Esthetic Evaluation and Acceptability of Different Hole Designs on Implant Crowns from the Perspective of Patients and Dentists in China

PURPOSE

Abutment access hole on dental implant crowns may facilitate crown retrieval and reduce cement overflow but present esthetic obstacle for patients. This study aimed to investigate the esthetic evaluation and acceptability of implant crowns with different hole designs from the perspective of patients and dentists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anterior and posterior implant zirconia crowns were fabricated into three types: no hole (NH), 1 mm micro hole (MH), and 2.5 mm regular hole (RH). The NH crown was set as the control, and the anterior and posterior crowns with MH and RH were evaluated. The subjects, who were recruited randomly, were comprised of lay patients (n=60) and professional dentists (n=30). All subjects were invited to evaluate the esthetic performance of MH and RH crowns on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), rate them from 0 to 10, state their acceptability of these crowns, and label them as acceptable and unacceptable.

RESULTS

The ANOVA analysis of the VAS esthetic evaluation showed that the size of the hole, the position of the teeth, and the professional background of the subject significantly and independently affected esthetic perception. Crowns with MH in the posterior position had higher esthetic scores and acceptability compared with crowns with RH in the anterior position, and dentists tended to show higher acceptance and better esthetic rating for crowns with holes compared with lay patients.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis that patients and dentists hold similar esthetic evaluations or acceptability towards implant crown hole designs was rejected. Lay patients had a lower tolerance for venting holes than dentists. Crowns with 1 mm micro holes were more recommendable than crowns with regular abutment access holes from the point of view of satisfying patients' esthetic needs.

Techniques for locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Different techniques for retrieving cement-retained implant-supported prostheses have been described to minimize damage to the prostheses. Nevertheless, a classification of the described techniques remains ambiguous.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to review and classify the described techniques for recording and locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A bibliographic search was completed on MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. A manual search was also conducted. The articles that described or evaluated techniques for recording and locating the screw access hole of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses were included. Two investigators independently assessed the quality assessment of the studies using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. A third examiner was consulted to resolve the lack of consensus.

RESULTS

A total of 30 articles were included. The different methods were classified according to whether the screw access hole location was registered before or after cementation. The precementation techniques were classified into 4 subgroups: identification marks, photographic records, digital files, and precementation screw access hole location guides. The postcementation techniques were subdivided into 2 subgroups: radiographic records and postcementation screw access hole location guides.

CONCLUSIONS

Different techniques have been proposed to facilitate the location of the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported restorations. Although the evidence is scarce, studies seem to ascertain that some techniques, such as the use of drilling guides, orientation with cone beam computed tomography images, or holes made in the metal framework, can increase the retrievability of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses and decrease complications in the location of the screw access hole. The proposed classification summarizes precementation and postcementation techniques and provides a tool to decide the most suitable for each specific clinical situation.

A new design of a multifunctional abutment to morse taper implant connection: Experimental mechanical analysis

The objective of this study was to evaluate a new design of multifunctional abutment for Morse taper implant connections, relative to the retentive stability after the application of cyclic loads in cemented and screwed crowns. Multifunctional abutments with two different angulations in the seating portion of the crown were tested, forming 2 groups (n = 30 samples per group): Group Abut11, where Smart abutments with an angle of 11.42° were used; Group Abut5, where Ideale abutments with an angle of 5° were used. Fifteen samples from each group received cemented crowns (CC) and another fifteen screwed crowns (SC). All crown samples were subjected to the mechanical cycling test at 360,000 cycles at a frequency of 4 Hz and 150 N of the load. The samples with CC were subjected to the tensile test to remove the crowns, while in the samples with SC, the detorque value of the fastening crown screws was measured. The mean tensile strength value of CC in the Abut11 group was 131.9 ± 13.5 N and, in the Abut5 group was 230.9 ± 11.3 N; while the detorque mean value in samples with SC 5.8 ± 1.8 N for the Abut11 group and, 7.6 ± 1.1 N for Abut5 group. Significant statistical differences were found between the two groups in both situations tested (p < 0.05). The multifunctional abutments, presenting a lesser angulation of the crown-seating portion, showed higher values of retention of the CC and a lesser screw loosening of torque of the fixing screws in the SC after the application of cyclic loads when compared to the abutments with more angulation in the crown-seating portion.