1
|
Rawal S, Ganpule A, Singh G, Shrivastava N, Kishore TA, Dubey D, Mavuduru RS, Kumar A, Gautam G, Pooleri GK, Keshavamurthy M, Ragavan N, Baxi H, Addla SK, Raghunath SK, Dahiya A, Gupta D, Sharma G. Perioperative and functional outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Descriptive analysis of Indian study group on partial nephrectomy database. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:121-126. [PMID: 38725898 PMCID: PMC11078450 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_443_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN. Methods For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers. Results In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively. Conclusions This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhir Rawal
- Department of Genito Uro-Oncology Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Arvind Ganpule
- Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Gurpremjit Singh
- Department of Uro-Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Nikita Shrivastava
- Department of Urology, DKS Super Speciality Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - T. A. Kishore
- Department of Urology, Aster Medicity, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Deepak Dubey
- Department of Urology, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Ravimohan S. Mavuduru
- Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anant Kumar
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Max Hospitals, Delhi, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Department of Uro-Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Ginil Kumar Pooleri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | | | - Hemang Baxi
- Department of Urology, HCG Cancer Center, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Sanjai Kumar Addla
- Department of Uro Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | - Akhil Dahiya
- Department of Clinical and Medical Affairs, Intuitive Surgical, California, USA
| | | | - Gopal Sharma
- Department of Urology, Medanta, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wong R, Patel B, Biyani CS. Perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic versus open versus robotic partial nephrectomy: Current Review. Urologia 2024; 91:26-32. [PMID: 37960843 DOI: 10.1177/03915603231211975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of small renal tumours remain gold-standard for individuals who are suitable candidates. Over the last decade, minimally invasive surgery has provided significant advancements within the field of urological surgery. However, there is still a debate on which surgical modality is superior. This study aims to review the current literature on perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic (LPN), open (OPN) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) using the standardised system, Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). METHODS A literature search was performed on Cochrane, Embase and PubMed databases. Articles between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Perioperative outcomes investigated include estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time (OT), conversion rate (CR), warm ischaemia time (WIT), positive surgical margin (PSM) and postoperative complications using CDC. Relevant pieces of literatures were analysed and data were extracted. RESULTS This study included 12 studies, with a total of 3908 patients. (LPN = 1120, OPN = 1206 and RPN = 1580). LPN demonstrated a lower overall EBL (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between OT (p = 0.291), CR (p = 0.200), WIT (p = 0.760), PSM (p = 0.549), CDC I (p = 0.556), CDC II (p = 0.779) and CDC⩾III (p = 0.663) of the three surgical approaches. CONCLUSION Compared with OPN and RPN, LPN demonstrated a lower EBL. All other perioperative outcomes demonstrated similar results between the three treatment modalities. Future large-scale, prospective, randomised studies is necessary to draw a definitive conclusion from this analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruby Wong
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bijendra Patel
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Chandra Shekhar Biyani
- Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun ZJ, Liu F, Wei HB, Zhang DH. Laparoscopic partial versus radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma over 4 cm. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17837-17848. [PMID: 37943356 PMCID: PMC10725398 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05487-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) > 4 cm. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent LPN or LRN in our department from January 2012 to December 2017. Of the 151 patients who met the study selection criteria, 54 received LPN, and 97 received LRN. After propensity-score matching, 51 matched pairs were further analyzed. Data on patients' surgical data, complications, histologic data, renal function, and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Compared with the LRN group, the LPN group had a longer operative time (135 min vs. 102.5 min, p = 0.001), larger intraoperative bleeding (150 ml vs. 50 ml, p < 0.001), and required longer stays in hospital (8 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001); however, the level of ECT-GFR was superior at 3, 6, and 12 months (all p < 0.001). Similarly, a greater number of LRN patients developed CKD compared with LPN until postoperative 12 months (58.8% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). In patients with preoperative CKD, LPN may delay the progression of the CKD stage and even improve it when compared to LRN treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, CSS, MFS, and PFS (p = 0.06, p = 0.30, p = 0.90, p = 0.31, respectively). The surgical method may not be a risk factor for long-term survival prognosis. CONCLUSION LPN preserves renal function better than LRN and has the potential value of significantly reducing the risk of postoperative CKD, but the long-term survival prognosis of patients is comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Jun Sun
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hai-Bin Wei
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Da-Hong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharma G, Shah M, Ahluwalia P, Bhandari M, Ahlawat R, Rawal S, Sivaraman A, Thyavihally YB, Gautam G. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in a multi-institutional cohort of Indian patients. Indian J Urol 2023; 39:39-45. [PMID: 36824116 PMCID: PMC9942208 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_238_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The literature on studies reporting trifecta or pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in Indian patients is limited. The primary aim of this study was to report and evaluate the factors predicting trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following RAPN in Indian patients using the multicentric Vattikuti collective quality initiative (VCQI) database. Methods From the VCQI database for patients who underwent RAPN, data for Indian patients were extracted and analyzed for factors predicting the achievement of trifecta and pentafecta following RAPN. Trifecta was defined as the absence of complications, negative surgical margins, and warm ischemia period shorter than 25 min or zero ischemia. Pentafecta covers all the trifecta criteria as well as >90% preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and no stage upgrade of chronic kidney disease at 12 months. Results In this study, among 614 patients, the trifecta was achieved in 374 patients (60.9%) and pentafecta was achieved in 24.2% of the patients. Patients who achieved trifecta had significantly higher mean age (54.1 vs. 51.0 years, P = 0.005), body mass index (BMI) (26.7 vs. 26.03 kg/m2, P = 0.022), and smaller tumor size (38.6 vs. 41.4 mm, P = 0.028). The preoperative eGFR (84.2 vs. 91.9 ml/min, P = 0.012) and renal nephrometry score (RNS) (6.96 vs. 7.87, P ≤ 0.0001) were significantly lower in the trifecta group. Comparing patients who achieved pentafecta to those who did not, we noted a statistically significant difference between the two groups for tumor size (36.1 vs. 41.5 mm, P = 0.017) and RNS (6.6 vs. 7.7, P = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, BMI and RNS were associated with trifecta outcomes. Similarly, only RNS was identified as an independent predictor of pentafecta. Conclusions RNS and BMI were independent predictors of the trifecta. At the same time, RNS was identified as an independent predictor of pentafecta following RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gopal Sharma
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Milap Shah
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Rajesh Ahlawat
- Department of Urology, The Medicity Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sudhir Rawal
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Yuvaraja B. Thyavihally
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Where Do We Stand? Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:99-111. [PMID: 35507213 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01093-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present an overview of the current evidence-based studies covering diagnostic and management of SRM. RECENT FINDINGS Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of the cancers. Nowadays, partial nephrectomy (PN) represents gold standard treatment. New nephron-sparing approaches such as active surveillance and ablative therapies have been increasingly used as an alternative to surgical intervention. Due to novel comprehension of RCC and widespread use of imaging techniques, diagnosis at early stage in elderly patients has increased. Treatment decision-making should be based on patient and tumour characteristics. With expanding treatment options, the management of SRMs has become a debate and should be adjusted to patient and tumour characteristics. In a shared decision manner, both active surveillance with possible delayed intervention and focal therapy should be discussed with the patient as an alternative to partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
|
6
|
The Impact of Postoperative Renal Function Recovery after Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58040485. [PMID: 35454324 PMCID: PMC9028221 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58040485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between warm ischemic time (WIT) and postoperative renal function using Trifecta achievement in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent robotic (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with RCC who underwent RAPN (RAPN group) or LPN (LPN group) at three institutions in Japan between March 2012 and October 2021. The primary endpoints were the rate of trifecta achievement in both surgical techniques and the association between WIT and recovery of postoperative renal function surgical outcomes. Results: The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly lower in patients with LPN than in those with RAPN (p < 0.001). WIT ≥ 25 min were 18 patients (18%) in the RAPN group and 89 (52.7%) in the LPN group. The postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was almost the same. However, 13 patients (7.7%) had a decreased in eGFR ≥ 15% at 3 months after LPN compared with the preoperative eGFR. Conclusions: The rate of trifecta achievement in the RAPN group was significantly higher than that in the LPN group. However, eGFR was identified as relatively better preserved after PN in both groups.
Collapse
|
7
|
Predicting Strict Trifecta Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, and C-Index Scores. J Kidney Cancer VHL 2021; 8:1-12. [PMID: 34703725 PMCID: PMC8490181 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i4.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Nephrometry scores are designed to characterize tumors and stratify the surgical complexity. It remains unclear as to which nephrometry score can accurately predict the surgical outcomes. We aimed to assess the utility of radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior, location (RENAL), preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classifications (PADUA), and centrality index (C-index) nephrometry scores for predicting the strict Trifecta achievement from a single institution series robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively identified the prospectively maintained robotic surgery database records of 91 patients who underwent RAPN between June 2015 and September 2020 in Antalya Training and Research Hospital. The main outcome of the study was the achievement of strict Trifecta (negative surgical margin, no major urologic complications, warm ischemia time ≤25 min, and ≥85% preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate). A multivariable analysis was performed to identify the factors of strict Trifecta success. The mean patient age was 55.82 ± 13.37 years with a median clinical tumor size of 3.5 cm (IQR 2.5–4.9). The median RENAL, PADUA, and C-index score were 7(IQR 6–8), 8(IQR 7–10), and 2.01(IQR 1.64–2.72), respectively. A strict Trifecta could be achieved in 54 patients (59.3%). Clinical tumor size (P = 0.011), RENAL risk groups (low:reference; intermediate; P = 0.040; high; P = 0.009), PADUA risk groups (low:reference; intermediate; P = 0.044; high; P = 0.001) and C-index risk groups (low:reference; high; P = 0.015) were the independent predictors of strict Trifecta attainment in the multivariate analysis. None of the nephrometry scores were a superior predictor compared to other nephrometry scores in comparative analysis. RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scores were all independent predictors of a strict Trifecta achievement. Our comprehensive comparison of the three scores identified that none of the nephrometry scores proved to be inferior to others nephrometry scores.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee JSZ, Hall J, Sutherland T. Complications of renal interventions: a pictorial review of CT findings. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:102. [PMID: 34275011 PMCID: PMC8286918 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01048-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of potential vascular and non-vascular complications can arise from surgical, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, radiotherapy and radiological renal interventions, including percutaneous image-guided biopsy and drainage. Computed tomography scan is usually one of the first and most important diagnostic imaging examinations requested when a potential complication is suspected. There are a wide range of common and uncommon potential complications from renal interventions. An understanding of underlying risk factors is important to reduce potential complications from renal intervention. Radiologists play a crucial role in recognising and diagnosing post-renal intervention complications on computed tomography scans, which could significantly improve the patient’s prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean S Z Lee
- Medical Imaging Department, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Jonathan Hall
- Medical Imaging Department, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Tom Sutherland
- Medical Imaging Department, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kato D, Nakane K, Enomoto T, Tomioka M, Nakai C, Takai M, Iinuma K, Muramatsu Maekawa Y, Mizutani K, Tsuchiya T, Yokoi S, Koie T. The utility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal function preservation, regardless of warm ischemia time, compared with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2021; 14:386-393. [PMID: 33034158 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the chronologic changes in renal function after laparoscopic partial (LPN) or radical nephrectomy (LRN) in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma. METHODS In this retrospective study, patients with clinical stage T1 renal cell carcinoma who underwent LPN or LRN were divided into three groups, namely, LPN-A group including LPN patients with WIT ≤25 minutes, LPN-B group including LPN patients with WIT >25 minutes, and LRN group. Perioperative complications that occurred within 30 days after surgery were retrieved. All patients were followed-up every 3 months to evaluate the estimated glomerular filtration rate. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the chronological changes in renal function after surgery. RESULTS A total of 153 patients were enrolled in this study. The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate between day 1 and 2 weeks after surgery was significantly lower in the LPN-B group than in the LPN-A group (p<0.005). Both LPN-A and -B groups achieved eGFR ≥90% 2 weeks after surgery. In addition, the estimated glomerular filtration rate decline from post-operative day 1 through 24 months in the LPN-A group or the LPN-B group was significantly smaller than that in the LRN group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of LPN in patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma. Although complication rates were similar in both groups, post-operative renal function was not different between the LPN-A and -B groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiki Kato
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keita Nakane
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Torai Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masayuki Tomioka
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Chie Nakai
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Manabu Takai
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Koji Iinuma
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | | | - Kosuke Mizutani
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Tsuchiya
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Yokoi
- Department of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Soisrithong C, Sirisreetreerux P, Sangkum P, Kijvikai K, Viseshsindh W, Kongchareonsombat W, Leenanupunth C, Kochakarn W, Jenjitranant P. Comparative Outcomes and Predictive Assessment of Trifecta in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Cases with Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 10-Year Experience at Ramathibodi Hospital. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:425-435. [PMID: 34235099 PMCID: PMC8254405 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s316824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare perioperative and trifecta outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with small renal mass at Ramathibodi Hospital, and to determine predictive factors in connection with trifecta. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 141 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy by eight experienced surgeons from January 2009 to December 2018. Baseline preoperative characteristics, postoperative and trifecta outcomes of the three treatment modalities were compared and analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to determine predictive factors for trifecta achievement. Results A total of 70 patients had complete data available. Eighteen OPN, 11 LPN and 41 RPN cases were identified and reviewed. All preoperative and perioperative parameters were similar, except for operative time, which was significantly shorter in the OPN group compared with those undergoing LPN and RPN (135 vs 189 and 225 min, respectively; p-value = 0.001). Of these 70 patients, 59 were deemed eligible for and included in trifecta analysis, which revealed similar trifecta outcomes (64.29%, 45.45%, and 64.71% in the OPN, LPN, and RPN groups, respectively; p-value = 0.388). Univariate analysis showed that length of hospital stay was a negative associated factor for trifecta achievement (p-value = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.619 (0.44–0.88)). Conclusion Although OPN displayed the shortest operative time, the trifecta achievement rate was not significantly different among the three groups. The sole parameter, which was negatively associated with trifecta outcome achievement, was the length of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaichant Soisrithong
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pokket Sirisreetreerux
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Premsant Sangkum
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kittinut Kijvikai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wit Viseshsindh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wisoot Kongchareonsombat
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Charoen Leenanupunth
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wachira Kochakarn
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pocharapong Jenjitranant
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seetharam Bhat KR, Moschovas MC, Onol FF, Rogers T, Roof S, Patel VR, Schatloff O. Robotic renal and adrenal oncologic surgery: A contemporary review. Asian J Urol 2021; 8:89-99. [PMID: 33569275 PMCID: PMC7859360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has evolved over time. Radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and safe for level I, II and III thrombus in high volume centers. Though it is feasible for level IV thrombus, this procedure needs a multi-departmental co-operation. However, the safety of robot-assisted procedures in this subset is still unknown. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has been universally approved and found oncologically safe. Robotic adrenalectomy has been increasingly utilized for select cases, especially in bilateral tumors and for retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fikret Fatih Onol
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Travis Rogers
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Shannon Roof
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Vipul R. Patel
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
| | - Oscar Schatloff
- Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth Celebration Health, Celebration, FL, USA
- Sudmedica Health, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mercimek MN, Ozden E. Comparison of functional outcomes of off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy access techniques: A preliminary report. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 47:103-111. [PMID: 32840334 PMCID: PMC7712686 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare renal functional outcomes of access techniques in patients who underwent off-clamp (Off-C) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: Thirty-four Off-C LPNs in patients with functioning contralateral kidney from March 2011 to June 2018 were included in the study. Twenty-two patients underwent transperitoneal, 12 patients underwent retroperitoneal Off-C LPN. The primary outcome was glomerular filtration rate changes over time, postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of trifecta and pentafecta rate. Results: Preoperative demographics, tumor size (26.59 vs. 22.83mm, p=0.790), RENAL score (5.45 vs. 5.33, p=0.990), operation time (79.95 vs. 81.33 min, p=0.157), blood loss (170.23 vs. 150.83mL, p=0.790) were similar in both groups. Although preservation of renal function was better in group 2 in the early period, similar results were found in both groups at the end of the first year, postoperatively. No positive surgical margin and postoperative major complications were detected in any patient. While trifecta goals were achieved in all the patients in the cohort, pentafecta rates were 90.9% and 91.7% in the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal groups, respectively. Conclusions: Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal access were found to have similar outcomes in terms of preservation of renal function at the end of the first year postoperatively. Off-C LPN may be considered as a safe and effective treatment option in patients having non-complex renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ender Ozden
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Atakum, Samsun, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|