Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Undergoing Endovascular or Conventional AAA Repair

Risk factors for postoperative cognitive and functional difficulties in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients: a three month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment and deficits in functional performance are major concerns following surgery, particularly for older patients. The objective of this study was to examine predictors of postoperative cognitive and functional difficulties and explore the relationship between presurgery and postsurgery cognitive ability and functional performance.

METHODS

89 patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery were administered a battery of cognitive measures preoperatively, at the time of discharge from hospital and 3 months postoperatively. Functional performance was evaluated by the Portland Adaptability Inventory (PAI), both pre and postsurgery. Symptoms of delirium were assessed during the first six postoperative days.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of delirium had a mild effect on functional performance 3 months postoperatively. The strongest predictors of postoperative functional performance were the level of functioning presurgery, a longer length of hospital stay and the total number of days delirious. Cognitive impairment postsurgery was predicted by presurgery cognitive measures of verbal memory and psychomotor speed performance and the total number of days delirious.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional performance outcomes for AAA patients 3 months postsurgery revealed no significant loss of functioning relative to presurgery levels, although longer length of hospital stay and greater number of days delirious was associated with somewhat poorer outcome on indicators of social and physical functioning. Cognitive impairment postoperatively was fairly mild but when it was found it was associated with number of days delirious and preoperative deficits in verbal memory and psychomotor speed.

The drama of being diagnosed with an aortic aneurysm and undergoing surgery for two different procedures: open repair and endovascular techniques

The purpose of this study is to describe and interpret what it means for patients to be diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and how they experience treatment. AAA is usually asymptomatic and often discovered coincidentally in conjunction with a diagnostic workup for other medical problems. Twenty patients who had undergone 2 different surgical procedures were sequentially invited for interviews 1 month following surgery. A hermeneutic approach was used. For all patients three themes emerged: an inability to come to terms with a life-threatening condition, a sense of living on borrowed time, and a sense of being granted a new lease on life. The theme that emerged for patients with open repair was that diagnosis with AAA was an ordeal to endure, while the theme for patients who underwent endovascular treatment was a sense of gratitude, security, and insecurity. Once the aneurysm was discovered patients were convinced that they were both blessed and saved, along with a sense of gratitude. Pre- and postoperative nursing care strategies can be developed based on the findings from this study.

Factors Impacting Functional Health and Resource Utilization Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Open and Endovascular Techniques

We assessed the impact on patient outcomes of comorbidities and type of aneurysm repair, open vs. endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Functional health status was measured prospectively using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Length of stay (LOS) and need for postdischarge resources (nursing and rehabilitation) were compared between groups. We reviewed the records of 218 patients (126 open, 92 EVAR) who underwent intervention between 1998 and 2003. The SF-36 was completed preoperatively and at intervals ranging from 2 weeks to 1 year after intervention. To identify factors impacting outcome, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Overall mortality was 1.9%: 3.2% for open repair and 0% for EVAR (p = 0.13). Physical and mental health were higher during the 3 months following EVAR compared with open repair: physical function (PF) (65.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 54.0 +/- 4.1), vitality (VT) (55.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 44.9 +/- 3.4), and emotional role (ER) (74.9 +/- 5.0 vs. 51.4 +/- 6.7) (analysis of variance p < 0.05). Women following EVAR had decreased physical summary scores (PSS) (34.8 +/- 2.5 vs. 40.4 +/- 1.1, p < 0.05) compared with men postprocedure despite no difference preoperatively. Congestive heart failure (CHF) was an independent factor that negatively impacted PF, body pain (BP), and PSS. EVAR was associated with improved VT and ER. Differences among open repair and EVAR diminished over time. LOS (in days) was greater for open vs. EVAR (9.2 +/- 0.78 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.17) and in women following both open (11.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.9) and EVAR (3.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.1) procedures (p < 0.05). Factors that adversely affected LOS were open repair, age, renal insufficiency, pulmonary disease, CHF, and female gender. Following EVAR, patients were less likely to require home care or transfer to a rehabilitation facility than after open repair (14.1 vs. 36.0%, p < 0.05). Women were significantly more likely to require postdischarge care after open repair (48.7 vs. 30.1%) and EVAR (41.7 vs. 10.0%) (p < 0.05). Logistic regression identified female gender, open repair, advanced age, and pulmonary disease as independent predictors of need for postdischarge care. Those patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair by open technique (compared to EVAR) had significantly impaired functional health with regard to PF, VT, and ER in the first 3 months after surgery. CHF and hypertension also significantly impaired individual functional health scores. Of significance was that female gender was associated with increased LOS and increased utilization of postdischarge nursing and rehabilitation resources following both open and endovascular surgery for AAA.

Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging

Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe alternative to conventional open surgical repair. Clinical success, however, is highly dependent on patient selection. Diagnostic vascular imaging has an essential role for this selection process. Following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), patients require long-term surveillance and again vascular imaging serves an integral function. This article reviews EVAR selection criteria and post-EVAR assessment and then discusses the imaging modalities used to evaluate these patients, namely multi-detector-row computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and catheter angiography.

Overview of success of EVAR: Progress to date

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been challenged by a number of groups, and the shortcomings of this procedure have been documented in the scientific literature. However, patients and physicians continue to pursue this procedure as a viable means of treating abdominal aortic aneurysms. Both device evolution and advancement of technical skills have led to dramatic improvements in the outcomes of EVAR within the last decade. These improvements and accomplishments have also been chronicled in the literature. This review looks at the successes of EVAR, based on both US Food and Drug Administration trials and independent studies comparing conventional open repair and endovascular repair.