Odors and cancer: Current status and future directions

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world. Because tumors detected at early stages are easier to treat, the search for biomarkers-especially non-invasive ones-that allow early detection of malignancies remains a central goal to reduce cancer mortality. Cancer, like other pathologies, often alters body odors, and much has been done by scientists over the last few decades to assess the value of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as signatures of cancers. We present here a quantitative review of 208 studies carried out between 1984 and 2020 that explore VOCs as potential biomarkers of cancers. We analyzed the main findings of these studies, listing and classifying VOCs related to different cancer types while considering both sampling methods and analysis techniques. Considering this synthesis, we discuss several of the challenges and the most promising prospects of this research direction in the war against cancer.

Antimesothelioma Immunotherapy by CTLA-4 Blockade Depends on Active PD1-Based TWIST1 Vaccination

Checkpoint immunotherapy is a major breakthrough for cancer treatment, yet its efficacy is often limited against many types of malignancies, including malignant mesothelioma. Considering that the immunotherapeutic efficacy depends on immunosurveillance, we sought to develop an active immunization method to break immune tolerance to tumor self-antigen. Here, we demonstrated that TWIST1, the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, was associated with human mesothelioma tumorigenesis and required for the invasion and metastasis of mesothelioma in the immune-competent murine AB1 model. When conventional TWIST1 vaccines were not effective in vivo, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)-based vaccination provided prophylactic control by inducing long-lasting TWIST1-specific T cell responses against both subcutaneous and metastatic mesothelioma lethal challenges. Furthermore, while CTLA-4 blockade alone did not show any immunotherapeutic efficacy against established mesothelioma, its combination with PD1-based vaccination resulted in 60% complete remission. Mechanistically, these functional T cells recognized a novel highly conserved immunodominant TWIST1 epitope, exhibited cytotoxic activity and long-term memory, and led to durable tumor regression and survival benefit against established AB1 mesothelioma and 4T1 breast cancer. We concluded that PD1-based vaccination controls mesothelioma by breaking immune tolerance to the tumor self-antigen TWIST1. Our results warrant clinical development of the PD1-based vaccination to enhance immunotherapy against a wide range of TWIST1-expressing tumors.

The Future of Mesothelioma Research: Basic Science Research

Our current understanding of mesothelioma in terms of disease induction, development, and treatment is underpinned by decades of basic laboratory science. In this chapter, we discuss the tools that have been developed to aid our understanding of mesothelioma such as cell lines and animal models. We then go on to detail the current use and understanding of conventional therapies for mesothelioma, e.g. chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, plus their mechanisms of action, and why they may be ineffective. Finally, we discuss a range of newer treatments that are either undergoing clinical trials or are still in the earlier stages of preclinical investigation. These include a growing number of immunotherapies (e.g. checkpoint inhibitors), plus targeted therapies, the search for clinical biomarkers to predict whether patients with mesothelioma might respond to particular treatments, and combined therapies where conventional treatments may be added to newer drugs. The strategy of repositioning existing drugs, approved for other diseases, to treat mesothelioma is also discussed.

Role of angiopoietins in mesothelioma progression

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anti-angiogenic treatment has been recently shown to be clinically beneficial for mesothelioma patients. Angiopoietins-1 and -2 are key regulators of tumor angiogenesis. Ang-1 is mainly known to promote angiogenesis and vessel stability, while Ang-2 could serve as an antagonist of Ang-1 causing vessel regression and destabilization or enhance angiogenesis in a context-dependent manner. We hypothesized that Ang-1 would promote and Ang2 would halt experimental mesothelioma by affecting tumor angiogenesis.

METHODS

To examine the effects of angiopoietins in mesothelioma angiogenesis and in vivo growth we constructed Ang-1 or Ang-2 overexpressing AE17 and AB1 mesothelioma cells and implanted them in the respective syngeneic animals. We also explored the clinical relevance of our observations using the human tumoral mRNAseq data available in the TCGA database.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ang-1 promotes mesothelioma angiogenesis and growth while the effect of Ang-2 is context-dependent. Low Ang-1 levels in human mesotheliomas are associated with the epitheloid subtype. Tumors of high Ang-1, or concurrent high Ang-2 and VEGF expression present high PECAM-1 and CDH5 expression, markers of vascularity and vascular stability, respectively. Our results highlight the importance of angiopoietins in mesothelioma pathophysiology and pave the way for the clinical development of novel anti-angiogenic strategies.

Targeting Tie-2/angiopoietin axis in experimental mesothelioma confers differential responses and raises predictive implications

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is resistant to currently used treatment. Angiopoieitn-1 directly promotes mesothelioma cell growth in a Tie-2-dependent fashion. Angiopoietin/Tie-2 axis may thus be valid targets for therapeutic interventions against mesothelioma. We hypothesized that a soluble angiopoietin inhibitor (Murine Tek-deltaFc) would halt mesothelioma progression in vivo by enhancing mesothelioma cell proliferation and inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Our hypothesis was challenged on two syngeneic mesothelioma in vivo models (AB1 cells-Balb/c mice and AE17 cells-C57BL/6 mice. Even though both mesothelioma cell lines express the Angiopoietin-1/-2 and Tie-2, murine Tek-deltaFc hampered AB1 but not AE17 mesothelioma growth in vivo by enhancing tumor cell apoptosis and limiting tumor angiogenesis. Neither angiopoietins (Angs)-1 and -2 nor the inhibitor affected mesothelioma cell growth in vitro. AB1 (responding) tumors were more vascularized and displayed higher endothelial Tie-2 and lower tumor Ang-1 expression than the (non-responding) AE17 tumors. Angiopoietins-1 and -2 are expressed in tumors and pleural cavity of mesothelioma patients demonstrating the clinical relevance of our experimental observations. In conclusion, disrupting Ang-Tie-2 signaling limits mesothelioma angiogenesis and halts tumor progression. Tumor vascularity, endothelial Tie-2 expression and tumor Ang-1 expression may predict mesothelioma response to Tek-deltaFc.

Breath analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and electronic nose to screen for pleural mesothelioma: a cross-sectional case-control study

RATIONALE

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is mainly caused by previous exposure to asbestos fibers and has a poor prognosis. Due to a long latency period between exposure and diagnosis, MPM incidence is expected to peak between 2020-2025. Screening of asbestos-exposed individuals is believed to improve early detection and hence, MPM management. Recent developments focus on breath analysis for screening since breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) which reflect the cell's metabolism.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this cross-sectional, case-control study is to identify VOCs in exhaled breath of MPM patients with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and to assess breath analysis to screen for MPM using an electronic nose (eNose).

METHODS

Breath and background samples were taken from 64 subjects: 16 healthy controls (HC), 19 asymptomatic former asbestos-exposed (AEx) individuals, 15 patients with benign asbestos-related diseases (ARD) and 14 MPM patients. Samples were analyzed with both GC-MS and eNose.

RESULTS

Using GC-MS, AEx individuals were discriminated from MPM patients with 97% accuracy, with diethyl ether, limonene, nonanal, methylcyclopentane and cyclohexane as important VOCs. This was validated by eNose analysis. MPM patients were discriminated from AEx+ARD participants by GC-MS and eNose with 94% and 74% accuracy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 82%, 100% for GC-MS and 82%, 55%, 82%, 55% for eNose, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows accurate discrimination of patients with MPM from asymptomatic asbestos-exposed persons at risk by GC-MS and eNose analysis of exhaled VOCs and provides proof-of-principle of breath analysis for MPM screening.

Safety and activity of microRNA-loaded minicells in patients with recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma: a first-in-man, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study

BACKGROUND

TargomiRs are minicells (EnGeneIC Dream Vectors) loaded with miR-16-based mimic microRNA (miRNA) and targeted to EGFR that are designed to counteract the loss of the miR-15 and miR-16 family miRNAs, which is associated with unsuppressed tumour growth in preclinical models of malignant pleural mesothelioma. We aimed to assess the safety, optimal dosing, and activity of TargomiRs in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

In this first-in-man, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial at three major cancer centres in Sydney (NSW, Australia), we recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma, measurable disease, radiological signs of progression after previous chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of 3 months or more, immunohistochemical evidence of tumour EGFR expression, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Patients were given TargomiRs via 20 min intravenous infusion either once or twice a week (3 days apart) in a traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in five dose cohorts. The dose-escalation steps planned were 5 × 10⁹, 7 × 10⁹, and 9 × 10⁹ TargomiRs either once or twice weekly, but after analysis of data from the first eight patients, all subsequent patients started protocol treatment at 1 × 10⁹ TargomiRs. The primary endpoints were to establish the maximum tolerated dose of TargomiRs as measured by dose-limiting toxicity, define the optimal frequency of administration, and objective response (defined as the percentage of assessable patients with a complete or partial response), duration of response (defined as time from the first evidence of response to disease progression in patients who achieved a response), time to response (ie, time from start of treatment to the first evidence of response) and overall survival (defined as time from treatment allocation to death from any cause). Analyses were based on the full analysis set principle, including every patient who received at least one dose of TargomiRs. The study was closed for patient entry on Jan 3, 2017, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02369198, and the Australian Registry of Clinical Trials, number ACTRN12614001248651.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 29, 2014, and Nov 24, 2016, we enrolled 27 patients, 26 of whom received at least one TargomiR dose (one patient died before beginning treatment). Overall, five dose-limiting toxicities were noted: infusion-related inflammatory symptoms and coronary ischaemia, respectively, in two patients given 5 × 10⁹ TargomiRs twice weekly; anaphylaxis and cardiomyopathy, respectively, in two patients given 5 × 10⁹ TargomiRs once weekly but who received reduced dexamethasone prophylaxis; and non-cardiac pain in one patient who received 5 × 10⁹ TargomiRs once weekly. We established that 5 × 10⁹ TargomiRs once weekly was the maximum tolerated dose. TargomiR infusions were accompanied by transient lymphopenia (25 [96%] of 26 patients), temporal hypophosphataemia (17 [65%] of 26 patients), increased aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotranferase (six [23%] of 26 patients), and increased alkaline phosphatase blood concentrations (two [8%]). Cardiac events occurred in five patients: three patients had electrocardiographic changes, one patient had ischaemia, and one patient had Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Of the 22 patients who were assessed for response by CT, one (5%) had a partial response, 15 (68%) had stable disease, and six (27%) had progressive disease. The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was therefore one (5%) of 22, and the duration of the objective response in that patient was 32 weeks. Median overall survival was 200 days (95% CI 94-358). During the trial, 21 deaths occurred, of which 20 were related to tumour progression and one was due to bowel perforation.

INTERPRETATION

The acceptable safety profile and early signs of activity of TargomiRs in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma support additional studies of TargomiRs in combination with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

FUNDING

Asbestos Diseases Research Foundation.

Chemosensitivity and resistance testing in malignant effusions with focus on primary malignant mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma

Cell based chemosensitivity and resistance testing is an attractive approach that offers functional measurement of drug response ex vivo with the ultimate goal to guide the choice of chemotherapy for various cancers. Thus, it has a great potential to select patients for the optimal treatment option, thereby offering a tool for personalized cancer therapy. Despite several decades of intensive scientific efforts ex-vivo tests are still not incorporated in the standard of care. Limited access to fresh tumor tissue, unsatisfactory models and single readout as endpoint constitute major hindrance. Thus, establishing and validating clinically useful and reliable model systems still remains a major challenge. Here we present malignant effusions as valuable sources for ex-vivo chemosensitivity and resistance testing. Accumulation of a malignant effusion in the pleura, peritoneum or pericardium is often the first diagnostic material for both primary malignant mesothelioma and a broad spectrum of metastatic adenocarcinoma originating from lung-, breast-, ovary- and gastro-intestinal organs as well as lymphoma. In contrast to biopsies, in these effusions malignant cells are easily accessible and often abundant. Effusion derived cells can occur dissociated or forming three-dimensional papillary structures that authentically recapitulate the biology of the corresponding tumor tissue and offer models for ex vivo testing. In addition, effusions have the advantage of being available prior to or concurrent with the pathological review, thus constituting an excellent source of viable cells for simultaneous molecular profiling, biomarker analysis and for establishing primary cells for studying tumor biology and resistance mechanisms. For a reliable test, however, a careful validation is needed, taking into account the inherited heterogeneity of malignant tumors, but also the complex interplay between malignant and benign cells, which are always present in this setting.