The Bone Lid Technique in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review

This scoping review aimed at reporting the outcomes of the bone lid technique in oral surgery in terms of bone healing, ridge preservation, and incidence of complications. Bone-cutting instruments and stabilization methods were also considered. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched using a combination of terms, including bone lid, bony window, piezosurgery, microsaw, cysts, endodontic surgery, impacted teeth, and maxillary sinus. A hand search was also performed. The last search was conducted on 30 November 2021. No date limitation was set. Searches were restricted to human clinical studies published in English. All types of study design were considered except reviews and case reports. After a two-step evaluation, 20 (2 randomized studies, 2 case-control studies, 3 cohort studies, 13 case series) out of 647 screened studies were included, reporting on 752 bone lid procedures. The bone lid technique was associated with favorable bone healing when compared to other methods, and with a very low incidence of major complications. Clinical indications, surgical procedures, study design, follow-up duration, and outcomes varied among the studies. Overall, favorable outcomes were reported using the bone lid approach, though evidence-based studies were scarce.

In-Block Lateralization as a New Technique for Mobilization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve: A Technique Case Series

The edentulous atrophic posterior mandible is often a great challenge for implant rehabilitation. Although a number of treatment options have been proposed, including the use of short implants and surgical grafting techniques, in cases of severe bone atrophy, techniques for mobilization of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) have been shown to be efficient, with good results. Four female patients underwent IAN lateralization for prosthetic rehabilitation of the posterior mandible from 2013 to 2019, with 3 years to 5 years and 3 months of follow-up. This case series describes a new technique for mobilization of the IAN, named in-block lateralization, to facilitate access to the IAN and to reduce nerve manipulation. The implant is immediately installed (allowing nerve lateralization in unitary spaces), and the original mandibular anatomy is restored with autogenous bone from the original bed during the same surgical procedure. When well indicated and well performed, this new approach provides better and easier visualization of the IAN and safer manipulation aiming to achieve good results for implant stability and minimal risk of neurosensory disturbances, allowing rehabilitation even in unitary spaces.

Evaluation of the effect of the lateralized inferior alveolar nerve isolation and bone grafting on the nerve function and implant stability. (Randomized Clinical Trial)

BACKGROUND

The inferior alveolar nerve lateralization (IANL), although allows for an implant full-length mandibular height engagement, coincides with depleting the buccal bone support and sensory deficits.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess whether interposing a bone graft coupled with securing a collagen membrane separation between the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and the underlying dental implants would preserve the nerve function, enhance the implant stability, and minimize the radiographic marginal bone loss.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with 30 atrophic mandibular edentulous ridges were subjected to IANL after being randomly assigned to two treatment modalities which consisted of 15 patients each. The (control group) utilized conventional IANL in direct contact with 20 implants. The (test group) implemented the IAN collagen-membrane wrapping and interposing bone graft to overlay 23 implants. The neural function, the radiographic marginal bone loss, and the implant stability quotient were assessed and compared 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

All the patients regained their full neurosensory function after 6 months, with statistically nonsignificant differences between both groups throughout the follow-up period. The mean marginal bone loss in the test group was (0.42 ± 0.09) mm versus (0.38 ± 0.14) mm for the control group, which was statistically similar (P = 0.401). The 6-month postoperative mean implant stability quotient values of the test group recorded (74.73 ± 2.68) versus (74.73 ± 1.79) for the control group, which was statistically nonsignificant with a value of P = 0.626.

CONCLUSION

The interposed bone graft, coupled with the collagen membrane isolation, neither subsided the neural disturbances nor enhanced the secondary implant stability and marginal bone loss.