Endovascular Repair for Acute Rupture of the Descending Thoracic Aorta

Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortobronchial and aortoesophageal fistulas

PURPOSE

To identify in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortobronchial fistula (ABF) and aortoesophageal fistula (AEF).

METHODS

The authors reviewed all published cases of ABF and AEF undergoing TEVAR indexed in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases. After removal of duplicates, 850 articles were scrutinized for relevance and validity. Exclusion criteria included: (1) no clear description of the organs involved with the fistula, (2) no description of outcomes after TEVAR for ABF or AEF, or (3) no original data presented in the article. In this manner, 66 relevant articles were identified that included original data on 114 patients (76 men; mean age 63+/-1.5 years) with ABF (n = 71) or AEF (n = 43). Meta-analyses were performed to investigate outcomes of TEVAR for ABF and AEF.

RESULTS

Patients with AEF presented more frequently with hypovolemic shock (33% versus 13%, p = 0.012) and systemic infection (36% versus 9%, p<0.001) compared to patients with ABF. In-hospital mortality was 3% (n = 2) after TEVAR for ABF and 19% (n = 8) after TEVAR for AEF (p = 0.004). Additional thoracic surgery in the first 30 days after TEVAR was performed in 3% (n = 2) of ABF patients and in 37% (n = 16) of AEF patients (p<0.001); 12 AEF patients who had received esophageal surgery in the first month after TEVAR showed lower fistula-related mortality during 6 months of follow-up compared to patients who did not receive additional esophageal surgery (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

TEVAR is associated with superior outcomes in patients with ABF. Endovascular management of AEF is associated with poor results and should not be considered definitive treatment. TEVAR could serve as a bridge to surgery for emergency cases of AEF only, with definitive open surgical correction of the fistula undertaken as soon as possible.

Initial Observations of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using Dyna-CT

PURPOSE

To examine the feasibility of a new technology that provides images resembling computed tomographic (CT) slices on the operating table during elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).

TECHNIQUE

Commercially available Dyna-CT equipment was used in conjunction with Voxar 3D software for image reconstruction. During the preliminary evaluation of 9 patients (7 men; median age 73 years, range 67-84) with non-ruptured AAA undergoing elective EVAR with the Zenith Trifab stent-graft under regional anesthesia, the equipment functioned sufficiently well to produce the planned image dataset in 8 of 9 patients. Rotation failed in 1 overweight individual due to a short distance between the patient's abdomen and the C-arm. In 7 of 8 patients, the radiologist was able to measure the diameter of the aneurysm, and it was possible to visualize the entire length of the treated aorta and the iliac arteries in all cases. The proximal aortic neck, including the stent-graft, was visualized in 7 cases. No endoleak or other complications was detected, which was confirmed on the pre-discharge CT scans. The time interval from the rotation of the C-arm until the appearance on the monitor of the first automatically generated 3D images was 7 minutes, which has subsequently been reduced to approximately 2 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary experience with Dyna-CT is promising, but further research is necessary to define the place of this imaging modality in EVAR.

Endovascular Repair of Nontraumatic Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Pathologies

Endovascular repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is receiving increased attention as the number of experienced users increases. Development of thoracic aortic stent grafts has lagged behind infrarenal advancements because of the reported prevalence of disease. In a few centers, however, the experience in performing thoracic stent graft procedures is quite substantial, such that endovascular therapy has been applied to ruptured thoracic aortic pathologies even though data remain limited and this novel therapy remains controversial. We report our combined experience with endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aneurysms (RTA) and ruptured thoracic dissections (RTD). One hundred eighty-four thoracic stent graft procedures at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and Union Memorial Hospital (UMH) were reviewed and those patients undergoing RTA or RTD repair from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003 identified. Patients having procedures for elective repair or aortic transections were excluded from the analysis. Patient presentation, preoperative condition, procedural variables, mortality, and morbidity were examined. Seventy-four percent of the collective procedures were undertaken in high-risk patients (UNC, 38 of 40; UMH, 99 of 144). Twenty-two patients (8.7%; UNC, n = 6; UMH, n = 16) underwent treatment for either an RTA (n = 11) or an RTD (n = 11). The average age of this cohort was 66.5 +/- 15.6 years and the average aneurysm diameter was 73.1 +/- 31.4 mm. The mean duration of symptoms prior to repair was 103.1 +/- 122 hr, influenced primarily by transport times and device availability. Stent graft exclusion was accomplished in 100% of patients with a procedural mortality of 0%. Commercial Talent devices were used in 19 patients (86.4%) and AneuRx device was used in 1 patient (4.5%). In the remaining two (9.1%) patients hand-made devices constructed of Gianturco stents and Dacron fabric were used because of active hemorrhage and lack of appropriate device sizes. Operative time was 135.5 +/- 48.5 min and was associated with an average blood loss of 242.0 +/- 232.4 cc. Thirty-day mortality was 45.5% (RTA, 27.3%; RTD, 63.6%; p = 0.099). Length of stay in the intensive care unit was 6.1 +/- 7.9 days and the mean hospital stay was 11.7 +/- 10.6 days. Major complications were present in 54.5% of RTA (cardiac, 1; pulmonary, 3; cardiovascular accident, 2; spinal cord ischemia, 2; pulmonary embolism, 1), and 81.2% of RTD (multisystem organ failure, 7; pulmonary, 1; common femoral artery injury, 1) but not statistically different between groups. There were only two late complications (cardiac death, endoleak-Ia, 1) that occurred during the mean follow-up of 12.5 +/- 11.3 (range, 1-32) months. These results indicate that endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic pathologies can be accomplished with an acceptable morbidity and mortality. There were no immediate procedural mortalities and complete exclusion was accomplished in all patients. Most postoperative complications arose from preexisting medical conditions and were not procedure related. The benefit of endovascular repair of ruptured thoracic aortic pathologies is promising.

[Aortobronchial fistulas]

INTRODUCTION

Aortobronchial fistulas are uncommon but generally fatal if not treated surgically. Haemoptysis is the main symptom of this pathology. STATES OF ART AND PERSPECTIVES: Aortobronchial fistulas occur most commonly in patients with thoracic aneurysms (atherosclerosis, mycotic, aortic surgery's complication...). Main investigation is CT angiography with 2 D and 3 D reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular exclusion can be efficient treatment option.