MRI images. Pressure, wall shear stress (WSS) indices and energy loss (EL) were computed.

RESULTS

Increased aortic stiffness and longer grafts increased aortic pressure and EL. Implementing a compliant graft matching the aortic compliance of the patient reduced the pulse pressure by 11% and EL by 4%. The endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) differed the most within the aneurysm, where the maximum percentage difference between the reference case and the mid (MDA) and complete (CDA) descending aorta replacements increased by 16% and 20%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that by minimising graft length and matching its compliance to the native aorta whilst aligning with surgical requirements, the risk of LV hypertrophy may be reduced. This provides evidence that compliance-matching grafts may enhance patient outcomes.

A novel MRI-based data fusion methodology for efficient, personalised, compliant simulations of aortic haemodynamics

We present a novel, cost-efficient methodology to simulate aortic haemodynamics in a patient-specific, compliant aorta using an MRI data fusion process. Based on a previously-developed Moving Boundary Method, this technique circumvents the high computational cost and numerous structural modelling assumptions required by traditional Fluid-Structure Interaction techniques. Without the need for Computed Tomography (CT) data, the MRI images required to construct the simulation can be obtained during a single imaging session. Black Blood MR Angiography and 2D Cine-MRI data were used to reconstruct the luminal geometry and calibrate wall movement specifically to each region of the aorta. 4D-Flow MRI and non-invasive pressure measurements informed patient-specific inlet and outlet boundary conditions. Luminal area closely matched 2D Cine-MRI measurements with a mean error of less than 4.6% across the cardiac cycle, while physiological pressure and flow distributions were simulated to within 3.3% of patient-specific targets. Moderate agreement with 4D-Flow MRI velocity data was observed. Despite lower peak velocity, an equivalent rigid-wall simulation predicted a mean Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS) 13% higher than the compliant simulation. The agreement observed between compliant simulation results and MRI data is testament to the accuracy and efficiency of this MRI-based simulation technique.