Endometrial sampling of gynaecological pathology

Combination Analysis of a Radiomics-Based Predictive Model With Clinical Indicators for the Preoperative Assessment of Histological Grade in Endometrial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Histological grade is one of the most important prognostic factors of endometrial carcinoma (EC) and when selecting preoperative treatment methods, conducting accurate preoperative grading is of great significance.

PURPOSE

To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based nomogram for discriminating histological grades 1 and 2 (G1 and G2) from grade 3 (G3) EC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study included 358 patients with histologically graded EC, stratified as 250 patients in a training cohort and 108 patients in a test cohort. T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and a dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE) were performed via 1.5-Tesla MRI. To establish ModelADC, the region of interest was manually outlined on the EC in an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. To establish the radiomic model (ModelR), EC was manually segmented by two independent radiologists and radiomic features were extracted. The Radscore was calculated based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. We combined the Radscore with carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and body mass index (BMI) to construct a mixed model (ModelM) and develop the predictive nomogram. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves were assessed to verify the prediction ability and the degree of consistency, respectively.

RESULTS

All three models showed some amount of predictive ability. Using ADC alone to predict the histological risk of EC was limited in both the cohort [area under the curve (AUC), 0.715; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6509-0.7792] and test cohorts (AUC, 0.621; 95% CI, 0.515-0.726). In comparison with ModelADC, the discrimination ability of ModelR showed improvement (Delong test, P < 0.0001 for both the training and test cohorts). ModelM, established based on the combination of radiomic and clinical indicators, showed the best level of predictive ability in both the training (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.898-0.951) and test cohorts (AUC, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.863-0.968). Calibration curves suggested a good fit for probability (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.673 and P = 0.804 for the training and test cohorts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The described radiomics-based nomogram can be used to predict EC histological classification preoperatively.

Comparison of aspirating pipettes and hysteroscopy with curettage

PURPOSE

In this prospective study, endometrial biopsy by pipette was compared with hysteroscopy with curettage in patients with an abnormal uterine bleeding (ABU) (hypermenorrhea, intermediate bleeding, continuous bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding) and patients with a sonographically abnormal endometrium.

METHODS

176 patients were included. The pipette samples were taken during the usual planned procedure under general anaesthesia. Thereafter, the planned hysteroscopy with curettage was completed. The study was performed as a double-blind study. The obtained histologies (of pipelle and curettage) were sent separately to the same pathologist. The pipelle material was encoded by a specific number without any patient data.

RESULTS

In 97% of the cases using the biopsy with pipette were obtained an adequate sample. The biopsy with pipette had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia. Pipette showed a significantly lower accuracy with a sensitivity of 28% in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Pipette showed the lowest sensitivity for polyps, myomas and atrophic endometrium.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that pipette sampling is a safe, accurate, low-cost ambulatory procedure with high sensitivity for the detection of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. In the case of sonographically definable findings (polyp, myoma), hysteroscopy with curettage is preferred.

Endometrial Cytology as a Method to Improve the Accuracy of Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: Case Report and Meta-Analysis

More and more researchers have reported that dilatation and curettage (D&C) or Pipelle had low accuracy, high misdiagnosis, and insufficient rate. Endometrial cytology is often compared with histology and seems to be an efficient method for the diagnosis of endometrial disorders, especially endometrial cancer. We report a case of misdiagnosed endometrial cancer by D&C, but with a positive cytopathological finding. Following that, a meta-analysis including 4,179 patients of endometrial diseases with cyto-histopathological results was performed to assess the value of the endometrial cytological method in endometrial cancer diagnosis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the cytological method in detecting endometrial atypical hyperplasia or cancer was 0.91[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.97] and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-0.99), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio was 25.4 (95% CI 8.1-80.1) and 0.10 (95% CI 0.00-0.30), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio which was usually used to evaluate the diagnostic test performance reached 260 (95% CI 36-1905). So we recommend that D&C and Pipelle are still practical procedures to evaluate the endometrium, cytological examinations should be utilized as an additional endometrial assessment method.

Hysteroscopic Curettage Using the Lin Snare and Y Adaptor: A Review of 300 Cases

STUDY

To present a de novo technique of endometrial sampling - hysteroscopic curettage.

OBJECTIVE

Aim to describe this new procedure and study its effectiveness and accuracy.

DESIGN

Prospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

SETTING

University-affiliated public hospital.

PATIENTS

Two hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients who attended outpatient gynaecological endoscopic centre.

INTERVENTION

A total of 300 hysteroscopic curettage was carried out using flexible hysteroscope and Lin snare system.

MAIN RESULTS

The procedure failure rate is 2.67%. Out of 292 successful hysteroscopic curettages, hysteroscopy alone has a sensitivity of 99% and negative predictive value of 97.7%. The accuracy was further improved to near perfection with curettage histology. The negative predictive value is 99%.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic curettage is easy to perform, highly effective and accurate. It offers an excellent outpatient alternative for patients who require endometrial sampling and/or an evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.