Stents in the treatment of renal artery stenosis: long-term follow-up

Double kiss mini-crush technique to treat complex recurrent renal artery in-stent restenosis

The double-kiss mini-crush (DKMC) technique has been successfully deployed in the past for the treatment of complex coronary lesions even for left main lesions. Our case report consists of a proof-of-principle that the DKMC technique can be successfully translated as well to the field of complex renal artery lesions. Insightful thinking out-of-the "coronary" box in concert with skillful off-label application of coronary stenting procedures may open the gate for unprecedented opportunities for the treatment of difficult-to-tackle in-stent restenosis in the renal circulation.

Interventions for renal artery stenosis: Appraisal of novel physiological insights and procedural techniques to improve clinical outcome

Randomized clinical trials failed to show additional benefit of renal artery stenting on top of medical therapy. Instead of writing an obituary on renal artery stenting, we try to explain these disappointing results. A transstenotic pressure gradient is needed to reduce renal perfusion and to activate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In only a minority of patients included in trials, a transstenotic pressure gradient is measured and reported. Like the coronary circulation, integration of physiological lesion assessment will allow to avoid stenting of non-significant lesions and select those patients that are most likely to benefit from renal artery stenting. Renal artery interventions are associated with peri-procedural complications. Contemporary techniques, including radial artery access, no-touch technique to engage the renal ostium and the use of embolic protection devices, will minimize procedural risk. Combining optimal patient selection and meticulous technique might lead to a netto clinical benefit when renal artery stenting is added to optimal medical therapy.

Renal Artery Revascularization a controversial treatment strategy for Renal Artery Stenosis. A case series and a brief review of current literature

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) may cause secondary hypertension, progressive decline in renal function, and cardiac destabilization syndromes including "flash" pulmonary edema, recurrent congestive heart failure, and cerebro-cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerotic lesions, fibromuscular dysplasia and vasculitides are the pathophysiologic basis of the disease. Common therapeutic pathways for RAS include medical therapy and revascularization with or without stenting. Randomized controlled trials evaluating renal revascularization, did not report any advantage of revascularization over medical therapy alone in terms of renal function improvement or prevention of cardiovascular events. However, mounting clinical experience suggests that the best strategy in RAS management is identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from renal artery stenting and also optimizing the safety and durability of the procedure. This review presents 3 cases of patients who undergone renal revascularization and discusses the available clinical evidence for identification of RAS patients who will potentially respond well to revascularization.

Renal Artery Stenosis in the Patient with Hypertension: Prevalence, Impact and Management

Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of renal artery stenosis. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is associated with three clinical problems: renovascular hypertension, ischemic nephropathy and cardiac destabilization syndrome which pose huge healthcare implications. There is a significant rate of natural disease progression with worsening severity of renal artery stenosis when renal revascularization is not pursued in a timely manner. Selective sub-groups of individuals with ARAS have had good outcomes after percutaneous renal artery stenting (PTRAS). For example, individuals that underwent PTRAS and had improved renal function were reported to have a 45% survival advantage compared to those without improvement in their renal function. Advances in the imaging tools have allowed for better anatomic and physiologic measurements of ARAS. Measuring translesional hemodynamic gradients has allowed for accurate assessment of ARAS severity. Renal revascularization with PTRAS provides a survival advantage in individuals with significant hemodynamic renal artery stenosis lesions. It is important that we screen, diagnosis, intervene with invasive and medical treatments appropriately in these high-risk patients.

When and How Should We Revascularize Patients With Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis?

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is the leading cause of secondary hypertension and may lead to resistant (refractory) hypertension, progressive decline in renal function, and cardiac destabilization syndromes (pulmonary edema, recurrent heart failure, or acute coronary syndromes) despite guideline-directed medical therapy. Although randomized controlled trials comparing medical therapy with medical therapy and renal artery stenting have failed to show a benefit for renal artery stenting, according to comparative effectiveness reviews by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the trials may not have enrolled patients with the most severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, who would be more likely to benefit from renal stenting. Because of limitations of conventional angiography, it is critical that the hemodynamic severity of moderately severe (50% to 70%) atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis lesions be confirmed on hemodynamic measurement. The authors review techniques to optimize patient selection, to minimize procedural complications, and to facilitate durable patency of renal stenting. The authors also review the current American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions appropriate use criteria as they relate to renal stenting.

Renal and Mesenteric Artery Intervention

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and may cause progressive renal disease and cardiac destabilization syndromes. Guideline-directed medical therapy is advised in all patients. Patients with refractory symptoms and hemodynamically significant stenoses are more likely to benefit from renal artery stent placement. Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is an infrequent and difficult to diagnose illness. Due to robust collateralization, clinical symptoms from mesenteric artery stenosis or occlusion is uncommon. Atherosclerosis is the most common etiology of CMI. Current evidence suggests that, compared with open surgical repair, endovascular therapy is the most cost-effective choice for CMI.

The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures

Although follow-up after open surgical and endovascular procedures is generally regarded as an important part of the care provided by vascular surgeons, there are no detailed or comprehensive guidelines that specify the optimal approaches with regard to testing methods, indications for reintervention, and follow-up intervals. To provide guidance to the vascular surgeon, the Clinical Practice Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery appointed an expert panel and a methodologist to review the current clinical evidence and to develop recommendations for follow-up after vascular surgery procedures. For those procedures for which high-quality evidence was not available, recommendations were based on observational studies, committee consensus, and indirect evidence. Recognizing that there are numerous published reports on the role of duplex ultrasound for surveillance of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts, the Society commissioned a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. The panel classified the strength of each recommendation and the corresponding quality of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system: recommendations were graded either strong or weak, and the quality of evidence was graded high, moderate, or low. The resulting recommendations represent a wide variety of open surgical and endovascular procedures involving the extracranial carotid artery, thoracic and abdominal aorta, mesenteric and renal arteries, and lower extremity arterial revascularization. The panel also identified many areas in which there was a lack of high-quality evidence to support their recommendations. This suggests that there are opportunities for further clinical research on testing methods, threshold criteria, and the role of surveillance as well as on the modes of failure and indications for reintervention after vascular surgery procedures.

Renal Artery Stenosis: When to Revascularize in 2017

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is the leading cause of secondary hypertension; it can also cause progressive renal insufficiency and cardiovascular complications such as refractory heart failure and flash pulmonary edema. Medical therapy including risk factor modification, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists, lipid lowering agents, and antiplatelet therapy is the first line of treatment in all patients. Patients with uncontrolled renovascular hypertension despite optimal medical therapy, ischemic nephropathy, and cardiac destabilization syndromes who have severe renal artery stenosis are likely to benefit from renal artery revascularization. Screening for renal artery stenosis can be done with Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Invasive physiologic measurements are useful to confirm the severity of renal hypoperfusion and therefore improve the selection patients likely to respond to renal artery revascularization. Primary patency exceeds 80% at 5 years and surveillance for in-stent restenosis can be done with periodic clinical, laboratory, and imaging follow-up.

Renal Artery Stenosis: Optimal Therapy and Indications for Revascularization

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and overall mortality. Manifestations of ARAS include resistant or malignant hypertension, progressive deterioration of renal function, and cardiac dysfunction syndromes of flash pulmonary edema and angina. Diagnosis rests upon non-invasive studies such as duplex ultrasonography and is confirmed using invasive renal arteriography. Regardless of the severity of ARAS, management of this entity has been a topic of contentious debate. For over two decades, the use of percutaneous revascularization to treat ARAS has been studied with various clinical trials. Though case series seem to demonstrate favorable clinical response to revascularization, the overwhelming majority of randomized clinical trials have not mirrored a robust outcome. In these trials, poor correlation is noted between the reduction of stenosis and the improvement of renovascular hypertension and glomerular filtration rate, and decrease in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. With dichotomizing results, the explanation for these discrepant findings has been attributed to improper trial design and inappropriate patient selection. An overview of the treatment options available will be provided, with a focus on the methodology and design of clinical trials investigating the efficacy of percutaneous revascularization. Emphasis is placed on appropriate patient selection criteria, which may necessitate the use of hemodynamic lesion assessment and clinical correlation based on individualized care. When clinical equipoise exists between optimal medical therapy and revascularization, the current paradigm supports ongoing medical therapy as the treatment of choice. However, renal artery stenting remains a viable therapeutic option for those who continue to have clinical syndromes consistent with renal hypoperfusion while adequately treated with optimal medical therapy. Despite observational studies suggesting clinical benefit for this specific patient population, there remains a paucity of randomized clinical trial data. Further trials targeting the patients who are inadequately treated with optimal medical therapy need to be undertaken to confirm the efficacy of revascularization.

A Novel Approach to Overcome Stent Strut Entrapment of the Distal Filter Retrieval Catheter during Vertebral Artery Stenting: The "Olive-Tipped" Technique

We developed an "olive-tipped" technique for preventing the distal filter retrieval catheter from entrapment in the stent struts during retrieval procedures after stent deployment and which we used in 2 vertebral artery stenting cases. A new wire entry port was made in the catheter at the transition of larger and smaller lumen to permit passage of a low-profile balloon into the lumen of the retrieval catheter. When the balloon was inflated across the retrieval catheter tip, a smoother profile was created which eliminated the sharp step between the catheter tip and the filter wire. The retrieval catheter could then be advanced easily through the stent struts using this modified system.

Technical discussion of diagnostic angiography and intervention of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

Renal artery stenting remains an important adjuvant treatment for true-resistant hypertension, although recent disappointing randomized trials highlight the importance of careful patient selection. Safe and successful renal interventions begin with critical core knowledge regarding renal artery anatomy and understanding the often hostile nature of the parent vessel (pararenal aorta). Armed with fundamental knowledge about anatomy and renal ostial disease pathology, it becomes easier to understand the advantages of less traumatic access techniques and how low-profile contemporary flexible stents have enhanced outcomes. In addition to suggested techniques based on detailed understanding of the vessel architecture and pathology, we will review the current available US Food and Drug Administration-approved balloon-expandable on-label renal stents and discuss the role of intravascular ultrasound for definition of lesion severity, stent sizing, and stent apposition. The durability of renal stenting will also be discussed, as will the velocity criteria for duplex surveillance. Lastly, the current empirical data related to renal embolic protection is provided, along with insight into technical issues in this domain.

Treatment of atheromatous renal artery in-stent restenosis in 51 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our treatment of renal artery in-stent restenosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Monocentric retrospective study of 53 cases of restenosis and two occlusions in 51 patients detected via systematic follow-up with imaging (72.5%) and/or deterioration of kidney function (5.9%) and/or blood pressure failure (54.9%), 15.7 months (5-121) after implantation, giving rise to 49 recalibrations via a balloon and five additional stentings. Analysis of the technical results, the effects on blood pressure and kidney function after repeated revascularizations.

RESULTS

Secondary permeability of 38 arteries (63.2%) after 12.4 months (3-64) with 14 second restenoses; 33.3% after redilation with a balloon, 60% after renewed stenting, more common in smokers (P=0.02), in case of peripheral arterial disease (P=0.02), ostial location (P=0.049) and kidney function impairment at the time of diagnosis of the restenosis (P=0.012). After 12.7 months (3-64) post-revascularization, kidney function was improved in 30% of patients and stabilised in 50% of patients. Treatment of second restenoses: one failure (7.1%), nine dilations with a balloon, three cutting balloon, one second stent. Treatment of third restenoses: 71.4% treated with a balloon (2), cutting balloon (2) or coated stent (DES) (1); then permeability at a later point in time: 50%.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of repeated restenoses with conventional techniques is of imperfect efficacy, and currently remains un-codified.

Renal artery stenosis: prevalence of, risk factors for, and management of in-stent stenosis

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is common and is associated with hypertension and chronic kidney disease. More frequent use of percutaneous renal artery stent placement for the treatment of renal artery stenosis during the past 2 decades has increased the number of patients with implanted stents. In-stent stenosis is a serious problem, occurring more frequently than earlier reports suggest and potentially resulting in late complications. Currently, there are no guidelines covering the approach to restenosis after renal artery stent placement. This article reviews data on the prevalence of and risk factors for the development of in-stent stenosis and the clinical manifestations, evaluation, and treatment of in-stent stenosis and suggests a strategy for the management of patients after percutaneous renal artery stent placement.

Renal intervention to treat hypertension

Renal artery intervention to treat hypertension is one of the frontiers of ongoing research in combating this epidemic. This article focuses on recent data regarding PTRS and catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation. Despite progress in this field large multicenter, randomized trials that compare these treatment modalities with medical therapy for hypertension are lacking.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renal artery stenting: an evolving therapeutic option

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a common clinical problem for which the optimal therapeutic strategy remains to be defined. However, renal artery stenting procedures have significantly increased as one approach to treat this clinical problem. Despite improvements in device design and technical performance of the procedure, the benefits and results of randomized clinical trials of renal artery stenting as a therapy remain confusing. Understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology and natural history of renal artery stenosis are central to improving the outcomes of renal artery stenting. Developing both noninvasive and invasive predictive tools to better identify which patient will respond to renal revascularization will also be beneficial. In this article, we will present an overview of atherosclerotic renal artery disease. The results of renal artery stenting will be discussed and from this, the available noninvasive and invasive tools available to assess the clinical and hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis will be presented.

Stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis of the vertebral artery ostium: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 117 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Although it is thought to be a safe treatment option, the main concerns related to treating vertebral artery ostium (VAO) stenosis with stents have been the rate of restenosis and the uncertain long-term results.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the angiographic and clinical results of stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis of the VAO.

METHODS

One hundred seventeen consecutive patients with atherosclerotic VAO stenosis were treated with stent placement over a period of 12 years. All patients were retrospectively analyzed through the use of a prospectively collected database. The indication criteria for this treatment protocol were symptomatic severe VAO stenoses (> 60%) and asymptomatic severe VAO stenoses (> 60%) with incidentally detected infarction in the posterior circulation. The target diameter of stent dilatation from 1997 to 2000 was the normal vessel diameter just distal to the lesion. Moderate overdilation in the proximal portion of the stents has been performed since 2001.

RESULTS

Successful dilatation was obtained in 116 of 117 cases. Transient neurological complications developed in 2 patients; however, no patients experienced any permanent neurological complications. One hundred four patients underwent follow-up angiography at 6 months after stenting. The restenosis rate at the 6-month follow-up was 9.6% (10 of 104). Until 2000, the restenosis rate after stenting was 13.3%. Since 2001, the restenosis rate has decreased to 4.5%. The median clinical follow-up period was 48 months. The annual rate of strokes in the posterior circulation was 0.95%.

CONCLUSION

Stent placement for atherosclerotic VAO stenosis is considered to be a feasible and safe treatment and may be effective for stroke prevention. The moderate overdilation of stents may be an effective modality for the prevention of restenosis.

Utilization of excimer laser debulking for critical lesions unsuitable for standard renal angioplasty

BACKGROUND

The energy emitted by ultraviolet laser is avidly absorbed in atherosclerotic plaques. Conceptually, it could be applied for debulking of selected atherosclerotic renal artery stenoses. We describe early experience with revascularization of critical renal artery lesions deemed unsuitable for standard renal angioplasty. Institutional Review Board permission to conduct the data analysis was obtained.

METHODS

Among 130 percutaneous renal artery interventions with balloon angioplasty and adjunct stenting, there were 12 (9%) patients who underwent laser debulking prior to stenting. These patients presented with critical (95+/-3.5% stenoses) lesions (11 de novo, 1 stent restenosis) deemed unsuitable for standard renal angioplasty because of marked eccentricity and presence of thrombus. Indications for intervention included preservation of kidney function, treatment of uncontrolled hypertension, management of congestive heart failure, and treatment of unstable angina. Blood pressure and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured pre- and 3 weeks post-intervention.

RESULTS

A baseline angiographic stenosis of 95+/-3.5% was reduced to 50+/-13% with laser debulking. There were no laser-induced complications. Post-stenting the angiographic residual stenosis was 0%. The mean gradient across the lesions was reduced from baseline 85+/-40 to 0 mmHg. A normal post-intervention antegrade renal flow was observed in all patients. Baseline mean systolic BP of 178+/-20 mmHg decreased to 132+/-12 mmHg (P<0.0001) and mean diastolic pressure of 85+/-16 mmHg reduced to 71+/-9 mmHg (P = 0.01). A pre-intervention mean eGFR of 47.7+/-19 ml/min/1.73 m(2) increased to 56+/-20.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (P = 0.05) post-procedure. The interventions were not associated with major renal or cardiac adverse events. During follow-up one patient developed transient contrast-induced nephropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Debulking of select renal artery stenoses with laser angioplasty followed by adjunct stenting is feasible. Further prospective, randomized studies will be required to explore the role of debulking and laser angioplasty in renal artery revascularization.

Diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: improving patient selection and outcomes

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is common among patients with atherosclerosis, and is found in 20-30% of individuals who undergo diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Renal artery duplex ultrasonography is the diagnostic procedure of choice for screening outpatients for RAS. Percutaneous renal artery stent placement is the preferred method of revascularization for hemodynamically significant RAS, and is favored over balloon angioplasty alone. Stent placement carries a class I recommendation for atherosclerotic RAS according to ACC and AHA guidelines. Discordance exists between the very high (>95%) procedural success rate and the moderate (60-70%) clinical response rate after renal stent placement, which is likely to be a result of poor selection of patients, inadequate angiographic assessment of lesion severity, and the presence of renal parencyhmal disease. Physiologic lesion assessment using translesional pressure gradients, and measurements of biomarkers (e.g. brain natriuretic peptide), or both, could enhance the selection of patients and improve clinical response rates. Long-term patency rates for renal stenting are excellent, with 5-year secondary patency rates greater than 90%. This Review will outline the clinical problem of atherosclerotic RAS and its diagnosis, and will critically assess treatment options and strategies to improve patients' outcomes.

Renal artery revascularization: collaborative approaches for specialists

Endovascular revascularization for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is the revascularization strategy of choice for patients with hemodynamically and clinically significant renal artery stenosis. Surgical revascularization is reserved for failed endovascular therapy or concomitant abdominal aortic surgery. Endovascular renal artery stenting is associated with excellent technical success, low complication rates, and acceptable long-term patency. This technique has been proven to be beneficial for preserving kidney function and stabilizing or improving blood pressure control in selected patients. Nevertheless, deterioration in kidney function after the procedure in 10% to 20% of cases may limit the immediate benefits of this technique. Atheroembolism appears to play an important role in the cause of kidney dysfunction after renal revascularization. Renal revascularization with a distal embolic protection device is a promising strategy in reducing the risk of atheroembolism and deterioration in kidney function.

Endovascular management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease: early results following primary intervention

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective review examines periprocedural morbidity and early functional responses to primary renal artery angioplasty and stenting (RA-PTAS) for patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (RVD).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing primary RA-PTAS for hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic RVD with hypertension and/or ischemic nephropathy were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Hypertension responses were determined based on pre- and post-intervention blood pressure measurements and medication requirements. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was used to determine renal function responses. Both hypertension and renal function responses were assessed at least three weeks after RA-PTAS. Stepwise multivariable regression analysis was used to examine associations between blood pressure and renal function responses to RA-PTAS and select clinical variables.

RESULTS

One-hundred ten primary RA-PTAS were performed on 99 patients with atherosclerotic RVD with a mean angiographic diameter-reducing stenosis of 79.2 +/- 12.9%. All patients had hypertension (mean of 3.4 +/- 1.3 antihypertensive agents). Mean pre-intervention eGFR was 49.9 +/- 22.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and 74 patients had a pre-intervention eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The technical success rate for RA-PTAS was 94.5%. The periprocedural complication rate was 5.5%; there were no periprocedural deaths. Statistically significant decreases in mean systolic blood pressure (161.3 +/- 25.2 vs. 148.5 +/- 25.2 post-intervention, P < .0001), diastolic blood pressure (78.6 +/- 13.3 versus 72.5 +/- 13.5 post-intervention, P < .0001), and number of antihypertensive agents (3.3 +/- 1.2 versus 3.1+/- 1.3 post-intervention, P = .009) were observed. Assessed categorically, hypertension response to RA-PTAS was cured in 1.1%, improved in 20.5%, and unchanged in 78.4%. Categorical eGFR response to RA-PTAS was improved in 27.7%, unchanged in 65.1%, and worsened in 7.2%. Multivariable stepwise regression revealed associations between pre- and post-intervention systolic blood pressure (P < .0001), diastolic blood pressure (P < .0001), and eGFR (P < .0001), as well as a trend toward improved diastolic blood pressure response among patients managed with staged bilateral intervention (P = .0589).

CONCLUSION

Primary RA-PTAS for atherosclerotic RVD was associated with low peri-procedural morbidity and mortality but only modest early improvements in blood pressure and renal function. Results from ongoing prospective trials are needed to assess the long term outcomes associated with RA-PTAS and clarify its role in the management of atherosclerotic RVD.

Catheter-based therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

The prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) is more common than was previously thought, particularly in patients with known coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral vascular atherosclerosis. Clinical subsets in which RAS is more common include patients with uncontrolled hypertension, renal insufficiency, and/or sudden onset ("flash") pulmonary edema. Renal artery atherosclerosis progresses over time and is associated with loss of renal function regardless of medical therapy. Patients with symptomatic (hypertension, renal insufficiency, or flash pulmonary edema) and hemodynamically significant RAS are potential candidates for revascularization. The current standard of care is stent placement for aorto-ostial atherosclerotic lesions. Procedure success rates are very high (> or =95%), with infrequent major complication rates. Five-year primary patency rates are 80% to 85%, and secondary patency rates exceed 90%. The key element in managing patients with RAS is selecting those most likely to benefit, that is, those with blood pressure control, preservation or improvement of renal function, and control of flash pulmonary edema from renal revascularization. This article will highlight the anatomical features, physiologic parameters, and biomarkers that may be helpful in optimally selecting patients for renal artery revascularization.

MDCT Angiography of the Renal Arteries in Patients with Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Implications for Renal Artery Stenting with Distal Protection

OBJECTIVE

Use of distal protection in renal artery stenting entails overcoming challenges unique to renal artery anatomy. We used 3D image reconstruction to review high-spatial-resolution MDCT angiographic data to better characterize the anatomy of stenotic renal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 218 abdominal MDCT angiograms from a single tertiary care referral center were reviewed. The subjects were 108 patients who had 127 arteries with more than 50% ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Vessel analysis software was used to measure renal artery length, cross-sectional area, and maximum diameter. Differences between mean values for women and men and for left and right renal arteries were measured with a two-tailed Student's t test.

RESULTS

Significant differences for men and women were found in average maximum cross-sectional area distal to the point of stenosis (0.3 +/- 0.19 vs 0.23 +/- 0.09 cm2, p = 0.006) and the corresponding maximum diameter (6.9 +/- 1.7 vs 6.1 +/- 1.1 cm2, p = 0.003). Average lengths of the main renal artery did not differ significantly for men and women. Differences for the left and right main renal arteries were found in minimum area (i.e., area of maximum stenosis, 0.08 +/- 0.04 vs 0.06 +/- 0.03 cm2, p = 0.03), area proximal to the bifurcation (0.26 +/- 0.11 cm2 vs 0.23 +/- 0.07 cm2, p = 0.02), and length (38.5 +/- 12.6 vs 48.7 +/- 16.2 mm, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Significant anatomic differences exist between the left and right renal arteries, between the renal arteries in men and those in women, and from one person to the next. Many of these differences are relevant to the design and use of distal protection devices in stenting of the renal arteries.

Factors Influencing the Need for Target Vessel Revascularization After Renal Artery Stenting

PURPOSE

To provide additional insight into factors that may be associated with the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR) following de novo renal artery stenting during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective chart and database review was conducted to analyze the progress of all patients with de novo symptomatic renal artery stenosis who underwent stent-supported angioplasty under the auspices of the Single Operator, Single Center, Renal Stent Retrospective Study (SOCRATES). The records review identified 782 patients who were enrolled in the study between 1993 and 2004; after excluding 34 (4.5%) patients (lost to follow-up or inadequate data), 748 consecutive patients (412 women; mean age 70.7+/-9.7 years, range 37-92) were suitable for longitudinal analysis. The need for TVR was based on strict clinical criteria (> or =20% rise in serum creatinine, worsening hypertension, and/or recurrent flash pulmonary edema), and all patients underwent multidisciplinary evaluation before stenting and during follow-up.

RESULTS

Follow-up spanned a mean 45.8+/-26.5 months. TVR was needed in 88 (10.03%) of 877 arteries and was best predicted by patient age < or =67 years (OR 2.91, p=0.0001), stent diameter < or =5.0 mm (OR 2.31, p=0.001), solitary functioning kidney (OR 2.01, p=0.048), history of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (OR 1.87, p=0.008), and antecedent history of stroke (OR 1.73, p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

Renal artery stenting appears to be durable, with only 10% of stented arteries requiring TVR during clinically-based long-term follow-up. Arteries with a final stent diameter < or =5.0 mm were more than twice as likely to need TVR, as were patients with a solitary kidney. The authors acknowledge that clinical recurrence is not a surrogate for ultrasound surveillance after renal artery stenting, so prospective controlled trials will be needed to determine risk factors for restenosis.

Renal angioplasty and stenting: long-term results and the potential role of protection devices

Renal angioplasty and stenting have become the first treatments to be proposed to patients presenting with renal artery stenosis. The immediate technical success rate is high, with a low complication rate and good long-term patency. In most reports, renal stenting has been proven to improve blood pressure. However, despite good immediate- and long-term results, postprocedural deterioration of renal function is a concern, and may occur after renal artery angioplasty and stenting in 20 to 40% of patients, which limits the immediate benefits of this technique. Of the causes of this deterioration in renal function, atheroembolism seems to play an important role. Contrary to earlier beliefs that atheroembolization is not an issue during percutaneous catheter interventions, there is now mounting evidence that distal atherosclerotic debris commonly embolizes from lesions in many vascular territories during percutaneous interventions. Atheroembolism seems to be the root cause of many procedural complications wherever atherosclerotic lesions are treated. Distal embolization was first demonstrated in saphenous vein grafts and now, clinical data are proving that similar embolization and distal-organ complications also occur during catheter treatment in certain native coronary lesions, carotid stenting and renal artery stenting, demonstrating the role and efficacy of protection devices to reduce the incidence of end-organ complications. The same protection devices (protection balloon and filters) utilized for coronary or carotid procedures may be used to protect the kidney from atheroembolism. In this review, the authors discuss recently published data concerning the techniques and results of renal angioplasty and stenting procedures performed under protection, and evaluate the benefits of this technique on renal function and its role in the future. Indications for this technique need to be discussed.

Distal embolic protection during renal artery angioplasty and stenting

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous renal artery angioplasty and/or stenting (RA-PTAS) is increasingly being used as an alternative to surgery for renal artery revascularization. Unfortunately, renal function responses after RA-PTAS appear to be inferior to those observed after surgical revascularization both in terms of improving and preventing deterioration of renal function postintervention. Atheroembolism during RA-PTAS has been postulated as a potential cause for the disparate results. Strategies to limit the occurrence of atheroembolism, such as the use of distal embolic protection (DEP) systems, may result in improved outcomes after RA-PTAS.

METHODS

All RA-PTAS procedures performed with DEP (using a commercially available temporary balloon occlusion and aspiration catheter) between October 2003 and July 2005 were reviewed. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated preintervention and 4 to 6 weeks postintervention using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Renal function and hypertension response rates as well as procedural data were classified and reported according to American Heart Association guidelines. Renal function improvement and deterioration were defined as a 20% increase and decrease in eGFR, respectively, compared with preoperative values. Continuous and categoric data were analyzed using paired t tests and repeated measures linear models.

RESULTS

DEP was used in 32 RA-PTAS procedures in 15 women and 11 men with a mean age of 71 years. All patients were hypertensive, 24 (92%) had renal insufficiency, and the mean preintervention degree of renal artery stenosis was 79%. Immediate technical success was achieved in 100% of RA-PTAS cases. Mean pre- and postintervention serum creatinine and eGFR values were 1.9 vs 1.6 mg/dL (P < .001) and 37 vs 43 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < .001), respectively. Renal function was defined as improved after 17 (53%) of 32 procedures and worsened in none (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

RA-PTAS using DEP resulted in 4- to 6-week postintervention renal function results approximating those of surgical revascularization. These data suggest that DEP use may prevent renal function harm during RA-PTAS as a result of atheroembolism and warrant further investigation.

A clinical survey of vascular stents

As a result of the many different potential locations to be treated, it is still difficult to evaluate the indications for efficacy and safety of non-coronary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting versus surgical methods, such as endarterectomy or bypass grafts. This paper reviews pertinent data published in the last 5-10 years and gives an overview of the main peripheral minimally invasive vascular interventional fields.

Treatment of severe renal artery stenosis by percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stent implantation: review of the pediatric experience: apropos of two cases

The clinical course of two children with mid-aortic syndrome and renal artery stenosis (RAS) who suffered from severe arterial hypertension is described. Hypertension was uncontrollable by antihypertensive medication and was managed by percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) with stent implantation. The pediatric experience with PTRA is limited, and there are only few cases reported with additional stent implantation. Complications of these procedures are well known from experience with adult patients. However, since surgical revascularization may be technically difficult especially in small children, PTRA with or without stenting should be considered as a valuable treatment option in pediatric RAS.

Renal artery stenting in solitary functioning kidneys: Technical and clinical results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and technical results of renal artery stenting for the treatment of renovascular hypertension and renal failure in patients with solitary functioning kidney.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with solitary functioning kidney underwent renal artery stenting and were followed up for 12-60 months. Before the procedures, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and serum creatinine levels were measured and the number of antihypertensive drugs was recorded and followed up after stenting. In case of restenosis, either in-stent percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or stent-in-stent placement was performed.

RESULTS

Primary technical success rate was 100%. One lesion was nonostial while 14 were ostial. Primary patency rates were 100% for 6 months, 92.3% for 12 months, and 69.2% for 24 months. The secondary patency rate at 24 months was 100%. The differences between the baseline and postprocedural values of systolic blood pressures, diastolic blood pressures and the number of antihypertensive drug were statistically significant (P < 0.05), except the values of serum creatinine. Hypertension was cured in 1 (6.7%) patient, improved in 4 (26.6%) and stabilized in 10 (66.7%) patients. Renal function improved in 9 (60%), stabilized in 4 (26.6%), and deteriorated in 2 (13.4%) patients. Minor complication rate was 13.4% and major complication rate was 13.4%.

CONCLUSION

Revascularization of renal artery stenosis using stent in solitary functioning kidneys is a safe and efficient procedure with high primary technical results, low restenosis rates and acceptable complication rates. It has an improving and controlling effect on blood pressure and renal functions.

Renal Artery Thrombosis Caused by Stent Fracture in a Single Kidney Patient

PURPOSE

To report a case of incomplete expansion, fracture, and thrombosis of a stent in the renal artery.

CASE REPORT

A 47-year-old man with right renal artery occlusion underwent direct stenting of the left renal artery using a balloon-expandable stent. Completion angiography showed satisfactory patency of the vessel although the stent was not fully expanded in its central segment. The patient received 5000 units of heparin during the procedure, but no additional anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy in the peri/postinterventional period. Twenty-five days later, he presented with acute renal insufficiency and uncontrolled hypertension. Angiography revealed in-stent thrombosis and collateral flow in the distal segment of the left renal artery. He underwent an aortorenal bypass, which salvaged the kidney. The stent, after removal from the vessel, was fractured and not completely expanded.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete expansion and fracture of the stent associated with insufficient antiplatelet therapy produced in-stent thrombosis. Collateral flow prevented kidney necrosis.