Endovascular management of arterioenteric fistulas: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the literature

A Case of Problem-Free Survival Five Years After Abdominal Aortic Sigmoid Colon Fistula Surgery

An aortoenteric fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening condition where an abnormal connection forms between the aorta and the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly the duodenum. It can be primary (arising spontaneously due to an aortic aneurysm or infection) or secondary (complicating prior vascular surgery). Immediate recognition and surgical intervention are critical to manage severe gastrointestinal bleeding and prevent fatal outcomes. A 71-year-old male developed an AEF following abdominal aortic graft surgery. Four months postoperatively, he presented with persistent lower gastrointestinal bleeding and was diagnosed with a secondary AEF. A staged surgical approach was employed, involving initial bowel resection, stoma creation, and graft cleaning, followed by subsequent aortic graft replacement with omental flap coverage. Postoperatively, a graft rupture at the proximal anastomosis required emergency endovascular stenting, which stabilized the patient. Antibiotic therapy successfully managed graft infection, including meropenem, linezolid, and later levofloxacin. The patient was discharged home on day 65 and has remained free of aortic events for five years. This case illustrates the complexity of AEF management, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary, staged approach to achieve infection control, hemostasis, and long-term stability. He has been followed up in an outpatient clinic since then. He is now 76 years old, five years later, and is progressing without an aortic event.

Management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulae: a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are a rare, complex and life-threatening complication following aortic repair. Traditional treatment strategy has been with open aortic repair (OAR), with emergence of endovascular repair (EVAR) as a potentially viable initial treatment option. Controversy exists over optimal immediate and long-term management.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, multi-institutional cohort study. Patients who had been treated for SAEF between 2003 and 2020 were identified using a standardized database. Baseline characteristics, presenting features, microbiological, operative, and post-operative variables were recorded. The primary outcomes were short and mid-term mortality. Descriptive statistics, binomial regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox age-adjusted survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Across 5 tertiary centres, a total of 47 patients treated for SAEF were included, 7 were female and the median (range) age at presentation was 74 years (48-93). In this cohort, 24 (51%) patients were treated with initially with OAR, 15 (32%) with EVAR-first and 8 (17%) non-operatively. The 30-day and 1-year mortality for all cases that underwent intervention was 21% and 46% respectively. Age-adjusted survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality in the EVAR-first group compared to the OAR-first group, HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.03, P = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

In this study there was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients who had OAR or EVAR as first line treatment for SAEF. In the acute setting, alongside broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, EVAR can be considered as an initial treatment for patients with SAEF, as a primary treatment or a bridge to definitive OAR.

A case report of primary aortoduodenal fistula: A forgotten cause of gastrointestinal bleeding

Aortoenteric fistula is one of the uncommon emergencies and is challenging to navigate for diagnostic testing. Here, we present a clinical case of an aortoduodenal fistula with primary etiology. A 73-year-old female patient with a history of hypertension was admitted to the hospital because of a 1-day history of melena. Ultrasound showed an abdominal aortic aneurysm sized (33 × 46) mm and a hematoma on the wall of the aorta. The patient underwent a gastrointestinal endoscopy with no bleeding point detected. However, the patient suddenly fell into a hemorrhagic shock on day 3 of admission. We rapidly performed fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion, a second gastrointestinal endoscopy, and a computed tomography scan of the abdomen with contrast injection that revealed a fistula from the abdominal aorta into the second segment of the duodenum. The patient was indicated for urgent endovascular aortic repair. Although this technique was successful with 3 abdominal aortic stents, the patient died due to multiorgan failure. Delayed diagnosis is the root cause of primary aortoduodenal fistula treatment failure, so it is important for clinicians to keep aortoduodenal fistula in mind as a possible cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in any patient.

Fatal bleeding due to an aorto-esophageal fistula: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Aorto-esophageal fistula is an extremely rare cause of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of an 80-year-old woman with esophageal cancer who was admitted to our department with hemorrhagic shock due to UGIB. During the diagnostic procedure, emergency computed tomography angiography was performed and confirmed aorto-esophageal fistula. Interventional radiologists inserted a stent graft into the aorta, successfully closing the fistula. Unfortunately, the patient later died of heart failure following irreversible hemorrhagic shock. Autopsy confirmed the aorto-esophageal fistula, which formed 1 cm below the distal edge of the stent previously inserted into the esophagus for a malignant stricture.

CONCLUSION

There are very rare causes of UGIB. Although clinical decisions are made during the diagnostic workup of these patients, we must be aware of the limitations of various therapeutic options, even the most contemporary.

Early and Late Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Infected Abdominal Aortic and/or Iliac Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Infected abdominal aortic and/or iliac aneurysm (AAIA) is a rare condition with a high mortality rate when treated with open surgery. In the past decade, the condition has increasingly been treated with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, early and late outcomes, including the continued need for antibiotic treatments and predictors of persistent infection, are poorly understood.

METHODS

We evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent EVAR for infected AAIA from January 2010 to October 2017. We collected data including patient age, gender, clinical presentation, aneurysm location, culture results, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, persistent infection, reintervention, and survival.

RESULTS

Among 792 patients diagnosed with AAIA, 64 were diagnosed with primary infected aneurysm, underwent EVAR, and were included in this study (81.3% male; median age, 72 years; range, 18-94 years). The most commonly isolated organisms were Salmonella species (34%), followed by Streptococcus (21%), and Staphylococcus species (21%). Aneurysms were intact in 48 patients (75%) and were ruptured in 16 (25%). The perioperative mortality was 4.7% (3 patients) of whom one was diagnosed with ruptured infected AAIA. Six (9.4%) patients died during hospitalization, 5 of severe sepsis with multiorgan failure and one of myocardial infarction. Among the 58 surviving patients, 34 (58.6%) had persistent infection, of whom 13 (22.4%) required early and late reintervention, including 2 with endograft infection, 8 with primary and secondary aortoenteric fistula, 2 with recurrent new aortic infection, and one with graft limb occlusion. The remaining 24 patients were able to discontinue antibiotics and had no recurrence or need for reintervention. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in the antibiotic-discontinuation group were 91.7%, 87.5%, and 68.0%, respectively, and 82.4%, 52.6%, and 32.9%, respectively, in the persistent-infection group (P = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, primary aortoenteric fistula (Adjusted OR [aOR], 20.469; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.265-331.320; P = 0.034) and preoperative serum albumin level <3 g/dL (aOR, 7.399; 95% CI, 1.176-46.558; P = 0.033) were preoperative parameter that predicted persistent infection. A C-reactive protein level more than 5 mg/L (aOR, 34.378; 95% CI, 4.888-241.788; P < 0.001) was observed in patients with persistent infection.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR is a feasible treatment with acceptable perioperative mortality for infected AAIA. Patients able to discontinue antibiotics have better survival and lower reintervention rates than those with persistent infection. A preoperative albumin level below 3 g/dL and primary aortoenteric fistula predicted persistent infection in this population.

Unusual cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in an 84-year-old woman: a miraculous survival from an aortoduodenal fistula repair

An 84-year-old woman presented acutely with dizziness, fatigue and a total of 800 mL of fresh per rectum (PR) bleeding. The significant history of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair 5 years ago included multiple episodes of endovascular leak around the stent associated with abscess of left psoas major, left abdominal wall abscess with sinus formation, appendicitis with abscess formation, and acute pancreatic and chronic cholecystitis with multiple gallstones in the 7 months prior to this presentation. During the preceding 7 months, the patient was stabilised with an intravenous proton pump inhibitor, blood transfusions and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) management for the assumed diagnosis of stress ulcers over multiple hospital admissions. Imaging with CT scan of the abdomen made the more accurate diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage caused by a fistula between the distal duodenum and aorta, which was later surgically confirmed. Removal of infected stents and axillobifemoral bypass were performed with a successful recovery.

Roles of endovascular aneurysm repair in management of secondary aorto-enteric fistulas

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulas (AEFs) are an uncommon but serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Case review of two cases of secondary AEF are as follows: the first case involved a 75-year- old male who presented with AEF 1 year post-emergency open AAA repair, successfully managed with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) without complication. The second case involved a 75-year-old male patient 14 months post open AAA repair for an inflammatory aneurysm who presented with an iliac-enteric fistula. The previous repair was relined with a bifurcated EVAR with subsequent laparotomy and resection of the affected portion of the small bowel. Both patients on lifelong antibiotics without further episodes of sepsis, recurrence of AEF or mortality at 12 months follow up. EVAR can be successful in the management of secondary AEF. Careful patient selection, accurate image interpretation, and expedient management are key factors to successful short- and long-term outcomes.

Perigraft air mimicking infection on CT angiography following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Aortic graft infection is a feared complication after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair secondary to its high mortality. Perigraft air is a common finding after open aortic aneurysm repair; however, it is also associated with aortic graft infection. Delineating between graft infection and common postoperative finding is a challenge. This is further complicated by use of hemostatic agents such as Gelfoam, which is also documented to cause perigraft air. Correct diagnosis has crucial implications in management of potential aortic graft infection, which is a vascular emergency. We report a case of perigraft air in a patient status after open aortic aneurysm repair with associated clinical manifestations of infection in whom conservative management and surveillance was selected for treatment. We then discuss the timeline of perigraft air, potential causation, importance of history, and physical examination, and finally, we discuss how specific findings on computed tomography imaging for infection in other areas may be useful in aortic graft infection.

Editor's Choice - Management of Secondary Aorto-enteric and Other Abdominal Arterio-enteric Fistulas: A Review and Pooled Data Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare management strategies for secondary abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas (AEFs).

METHODS

This study is a review and pooled data analysis. Medline and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2015. Particular emphasis was given to short- and long-term outcomes in relation to AEF repair type.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixteen publications were retrieved, reporting on 823 patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.7%. Open surgery had higher in-hospital mortality (246/725, 33.9%), than endovascular methods (7/98, 7.1%, p < .001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3-14.7, including staged endovascular to open surgery, 0/13, 0%). In-hospital mortality after graft removal/extra-anatomical bypass grafting was 31.2% (66/226), graft removal/in situ repair 34% (137/403), primary closure of the arterial defect 62.5% (10/16), and for miscellaneous open procedures 41.3% (33/80), p = .019. Among the subgroups of in situ repair, homografts were associated with a higher mortality than impregnated prosthetic grafts (p = .047). There was no difference in recurrent AEF-free rates between open and endovascular procedures. Extra-anatomical bypass/graft removal and in situ repair had a lower AEF recurrence rate than primary closure and homografts. Late sepsis occurred more often after endovascular surgery (2-year rates 42% vs. 19% for open, p = .001). The early survival benefit of endovascular surgery was blunted during follow-up, although it remained significant (p < .001). Within the in situ repair group, impregnated prosthetic grafts were associated with the worst overall and AEF related mortality free rates and vein grafts with the best. No recurrence, sepsis, or mortality was reported following staged endograft placement to open repair after a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (p = .18, p = .22, and p = .006, respectively, compared with patients in other groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular surgery, where appropriate, is associated with better early survival than open surgery for secondary AEFs. Most of this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ vein grafting may achieve the best results in selected patients.

Emergent interventional approach for aortogastric tube fistula with massive gastrointestinal bleeding

This report describes the successful endovascular treatment of a rare case of aortogastric tube fistula with massive gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The patient's history included oesophageal reconstruction for oesophageal carcinoma using a gastric tube. Emergent angiography revealed extravasation from the thoracic aorta into the thinner aortogastric tube fistula. A microcatheter was inserted into the aortogastric tube with the aortic approach for embolisation with a mixture of n-butyl cyanoacrylate and iodised oil to enable fluoroscopic visualisation. Aortography confirmed the complete absence of extravasation after embolisation, after which a stent graft was placed. This procedure demonstrated that transcatheter embolisation of the aortogastric tube fistula was possible, and that the technique can be used as an emergency option. CT imaging was performed 21 days after the procedure, and revealed no trace of extravasation or inflammation. There were no complications during the 14 months following the endovascular treatment; the patient remains in stable condition.

Endovascular repair of a complex giant infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Giant aortic aneurysms (transverse diameter greater than 10.0 cm) are rare and open surgery is often the treatment of choice. We report an infrarenal saccular giant aortic aneurysm (measuring 25 cm in transverse diameter), which was treated with endovascular repair, with immediate technical success. No similar report of a giant infrarenal aortic aneurysm treated with an endovascular technique was found in the literature. High-risk patients could possibly benefit from the endovascular technique. Nevertheless, patient survival remains strongly influenced by comorbidities.

Relato de caso de tratamento endovascular de fístula aorto-entérica secundária

O tratamento tradicional da fístula aorto-entérica secundária baseia-se na retirada cirúrgica da prótese, desbridamento aórtico, enxerto extra-anatômico, ou in situ, nos casos em que o campo cirúrgico apresenta-se sem sinais de infecção. Recentemente, alguns autores vêm preconizando o tratamento endovascular em pacientes instáveis e com alto risco cirúrgico. Apresentamos um relato de caso de paciente portador de fístula aorto-entérica secundária tratado inicialmente por via endovascular.