Associations of absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures (FRAX®) and total cardiovascular risk (SCORE) in urban population of the Russian Federation

Comorbidity of patients with noncommunicable diseases in general practice. Eurasian guidelines

Создание руководства поддержано Советом по терапевтическим наукам отделения клинической медицины Российской академии наук.

Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases and their Risk Factors in Regions of Russian Federation (ESSE-RF) study. Ten years later

The growing weight of noncommunicable diseases, primarily cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), is a great threat to the health of population worldwide, worsening the quality of life and reducing life expectancy. Realization of this threat led to initiation of epidemiological study by the Russian Ministry of Health to investigate the prevalence of CVDs and their risk factors, since it is CVDs that specify the high allcause mortality in Russia. In the modern history of epidemiology of non-infectious disease, the Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases and their Risk Factors in Regions of Russian Federation (ESSE-RF) study occupies a special place. This is the largest epidemiological study, which is considered as a continuation of preventive activity in order to obtain unbiased information on epidemiological characteristics of population in Russian regions. To conduct the study, the Research Organizing Committee of ESSE-RF study was created and a protocol was developed. All interested scientists and experts from following three centers took part in the work: National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Center, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology. The Russian regions were justified and selected for participation. In 2012-2014 ESSE-RF study, 13 following Russian regions took part: Volgograd, Vologda, Voronezh, Ivanovo, Kemerovo, Tyumen Oblasts; Krasnoyarsk and Primorsky Krai; the Republic of North Ossetia (Alania); cities of Orenburg, Samara, St. Petersburg and Tomsk. All participated regions used a single study protocol, while biochemical parameters were determined in Federal centers using the same equipment and reagent kits. The paper presents some of the most interesting results that indicate a change in Russian epidemiological situation over the past few years. After the end of cross-sectional study, a field of priority research areas was formed in each center.

Conclusion. Epidemiological studies are the most important scientific tool for assessing the prevalence of diseases, their risk factors, as well as predicting adverse events. Based on the results obtained, healthcare system and medical community determine priorities and develop related strategies (population-based and high-risk strategies). For their implementation, a regulatory and legal framework is being created.

The level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide depending on vascular wall condition and bone mass in postmenopausal women

Aim. To assess the relationship of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels with vascular wall condition and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women.

Material and methods. The cross-sectional study included 107 outpatients aged 45-82 years who signed informed consent. The inclusion criterion was a menopause during ≥1 year. The level of serum NT-proBNP was determined by electrochemiluminescence. BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Intima-media thickness (IMT), the presence and number of atherosclerotic plaques were evaluated using carotid duplex scanning. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index were estimated by applanation tonometry. To assess 10-year cardiovascular risk, the SCORE high-risk charts were used. Using the Russian model of FRAX® score, 10-year fracture risk was assessed.

Results. NT-proBNP level in women with postmenopause >10 years was significantly higher than in those with postmenopause <5 years — 98,7 vs 56,3 pg/ml (p<0,001), but there was no independent relationship according to the regression analysis. According to multivariate regression analysis adjusted for age, menopause duration, systolic blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels, there were independent relationship between the following parameters: NT-proBNP and IMT (β=2,38, p<0,03), NT-proBNP and PWV (β=1,76, p<0,001). NT-proBNP level in patients with osteoporosis was significantly higher than in women with normal bone mass (p<0,01). A negative correlation was observed between NT-proBNP and BMD of the proximal femur (r=-0,26, p<0,05), while the relationship between BMD of the lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) and NT-proBNP did not reach significance. In multivariate regression analysis, this relationship has not been confirmed. A positive correlation was obtained between cardiovascular risk (SCORE) and NT-proBNP levels (r=0,28, p<0,001). NT-proBNP levels did not differ in women with a high and low 10-year risk of both major osteoporotic fractures and femoral fractures.

Conclusion. An independent relationship of NT-proBNP with vascular stiffness and preclinical atherosclerosis was demonstrated: IMT and PWV. This indicates the participation of NT-proBNP in the atherosclerosis development. The association of elevated NT-proBNP levels with osteoporosis is significant, but not independent, and is apparently related to other factors.