The Pathology and Molecular Genetics of Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Mini-Review

Case report: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma masquerading as hydronephrosis

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC), a manifestation of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma, is characterized by elevated invasiveness and a grim prognosis. Typically, SRCC patients present with advanced or metastatic conditions and survival rates rarely extend beyond one year. In this study, we describe a case of SRCC characterized by the patient exhibiting right flank pain without hematuria. Initially, imaging interpretations led to a diagnosis of severe hydronephrosis. Subsequently, an open right nephrectomy post-surgery confirmed the pathology of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma.

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Present and Future of Treatment Paradigms

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is an aggressive form of kidney cancer that is associated with poor prognosis. It can arise from any histologic type of renal cell carcinoma. The majority of cases will present with advanced or metastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. Nephrectomy is the treatment of choice in locally resectable disease. The therapeutic options for sRCC have evolved in the past decade. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and monotherapy with targeted therapy (VEGF and mTOR) have historically shown poor response rates and survival in the treatment of metastatic sRCC. The use of checkpoint inhibitors and their combination with targeted therapy against VEGF has changed the landscape and outcomes for renal cell carcinoma. Given the rarity of sRCC most of the data on treatment is from small cohorts or extrapolation from larger clinical trials. The benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy to VEGF has shown promise in the sRCC population in post hoc analysis of large clinical trials. Future research focusing on further characterizing the unique biologic and clinical features of sRCC is critical in advancing the knowledge and developing effective therapy to improve clinical outcomes and survival.

Novel risk scoring system for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with cabozantinib

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib is an effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) criteria is the gold standard for risk stratification in mRCC. We created a risk scoring system specific for mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 87 patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were used to measure clinical outcomes. Upon variable selection in multivariable analysis (MVA), elevated baseline monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), sarcomatoid histologic component, ECOG PS > 1, and absence of bone metastases were each assigned 1 point. A three-group risk scoring system was then created: low (score=0-1), intermediate (score=2), and high risk (score=3-4). The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years-old and the majority were males (71%) with clear-cell RCC (75%). Most (67%) received at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy. High risk and intermediate risk pts had significantly shorter OS (high risk HR: 13.84, p<0.001; intermediate risk HR: 3.50, p = 0.004) and PFS (high risk HR: 7.31, p<0.001; intermediate risk HR: 1.87, p = 0.053) compared to low risk patients in MVA.

CONCLUSIONS

RCC patients treated with cabozantinib may benefit from specific risk stratification criteria using RCC histology, ECOG PS, sites of metastatic disease, and MLR. These variables are easily accessible in the clinical setting and may be helpful to determine which mRCC patients may benefit from treatment with cabozantinib.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biology, natural history and management

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is an uncommon feature that can occur in most histological subtypes of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and carries a decidedly poor prognosis. Historically, conventional treatments for sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have shown little efficacy, and median survival is commonly 6–13 months. Despite being first described in 1968, the mechanisms driving sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remain poorly understood, and information and treatment options available to physicians and patients are limited. When diagnosed at an early stage, surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice. However, preoperative identification through routine imaging or biopsy is unreliable and most patients present with advanced disease and systemic symptoms. For these patients, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy is disputed. The expansion of immunotherapies approved for RCCs has generated a search for biomarkers that might be indicative of treatment response in sRCCs, although a proven effective systemic agent remains elusive. PDL1 expression is increased in sarcomatoid dedifferentiated renal tumours, which suggests that patients with sRCCs could benefit from PD1 and/or PDL1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Treatment outcomes for sarcomatoid tumours have remained relatively consistent compared with other RCCs, but further investigation of the tumour–immune cell microenvironment might yield insights into further therapeutic possibilities.

In this Review, Blum et al. summarize the current knowledge on sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, a diagnosis characterized by the presence of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation and a poor prognosis. They discuss the origin, presentation, molecular biology and treatment of this disease.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is not considered to be a unique histological subtype of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs); rather, it can be present within any subtype of RCCs.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation appears in ~4% of all RCCs, but is present in ~20% of all metastatic RCCs. According to WHO guidelines, any RCC with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is a WHO–International Society of Urological Pathology grade 4 lesion.

Sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is often heterogeneously present within RCCs, making routine imaging and biopsy unreliable for preoperative detection. Surgical resection for localized disease is the standard of care, with subsequent close monitoring of patients following surgery.

In patients with metastatic disease, conventional therapies such as surgery and systemic agents have been ineffective and overall 5-year survival remains at 23.5–33%.

Previous genomic analyses have failed to identify definitive mutational drivers of disease. However, sarcomatoid RCCs (sRCCs) have been shown to have higher PD1 and PDL1 expression than other subtypes of RCCs. Newer combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies could yield improved responses and outcomes.

Studies investigating sRCCs are limited by patient numbers owing to the low incidence of sRCCs and their advanced stage at presentation. Multi-institutional efforts to establish a consensus on treatment recommendations based on highly powered data are essential.

Evolving Paradigms in the Management and Outcomes of Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common cancer that affects a significant number of patients every year around the world. The presence of sarcomatoid features in these tumors is considered a poor prognostic feature. Patients with RCC with sarcomatoid features had significantly worse outcomes when treated with sunitinib, the previous first-line standard of care therapy when compared to patients without such features. Multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently been approved for the treatment of RCC. In this article, we review the literature available on the outcomes of patients with sarcomatoid RCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Possible reversibility between epithelioid and sarcomatoid types of mesothelioma is independent of ERC/mesothelin expression

Background

Mesothelioma is histologically divided into three subgroups: epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic types. The epithelioid or sarcomatoid type is morphologically defined by polygonal or spindle-like forms of cells, respectively. The biphasic type consists of both components. It is not yet understood how histological differentiation of mesothelioma is regulated. ERC/mesothelin is expressed in most cases of the epithelioid type, but not in the sarcomatoid type of mesothelioma. Consequently, its expression is well correlated to the histological subtype. We hypothesized that ERC/mesothelin expression influences the histological differentiation of mesothelioma, and tested this hypothesis.

Methods

We performed studies using the overexpression or knockdown of ERC/mesothelin in mesothelioma cells to examine its effect on cellular morphology, growth kinetics, or migration/invasion activity, in vitro. We then transplanted ERC/mesothelin-overexpressing and control cells into the intraperitoneal space of mice. We examined the effect of ERC/mesothelin overexpression on mouse survival and tumor phenotype.

Results

In vitro cell culture manipulations of ERC/mesothelin expression did not affect cellular morphology or proliferation, although its overexpression enhanced cellular adhesion and the migration/invasion activity of mesothelioma cells. The survival rate of mice following intraperitoneal transplantation of ERC/mesothelin-overexpressing mesothelioma cells was significantly lower than that of mice with control cells. The histological evaluation of the tumors, however, did not show any morphological difference between two groups, and our hypothesis was not validated. Unexpectedly, both groups (ERC/mesothelin-overexpressing and control) of mesothelioma cells that were morphologically monophasic and spindle-like in vitro differentiated into a biphasic type consisting of polygonal and spindle-like components in the transplanted tumor, irrespective of ERC/mesothelin expression.

Conclusions

These results suggested that the histological transition of mesothelioma between epithelioid and sarcomatoid types may be reversible and regulated not by ERC/mesothelin, but by other unknown mechanisms.

FDG PET/CT and CT Findings of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Differentiation

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and enhanced CT in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid differentiation and the differential diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Among patients with renal tumors confirmed by pathologic examination from September 2010 to August 2019, 29 patients with RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and 82 patients with ccRCC who underwent FDG PET/CT, renal contrast-enhanced CT examination, or both, before surgery were studied. Features of the two groups on CT and PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS. The tumor size of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation was larger than that of ccRCC (p = 0.0086). Cystic necrosis, peritumoral neovascularity, and metastasis were more common in RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation (p = 0.0052, p = 0.0008, p < 0.0001, respectively). The ratio of necrotic area to tumor diameter of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation was statistically significantly larger than that of ccRCC (p = 0.0032). Three cases of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation showed a large central necrotic area and dense intratu-moral neovascularity in the surrounding parenchyma, defined as the ring-of-fire sign, which was not found in ccRCC. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean), and peak standardized uptake value (SUV_peak) of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation were statistically significantly higher than those for ccRCC (all p < 0.0001), and the SUV_max, SUV_mean, and SUV_peak cutoff values of 5.4, 4.2, and 5.0, respectively, were helpful for discrimination. CONCLUSION. Imaging features including higher SUV_max, SUV_mean, and SUV_peak; a larger ratio of necrotic area to tumor diameter; the presence of peritumoral neovascularity; and metastasis are more commonly associated with RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation than with ccRCC. The ring-of-fire sign and SUV_max, SUV_mean, SUV_peak cutoff values of 5.4, 4.2, 5.0, respectively, may be helpful to indicate RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation.

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma With Unusual Metastasis to the Small Intestine Manifesting as Perforated Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma is a rare form of dedifferentiated carcinoma with a high metastatic rate and adverse prognosis. Common sites of metastasis include lymph nodes, lung, liver and bone. We report a case of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with unusual metastasis to the small intestine in a 65-year-old female with a history of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with focal sarcomatoid transformation.

CASE REPORT

The patient presented to the Emergency Department with worsening abdominal pain. Imaging showed perforated acute appendicitis, however, diagnostic laparoscopy found no evidence of appendicitis, but a small punctate perforation in the small intestine. Gross examination of the small intestine showed a 2 cm tan-white lobular firm lesion at the perforation site involving the full thickness of the wall. Histological examination revealed a high-grade spindle-cell neoplasm with hyperchromatic and pleomorphic nuclei, frequent mitotic figures, and necrosis. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CD10 and carbonic anhydrase 9, but negative for pan-cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, paired box gene 8, renal cell carcinoma, desmin, smooth-muscle actin, c-KIT, discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor protein 1, CD34, and S100. Molecular studies showed that the tumor cells were microsatellite stable but harbored mutations in polybromo-1, telomerase reverse transcriptase, and von Hippel-Lindau genes, supporting renal cell carcinoma in nature. The patient received radiation therapy but unfortunately died after one month due to rapid disease progression.

CONCLUSION

This was a rare and challenging case of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma metastasis to the small intestine with loss of some renal cell carcinoma markers, reinforcing the aggressive nature of this entity and the importance of correlating findings with the prior history for reaching correct diagnosis.

Patterns of Presentation and Treatment Outcomes of Non-clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients in 2 Tertiary Referral Centers in Sydney, Australia

BACKGROUND

Non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features (scRCC) are rare, and represent subtypes with less defined treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to describe the patterns of care and outcomes of these patients in 2 tertiary referral centers in South Western Sydney Local Health District over a 10-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with RCC seen at South Western Sydney Local Health District from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015 were identified from electronic medical records. For each patient, we extracted details regarding demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, recurrences, and survival, which was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 178 patients with RCC identified between 2005 and 2015, 23% (n = 41) had nccRCC and 8% (n = 15) had scRCC. Twenty-five patients in total had de novo metastatic disease or disease recurrence. The median follow-up was 46 and 16 months for nccRCC and scRCC, respectively. The median overall survival for nccRCC with metastatic disease was 34 months (range, 14 months to not reached). Seventy percent of these patients received systemic therapy. By contrast, the median overall survival for scRCC with metastatic disease was 10 months (range, 1.6-89 months). Less than one-half of the patients with scRCC received systemic therapy in our cohort, with only 34% receiving no more than 1 line of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the rapid and aggressive course of scRCC, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic strategies in this rare patient population.

Extensive Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT: a Case Report and Review of Literature

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is a highly aggressive form of dedifferentiated renal cell carcinoma. We report a 62-year-old man who presented with respiratory symptoms and a lung mass on chest computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and was found to have extensive metastatic disease. Based on the history and imaging findings, there were possible primary malignancies, including bronchogenic carcinoma, melanoma, or an aggressive lymphoma. An excisional biopsy surprisingly revealed a high-grade sarcomatoid carcinoma with no evidence of differentiation, and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies showed that the tumor cells were positive for markers of genitourinary origin (PAX-8 and vimentin). The histologic and IHC results, along with multiple FDG-avid exophytic lesions in both kidneys, were considered diagnostic of sRCC. Here we have highlighted the potential role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT in patients with sRCC, discussed the diagnostic challenges, and presented a brief review.