Multislice computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery

Value of C-Arm Computed Tomography to Evaluate Stent Deployment During Femoro-Popliteal Revascularization

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of C-arm computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in detecting incomplete stent expansion (ISE) after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as a gold standard.

MATERIALS

Fifty patients with symptomatic SFA occlusive disease requiring angioplasty were prospectively included. Once technical success (<30 % residual stenosis) was obtained on post-procedural DSA, C-arm CT and IVUS were acquired. DSA and C-arm CT examinations were reviewed by 2 investigators and correlated with IVUS. C-arm CT image quality was rated on a four-point scale. Doppler ultrasound was performed at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The ankle-brachial index was 0.69 ± 0.10 and 0.99 ± 0.40, respectively, pre- and post-procedure. C-arm CT imaging quality was rated as good or excellent in 80%. In-stent minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was evaluated at 4.71 ± 0.7 mm on DSA, 3.39 ± 0.6 mm on IVUS, and 3.12 ± 0.9 mm on C-arm CT. Compared to IVUS, DSA demonstrated an overestimation of MLD (p = 0.0001), an underestimation of ISE (DSA = 18.8% ± 7.6; IVUS = 29.8% ± 9) (p < 0.0001), and a poor inter-technique intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.24). No difference was observed between IVUS and C-arm CT in ISE as calculated by diameter (29.8 ± 9 vs. 28.2 ± 12.5%, p = 0.5) and area (30.2 ± 8.4 vs. 33.3 ± 9.5%, p = 0.2). Inter-technique ICC between C-arm CT and IVUS was 0.72 [95%CI 0.49; 0.85] for MLA measurements. The inter-observer ICC for MLD and MLA measurements on C-arm CT were, respectively, estimated at 0.75 [95% CI 0.40, 0.89] and 0.77 [95% CI 0.43, 0.90)].

CONCLUSIONS

C-arm CT presents a better correlation with IVUS than DSA to determine lumen diameter and ISE immediately after percutaneous revascularization.

Accuracy of multislice CT angiography for the assessment of in-stent restenoses in the iliac arteries at reduced dose: a phantom study

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the potential of low-dose CT angiography for accurate assessment of in-stent restenoses (ISRs) of the iliac artery.

METHOD

A Rando anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Research Labs, Stanford, CA), custom-made wax simulating hyperplastic tissue and a nitinol stent were used to simulate a patient with clinically relevant iliac artery ISRs. The cylindrical lumen was filled with a solution of iodine contrast medium diluted in saline, representing a patient's blood during CT angiography. The phantom was subjected to standard- and low-dose angiographic exposures using a modern multidetector (MD) CT scanner. The percentage of ISR was determined using the profile along a line normal to the lumen axis on reconstructed images of 2 and 5 mm slice thickness. Percentage ISRs derived using the standard- and low-dose protocols were compared. In a preliminary study, seven patients with stents were subjected to standard- and low-dose MDCT angiography during follow-up. The resulting images were assessed and compared by two experienced radiologists.

RESULTS

The accuracy in measuring the percentage ISR was found to be better than 12% for all simulated stenoses. The differences between percentage ISRs measured on images obtained at 120 kVp/160 mAs and 80 kVp/80 mAs were below 6%. Patient image sets acquired using low-exposure factors were judged to be of satisfactory diagnostic quality. The assessment of ISR did not differ significantly between image sets acquired using the standard factors and those acquired using the low-exposure factors, although the mean reduction in patient effective dose was 48%.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in exposure factors during MDCT angiography of the iliac artery is possible without affecting the accuracy in the determination of ISRs.