Assessment of the fit of removable partial denture fabricated by computer-aided designing/computer aided manufacturing technology

A fully digital workflow for the design and manufacture of a class of metal orthodontic appliances

Background

Traditional working procedures requires a lot of clinical processes and processing time.

Methods

The orthodontic metal appliances were made by applying oral scanners, digital images, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) printers.

Results

The computer digital technology simplified the manufacturing process for dental appliances and shorten the duration for clinical operation and technical processing.

Conclusions

The technique described in this paper can guarantee the accuracy of orthodontic appliances and bring revolution the field.

Clinical significance

The CAD-CAM technology provides a fully digital workflow for manufacturing metal orthodontic appliances, which saves a considerable amount of labor and material costs, and significantly reduces heavy metal pollution in the working environment of dental technicians.

Fit of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from 3D printed patterns versus the conventional method: An in vitro comparison

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The conventional method of fabricating removable partial denture (RPD) patterns is a time-consuming, expensive, and complex process, and the success of the treatment depends on the fit of the framework. Questions still remain as to whether the 3D-printing method is an acceptable procedure compared with the conventional method.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the fit of RPDs cast from 3D printed frameworks and conventionally fabricated RPDs according to the gaps between the framework and the reference model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A metal reference model was made from a Kennedy class III modification 1 maxillary typodont. For the conventional group (n=9), impressions were made from the metal cast. Cobalt chromium frameworks were cast with the conventional method. For the digital group (n=9), the metal cast was scanned with a laboratory scanner, and the RPD was designed in the 3Shape platform. The standard tessellation language (STL) file of the design was downloaded to a 3D printer (Hunter DLP), and 9 resin frameworks were printed. These frameworks were invested and cast in the same dental laboratory as the first group. Gap measurement was assessed vertically with a superimposition software program (Geomagic Control X), and additional measurements were assessed under rests, reciprocal arms, and a 2.2-mm box under the major connector. The independent t test was used for determining the results and statistical analysis between groups. The paired t test was used for statistical analysis within groups (α=.05 for all tests).

RESULTS

No significant differences (P>.05) were observed in the mean ±standard deviation in overall fit according to the gaps in the conventional group (103 ±18 μm) and those in the digital group (109 ±21 μm). The biggest gap (poorest fit) was observed in the 2.2-mm box under the major connector (115 ±6 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

Both conventional and 3D-printing methods showed clinically acceptable fits. Further clinical studies with a larger sample size and long-term follow-up are needed.

Evaluation and assessment of the wettabilty and water contact angle of modified poly methyl methacrylate denture base materials against PEEK in cast partial denture framework: an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of adults with partially dental arches is expected to be more than imagined and patients requiring replacement of missing teeth are slowly increasing in number too. Removable partial dentures are known to provide for substantial replacement for the missing teeth with also added advantages when compared to fixed or implant prosthesis, mainly in elderly patients. Denture base material performance and durability are greatly influenced by wettability and water contact angle. In the case of dentures; adequate moisture distribution is necessary to ensure excellent wettability which has an influence on comfort and oral health. The purpose of conducting this study was to find out whether the advancements made using PEEK (Polyether ether ketone) would prove to be more beneficial than the current upgrades in the current material spectrum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed under in vitro conditions. All the fabrication and processing was done only by one operator. The materials used were divided into three groups each comprising 20 samples. Group A was modified polymethylmethacrylate (Bredent Polyan), Group B was polyoxymethylene acetal resin (Biodentaplast) and Group C was PEEK. An Ossila Goniometer was used to measure the contact angle. The three types of liquids used for the testing included distilled water, natural saliva and mouth wetting solution (Wet Mouth Liquid, ICPA India). Human saliva was collected from an individual with no medical conditions and normal salivary secretion.

RESULTS

The data was analyzed using One-way ANOVA test and a pairwise comparison using the Post Hoc Tukey's Honest Significant Difference. Table 1 consists of the mean water contact angles of the denture base materials and mean contact angles of various denture base materials. In saliva, mouth wetting solution and distilled water, the highest mean and least mean contact angle was seen in Polyan and Biodentaplast respectively. A signicant difference was seen between PEEK and Polyan and Biodentaplast and Polyan on further comparison.

CONCLUSION

From the resources and the materials at our disposal, it could be concluded that Polyan, Biodentaplast and PEEK and could be used as viable options in cast partial denture framework.

Optimization of Digital Light Processing Three-Dimensional Printing of the Removable Partial Denture Frameworks; The Role of Build Angle and Support Structure Diameter

The optimal three-dimensional (3D) printing parameters of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks should be studied to achieve the best accuracy, printing time, and least materials consumed. This study aimed to find the best build angle and support structures’ diameter of the 3D printed (RPD) framework. Sixty (RPD) frameworks (10 in each group) were manufactured by digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technology at three build angles (110-D, 135-D, and 150-D) and two support structures diameters (thick, L, and thin, S). Six groups were named according to their printing setting as (110-DS, 135-DS, 150-DS, 110-DL, 135-DL, and 150-DL). Frameworks were 3D scanned and compared to the original cast surface using 3D metrology software (Geomagic Control X; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). Both printing time and material consumption were also recorded. Data were tested for the significant difference by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test at (α = 0.05). The correlations between outcome parameters were also calculated. The 110-DL group showed the least accuracy. Significantly, the printing time of the 150-D groups had the lowest time. Material consumption of group 110-DS presented the lowest significantly statistical value. Printing time had a linear correlation with both accuracy and material consumption. Within the study limitations, the 150-degree build angle and thin diameter support structures showed optimal accuracy and time-saving regardless of material consumption.

Influence of molding angle on the trueness and defects of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of molding angle on the trueness and defects associated with removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM).

METHODS

A plaster model of a partially edentulous mandibular arch classified as Kennedy class II modification 1 was used. After obtaining the 3D data of the model (design data), a framework was designed using CAD software. Based on the design data, three different molding angle conditions (0°, 45°, and -45°) were set in the CAM software. The frameworks were fabricated by SLM under each condition, and 3D data were captured (fabrication data). The design and fabrication data were superimposed using 3D inspection software to verify the shape errors. The number of support structures was then measured. To examine the internal defects, micro-computed tomography (µCT) was performed for void analysis. Surface roughness was measured using a laser microscope.

RESULTS

The overall shape errors of the RPD framework were smaller under the 0° condition compared with the others, and the largest number of support structures was observed at 0°. Many internal defects were observed in the large components of the framework at 45° and -45°. The surface roughness was the smallest at -45°.

CONCLUSION

The trueness and defects associated with the RPD frameworks were affected by the difference in the SLM molding angle.

Fit Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated with CAD/CAM, Rapid Prototyping, and Conventional Techniques: A Systematic Review

Objective

Analyzing and comparing the fit and accuracy of removable partial denture (RPDs) frameworks fabricated with CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping methods with conventional techniques.

Materials and Methods

The present systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out on PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane collaboration, Science direct, and Scopus scientific engines using selected MeSH keywords. The articles fulfilling the predefined selection criteria based on the fit and accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks constructed from digital workflow (CAD/CAM; rapid prototyping) and conventional techniques were included.

Results

Nine full-text articles comprising 6 in vitro and 3 in vivo studies were included in this review. The digital RPDs were fabricated in all articles by CAD/CAM selective laser sintering and selective laser melting techniques. The articles that have used CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technique demonstrated better fit and accuracy as compared to the RPDs fabricated through conventional techniques. The least gaps between the framework and cast (41.677 ± 15.546 μm) were found in RPDs constructed through digital CAD/CAM systems.

Conclusion

A better accuracy was achieved using CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping techniques. The RPD frameworks fabricated by CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping techniques had clinically acceptable fit, superior precision, and better accuracy than conventionally fabricated RPD frameworks.

Computer-aided technology for fabricating removable partial denture frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A consensus that establishes the indications and clinical performance of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks designed and manufactured with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the currently published literature investigating different CAD-CAM methods and techniques for RPD manufacturing and their clinical performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of studies published up to September 2019 was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SciELO databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA Statement) criteria and was registered and approved in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42020152197). The population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was "Do the CAD-CAM frameworks have similar performances to those fabricated by conventional techniques?" The meta-analysis included clinical and in vitro studies based on the effect size and test of Null (2-Tail) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Clinical and in vitro studies were selected and analyzed separately.

RESULTS

A total of 15 articles out of 358 were selected. For clinical studies, quantitative analysis with a sample of 25 participants showed a mean discrepancy between occlusal rests and rest seats of 184.91 μm (95% CI: 152.6 μm-217.15 μm) and heterogeneity (I²) of 0%. Clinical data considered that frameworks were acceptable for continuity of treatment. The predominant materials were cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and studies using Co-Cr reported that the structure required adjustments. In addition, it has been reported that the indirect technique was time-consuming and selective laser melting (SLM) can be costly. PEEK structures have been more widely accepted because of improved esthetics. Quantitative data from the in vitro studies revealed that the additive manufacturing technique (2.006 mm: 95% CI: -2.021 mm to 6.032 mm) was not significantly different from the indirect technique (0.026 mm; P=.455; random: I²: 98.402%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical studies and in vitro research on CAD-CAM planning and manufacturing of removable prosthesis frameworks are still sparse. However, preliminary data indicate a similar fit and esthetic improvement when compared with the conventional technique.

Influence of reinforcement bar on accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D-printed pattern and selective laser sintering

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by 3D-printed pattern casting (AM-Cast) and selective laser sintering (SLS) under different co nditions with a reinforcement bar.

METHODS

A partially edentulous model was scanned with a dental laboratory scanner, and CAD software was used to design the framework. Reinforcement bars (n=0-2) were set on the lingual side of the framework. 3D scanning of the fabricated frameworks by AM-Cast and SLS was performed, and the obtained data were overlapped with the design data. The differences in shape among setting conditions of the bar were statistically compared using the Bonferroni method after the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

The ranges in differences of the AM-Cast-0, AM-Cast-1, and AM-Cast-2 were -0.167 to 0.128 mm, -0.101 to 0.105 mm, and -0.185 to 0.015 mm, respectively. The ranges of SLS-0, SLS-1, and SLS-2 were -0.166 to 0.035 mm, -0.182 to 0.049 mm, and -0.138 to 0.038 mm, respectively. Large discrepancies were observed at the joining area of the lingual bar on the right side of the AM-Cast. A significant difference was found between the AM-Cast-0 and AM-Cast-1, and between the AM-Cast-0 and AM-Cast-2.

CONCLUSIONS

The setting conditions of the reinforcement bar affected the accuracy of the lingual bar in the AM-Cast; however, no effect was observed on the displacement of the central area of the lingual bar in SLS. Setting a single reinforcing bar on the retentive latticework contributed to improving the accuracy of the lingual bar in the AM-Cast but not the displacement of the central area of the lingual bar in SLS.

Service Evaluation of Recording Jaw Registrations for Removable Partial Dentures in NHS General Dental Practices

AIMS

To establish the prevalence of jaw registrations being taken for removable partial dentures (RPDs) in primary dental NHS practices.

METHOD

271 RPDs made by 16 general dental practitioners across four NHS dental practices were evaluated prospectively. The number of teeth replaced, whether jaw registration was undertaken, and the number of denture adjustment appointments were recorded. Telephone interviews with dental technicians were held to establish their preferred jaw registrations material.

MAIN FINDINGS

Jaw registrations were not carried out in 27% (n=72) of RPD. When jaw registration was recorded, 14% (n=28) required a further denture adjustment appointment. 64% (n=46) of dentures where jaw registration was not recorded required at least one further denture adjustment appointment. Dental technicians unanimously preferred a squash-bite wax block, with centre and canine positions marked and cast models secured with elastic bands.

CONCLUSION

Overall, recording a jaw registration reduced the number of denture adjustment appointments required.

An In Vitro Investigation of Accuracy and Fit of Conventional and CAD/CAM Removable Partial Denture Frameworks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the overall accuracy and fit of conventional versus computer-aided design/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks based on standard tessellation language (STL) data analysis, and to evaluate the accuracy and fit of each component of the RPD framework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A maxillary metal framework was designed for a Kennedy class III Modification I arch. The master model was scanned and used to compare the fit and accuracy of RPD frameworks. Forty impressions (conventional and digital) of the master cast were made and divided into 4 groups based on fabrication method: group I, lost-wax technique (conventional technique), group II, CAD-printing, group III, CAD-printing from stone cast, and group IV, lost-wax technique from resin-printed model. RPD frameworks were fabricated in cobalt-chromium alloy. All frameworks were scanned, and the gap distance between the framework and scanned master model was measured at 8 locations. Color mapping was conducted using comprehensive metrology software. Data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskall-Wallis test, followed by the Bonferroni method for pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Color mapping revealed distinct discrepancies in major connectors among the groups. When compared to 3D-printed frameworks, conventional cast frameworks fabricated using dental stone or printed resin models revealed significantly better fit (p < 0.05) particularly in the major connectors and guide plates. The biggest gap (0.33 mm ± 0.20 mm) was observed with the anterior strap of the major connector with the printed frameworks (groups II and III). The method of fabrication did not affect the adaptation of the rests or reciprocation plates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both conventional and 3D-printing methods of framework fabrication revealed clinically acceptable adaptation, the conventional cast RPD groups revealed better overall fit and accuracy.