The use of laser technology (Er;Cr:YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study

The Evolution of Custom Subperiosteal Implants for Treatment of Partial or Complete Edentulism in Patients with Severe Alveolar Ridge Atrophy

Dental implants have always played an important role in dentistry and have been used to replace missing teeth since around 600 AD. They can be classified into three groups: endosteal, subperiosteal, and transosteal. Over time, different materials have been used to manufacture dental implants and these, in turn, can be divided into three groups: metals, ceramics, and polymers. Today, the most commonly used treatment for edentulism is the use of endosteal implants. However, such an approach cannot be used in patients with severe alveolar ridge atrophy and, in such cases, custom subperiosteal implants are an alternative. This review article focuses on historical developments and improvements that have been made over recent years in treatment options for patients suffering from edentulism and significant resorption of the alveolar ridge. These treatment options involve the utilization of custom subperiosteal implants. This paper looks at the historical evolution of these implants, the significance of diagnostic imaging, and the application of the contemporary methods of production, such as CAD-CAM and additive manufacturing. The research emphasizes the importance of accuracy and personalization provided by these emerging technologies that have rendered subperiosteal implants a more feasible and less intrusive alternative for patients suffering from significant bone loss.

Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla

The aim of this study is to examine the stresses that will occur under occlusal forces on the cortical bone, spongious bone and the subperiosteal implant systems made of Titanium and%60 Carbon fiber reinforced Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material. Two different models of subperiosteal implant systems on maxilla made of Titanium and %60 Carbon fiber reinforced Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material. As a result of vertical and oblique forces, the stress values and distributions on the subperiosteal implant systems and bone were examined. After applying the three different force protocols, von Mises stress, Maximum principal stress and Minimum principal stress values and distribution on the subperiosteal implant body, fixation screws, cortical and spongious bone were analyzed by finite element analysis. In all scenarios, the von Mises values ​​on the Titanium subperiosteal implant system were found to be approximately twice on the 60% carbon fiber reinforced PEEK subperiosteal implant system plates. Subperiosteal implants produced from titanium and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK material exhibited similar stress values on cortical and spongious bone. According to the results of this study, 60% Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK material can be considered as an alternative material to titanium since it exhibits similar biomechanical behavior with titanium subperiosteal implants on cortical and spongious bone. In order to be routinely used as dental subperiosteal implant material, it should be supported by long-term in vivo studies.

Additively Manufactured Lattice-like Subperiosteal Implants for Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Ridge

Subperiosteal implants represent an alternative implant approach for cases with severe bone atrophy. Although some successful clinical cases have been reported, the biomechanical stability of subperiosteal implants remains unclear, and more data are needed to confirm the feasibility of this approach. Therefore, this study investigated the biomechanical characteristics of subperiosteal implants based on histological observation, clinical cases, and finite element analysis. Finite element analysis indicated that subperiosteal implants with a lattice-like structure could better disperse the stress to the underlying bone surface. A novel customized subperiosteal implant was then digitally designed and fabricated using an additive manufacturing technology. Six beagle dogs received such customized subperiosteal implants. Histological and microcomputed tomography examination showed new bone growth into and around the implant. Patient-specific subperiosteal implants were placed into the edentulous mandibular bone, with immediate loading. The implant was functional, without pain or infection, over a 12 month observation period. Images taken 12 months post-operatively showed new bone formation and osseointegration of the device. This indicated that 3D-printed lattice-like subperiosteal implants have sufficient stability for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic ridges.