1
|
Tayebi S, Verma S, Sidana A. Real-Time and Delayed Imaging of Tissue and Effects of Prostate Tissue Ablation. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:477-489. [PMID: 37421582 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01175-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate ablation is increasingly being utilized for the management of localized prostate cancer. There are several energy modalities with varying mechanism of actions which are currently used for prostate ablation. Prostate ablations, whether focal or whole gland, are performed under ultrasound and/or MRI guidance for appropriate treatment plan execution and monitoring. A familiarity with different intraoperative imaging findings and expected tissue response to these ablative modalities is paramount. In this review, we discuss the intraoperative, early, and delayed imaging findings in prostate from the effects of prostate ablation. RECENT FINDINGS The monitoring of ablation both during and after the therapy became increasingly important due to the precise targeting of the target tissue. Recent findings suggest that real-time imaging techniques such as MRI or ultrasound can provide anatomical and functional information, allowing for precise ablation of the targeted tissue and increasing the effectiveness and precision of prostate cancer treatment. While intraprocedural imaging findings are variable, the follow-up imaging demonstrates similar findings across various energy modalities. MRI and ultrasound are two of the frequently used imaging techniques for intraoperative monitoring and temperature mapping of important surrounding structures. Follow-up imaging can provide valuable information about ablated tissue, including the success of the ablation, presence of residual cancer or recurrence after the ablation. It is critical and helpful to understand the imaging findings during the procedure and at different follow-up time periods to evaluate the procedure and its outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shima Tayebi
- Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Abhinav Sidana
- Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0589, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bui TL, Glavis-Bloom J, Chahine C, Mehta R, Wolfe T, Bhatter P, Rupasinghe M, Carbone J, Haider MA, Giganti F, Giona S, Oto A, Lee G, Houshyar R. Prostate minimally invasive procedures: complications and normal vs. abnormal findings on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:4388-4400. [PMID: 33977352 PMCID: PMC8346422 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03097-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive alternatives to traditional prostate surgery are increasingly utilized to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and localized prostate cancer in select patients. Advantages of these treatments over prostatectomy include lower risk of complication, shorter length of hospital stay, and a more favorable safety profile. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become a widely accepted imaging modality for evaluation of the prostate gland and provides both anatomical and functional information. As prostate mpMRI and minimally invasive prostate procedure volumes increase, it is important for radiologists to be familiar with normal post-procedure imaging findings and potential complications. This paper reviews the indications, procedural concepts, common post-procedure imaging findings, and potential complications of prostatic artery embolization, prostatic urethral lift, irreversible electroporation, photodynamic therapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, focal cryotherapy, and focal laser ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh-Lan Bui
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Justin Glavis-Bloom
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Chantal Chahine
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Raj Mehta
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Taylor Wolfe
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Param Bhatter
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Mark Rupasinghe
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Joseph Carbone
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| | - Masoom A. Haider
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Sinai Health System, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Simone Giona
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, Camberley UK
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Grace Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Roozbeh Houshyar
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Bldg. 1 Route 140, Orange, CA 92868-3201 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Marini P, Cazzato RL, Garnon J, Shaygi B, Koch G, Auloge P, Tricard T, Lang H, Gangi A. Percutaneous MR-guided prostate cancer cryoablation technical updates and literature review. BJR Open 2019; 1:20180043. [PMID: 33178928 PMCID: PMC7592492 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in males. The benefits in terms of overall reduction in specific mortality due to the widespread use of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening and the advancements in the curative treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) appear to have reached a plateau. There remains, however, the questions of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of such patients. Currently, the main challenge in the treatment of patients with clinically organ-confined PCa is to offer an oncologically efficient treatment with as little morbidity as possible. Amongst the arising novel curative techniques for PCa, cryoablation (CA) is the most established one, which is also included in the NICE and AUA guidelines. CA is commonly performed under ultrasound guidance with the inherent limitations associated with this technique. The recent advancements in MRI have significantly improved the accuracy of detecting and characterizing a clinically significant PCa. This, alongside the development of wide bore interventional MR scanners, has opened the pathway for in bore PCa treatment. Under MRI guidance, PCa CA can be used either as a standard whole gland treatment or as a tumor targeted one. With MR-fluoroscopy, needle guidance capability, multiplanar and real-time visualization of the iceball, MRI eliminates the inherent limitations of ultrasound guidance and can potentially lead to a lower rate of local complications. The aim of this review article is to provide an overview about PCa CA with a more specific insight on MR guided PCa CA; the limitations, challenges and applications of this novel technique will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre de Marini
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Julien Garnon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Behnam Shaygi
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Guillaume Koch
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Pierre Auloge
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Thibault Tricard
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Hervé Lang
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|