Liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

State-of-the-art surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most commonly diagnosed primary liver tumor with an increasing incidence worldwide. Management of patients with HCC is largely dictated by the presence of cirrhosis, disease stage, underlying liver function, and patient performance status.

PURPOSE

We provide an update on key aspects of surgical treatment options for patients with HCC. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection and transplantation remain cornerstone treatment options for patients with early-stage disease and constitute the only potentially curative options for HCC. Selection of patients for surgical treatment should include a thorough evaluation of tumor characteristics and biology, as well as evidence-based use of various available treatment options to achieve optimal long-term outcomes for patients with HCC.

Losartan supports liver regrowth via distinct boost of portal vein pressure in rodents with 90 % portal branch ligation

OBJECTIVES

The study used a model of 90 % portal branch ligation (PBL) in rats to study the effect of losartan on portal vein pressure (PVP) and liver regeneration in rats after PBL.

METHODS

A total of 144 male Sprague-Dawley rats were arbitrarily designated into three treatment method groups: a sham operation group (Sham), a PBL treatment group (PBL), and a PBL plus losartan treatment group (PBL + L). Losartan (2 mg/day) was intragastrically gavaged 3 days before the PBL or sham operation to time points of study.

RESULTS

Both the PBL and PBL + L groups showed an intense surge in PVP after PBL treatment, peaking at 12 h postsurgery, then lessening progressively afterwards. PVP was substantially greater in these two groups compared with the Sham group at 6-72 h postsurgery (p < 0.01). Compared with the PBL group, the PBL + L group showed a noticeable reduction in PVP 6-48 h postsurgery (p < 0.05); the PBL group showed considerably raised levels of plasma ALT and AST 6-72 h postsurgery (p < 0.01). Compared to the PBL group, the PBL + L group showed drastically reduced plasma ALT and AST levels 12-72 h postsurgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan supports liver regeneration in 90 % of rats that underwent PBL. The mechanism may be related to losartan's ability to regulate PVP and increase serum hepatocyte growth factor levels.

Surgical resection versus liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major worldwide health problem, involving more than half a million new patients yearly, with a different incidence in different parts of the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma develops in about 80% of cirrhotic patients, and cirrhosis is considered the strongest predisposing factor for it. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are conventional treatment modalities that can offer long-term survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of surgical resection compared with those of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) at ISI Web of Science (last search February 2013). We also searched the abstracts from annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), provided through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group until February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and hepatic transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search strategies were run and two authors individually evaluated whether the retrieved studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation as the major methods of treating hepatocellular carcinoma were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Strategies for resection using portal vein embolization: hepatocellular carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is increasingly used to optimize the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) and to reduce the risk for complications of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). In patients with HCC who are candidates for extended hepatectomy and in patients with HCC and well-compensated cirrhosis who are being considered for major hepatectomy, FLR volumetry is routinely performed, and PVE is employed in selected cases to optimize the volume and function of the FLR prior to surgery. Similarly, in patients with hilar CCA who are candidates for extended hepatectomy, careful preoperative preparation using biliary drainage, FLR volumetry, and PVE optimizes the volume and function of the FLR prior to surgery. Appropriate use of PVE has led to improved postoperative outcomes after major hepatectomy for these diseases and oncological outcomes similar to those in patients who undergo resection without PVE. Specific indications for PVE are being clarified. FLR volumetry is necessary for proper selection of patients for PVE. Analysis of the degree of hypertrophy of the FLR after PVE (a dynamic test of liver regeneration) complements analysis of the pre-PVE FLR volume (a static test). Together, FLR degree of hypertrophy and FLR volume are the best predictors of outcome after major hepatectomy in an individual patient, regardless of the degree of underlying liver disease. This article synthesizes the literature on the approach to patients with HCC and CCA who are candidates for major hepatectomy. The rationale and indications for FLR volumetry and PVE and outcomes following PVE and major hepatectomy for HCC and CCA are discussed.

Prediction of postoperative hepatic insufficiency by liver stiffness measurement (FibroScan((R))) before curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study

Background

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (FibroScan^®) reflects the degree of hepatic fibrosis. This prospective study investigated how well LSM predicts the development of hepatic insufficiency after curative liver resection surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

The study enrolled 72 consecutive patients who underwent a preoperative LSM to assess the degree of liver fibrosis followed by curative liver resection surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma between July 2006 and December 2007. The primary end point was the development of hepatic insufficiency.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 54.9 years. Twenty patients (27.7%) had chronic hepatitis and 52 (72.3%) had cirrhosis (44 and 8 patients showed Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively). The mean LSM was 17.1 kPa. Twelve patients (16.6%) had segmentectomy only, 16 patients (22.2%) had bisegmentectomy, and 44 patients (61.2%) had lobectomy. Nine patients (12.5%) had stage I tumor, 56 (77.7%) had stage II, and 7 (9.8%) had stage III. Univariate and subsequent multivariate analyses revealed that preoperative LSM was the only independent risk factor for predicting the development of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (cutoff, 25.6 kPa; P = 0.001; relative risk, 19.14; 95% confidence interval, 2.71–135.36).

Conclusions

LSM is potentially useful to predict the development of postoperative hepatic insufficiency in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative liver resection surgery.

Prediction of postoperative hepatic insufficiency by liver stiffness measurement (FibroScan((R))) before curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (FibroScan((R))) reflects the degree of hepatic fibrosis. This prospective study investigated how well LSM predicts the development of hepatic insufficiency after curative liver resection surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

The study enrolled 72 consecutive patients who underwent a preoperative LSM to assess the degree of liver fibrosis followed by curative liver resection surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma between July 2006 and December 2007. The primary end point was the development of hepatic insufficiency.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 54.9 years. Twenty patients (27.7%) had chronic hepatitis and 52 (72.3%) had cirrhosis (44 and 8 patients showed Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively). The mean LSM was 17.1 kPa. Twelve patients (16.6%) had segmentectomy only, 16 patients (22.2%) had bisegmentectomy, and 44 patients (61.2%) had lobectomy. Nine patients (12.5%) had stage I tumor, 56 (77.7%) had stage II, and 7 (9.8%) had stage III. Univariate and subsequent multivariate analyses revealed that preoperative LSM was the only independent risk factor for predicting the development of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (cutoff, 25.6 kPa; P = 0.001; relative risk, 19.14; 95% confidence interval, 2.71-135.36).

CONCLUSIONS

LSM is potentially useful to predict the development of postoperative hepatic insufficiency in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing curative liver resection surgery.