Evaluation of Bloodstream Infections During Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Malignant Hematological Diseases: Single Center Experience

Third-generation cephalosporin resistant gram-negative bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy; an 11-year multi-centre retrospective study

Objectives

Among patients with haematological malignancy, bacteraemia is a common complication during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Resistance of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) is increasing. In order to explore the value of using surveillance cultures to guide empirical treatment e.g. choosing between carbapenem versus ceftazidime- we aimed to assess the distribution of pathogens causing bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy, and the proportion of 3GC-resistant GNB (3GC-R GNB) bacteraemia that was preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization.

Methods

Using 11 years of data (2008–2018) from the Dutch national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system, we assessed the prevalence of 3GC-R GNB in episodes of bacteraemia, and the proportion of 3GC-R GNB bacteraemia that was preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization. Colonization was defined as availability of any GNB surveillance isolate in the year before, independent of the causative micro-organism (time-paired isolates).

Results

We included 3887 patients, representing 4142 episodes of bacteraemia. GNB were identified in 715/4142 (17.3%), of which 221 (30.9%) were 3GC-R GNB. In 139 of these 221 patients a time-paired surveillance culture was available. In 76.2% (106/139) of patients these surveillance cultures already showed 3GC-R GNB isolates in the year prior to the culture date of the 3GC-R GNB positive blood isolate.

Conclusions

This multi-centre study shows that in patients with haematological malignancy, the majority of 3GC-R GNB bacteraemia is preceded by 3GC-R GNB colonization. Prospective clinical studies are needed to assess the safety and benefits of the use of surveillance-cultures to guide empirical therapy to restrict the empirical use of carbapenems in this population.

A practical update on the epidemiology and risk factors for the emergence and mortality of bloodstream infections from real-world data of 3014 hematological malignancy patients receiving chemotherapy

Background: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common and serious complication after patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) receiving chemotherapy. This study examined real-world data seeking to characterize HM BSI and identify risk factors for BSI emergence and mortality.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the pathogenic epidemiology, antibiotic resistance, and BSI risk factors in a single-center cohort including 3014 consecutive patients with HM receiving chemotherapy between 2013 and 2016. Results of the pathogenic epidemiology were validated via comparison to available reported data.

Results: We found that 725 patients (24.1%) had BSIs. Gram-negative (G-) bacteria represented 64.7% of the 744 isolated pathogenic strains, while Gram-positive (G+) bacteria and fungi accounted for 27.7% and 7.7% of the BSIs, respectively. The most common isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.2%), and 95.1% of the multidrug-resistant strains (MDR) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing strains. G- bacteria were the main microflora responsible for BSI in our cohort of Chinese HM patients compared to studies in developed countries or in neutropenic children with HM or solid tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, age ≥ 45 and < 65 yr, hospital length of stay ≥ 9d, neutropenia ≥ 7d before cultures, ≥ 2 antibiotics, and infections (gastrointestinal, perirectal, or urinary tract) independently predicted BSI emergence. Furthermore, age ≥ 65 yr, neutropenia ≥ 7d before blood cultures, no HM remission, lower white blood cell count, ≥ 3 antibiotics, respiratory infections, and Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BSI were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.

Conclusions: G- bacteria were the predominant microflora during the study period and antibiotic resistance levels of the pathogens detected were high, especially for MDR strains. The mortality of BSI patients was high in this large cohort. Close attention should be paid to the risk factors identified here to facilitate timely and effective clinical management of such patients.

Timing of Blood Cultures in the Setting of Febrile Neutropenia: An Australian Institutional Experience

Objective

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a hematological emergency requiring urgent investigations to exclude infection and treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Despite frequent blood cultures (BCs) being taking during episodes of FN, in the current literature BC positivity rates remain low in FN. This study aims to determine the BC positivity rate in FN hematology patients and determine the utility of collecting BCs beyond 24 h of commencing broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Materials and Methods

BC results between 2014 and 2016 from all FN hematology patients were analyzed. Patient episodes of FN (PEFNs) were defined as a continuous period of FN where the interval between BC samples was a maximum of two days. In total from 2014 to 2016, 379 patients experienced 914 PEFNs and had 4267 BCs collected.

Results

Overall BC positivity rates and BC-positive PEFN rates were 8.16% and 13.35%, respectively. Within the first 24 h, the positivity rate of the first BCs was 3.49%, while subsequent BC positivity within the first 24 h was 11.96%. BC positivity rates declined after 24 h to 2.18%.

Conclusion

It is likely that BCs beyond 24 h of commencing broad-spectrum antibiotics will rarely identify relevant microorganisms. Not collecting BCs after 24 h would likely reduce laboratory test costs, patient discomfort, and iatrogenic anemia.

Synchronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections: The Need for All Artificial Joints to Be Aspirated Routinely

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication with increasing incidence. However, we are not aware of any robust data on patients having PJI at the same time in ≥2 joints that had undergone total joint arthroplasty, referred to as synchronous PJI throughout this article. The aims of this study were to investigate the probability of the development of synchronous PJI of another prosthetic joint and to identify possible clinical risk factors for the development of synchronous PJI. In addition, we aimed to determine whether routine aspiration of all other prosthetic joints was warranted after a diagnosis of PJI in a single joint.

METHODS

A total of 2,532 septic revision procedures were performed during the study period. In the final analysis, 644 patients (26 with synchronous PJI and 618 with non-synchronous PJI) with 1,508 prosthetic joints were included. The mean age (and standard deviation) was 71 ± 9.6 years. Using bivariate analyses, we calculated the odds of synchronous PJI as a function of various demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A suspicious clinical presentation of the non-primary joint had the strongest association with synchronous PJI (odds ratio [OR], 58.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.4 to 152.8]). Additional associations with synchronous PJI were detected for a history of neoplasia (OR, 12 [95% CI, 3.9 to 37.2]), the use of immune-modulating therapy (OR, 9.5 [95% CI, 3.4 to 26.2]), the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis (OR, 8.4 [95% CI, 2.8 to 25]), and having ≥3 prosthetic joints (OR, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.37 to 6.64]).

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous PJI is a rare but very serious complication and every prosthetic joint should be investigated meticulously. Suspicious clinical presentation, a history of neoplasia, sepsis, immune-modulating therapy, and ≥3 prosthetic joints were identified as risk factors and should increase the physician's vigilance. In the case of PJI, aspiration of each joint that had undergone total joint arthroplasty should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Significance of Isolates Known to Be Blood Culture Contaminants in Pediatric Patients

Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of isolates from blood stream infection known to be blood culture contaminants in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Microbiological reports and medical records of all blood culture tests issued from 2002 to 2012 (n = 76,331) were retrospectively reviewed. Evaluation for potential contaminants were done by reviewing medical records of patients with the following isolates: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, viridans group Streptococcus, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Micrococcus, Aerococcus, and Proprionibacterium species. Repeated cultures with same isolates were considered as a single case. Cases were evaluated for their status as a pathogen. Results: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus had clinical significance in 23.8% of all cases. Its rate of being a true pathogen was particularly high in patients with malignancy (43.7%). Viridans group Streptococcus showed clinical significance in 46.2% of all cases. Its rate of being a true pathogen was similar regardless of the underlying morbidity of the patient. The rate of being a true pathogens for remaining isolates was 27.7% for Bacillus and 19.0% for Corynebacterium species. Conclusions: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and viridans group Streptococcus isolates showed high probability of being true pathogens in the pediatric population, especially in patients with underlying malignancy.

Empiric antibiotic protocols for cancer patients with neutropenia: a single-center study of treatment efficacy and mortality in patients with bacteremia

BACKGROUND

There are several empiric antibiotic treatment options for febrile neutropenia, yet there is no universally-accepted initial protocol. We aimed to assess the performance of a protocol (piperacillin, gentamicin and cefazolin) introduced over 40 years ago and compare its coverage against bacteria isolated from blood of neutropenic patients with that of various commonly used antibiotic treatment protocols.

METHODS

Adults with neutropenia admitted between 2003 and 2012 to the hemato-oncologic departments and in whom blood cultures were taken on admission were included. Appropriateness of several common antibiotic protocols was assessed based on the susceptibility of the blood isolates. Crude mortality rates were computed by the susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients' blood to the actual treatment given.

RESULTS

In total, 180 admissions of neutropenic patients (95 in patients who had fever above 38 °C) with positive blood cultures were analyzed. The actual antibiotic regimen prescribed was deemed appropriate in 82% of bacteremia episodes. The recommended institutional protocol was used in 62% of bacteremia episodes in neutropenic patients. This protocol would have been appropriate in 85% of all neutropenic bacteremia episodes and 89% of episodes in febrile neutropenia patients compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (79%, P = 0.13 and 76%, P = 0.002, respectively) and imipenem (93%, P = 0.004 and 92%, P = 0.74, respectively). Isolation of bacteria resistant to the actual antibiotic treatment given was associated with higher mortality at one week and at 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Common current antibiotic regimens provide similar coverage among febrile neutropenic patients, whereas broad spectrum antibiotic combinations maximize coverage among neutropenic patients.