Sustainable solutions for direct TLC enantioseparation with in-home thought-out, prepared/modified chiral stationary phases

TLC is used globally, yet less attention has been paid to TLC (in enantioseparation) despite its advantages. The present paper describes/reviews successfully practiced direct approaches of 'chiral additive in achiral stationary phase' (as an application of in-home thought out, prepared, tested, and modified chiral stationary phase), 'pre-mixing of chiral reagent with the enantiomeric mixture' (an approach using both achiral phases during chromatographic separation) and 'chiral additive in mobile phase', and chiral ligand exchange for enantioseparation of DL-amino acids, their derivatives, and some active pharmaceutical ingredients. It provided efficient enantioseparation, quantitative determination, and isolation of native forms via in-situ formation of non-covalent diastereomeric pair. The mechanism of enantioseparation in these approaches has been discussed along with the isolation and establishment of the structure of diastereomers. This may help chemists gain useful insights into fields outside their specialization and the experts get brief accounts of recent key developments, providing solutions for sustainable development of less expensive methods for control of enantiomeric purity and isolation of native enantiomers.

Enantioselective Analysis of Mexiletine Using Chromatographic Techniques: A Review

Background:

Mexiletine belongs to the β-amino-aryl-ether group of pharmaceutical and applied in the diagnosis of antiarrhythmics, allodynia, and myotonic disorders. In its chemical structure, it possesses a chiral center and practiced in the form of the racemic mixture. The production and accessibility of mexiletine have accompanied with a meaningful development in awareness of its pharmacologic actions. But in clinical arrhythmias and binding experiments on cardiac sodium channels, the (R)-enantiomer of mexiletine is more potent than the (S)-enantiomer. Also, (S)-enantiomer is further active in the diagnosis of allodynia than the (R)-enantiomer.

Methods:

During the last two decades, chromatographic techniques such as HPLC, and GC coupled with mass spectrometry or field ionization detector was used for the stereoselective analysis of MEX enantiomers.

Results:

The direct enantioresolution deal with the use of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) with or no pre-derivatization which depend on a chromophoric entity in the racemates whereas indirect HPLC process involved the use of chiral derivatization reagents (CDR) for the synthesis of diastereomeric derivatives of racemates. Different techniques have their strengths and weaknesses.

Conclusion:

Regulation of enantiomeric purity and estimation of particular enantiomers of drug molecules stays an essential topic for therapeutic, diagnostic, and regulatory uses and to promote a precise assessment of the hazards to human health by false enantiomers. This review aims to offer a systematic survey of the analytical methods (chromatography based) used in the enantioselective analysis of MEX developed in the last two decades (the year 2000 onwards).

'Ab Ovo' Chiral Phases and Chiral Reagents for Liquid Chromatographic Separation and Isolation of Enantiomers

The de-novo approach of mixing chirally pure reagents or Cu(II)-L-amino acid complexes in the slurry of silica gel for preparing TLC plates was reported from author's laboratory and was successful for separation and isolation of enantiomers. Using high molar absorptivity molecules, e. g., 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and cyanuric chloride, more than 38 new chiral derivatizing reagents were synthesized in our laboratory by straightforward nucleophilic substitution with simple chiral auxiliaries. Besides, (S)-naproxen, (S)-ketoprofen, and (S)-levofloxacin were used as chiral platforms. A conceptual approach using both achiral phases in chromatography for enantioseparation was also adopted. ¹ H NMR and DFT based software were used to explain structures of non-covalent and covalent diastereomeric pairs and determination of configuration and separation mechanism. The methods can be easily used to determine and control enantiomeric purity with advantages over a variety of commercial chiral phases.