Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Decade of Progress

Retrograde branched extension limb assembling stent of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: A longitudinal hemodynamic analysis for stent graft migration

PURPOSE

Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PRAAAs) are a life-threatening disease, and hemodynamic analysis may provide greater insight into the effectiveness and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, the lack of patient-specific boundary conditions on the periphery compromises the accuracy. Windkessel (WK) boundary conditions coupled to hemodynamic follow-up models of a PRAAA patient, aims to provide insights into the link between hemodynamics and poor prognosis.

METHOD

One PRAAA patient underwent EVAR and reintervention after one branch of stent-graft (SG) had migrated. Totally five computational follow-up models were studied. Patient-specific flow data acquired via ultrasound were used to define the boundary conditions in the ascending aorta and the following three branches. Coupled zero-dimensional WK models representing the distal vasculature were used to define the outlet boundary conditions under the abdomen.

RESULTS

Flow divisions of the main SG branches were 40.7% and 24.7%, respectively. Time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index (OSI) increased at the junction connected the SG branch and the stent leading to the right common iliac artery (RCIA) where the stent migrated. The OSI and relative residence time (RRT) value in superior mesenteric artery increased notably after the migration, the RRT continuously increased following the reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Unbalanced flow, resulting in locally high-speed flow, high WSS and OSI might significantly affect stent stability. Results suggest that diameters and interconnection design of stents in complex cases should take the flow division into consideration and computational simulations might be considered as a tool for intervention protocol design.

A multimodality vascular imaging phantom of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a visible thrombus

PURPOSE

With the continuous development of new stent grafts and implantation techniques, it has now become technically feasible to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with challenging anatomy using endovascular repair with standard, fenestrated, or branched stent-grafts. In vitro experimentations are very useful to improve stent-graft design and conformability or imaging guidance for stent-graft delivery or follow-up. Vascular replicas also help to better understand the limitation of endovascular approaches in challenging anatomy and possibly improve surgical planning or training by practicing high risk clinical procedures in the laboratory to improve outcomes in the operating room. Most AAA phantoms available have a very basic anatomy, which is not representative of the clinical reality. This paper presents a method of fabrication of a realistic AAA phantom with a visible thrombus, as well as some mechanical properties characterizing such phantom.

METHODS

A realistic AAA geometry replica of a real patient anatomy taken from a multidetector computed tomography (CT) scan was manufactured. To demonstrate the multimodality imaging capability of this new phantom with a thrombus visible in magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, CT angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and ultrasound, image acquisitions with all these modalities were performed by using standard clinical protocols. Potential use of this phantom for stent deployment was also tested. A rheometer allowed defining hyperelastic and viscoelastic properties of phantom materials.

RESULTS

MR imaging measurements of SNR and CNR values on T1 and T2-weighted sequences and MR angiography indicated reasonable agreement with published values of AAA thrombus and abdominal components in vivo. X-ray absorption also lay within normal ranges of AAA patients and was representative of findings observed on CTA, fluoroscopy, and DSA. Ultrasound propagation speeds for developed materials were also in concordance with the literature for vascular and abdominal tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

The mimicked abdominal tissues, AAA wall, and surrounding thrombus were developed to match imaging features of in vivo MR, CT, and ultrasound examinations. This phantom should be of value for image calibration, segmentation, and testing of endovascular devices for AAA endovascular repair.

Unusual treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Aortic stenting with covered stent

INTRODUCTION

It is now becoming increasingly difficult to accept that some patients are not suitable for surgery due to high surgical risk. The continuous technological progress, in the endovascular field in particular, are urging surgeons to put the limit even more forth.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We are going to describe an endovascular option used to treat an infrarenal aortic aneurysm where the diameter of the iliac vessels couldn't allow the use of any device available on the market. Three covered AdvantaV12 stents were placed in series in the aorta to build the endoprosthesis body and two Bard Fluency 8mm×60mm were then placed in a "kissing way" into the common iliac arteries like legs.

DISCUSSION

Continuous technological progress, particularly in the endovascular field, is driving surgeons to push the limits even further. Nevertheless, some things still seem not to be possible, but in comparison to traditional surgery where all is well demonstrated and documented, the endovascular approach is still a young discipline and allows us to try to find new solutions.

CONCLUSION

We can therefore assert that in exceptional circumstances, an aortic endoprosthesis can be built inside the aortic lumen using covered stents.

A branched, balloon-deployable, Aortomonoiliac stent-graft for treatment of AAA in a patient with a solitary intrapelvic kidney

PURPOSE

To report the use of a branched, balloon-deployable stent-graft to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the setting of a solitary kidney.

CASE REPORT

A 72-year-old man with a solitary intrapelvic kidney and multiple comorbid conditions was diagnosed with an asymptomatic 5.3-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); the renal artery emerged from the aneurysm sac. A customized branched, balloon-deployable, aortomonoiliac stent-graft was utilized to exclude the AAA and preserve perfusion to the single renal artery. A synthetic bypass was then implanted to restore perfusion to the contralateral limb. The diameter of the aneurysm decreased from 5.3 to 2.7 cm at 18 months. The renal artery was patent without evidence of stenosis; renal function was normal.

CONCLUSION

The deployment of a novel branched stent-graft represents an interesting alternative approach to the treatment of a juxtarenal aneurysm.

A review of the in vivo and in vitro biomechanical behavior and performance of postoperative abdominal aortic aneurysms and implanted stent-grafts

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has generated widespread interest since the procedure was first introduced two decades ago. It is frequently performed in patients who suffer from substantial comorbidities that may render them unsuitable for traditional open surgical repair. Although this minimally invasive technique substantially reduces operative risk, recovery time, and anesthesia usage in these patients, the endovascular method has been prone to a number of failure mechanisms not encountered with the open surgical method. Based on long-term results of second- and third-generation devices that are currently becoming available, this study sought to identify the most serious failure mechanisms, which may have a starting point in the morphological changes in the aneurysm and stent-graft. To investigate the "behavior" of the aneurysm after stent-graft repair, i.e., how its length, angulation, and diameter change, we utilized state-of-the-art ex vivo methods, which researchers worldwide are now using to recreate these failure modes.

[Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair with stent grafts]

As an alternative to surgery, endovascular therapy with stent grafts has become the second main treatment option for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Unlike surgery, endovascular treatment with stent grafts is also applicable in patients unfit for open repair. Despite current improvements in endovascular repair devices, significant anatomic barriers still exclude this technique for a large number of patients. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound are essential for diagnostics, preintervention planning, and postintervention follow-up of abdominal aneurysms treated with stent grafts. This review covers etiology, pathology, and diagnostic aspects. Materials and methods for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms are presented in detail, and clinical results and complications are discussed.

Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Oversized (36-mm) Zenith Endografts

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with unfavorable necks using the 36-mm Zenith endograft.

METHODS

The indication for use of the 36-mm endograft for infrarenal aortic aneurysm was a minimum 20-mm-long sealing zone and a diameter >28 mm at any point but <34 mm, varying more than 3 mm in contour. A series of 67 patients (64 men; mean age 76.2 years, range 59.5 to 88.3) who had been treated with the 36-mm endografts between June 1999 and February 2004 were assessed for medium-term outcomes. The patients were identified from the device planning records. Follow-up was carried out using chart review and direct patient contact. The indication for use of the endograft was checked with the aneurysm neck profile from the original planning diagrams. Cause of death was ascertained from the treating clinician, the medical record, or the State Death Registry. Outcome endpoints were proximal type I and type III endoleaks, migration, sac size change, and death.

RESULTS

The mean diameter of the sealing zone was 31.9+/-1.6 mm within the 20-mm segment from the lowest renal artery. Stent-graft delivery was achieved in all 67 patients. Two (3%) patients died within 30 days from non-graft-related cardiorespiratory causes. Proximal type I endoleaks were identified in 3 (4.5%) patients: 2 during deployment and another at 9 days. The mean follow-up period for the 65 patients who survived 30 days was 26.9+/-12.6 months (range 2-66). Migration occurred in 1 patient with development of a type III endoleak and sac reperfusion due to separation of the graft body from the bare anchor stent owing to suture breakage. Forty-seven patients were alive at the last review. The aneurysm sac had contracted or was unchanged in 45 (96%) cases. Minor enlargements of the sac were observed in 2 patients. The re-intervention rate was 16.4% (11 patients). There was 1 conversion to open repair to treat perigraft sepsis. The aneurysm- and procedure-related mortality was 4.5%; no patient experienced rupture. All-cause mortality was 29.9% (20/67).

CONCLUSION

Large caliber endografts such as the Zenith 36-mm are an alternative option to open surgery or fenestrated endografting for some infrarenal aneurysms.

Outcomes of Fenestrated Endografts in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Western Australia (1997–2004)

PURPOSE

To describe a 7-year experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using fenestrated Zenith endovascular endografts.

METHODS

Six endovascular surgeons from 7 medical centers in Perth, Western Australia, contributed data to this retrospective study of 58 AAA patients (51 men; mean age 75.5+/-8.5 years, range 60-94) treated with fenestrated endografts. Fenestrations were applied to 116 target vessels; more than half of patients had >/=2 target vessels. The results were based on satisfactory deployment of the stent-graft and fenestrations (technical success), technical success and no complications (procedural success), and aneurysm exclusion with no endoleak, rupture, unresolved complications, or dialysis (treatment success).

RESULTS

Technical success was 82.8% for patients (90.5% for target vessels), procedural success was 74.1%, and treatment success was 94.8%. There were no cases of conversion or rupture. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4% (n=2). Over a mean follow-up of 1.4+/-1.2 years, 10 (17.2%) patients experienced loss of a target vessel (9.5% of target vessels). Factors associated with target vessel loss were no stent, >60 degrees neck angulation, multiple renal vessels, and vessel diameter </=4 mm. Four (6.9%) patients developed renal impairment, but none required dialysis. Fourteen (24.1%) patients had a secondary intervention. Unresolved endoleaks persisted in 1 (1.7%) patient.

CONCLUSION

Fenestrated endografts extend the treatment options for infrarenal AAAs with necks unsuitable for standard endovascular repair. This early data show a trend toward higher mortality of selected patients with fenestrated endografts than for standard stent-graft repair, but the mortality rate is comparable to open repair. Target vessel occlusion predominantly results from pre-existing disease or the lack of a stent. The lessons learned from this experience contributed toward guidelines for users of fenestrated endografts.

Movement and Dislocation of Modular Stent-Grafts Due to Pulsatile Flow and the Pressure Difference Between the Stent-Graft and the Aneurysm Sac

PURPOSE

To investigate the stability and movement of modular aortic stent-grafts subjected to oscillating forces from pulsatile blood flow, with particular reference to the thoracic aorta.

METHODS

Analytical mathematical modeling was used to understand the forces on modular grafts. In a benchtop experiment, a transparent acrylic box was filled with water to mimic an aneurysm. Two stent-grafts were placed inside the box in a nested, arched configuration where one component was partly inside the other. A pump produced a pulsatile approximately 5-L/min flow of water through the stent-grafts at a mean inlet pressure of approximately 100 mmHg (approximately 13,330 Pa), with systolic and diastolic pressures of approximately 130 and approximately 80 mmHg, respectively (pulse pressure 50 mmHg). The movement of the 2 modular stent-grafts was observed.

RESULTS

The curved stent-graft system oscillated transversely when there was zero mean pressure difference between the stent-graft and the aneurysm. As the mean pressure difference was increased, this transverse graft movement was damped and then disappeared. A relatively large pressure difference caused the stent-graft to inflate and become sturdier. In terms of stability, the analytical mathematical model for a 30-mm-diameter Zenith modular stent-graft curved through 90 degrees (with the ends of the graft fixed in place) showed that the modular components will separate at a pressure difference of 0 mmHg for 1 stent segment overlap (20 mm) and at an average 59 mmHg pressure difference for 2 stent overlaps, but the device would not separate at a pressure difference of 90 mmHg for 3 stent overlaps.

CONCLUSION

Transverse cyclic movement of the curved stent-graft system with pulsation indicates a pressurized sac. When the pressure difference is large and there is a blood-tight seal between the aneurysm and the stent-graft, then the transverse movement of the stent-graft is minimal, but the risk for modular separation is highest. Curved thoracic endografts are subject to forces that may cause migration or separation, the latter being more likely if the seal between the graft and the sac is blood tight, if the blood pressure is high, and if the diameter of the graft is small and the sac large. Operators should plan for maximum overlap of modular components when treating large or long thoracic aneurysms.