Improved catheter navigation with 3D electromagnetic guidance

Impact of the Endonaut® angio-navigation system on radiation exposure in endovascular aortic repair performed with mobile C-arms

OBJECTIVE

Fusion imaging systems have proved to reduce radiation exposure mostly in hybrid rooms but reports with mobile C-arms are few. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of the Endonaut® navigation system on radiation exposure in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed with mobile C-arms.

METHODS

All patients undergoing EVAR and/or iliac branched devices implantation between January 2016 and August 2022 were included. All procedures were performed with a mobile C-arm (Siemens Avantic® or GE Elite® until March 2018, Siemens Cios Alpha® thereafter). The Endonaut® navigation system has been used since January 2021. Two groups were therefore compared : before (control group) and after the use of Endonaut®. Radiation data including Dose Area Product (DAP) values, Air Kerma (AK) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 153 patients were included: control group (CGr), n = 121; Endonaut® group (EnGr), n = 32. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. DAP values were significantly lower in the EnGr (38 Gy.cm2 ± 24) vs. the CGr (76 Gy.cm2 ± 51) (p<.05) despite a significantly higher number of complex procedures such as iliac branched devices (p<.05). AK values were not significantly different between the EnGr and the CGr (196 mGy ± 114 vs. 209 mGy ± 138) as well as FT (33 minutes ± 18 vs. 33 minutes ± 16). Technical success was 97% (31/32) in the EnGr vs. 96% (116/121) in the CGr (p=.79). The volume of contrast media was significantly lower in the EnGr (94 cc ± 41) vs. the CGr (143 cc ± 66) (p<.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the use of the Endonaut® angio-navigation system when performing EVAR with mobile C-arms led to a radiation dose reduction without compromising technical success or procedural time.

A Steerable and Electromagnetically Tracked Catheter: Navigation Performance Compared With Image Fusion in a Swine Model

PURPOSE

Cannulation of visceral vessels is necessary during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair. In an attempt to reduce the associated radiation and contrast dose, an electromagnetically (EM) trackable and manually steerable catheter has been developed. The purpose of this preclinical swine study was to evaluate the cannulation performance and compare the cannulation performance using either EM tracking or image fusion as navigation tools.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both renal arteries, the superior mesenteric artery, and the celiac trunk were attempted to be cannulated using a 7F steerable, EM trackable catheter in 3 pigs. Seven operators attempted cannulation using first 3-dimensional (3D) image navigation with EM tracking and then conventional image fusion guidance. The rate of successful cannulation was recorded, as well as procedure time and radiation exposure. Due to the lack of an EM trackable guidewire, cannulations that required more than 1 attempt were attempted only with image fusion. The EM tracking position data were registered to preoperative 3D images using a vessel-based registration algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 72 cannulations were attempted with both methods, and 79% (57) were successful on the first attempt for both techniques. There was no difference in cannulation rate (p=1), and time-use was similar. Successful cannulation with image fusion was achieved in 97% of cases when multiple attempts were allowed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of a steerable and EM trackable catheter with 3D image navigation. Navigation performance with EM tracking was similar to image fusion, without statistically significant differences in cannulation rates and procedure times. Further studies are needed to demonstrate this utility in patients with aortic disease.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Electromagnetic tracking in combination with a novel steerable catheter reduces radiation and contrast media doses while providing three-dimensional visualization and agile navigation during endovascular aortic procedures.

Branched Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair Under Electromagnetic Guidance in an in Vitro Model

PURPOSE

We report a new approach to perform endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms under electromagnetic navigation guidance using a modified system (IOPS; Centerline Biomedical, Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) and a modified branched endograft (E-nside TAAA Multibranch Stent Graft System; Artivion Inc., Kennesaw, GA, USA).

CASE REPORT

We performed this case in an aortic in vitro model made from transparent polyurethane in our research hybrid room (Discovery IGS 730; GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, USA). While the implantation of this device typically involves several challenging steps, including precise endograft implantation, snaring of preloaded guide wires, and cannulation of target visceral arteries, all were successfully performed using electromagnetic navigation guidance.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary experience suggests that endograft implantation under electromagnetic navigation guidance in an integrated hybrid operating room is an innovative option to address technical challenges and reduce patient and operator radiation exposure associated with complex endovascular surgery.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Most steps of a branched endografting procedure can be performed without X-Ray exposure when using electromagnetic navigation guidance and a modified branched endograft.

New tools to reduce radiation exposure during aortic endovascular procedures

INTRODUCTION

The evolution of endovascular surgery over the past 30 years has made it possible to treat increasingly complex vascular pathologies with an endovascular method. Although this generally speeds up the patient's recovery, the risks of health problems caused by long-term exposure to radioactive radiation increase. This warrants the demand for radiation-reducing tools to reduce radiation exposure during these procedures.

AREAS COVERED

For this systematic review Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were searched on 28 December 2021 to provide an overview of tools that are currently used or have the potential to contribute to reducing radiation exposure during endovascular aortic procedures. In addition, an overview is presented of radiation characteristics of clinical studies comparing a (potential) radiation-reducing device with conventional fluoroscopy use.

EXPERT OPINION

Radiation-reducing instruments such as fiber optic shape sensing or electromagnetic tracking devices offer the possibility to further reduce or even eliminate the use of radiation during endovascular procedures. In an era of increasing endovascular interventional complexity and awareness of the health risks of long-term radiation exposure, the use of these technologies could have a major impact on an ongoing challenge to move toward radiation-free endovascular surgery.

Updates in Endovascular Procedural Navigation In Canadian Journal of Cardiology

There have been significant advancements in endovascular technology over the past decade. Increasingly complex disease processes are being addressed in a less invasive fashion, while still relying on standard two-dimensional, gray-scale fluoroscopy imaging to guide the procedures. With the advent of flat panel detectors as standard on fluoroscopy units and the utilization of fluoroscopy cone-beam computed tomography, the development of improved imaging tools has occurred which will help improve the imaging modalities used to perform these endovascular procedures. . Fusion imaging, the overlay of pre-operative 3-dimensional computed tomography images helps interventionalists perform endovascular procedures. Building on this technology, improvements in its function and utilization have occurred with the additional application of artificial intelligence and machine learning - allowing the images to independently accommodate to changes in the visualized anatomy. Corresponding development of navigation systems, allowing for the tracking of endovascular tools within these images using either fiberoptics of electromagnetic field generators, are looking to improve the accuracy of the procedures while reducing the need for radiation and contrast agents. These tools are making a dramatic change in our ability to perform complex endovascular procedures, and are the future gold standard. Ultimately, these will allow procedures to occur more quickly and more safely.

Robotic endovascular surgery: current and future practice

Minimally invasive techniques have been at the forefront of surgical progress, and the evolution of endovascular robotic technologies has seen a paradigm shift in the focus of future innovation. Endovascular robotic technology may help overcome many of the challenges associated with traditional endovascular techniques by enabling greater control, stability, and precision of target navigation and treatment, while simultaneously reducing operator learning curves and improving safety. Several robotic systems have been developed to perform a broad range of endovascular procedures, but none have been used at scale or widely in routine practice, and the evidence for their safety, effectiveness, and efficiency remains limited. High cost and device complexity, lack of haptic feedback, and limited integration and interoperability with existing equipment and devices are the principal technology, cost, and sustainability barriers to the scalability and widespread adoption in day-to-day practice. In order to fully realize its potential, future robotic innovation must ensure compatibility with a range of off-the-shelf equipment that can be tracked and exchanged quickly during a procedure and come together with developments in navigation, tracking, and imaging. Reducing cost and complexity and supporting sustainability of the technology is key. In parallel, new technologies must be evaluated by clear and transparent standardized outcomes and be accompanied by robust clinical training. Key to the successful future development and dissemination of robotic technology is open collaboration among industry, clinicians, and patients in order to fully understand and address current challenges and enable the technology to realize its full potential.

Three-Dimensional Holographic Guidance, Navigation, and Control (3D-GNC) for Endograft Positioning in Porcine Aorta: Feasibility Comparison With 2-Dimensional X-Ray Fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVES

Intraprocedural deployment of endovascular devices during complex aortic repair with 2-dimensional (2D) x-ray fluoroscopic guidance poses challenges in terms of accurate delivery system positioning and increased risk of x-ray radiation exposure with prolonged fluoroscopy times, particularly in unfavorable anatomy. The objective of this study was to assess feasibility of using an augmented reality (AR) system to position and orient a modified aortic endograft delivery system in comparison with standard fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 3-dimensional guidance, navigation, and control (3D-GNC) prototype system was developed for eventual integration with the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS, Centerline Biomedical, Cleveland, OH) to project spatially registered 3D holographic representations of the subject-specific aorta for intraoperative guidance and coupled with an electromagnetically (EM) tracked delivery system for intravascular navigation. Numerical feedback for controlling the endograft landing zone distance and ostial alignment was holographically projected on the operative field. Visualization of the holograms was provided via a commercially available AR headset. A Zenith Spiral-Z AAA limb stent-graft was modified with a scallop, 6 degree-of-freedom EM sensor for tracking, and radiopaque markers for fluoroscopic visualization. In vivo, 10 interventionalists independently positioned and oriented the delivery system to the ostia of renal or visceral branch vessels in anesthetized swine via open femoral artery access using 3D-GNC and standard fluoroscopic guidance. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, cumulative air kerma, and contrast material volume were recorded for each technique. Positioning and orientation accuracy was determined by measuring the target landing-zone distance error (δ_LZE) and the scallop-ostium angular alignment error (θ_SOE) using contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography imaging after each positioning for each technique. Mean, standard deviation, and standard error are reported for the performance variables, and Student's t tests were used to evaluate statistically significant differences in performance mean values of 3D-GNC and fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Technical success for the use of 3D-GNC to orient and position the endovascular device at each renal-visceral branch ostium was 100%. 3D-GNC resulted in 56% decrease in procedure time in comparison with standard fluoroscopic guidance (p<0.001). The 3D-GNC system was used without fluoroscopy or contrast-dye administration. Positioning accuracy was comparable for both techniques (p=0.86), while overall orientation accuracy was improved with the 3D-GNC system by 41.5% (p=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The holographic 3D-GNC system demonstrated improved accuracy of aortic stent-graft positioning with significant reductions in fluoroscopy time, contrast-dye administration, and procedure time.

Improved 3D Catheter Shape Estimation Using Ultrasound Imaging for Endovascular Navigation: A Further Study

OBJECTIVE

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy is the standard guidance imaging method for closed endovascular intervention. However, two-dimensional fluoroscopy lacks depth perception for the intervention catheter and causes radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients. In this paper, we extend our previous study and develop the improved three-dimensional (3D) catheter shape estimation using ultrasound imaging. In addition, we perform further quantitative evaluations of endovascular navigation.

METHOD

First, the catheter tracking accuracy in ultrasound images is improved by adjusting the state vector and adding direction information. Then, the 3D catheter points from the catheter tracking are further optimized based on the 3D catheter shape optimization with a high-quality sample set. Finally, the estimated 3D catheter shapes from ultrasound images are overlaid with preoperative 3D tissue structures for the intuitive endovascular navigation.

RESULTS

the tracking accuracy of the catheter increased by 24.39%, and the accuracy of the catheter shape optimization step also increased by approximately 17.34% compared with our previous study. Furthermore, the overall error of catheter shape estimation was further validated in the catheter intervention experiment of in vitro cardiovascular tissue and in a vivo swine, and the errors were 2.13 mm and 3.37 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Experimental results demonstrate that the improved catheter shape estimation using ultrasound imaging is accurate and appropriate for endovascular navigation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Improved navigation reduces the radiation risk because it decreases use of X-ray imaging. In addition, this navigation method can also provide accurate 3D catheter shape information for endovascular surgery.

Vessel-based rigid registration for endovascular therapy of the abdominal aorta

BACKGROUND

Combining electromagnetic tracking of instruments with preoperatively acquired images can provide detailed visualization for intraoperative guidance and reduce the need for fluoroscopy and contrast. In this study, we investigated the accuracy of a vessel-based registration method designed for matching preoperative image and electromagnetically tracked positions for endovascular therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An open-source registration method was used to match the centerline extracted from computed tomography (CT) to electromagnetically tracked positions within a vascular phantom representing the abdominal aorta with bifurcations. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated for 11 fiducials distributed over the phantom. Median and intra-quartile range (IQR) for 30 registrations was reported. TRE < 5 mm was claimed sufficient for endovascular navigation, evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. TRE was also compared to a 3D-3D registration method based on intraoperative cone-beam CT, using the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

The TRE was 3.75 (IQR: 3.48-3.99) mm for the centerline registration algorithm and 3.21 (IQR: 1.50-3.57) mm for the 3D-3D method (p < .001). For both methods, the TRE was significantly < 5 mm (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The centerline registration method was feasible, with an accuracy sufficient for navigation in endovascular therapy. The centerline method avoids additional image acquisition for registration purpose only.

Design and Experimental Validation of an Active Catheter for Endovascular Navigation

Endovascular techniques have many advantages but rely strongly on operator skills and experience. Robotically steerable catheters have been developed but few are clinically available. We describe here the development of an active and efficient catheter based on shape memory alloys (SMA) actuators. We first established the specifications of our device considering anatomical constraints. We then present a new method for building active SMA-based catheters. The proposed method relies on the use of a core body made of three parallel metallic beams and integrates wire-shaped SMA actuators. The complete device is encapsulated into a standard 6F catheter for safety purposes. A trial-and-error campaign comparing 70 different prototypes was conducted to determine the best dimensions of the core structure and of the SMA actuators with respect to the imposed specifications. The final prototype was tested on a silicon-based arterial model and on a 23 kg pig. During these experiments, we were able to cannulate the supra-aortic trunks and the renal arteries with different angulations and without any complication. A second major contribution of this paper is the derivation of a reliable mathematical model for predicting the bending angle of our active catheters. We first use this model to state some general qualitative rules useful for an iterative dimensional optimization. We then perform a quantitative comparison between the actual and the predicted bending angles for a set of 13 different prototypes. The relative error is less than 20% for bending angles between 100 deg and 150 deg, which is the interval of interest for our applications.

Flexible robotics with electromagnetic tracking improves safety and efficiency during in vitro endovascular navigation

OBJECTIVE

One limitation of the use of robotic catheters is the lack of real-time three-dimensional (3D) localization and position updating: they are still navigated based on two-dimensional (2D) X-ray fluoroscopic projection images. Our goal was to evaluate whether incorporating an electromagnetic (EM) sensor on a robotic catheter tip could improve endovascular navigation.

METHODS

Six users were tasked to navigate using a robotic catheter with incorporated EM sensors in an aortic aneurysm phantom. All users cannulated two anatomic targets (left renal artery and posterior "gate") using four visualization modes: (1) standard fluoroscopy mode (control), (2) 2D fluoroscopy mode showing real-time virtual catheter orientation from EM tracking, (3) 3D model of the phantom with anteroposterior and endoluminal view, and (4) 3D model with anteroposterior and lateral view. Standard X-ray fluoroscopy was always available. Cannulation and fluoroscopy times were noted for every mode. 3D positions of the EM tip sensor were recorded at 4 Hz to establish kinematic metrics.

RESULTS

The EM sensor-incorporated catheter navigated as expected according to all users. The success rate for cannulation was 100%. For the posterior gate target, mean cannulation times in minutes:seconds were 8:12, 4:19, 4:29, and 3:09, respectively, for modes 1, 2, 3 and 4 (P = .013), and mean fluoroscopy times were 274, 20, 29, and 2 seconds, respectively (P = .001). 3D path lengths, spectral arc length, root mean dimensionless jerk, and number of submovements were significantly improved when EM tracking was used (P < .05), showing higher quality of catheter movement with EM navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

The EM tracked robotic catheter allowed better real-time 3D orientation, facilitating navigation, with a reduction in cannulation and fluoroscopy times and improvement of motion consistency and efficiency.

Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

This study reviewed the current developments in manual tracking and robotic navigation technologies for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies reporting manual tracking or robotic navigation systems that are able to manipulate endovascular surgical tools during abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Reports were grouped by the navigation systems and categorized into phantom, animal, and clinical studies. First, the general characteristics of each system were compared. Second, target registration error and deployment error were used to compare the accuracy of the tracking systems. Third, all systems were reviewed for fluoroscopy time (FT), radiation dose, and contrast volumes, if reported, in rigid and nonrigid studies. Fourth, vascular cannulation performance of the systems was compared, studying cannulation time, Imperial College Complex Cannulation Scoring Tool score, and the number of wall hits and catheter movements within rigid studies.

RESULTS

Of 721 articles and references found, 18 studies of four different navigation systems were included: the Aurora (Northern Digital, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) tracking system, the StealthStation (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) tracking system, an ultrasound localization tracking system, and the Sensei (Hansen Medical, Mountain View, Calif) steerable remote-controlled robotic navigation system. The mean tracking accuracy averaged 1 mm for the three manual tracking systems measured in a rigid environment. An increase of target registration error reaching >3 mm was reported when measured in a nonrigid experimental environment or due to external distortion factors. Except within small-animal studies or case studies, no evidence was found on reduction of clinical outcome parameters, such as FT, radiation dose, and contrast volumes, within clinical EVAR. A comparison of vascular cannulation performance in rigid studies revealed that the Sensei robotic system might have an advantage during advanced cannulation compared with standard cannulation within complex cannulations tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes the current studies on manual tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in EVAR. The main focus of these systems is improving aortic vessel cannulation, required in complex EVAR, in which the robotic system with the improved steerability is favored over manual tracking systems or conventional cannulation. All reviewed tracking systems still require X-ray for anatomic imaging, stent graft deployment, and device registration. Although the current reviewed endovascular navigation systems have shown their potential in phantom and animal studies, clinical trials are too limited to conclude that these systems can improve EVAR outcomes or that they can systematically reduce FTs, radiation doses, and contrast volumes during (complex) EVAR.

Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of image fusion (IF) of preprocedural arterial-phase computed tomography with intraprocedural fluoroscopy for roadmapping in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms, and to compare this approach versus current roadmapping methods (ie, two-dimensional [2D] and three-dimensional [3D] angiography).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques were retrospectively reviewed; these included aneurysms of digestive and/or renal arteries and pararenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. All interventions were performed with the same angiographic system. According to the availability of different roadmapping software, patients were successively placed into three intraprocedural image guidance groups: (i) 2D angiography (n = 9), (ii) 3D rotational angiography (n = 14), and (iii) IF (n = 14). X-ray exposure (dose-area product [DAP]), injected contrast medium volume, and procedure time were recorded.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar among groups, with no statistically significant differences (P ≥ .05). There was no statistical difference in endograft deployment success between groups (2D angiography, eight of nine patients [89%]; 3D angiography and IF, 14 of 14 patients each [100%]). The IF group showed significant reduction (P < .0001) in injected contrast medium volume versus other groups (2D, 235 mL ± 145; 3D, 225 mL ± 119; IF, 65 mL ± 28). Mean DAP values showed no significant difference between groups (2D, 1,188 Gy · cm(2) ± 1,067; 3D, 984 Gy · cm(2) ± 581; IF, 655 Gy · cm(2) ± 457; P = .18); nor did procedure times (2D, 233 min ± 123; 3D, 181 min ± 53; IF, 189 min ± 60; P = .59).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IF-based roadmapping is a feasible technique for endovascular complex aneurysm repair associated with significant reduction of injected contrast agent volume and similar x-ray exposure and procedure time.