1
|
Bohren MA, Hazfiarini A, Vazquez Corona M, Colomar M, De Mucio B, Tunçalp Ö, Portela A. From global recommendations to (in)action: A scoping review of the coverage of companion of choice for women during labour and birth. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001476. [PMID: 36963069 PMCID: PMC10021298 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Women greatly value and benefit from the presence of someone they trust to support them throughout labour and childbirth ('labour companion of choice'). Labour companionship improves maternal and perinatal outcomes, including enhancing physiological labour and birth experiences. Despite clear benefits, implementation is slow. We conducted a scoping review to assess coverage and models of labour companionship, including quantitative studies reporting coverage of labour companionship in any level health facility globally. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Global Health from 1 January 2010-14 December 2021. We extracted data on study design, labour companionship coverage, timing and type of companions allowed, and recoded data into categories for comparison across studies. We included data from a maternal health sentinel network of hospitals in Latin America, using descriptive statistics to assess coverage among 120,581 women giving birth in these sites from April 2018-April 2022. In the scoping review, we included 77 studies from 27 countries. There was wide variation in the coverage of labour companionship: almost one-third of studies reported coverage less than 40%, and one-third of studies reported coverage between 40-80%. Husbands or partners were the most frequent companion (37.7%, 29/77), followed by family member or friend (gender not specified) (32.5%, 25/77), family member or friend (female-only) (13.0%, 10/77). Across nine sentinel hospitals in five Latin American countries, there was variation in coverage, with no companion at any time ranging from 14.9%-93.8%. Despite the well-known benefits and factors affecting implementation of labour companionship, more work is needed to improve equitable coverage. Concerted efforts are needed to engage with communities, health workers, health managers, and policy-makers to establish policies, address implementation barriers, and integrate data on coverage into perinatal records and quality processes to ensure that all women have access. Harmonized reporting of labour companionship would greatly enhance understanding at global level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alya Hazfiarini
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martha Vazquez Corona
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mercedes Colomar
- The Latin American Center for Perinatology/Women´s and Reproductive Health Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Bremen De Mucio
- The Latin American Center for Perinatology/Women´s and Reproductive Health Unit, Pan American Health Organization, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jasiński AM, Derbis R. Social support at work and job satisfaction among midwives: The mediating role of positive affect and work engagement. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:149-160. [PMID: 36254580 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study examined whether social support at work from superiors and colleagues is associated with positive affect at work, and whether work engagement creates a positive relationship with job satisfaction among midwives. We also investigated whether a positive affect and work engagement mediate the relationship between social support at work and job satisfaction. DESIGN This was a quantitative cross-sectional study. METHODS Data were collected from 163 midwives working in the Polish public healthcare system between June 2019 and December 2019. RESULTS There was a direct relationship between support from superiors and colleagues, positive affect at work, work engagement and job satisfaction. The relationship between support from superiors and job satisfaction was mediated partially by positive affect at work and work engagement. In contrast, the relationship between support from colleagues and job satisfaction was mediated entirely by positive affect at work and work engagement. CONCLUSION Support from colleagues, compared to support from superiors, was a stronger predictor of positive affect at work and job satisfaction among midwives. Support at work is a resource that leads to higher job satisfaction by generating positive feelings and increasing work engagement. IMPACT We recommend paying particular attention to the role of inter-personal relationships and positive feelings at work in shaping the level of satisfaction with work among midwives. The personnel management policy at healthcare institutions should be oriented towards strengthening supportive attitudes in the workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Romuald Derbis
- Institute of Psychology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maskálová E, Mazúchová L, Kelčíková S, Samselyová J, Kukučiarová L. Satisfaction of women with childbirth. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY 2021. [DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|