Campos PM, Gouveia HG, Strada JKR, Moraes BA. Skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding of newborns in a university hospital.
Rev Gaucha Enferm 2020;
41:e20190154. [PMID:
32401893 DOI:
10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190154]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine the prevalence of skin-to-skin contact (STSC) and breastfeeding (BF) stimulation, as well as the reasons for these practices not to be performed; to identify whether women were given information on these practices along the pre-natal monitoring.
METHOD
A cross-sectional study carried out in a university hospital with 586 women. Data collection was from February to September 2016. Data was collected from patient records and from a questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Immediately after birth, 60.1% of the newborns (NBs) had STSC, and 44.9% were stimulated to suck at the breast. After primary care, 24.1% had STSC, and 69.3% were stimulated to suck at the breast; 47.7% of the newborns did not have STSC due to their unfavorable clinical conditions; 79.2% of the women were not able to inform the reason why BF was not stimulated; 58.5% of the women had pre-natal guidance about STSC, and 90.8% about BF.
CONCLUSION
Both STSC and BF rates could be improved, in view of the benefits provided by these practices.
Collapse