Renal Infarction Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair:Incidence and Clinical Consequences

Extended total arch replacement via the L-incision approach: single-stage repair for extensive aneurysms of the aortic arch

OBJECTIVES

Total arch replacement via the L-incision approach (a combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper median sternotomy) can be used to achieve more extensive replacement.

METHODS

In the period between 2002 and 2014, 279 total arch replacement procedures were performed. After excluding cases of acute aortic dissection and cases involving concomitant, hybrid or frozen elephant trunk procedures, patients who underwent isolated total arch replacement via an L-incision (n = 29) and via median sternotomy (n = 143) were identified and the data pertaining to their cases were analysed.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was higher in the L-incision group than in the median sternotomy group (6.9 vs 2.1%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. The L-incision group displayed a higher rate of respiratory complications, including pneumonia (28 vs 7.0%, P = 0.0034), the need for tracheostomy (17 vs 2.1%, P = 0.0038) and pulmonary haemorrhage (6.9 vs 0%, P = 0.028). The rate of paraplegia was similar between the groups (0 vs 1.4%, P = 1.00), despite the wider range replaced via the L-incision approach (7.3 ± 1.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.8 anatomical zones, P < 0.001). The rates of other complications and functional recovery were similar. The long-term survival (73 vs 84% at 5 years) and aortic event-free rates (94 vs 96% at 5 years) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of left anterior thoracotomy and upper median sternotomy can be applied to the single-stage repair of extended aneurysms with acceptable results in appropriately selected patients.

Imaging of iatrogenic complications of the urinary tract: kidneys, ureters, and bladder

Iatrogenic complications of various severities may arise from many, if not all, forms of medical and surgical treatment. Most of these occur in spite of proper precautions. Every system in the human body may be affected, and the urinary tract is no exception. Radiologists are often the first to suspect and identify such iatrogenic injuries and, therefore, awareness of the pertinent imaging findings is vital. This review explores and illustrates many of the common and less common iatrogenic complications affecting the kidney, ureters, and bladder.

Risk factors and impact of proximal fixation on acute and chronic renal dysfunction after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using glomerular filtration rate criteria

BACKGROUND

The incidence of renal impairment relevant to proximal fixation of aortic endograft devices remains unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 208 consecutive patients that underwent EVAR from 2006 to 2011. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was based on MDRD study equation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were classified with ADIQ/RIFLE criteria and National Kidney Foundation criteria, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate progression to CKD. Multivariate regression model was fit to identify predictors for developing AKI and CKD.

RESULTS

Suprarenal fixation group (SF) included 110 patients and infrarenal fixation group (IF) included 98 patients. Both groups had similar demographics, baseline eGFR, and renal-protection protocols. There was a trend for decreased use of contrast in IF group (median: 93.5 vs. 103 cc, P = 0.07). AKI occurred in 15% of patients in SF group and 19% of patients in IF group (RR: 1.24, P = 0.47). The freedom from progression to stage 3 or 4 CKD in the SF group was 0.76, 0.72, and 0.49 at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively, while for IF group was 0.8, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively (P = 0.4). Increasing age (P = 0.07), lengthy procedures (P < 0.001), and baseline renal dysfunction (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for developing CKD. Contrast volume (P < 0.001) and ace-inhibitors (P = 0.07) were predictors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

Proximal fixation type has no significant effect on both acute and chronic renal function. Identification of modifiable perioperative risk factors may be used to improve renal function outcomes.

Placement of endovascular stent across the branching arteries: long-term serial evaluation of stent-tissue responses overlying the arterial orifices in an experimental study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the effects of stenting across the branching arteries on the patency and stent-tissue responses over the branching arterial orifices.

METHODS

Thirteen dogs were observed after placing aortic stents across the celiac arteries (CA), superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and renal arteries (RA). The animals were grouped according to stent types: large-cell group (n = 6) and small-cell group (n = 7). Angiography was performed to evaluate the branching artery patency at 2, 6, and 12 months after stent insertion, and the stent-tissue responses covering the orifices were evaluated on histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

All branching arteries were patent on follow-up angiography; however, three patterns of stent-tissue responses over the orifices were observed: neointimal layering, bridging septa, and papillary hyperplasia. Although neointimal layering and bridging septa were evenly observed, severe papillary hyperplasia was more frequent at SMA and CA than RA. Four RA showed less than 50% ostial patency, and localized infarct was observed in six kidneys (24%). The ostial patency tended to decrease with small-cell stent during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Various stent-tissue responses over the branching artery orifices are induced by the aortic stent covering the branching arteries and may not be easily detected by conventional angiography. Subclinical renal infarct also may occur despite patent renal angiography.

Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the AneuRx® Stent Graft: Impact of Excluding Accessory Renal Arteries

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical sequelae of accessory renal artery exclusion during endo-AAA repair. Medical records and pre- and postoperative CT scans were reviewed from 114 AAA patients treated with the AneuRx stent graft between 1996-2001. Thirty-seven accessory renal arteries were identified in 32/114 patients (28%) with 19/32 patients having infrarenally located accessory renal arteries. In group I (11 patients), the stent graft excluded 11 accessory renal arteries. In group II (8 patients), eight accessory renal arteries were not excluded. Average infrarenal neck length was 24.9 mm in group I vs. 30.7 mm in group II (p = 0.07). The average length of device seal was similar in both groups (19.4 vs. 18.5 mm, p = 0.67). There were no perioperative deaths, significant postoperative hypertension, rise in serum creatinine, or postoperative renal infarctions in either group. Three of eight patients (38%) in the non-excluded group developed type I proximal endoleaks whereas none in the excluded patient group did (p = 0.06). Accessory renal arteries may be safely excluded during endovascular AAA repair and may result in a more secure proximal device fixation.

Managing renal arterial disease and hypertension

Treating patients with renovascular disease is complex, particularly as imaging and medical techniques become more effective. Atherosclerotic renal artery disease is present in 7% of the general population above age 65 and in 20 to 45% of patients with coronary disease or aortoiliac disease. Most patients are treated medically, but when progressive hypertension, renal insufficiency, or circulatory congestion develops, revascularization should be considered. Endovascular procedures with arterial stents are now widely employed. These procedures sometimes offer major benefits in blood pressure control and stabilization of renal function. Stent procedures continue to entail hazards, including atheroemboli, arterial dissections, and thrombosis, in addition to restenosis rates of 14 to 20%. Small, randomized trials to date demonstrate no survival benefit to either endovascular or surgical revascularization as compared with medical management. Recognizing renal artery disease and directing revascularization procedures to those with the most benefit remains a premier challenge for the clinician.