PEEK stress-shielding with artificial bone for dental implants

Dental titanium implants and their surface modifications markedly improve implant biocompatibility. However, studies evaluating the mechanical biocompatibility of implants are scarce. In particular, the analysis of mechanical biocompatibility deficiencies leading to stress shield-induced bone resorption. Recently, we focused on using PEEK as a dental material. This study explored the hypothesis that PEEK implants improve the stress shielding of titanium. In this study, artificial bone surfaces were examined to measure strains on the artificial bone surface under compressive loading with the implants in place. Additionally, 3D image analysis of the fracture state inside the bone tissue was performed using micro-CT (µCT). This hypothesis was supported by µCT imaging analysis of bone tissue changes under stress, which revealed that PEEK implants transfer greater loads than titanium implants. µCT imaging and statistical analysis showed that bone porosity had little effect on stress shielding.

Adding mechanobiological cell features to finite element analysis of an immediately loaded dental implant

Finite element analysis (FEA) has been used to analyze the behavior of dental materials, mainly in implantology. However, FEA is a mechanical analysis and few studies have tried to simulate the biological characteristics of the healing process of loaded implants. This study used the rule of mixtures to simulate the biological healing process of immediate implants in an alveolus socket and bone-implant junction interface through FEA. Three-dimensional geometric models of the structures were obtained, and material properties were derived from the literature. The rule of mixtures was used to simulate the healing periods-immediate and early loading, in which the concentration of each cell type, based on in vivo studies, influenced the final elastic moduli. A 100 N occlusal load was simulated in axial and oblique directions. The models were evaluated for maximum and minimum principal strains, and the bone overload was assessed through Frost's mechanostat. There was a higher strain concentration in the healing regions and cortical bone tissue near the cervical portion. The bone overload was higher in the immediate load condition. The method used in this study may help to simulate the biological healing process and could be useful to relate FEA results to clinical practice.

Effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on stress distribution in rigid polyurethane foam during insertion

Anchorage, evaluated by the maximum insertion torque (IT), refers to mechanical engagement between dental implant and host bone at the time of insertion without external loads. Sufficient anchorage has been highly recommended in the clinic. In several studies, the effects of implant diameter and taper body design under external loading have been evaluated after insertion; however, there are few studies, in which their effects on stress distribution during insertion have been investigated to understand establishment of anchorage. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dental implant diameter and tapered body design on anchorage combining experiments, analytical modeling, and finite element analysis (FEA). Two implant designs (parallel-walled and tapered) with two implant diameters were inserted into rigid polyurethane (PU) foam with corresponding straight drill protocols. The IT was fit to the analytical model (R2 = 0.88-1.0). The insertion process was modeled using explicit FEA. For parallel-walled implants, normalized IT and final FEA contact ratio were not related to the implant diameter while the implant diameter affected normalized IT (R2 = 0.90, p < 0.05, β1 = 0.20 and β2 = 0.93, standardized regression coefficients for implant diameter and taper body design) and final FEA contact ratio of tapered implants. The taper design distributed the PU foam stress further away from the thread compared to parallel-walled implants, which demonstrated compression in PU foam established by the tapered body during insertion.

Convergent angles of a tapered implant referred from the root profile of premolars

Background/purpose

Limited studies have discussed the convergent profiles regarding tapered implants based on biological considerations. This study analyzed the convergent angles (CAs) of premolar roots and imitated a tapered implant according to the anatomy of tooth roots.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 single-rooted premolars were explored by micro-computed tomography. Every individual root was divided into 10 segments corono-apically, and the roots' buccolingual (BL) and mesiodistal (MD) CAs were measured by sections. To mimic a dental implant, the irregular shape of examined root cross-sections was transformed into a circular shape with equal areas. A biomimetic dental implant (BDI) was reconstructed and its CAs were compared with those of the natural roots' BL and MD at the examined levels and overall estimation.

Results

In general, the maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated comparable CA patterns. However, significantly different CA patterns of BL, MD, and BDI were developed for both the maxillary and mandibular roots at the examined levels. The BL's CAs were greater than those CAs measured from the BDI and MD aspects, particularly for the sections at the middle and apical thirds of the roots. For overall CAs, the BDI's CAs were comparable with the average CAs of the BL and MD for both premolar groups.

Conclusion

Instead of a cylindrical configuration, the BDI prototype demonstrated a tapered model with a continuous slope. The average CA of BDI was 14°-24°, serving as a biological reference for future tapered implant design and research.

Characteristics of the convergent angles of tapered implants based on a premolar root model

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Developing tapered implants with the most appropriate angular characteristics requires an improved analysis of the anatomy of premolar roots.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this observational study was to analyze the 3D anatomy of premolar roots by determining the tapered slope and convergent angle (TS/CA), to transform the TS/CA patterns into those in which the tapered implants mimic natural tooth roots, and to provide TS/CA references for future investigations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 73 human single-rooted premolars were surveyed and analyzed by microcomputed tomography and an associated software program. The 3D root surface area (RSA), the radius/diameter (R/D) at the planned first to tenth millimeter levels apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and the TS/CA at corresponding levels were calculated. The results were statistically analyzed by using an independent samples t test to assess the general differences of tested parameters between maxillary and mandibular premolars. A paired t test was used to examine the significant intragroup TS/CA differences between sequential coronoapical levels. One-way ANOVA was applied to study the general significance of developmental patterns in maxillary and/or mandibular groups. Two-way ANOVA was used to inspect the TS/CA significance at various measurements coronoapically between the maxillary and mandibular premolars (α=.05).

RESULTS

Generally, the RSA, root length, R/D, and TS/CA parameters examined for the maxillary premolar roots differed significantly from those for the mandibular roots at the evaluated levels (P<.05). According to the measurements, the maxillary premolar roots generally exhibited nonsignificant RSA and R/D reduction patterns, with a decreasing angle of TS=13.44 degrees and CA=24.53 degrees coronoapically. However, mandibular premolar roots exhibited a significant reduction pattern, with TS=11.25 degrees and CA=21.06 degrees coronoapically according to both individual and general evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the developmental patterns of the evaluated TSs/CAs, tapered implants imitating premolar root anatomy should have a conical rather than a cylindrical shape, and the R/D of these models should be reduced to half at the apical third. However, further studies are warranted to identify more TS/CA characteristics related to the tapered implants, including the TSs/CAs of other tooth types.

Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the stress/strain in dental implant/abutments with alternative materials, in implants with different microgeometry, through finite element analysis (FEA). Three-dimensional models were created to simulate the clinical situation of replacement of a maxillary central incisor with implants, in a type III bone, with a provisional single crown, loaded with 100 N in a perpendicular direction. The FEA parameters studied were: implant materials-titanium, porous titanium, titanium-zirconia, zirconia, reinforced fiberglass composite (RFC), and polyetheretherketone (PEEK); and abutment materials-titanium, zirconia, RFC, and PEEK; implant macrogeometry-tapered of trapezoidal threads (TTT) and cylindrical of triangular threads (CTT) (ø4.3 mm × 11 mm). Microstrain, von Mises, shear, and maximum and minimum principal stresses in the structures and in peri-implant bone were compared. There was increased stress and strain in peri-implant bone tissue caused by implants of materials with lower elastic modulus (mainly for PEEK and RFC). They also presented higher concentration of stresses in the implant itself (especially RFC). Zirconia implants led to lower stress and strains in peri-implant bone tissue. Less rigid abutments (RFC and PEEK) associated with titanium implants led to higher stress in the implant and in peri-implant bone tissue. The TTT macrogeometry showed a higher stress concentration in the implant and peri-implant bone tissue. The stress/strain in peri-implant bone tissue and implant structures were affected by the material used, where reduced values were caused by stiffer materials. Lower stress/strain values were obtained with cylindrical implants of triangular treads.

Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: A systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implants with different neck characteristics.

METHODS

A protocol-oriented search aimed at the question: "In patients subjected to tooth replacement with screw-type dental implants does the modification of the implant neck macro- or microgeometry contribute to the improvement of survival rates and maintenance of the peri-implant marginal bone levels?" Primary outcomes were survival and marginal bone level (MBL) changes evaluated on randomized controlled trials with >10 participants and follow-up >1 year. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The review follows the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies compared: (a) One- versus two-piece implants (N = 7); (b) Two-piece implants with different neck characteristics (machined and rough collars, microthreads, LASER microtexturing) (N = 21); (c) Two-piece implants with macrogeometry modifications (tapering, back-tapering, and scalloping) (N = 6). One- and two-piece implants showed similar survival (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: [0.12, 1.66], p = 0.23) and MBL changes (WMD = 0.09 mm, 95% CI: [-0.27, 0.45], p = 0.64) at 1-year post-loading. Machined collar implants have higher risk of early failure than rough collar implants (RR = 3.96, 95% CI: [1.12, 13.93], p = 0.03) and 0.43 mm higher bone resorption (95% CI: [0.0, 0.86], p = 0.05). Microthreads (WMD = 0.07 mm, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.15], p = 0.10) and LASER microtexturing (WMD = 0.15 mm, 95% CI: [-0.35, 0.65], p = 0.56) do not reduce bone resorption. Scalloped implants have 1.26 mm higher resorption (95% CI: [0.72, 2.00], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One- and two-piece implants have similar survival and MBL changes. Rough collar implants have lower MBL changes than machined collar implants. Additional modifications to rough collars are irrelevant.

Stability of tapered and parallel-walled dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have suggested that dental implants with a tapered configuration have improved stability at placement, allowing immediate placement and/or loading. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the implant stability of tapered dental implants compared to standard parallel-walled dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Applying the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for in electronic databases and complemented by hand searching. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and data were analyzed using statistical software.

RESULTS

A total of 1199 studies were identified, of which, five trials were included with 336 dental implants in 303 participants. Overall meta-analysis showed that tapered dental implants had higher implant stability values than parallel-walled dental implants at insertion and 8 weeks but the difference was not statistically significant. Tapered dental implants had significantly less marginal bone loss compared to parallel-walled dental implants. No significant differences in implant failure rate were found between tapered and parallel-walled dental implants.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of tapered dental implants in achieving greater implant stability compared to parallel-walled dental implants. Superior short-term results in maintaining peri-implant marginal bone with tapered dental implants are possible. Further properly designed RCTs are required to endorse the supposed advantages of tapered dental implants in immediate loading protocol and other complex clinical scenarios.

Soft Tissue Changes Around Immediately Placed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses With at Least 12 Months of Follow-Up After Functional Loading

BACKGROUND

Immediate implant placement (IIP) is predictable but can lead to esthetic challenges, including midfacial recession (MFR) and papillary height (PH) loss. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the effect of IIP on MFR and PH after at least 12 months of functional loading.

METHODS

Literature review of the Cochrane and MEDLINE electronic databases and hand search up to January 2016 identified eligible studies. Four reviewers independently assessed data quality and methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 106 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies qualified for three meta-analyses. MFR was slightly less in conventional implant placement (CIP) than in IIP, but the result was not statistically significant (mean difference [MD] -0.064 mm; P = 0.687). Similarly, there was better PH maintenance in CIPs, with statistical significance for distal PH (DPH) only (cumulative PH: MD -0.396, P = 0.010; DPH: MD -0.765, P <0.001; mesial PH [MPH]: MD -0.285, P = 0.256). MFR was slightly less in IIP with thick versus thin biotypes, but not statistically significantly different (MD -0.373, P = 0.243). Pooled data showed statistically significantly less MFR and better PH maintenance in IIP with thick biotype (MFR: MD -0.478, P <0.001; cumulative PH: MD -0.287, P <0.001; MPH: MD -0.288, P <0.001; DPH: MD -0.310, P <0.001). Non-significantly less MFR (MD 0.253, P = 0.384) and significantly better PH maintenance were found in IIP with immediate provisionalization versus conventional restoration (MD -0.519, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

IIP in thick biotype and with immediate provisionalization had less MFR and better PH than IIP in thin biotype or with delayed restoration. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity, which was calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis statistical software that took into account sample size and different treatment groups, and limited qualified studies.

Tapered Implants in Dentistry: Revitalizing Concepts with Technology: A Review

The most common approach to lessen treatment times is by decreasing the healing period during which osseointegration is established. Implant design parameters such as implant surface, primary stability, thread configuration, body shape, and the type of bone have to be considered to obtain this objective. The relationship that exists between these components will define the initial stability of the implant. It is believed implant sites using a tapered design and surface modification can increase the primary stability in low-density bone. Furthermore, recent experimental preclinical work has shown the possibility of attaining primary stability of immediately loaded, tapered dental implants without compromising healing and rapid bone formation while minimizing the implant stability loss at compression sites. This may be of singular importance with immediate/early functional loading of single implants placed in poor-quality bone. The selection of an implant that will provide adequate stability in bone of poor quality is important. A tapered-screw implant design will provide adequate stability because it creates pressure on cortical bone in areas of reduced bone quality. Building on the success of traditional tapered implant therapy, newer tapered implant designs should aim to maximize the clinical outcome by implementing new technologies with adapted clinical workflows.