1
|
Wu Q, Ru G, Xiao W, Wang Q, Li Z. Adverse effects of ovarian cryopreservation and auto-transplantation on ovarian grafts and quality of produced oocytes in a mouse model. Clin Sci (Lond) 2023; 137:1577-1591. [PMID: 37782233 PMCID: PMC10600147 DOI: 10.1042/cs20230483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
The process of ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation is the only feasible fertility preservation method for prepubertal girls and female patients with cancer who cannot delay radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, basic research on this technique is lacking. To better understand ovarian function and oocyte quality after ovarian tissue (OT) transplantation, we characterised the appearance, angiogenesis, and endocrine function of ovarian grafts in a murine model; the mitochondrial function and DNA damage in oocytes isolated from the OT; and the development of embryos after in vitro fertilisation. The results showed a decrease in oocyte numbers in the transplanted OT, abnormal endocrine function of ovarian grafts, as well as dysfunctional mitochondria and DNA damage in the oocytes, which could adversely affect subsequent embryonic development. However, these adverse phenotypes were partially or completely resolved within 21 days of transplantation, suggesting that ovulation induction and assisted pregnancy treatment should not be conducted too soon after OT transfer to ensure optimal patient and offspring outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Que Wu
- Reproductive Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou City, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Gaizhen Ru
- Reproductive Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou City, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Wanfen Xiao
- Reproductive Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou City, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Reproductive Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou City, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiling Li
- Reproductive Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou City, 515041, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu C, Wu T, Chen D, Wei S, Tang W, Xue L, Xiong J, Huang Y, Guo Y, Chen Y, Wu M, Wang S. The effects and mechanism of taxanes on chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage: A review of current evidence. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1025018. [PMID: 36531475 PMCID: PMC9756165 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1025018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy is often a cause of premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility since the ovarian follicles are extremely sensitive to the effects of chemotherapeutic agents. Different chemotherapeutic agents with varying mechanisms of action may damage ovarian function differently. Taxanes are widely used in clinical cancer treatment, but the specific reproductive toxicological information is still controversial. This review described the impact and duration of taxanes on ovarian function in women and analyzed the possible reasons for different conclusions. Furthermore, the toxicity of taxanes on ovarian function and its possible mechanisms were discussed. The potential protective strategies and agents against ovarian damage induced by taxanes are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuqing Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Tong Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Dan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Simin Wei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Weicheng Tang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Liru Xue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jiaqiang Xiong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yibao Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Yican Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Meng Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Shixuan Wang, ; Meng Wu,
| | - Shixuan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Shixuan Wang, ; Meng Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Female Oncofertility: Current Understandings, Therapeutic Approaches, Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235690. [PMID: 34884393 PMCID: PMC8658080 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in early detection and oncological therapies have ameliorated the survival rate of young cancer patients. Yet, ovarian impairment induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy is still a challenging issue. This review, based on clinical and lab-based studies, summarizes the evidence of gonadotoxicity of chemoradiotherapy, the recent approaches, ongoing controversies, and future perspectives of fertility preservation (FP) in female patients who have experienced chemo- or radio-therapy. Existing data indicate that chemotherapeutic agents induce DNA alterations and massive follicle activation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway. Meanwhile, the radiation causes ionizing damage, leading to germ cell loss. In addition to the well-established methods, numerous therapeutic approaches have been suggested, including minimizing the follicle loss in cryopreserved ovarian grafts after transplantation, in vitro activation or in vitro growing of follicles, artificial ovarian development, or fertoprotective adjuvant to prevent ovarian damage from chemotherapy. Some reports have revealed positive outcomes from these therapies, whereas others have demonstrated conflictions. Future perspectives are improving the live birth rate of FP, especially in patients with adverse ovarian reserve, eliminating the risk of malignancy reintroducing, and increasing society’s awareness of FP importance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ovarian Reserve after Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11080704. [PMID: 34442350 PMCID: PMC8400427 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11080704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in the female population. In recent years, its diagnosis in young women has increased, together with a growing desire to become pregnant later in life. Although there is evidence about the detrimental effect of chemotherapy (CT) on the menses cycle, a practical tool to measure ovarian reserve is still missing. Recently, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) has been considered a good surrogate for ovarian reserve. The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the effect of CT on AMH value. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the PubMed and Scopus electronic databases on articles retrieved from inception until February 2021. Trials evaluating ovarian reserves before and after CT in BC were included. We excluded case reports, case-series with fewer than ten patients, reviews (narrative or systematic), communications and perspectives. Studies in languages other than English or with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients were also excluded. AMH reduction was the main endpoint. Egger's and Begg's tests were used to assess the risk of publication bias. RESULTS Eighteen trials were included from the 833 examined. A statistically significant decline in serum AMH concentration was found after CT, persisting even after years, with an overall reduction of -1.97 (95% CI: -3.12, -0.82). No significant differences in ovarian reserve loss were found in the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to wild-type patients. CONCLUSIONS Although this study has some limitations, including publication bias, failure to stratify the results by some important factors and low to medium quality of the studies included, this metanalysis demonstrates that the level of AMH markedly falls after CT in BC patients, corresponding to a reduction in ovarian reserve. These findings should be routinely discussed during oncofertility counseling and used to guide fertility preservation choices in young women before starting treatment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang S, Pei L, Hu T, Jia M, Wang S. Protective effect of goserelin on ovarian reserve during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients: a prospective cohort study in China. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:976-986. [PMID: 33411897 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does goserelin, a GnRH agonist, have a protective effect in young breast cancer patients in terms of ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) during chemotherapy? SUMMARY ANSWER Compared with chemotherapy alone, concurrent goserelin is associated with a higher probability of ovarian reserve recovery at 1 year after chemotherapy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous studies on the administration of goserelin to protect ovarian function during chemotherapy have produced conflicting results because of the endpoint used, namely, chemotherapy-induced amenorrhoea. Reproductive medicine specialists consider AMH and AFC as the most sensitive ovarian reserve markers; however, they have never been used as biomarkers to assess the potential protective effects on ovarian reserve of goserelin during chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a prospective cohort study in which patients were assigned to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with goserelin (the goserelin group) or without goserelin (the control group) according to each patient's preference. Of 242 breast cancer patients enrolled between December 2015 and November 2019, 76 in control group and 73 in goserelin group were able to be assessed at 1 year after chemotherapy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Premenopausal patients with a regular menstrual cycle and aged 18-45 years were eligible for enrolment if they were newly diagnosed with stages I-III breast cancer for which treatment with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was planned. Each patient in the goserelin group was given a subcutaneous dose of 3.6 mg at least 1 week before the first cycle of chemotherapy and then every 4 weeks for the duration of chemotherapy. Ovarian reserve markers and menstrual status were evaluated before and after chemotherapy in the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was the AMH recovery rate, the secondary endpoints were the recovery rates of AFC, estradiol (E2), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and menstruation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Among 149 patients (76 in the control group and 73 in the goserelin group) with complete data at 1 year after chemotherapy, the adjusted recovery rate of AMH was 46.5% and 21.8% in the goserelin group and control group, respectively (odds ratio: 3.08; P = 0.002). The trends in AFC and FSH recovery rates were consistent with that in AMH recovery rate. Notably, AMH levels remained low in 41.3% of patients whose menstrual activity had resumed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Randomisation was not performed because of ethical considerations, so selection bias was inevitable, although propensity score weighting was done. The study was also underpowered because 21.5% (52/242) of enrolled patients received GnRH agonist-containing endocrine therapy and could not be analysed at 1 and 2 years after chemotherapy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results indicate that co-administration of goserelin with chemotherapy provides obvious ovarian reserve protection in these young breast cancer patients. We expect that these results will be applicable in clinical practice for young breast cancer patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2016YFC0901302, by the Research and Development Fund of Peking University People's Hospital No. RD2014-13, RDY2017-19 and by AstraZeneca. The authors have no disclosures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02430103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Pei
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Taobo Hu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mei Jia
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shu Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moura GAD, Monteiro PB. Cytotoxic Activity of Antineoplastic Agents on Fertility: A Systematic Review. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2020; 42:759-768. [PMID: 33254272 PMCID: PMC10309244 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the long-term effects of antineoplastic treatments on patient fertility. SELECTION OF STUDIES The studies were selected through the New PubMed, Scielo and Lilacs databases along with references used for the creation of the present work. For the selection of studies, articles published between the periods from January 1, 2015 to April 6, 2020 in the English, Portuguese and Spanish languages were used. As inclusion criteria: cohort studies and studies conducted in vitro. As exclusion criteria: review articles, reported cases, studies that do not address thematic reproduction, studies that do not address the cancer theme, articles that used animals, articles that address the preservation of fertility and articles in duplicate in the bases. DATA COLLECTION The collected data included: age of the patient at the beginning of treatment, type of neoplasm, type of antineoplastic treatment, chemotherapy used, radiotherapy dosage, radiotherapy site, effect of antineoplastic agents on fertility and number of patients in the study. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty studies were evaluated, antineoplastic chemotherapy agents and radiotherapy modulate serum hormone levels, reduces germ cell quantities and correlated with an increase in sterility rates. The effects mentioned occur in patients in the prepubertal and postpubertal age. CONCLUSION Antineoplastic treatments have cytotoxic effects on the germ cells leading to hormonal modulation, and pubertal status does not interfere with the cytotoxic action of therapies.
Collapse
|