Using an Entrustable Professional Activity to Assess Consultation Requests Called on an Internal Medicine Teaching Service

The Art of the Consult Call: Improving Communication Through Shared Mental Models

Introduction

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cites effective communication with physicians as a core competency for emergency medicine (EM) residents. However, there is no standardized curriculum dedicated to communication beyond practice in the clinical setting.

Methods

We developed a 1-hour EM didactic session on effective consultations using experiential education principles. Learners were placed in pairs of one junior learner and one senior learner. The junior learner performed a mock phone consultation using an EM patient case; the senior learner completed an online evaluation, assessing the junior learner on 13 core components of a successful consult call, based on Kessler's 5Cs consultation model. Subsequently, learners participated in an intervention, which included an artistic activity and facilitated debrief, connecting their reflections to clinical practice. Postintervention, the same paired learners completed a second mock consultation call and reevaluation. Finally, learners completed a feedback survey.

Results

Fifteen pairs completed both the pre- and postintervention evaluations. Of the junior learners simulating the consultation call, 47% were clinical medical students, and 53% were first-year EM residents. Preintervention, learners completed a mean of 51% of core consult call components compared to a mean of 84% postintervention. This 33% improvement was statistically significant (p < .001; 95% CI, 19.9-46.1). Eight participants completed the feedback survey; 100% agreed or strongly agreed with positive statements regarding overall session content.

Discussion

This engaging interactive session utilizing a mock communication exercise, unique artistic activity, and guided reflection can effectively increase junior learners' phone consultation communication skills.

An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: A scoping review

The purpose of this scoping review is to update the recent progress of EPAs research in GME, focusing on the topical concern of EPAs effectiveness, and to provide a reference for medical researchers in countries/regions interested in introducing EPAs. Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework regarding scoping reviews, the researchers, in January 2021, conducted a search in five databases to ensure the comprehensiveness of the literature. After the predetermined process, 29 articles in total were included in this study. The most common areas for the implementation and evaluation of EPAs were Surgery (n = 7,24.1%), Pediatric (n = 5,17.2%) and Internal medicine (n = 4,13.8%), a result that shows a relatively large change in the research trend of EPAs in the last two years. Prior to 2018, EPAs research focused on internal medicine, psychiatry, family medicine, and primary care. The articles in the category of EPAs implementation and evaluation had four main themes: (1) validation of EPAs (n = 16,55.2%); (2) describing the experience of implementing EPAs (n = 11,37.9%); (3) examining the factors and barriers that influence the implementation and evaluation of EPAs (n = 6,20.6%); and (4) researching the experiences of faculty, interns, and other relevant personnel in using EPAs. Training programs were the most common EPAs implementation setting (n = 26,89.6%); direct observation and evaluation (n = 12,41.4%), and evaluation by scoring reports (n = 5,17.2%) were the two most common means of assessing physicians' EPA levels; 19 papers (65.5%) used faculty evaluation, and nine of these papers also used self-assessment (31.0%); the most frequently used tools in the evaluation of EPAs were mainly researcher-made instruments (n = 37.9%), assessment form (n = 7,24.1%), and mobile application (n = 6,20.7%). Although EPAs occupy an increasingly important place in international medical education, this study concludes that the implementation and diffusion of EPAs on a larger scale is still difficult.

Entrustable professional activities for apheresis medicine education

BACKGROUND

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are well-defined, executable, observable, and measurable activities that are performed by a trainee and can be performed independently as training progresses. The purpose of this study is to develop EPAs specific for the practice of apheresis medicine (AM).

METHODS

Members of the American Society for Apheresis Graduate Medical Education subcommittee developed a list of 28 apheresis medical activities linked to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones and competencies in five areas: (a) consultation, (b) clinical care for therapeutic apheresis, (c) clinical care for donor collections, (d) test optimization, and (e) vascular access. Ten AM experts using a validated tool to measure the quality of the EPAs (QUEPA) evaluated these activities with use of a Likert scale. Per group consensus, an activity was considered acceptable for each domain if it had received an average score greater than 3.7, and it was rated 4 or 5 (agree or strongly agree) by at least 70% of experts.

RESULTS

Of the 28 activities, 11 did not have acceptable QUEPA scores: 7 activities were rated as unobservable, 4 were rated unfocused, 2 were rated unrealistic and not generalizable, and 2 were rated as not addressing multiple competencies. Four activities had unacceptable scores in more than one domain. Subcommittee members edited these 11 activities over two review cycles to produce a final list of 26 activities.

CONCLUSION

A set of practical, focused, and observable EPAs in AM were systematically developed. These EPAs can be used to assess and support trainee performance in AM.