Apocrine Variant of Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Further Clinical, Histopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Characterization of an Emerging Entity

To date, the apocrine variant of lobular carcinoma in situ (AP-LCIS) has been cursorily described as a subtype of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). We retrospectively reviewed 34 cases of AP-LCIS (including 23 associated with invasive lobular carcinoma) to fully characterize it. AP-LCIS typically presented with screen-detected calcifications in older women (mean age: 65 y) and was characterized by distended terminal duct lobular units with relatively large "pleomorphic" cells, central necrosis, and calcifications. AP-LCIS cells exhibited abundant eosinophilic occasionally granular cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Synchronous classic and/or florid LCIS was identified in 24/34 (70%) AP-LCIS, and in 9/11 (82%) pure AP-LCIS. Most (68%) cases of AP-LCIS were estrogen receptor-positive (50% strongly), 35% were progesterone receptor-positive, 26% were human epidermal growth factor 2-positive, 18% demonstrated high-proliferation rate (Ki67: >15%), and 90% were androgen receptor-positive. Aurora kinase A, immunoreactive in 38% of AP-LCIS cases, was not significantly associated with recurrence, development of invasion, or nodal positivity (P>0.05). Compared with conventional (nonapocrine) pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (P-LCIS), aurora kinase A was expressed in a significantly greater proportion of P-LCIS (100%). AP-LCIS and P-LCIS did not otherwise differ in clinicopathologic features. Next-generation sequencing utilizing the Oncomine Comprehensive Panel v2, performed on 27 AP-LCIS cases, showed no specific molecular findings. In a mean follow-up of 57 months, 2 (of 11, 18%) pure AP-LCIS cases recurred (2 both in situ and invasive) and none metastasized or proved fatal. AP-LCIS should be regarded as another high-grade LCIS similar to P-LCIS in many respects, and pending additional studies should be managed similarly.

Breast Cancer Risk and Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents After a Benign Breast Biopsy

Over one million women in the United States receive biopsy diagnoses of benign breast disease (BBD) each year, which confer a 1.5-4.0-fold increase in breast cancer risk. Studies in the general population suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) lower breast cancer risk; however, associations among women with BBD are unknown. We assessed whether NSAID use among women diagnosed with BBD is associated with lower breast cancer risk. Participants included 3,080 women (mean age = 50.3 ± 13.5 years) in the Mayo BBD surgical biopsy cohort diagnosed between January 1, 1992 and December 31, 2001 who completed breast cancer risk factor questionnaires that assessed NSAID use, and whose biopsies underwent detailed pathology review, masked to outcome. Women were followed from date of BBD biopsy to breast cancer diagnosis (main outcome) or censoring (death, prophylactic mastectomy, reduction mammoplasty, lobular carcinoma in situ or last contact). Median follow-up time was 16.4 ± 6.0 years. Incident breast cancer was diagnosed among 312 women over a median follow-up of 9.9 years. Regular non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with lower breast cancer risk [HR = 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46-0.85; P = 0.002] with trends of lower risk (highest tertiles of use vs. nonuse) for greater number of years used [HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.31-0.97; P _trend = 0.003), days used per month (HR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.33-0.80; P _trend = 0.001) and lifetime number of doses taken (HR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.31-0.89; P _trend = 0.003). We conclude that nonaspirin NSAID use is associated with statistically significant lower breast cancer risk after a BBD biopsy, including a dose-response effect, suggesting a potential role for NSAIDs in breast cancer prevention among patients with BBD.

Columnar Cell Lesion and Apocrine Hyperplasia of the Breast: Is There a Common Origin? The Role of Prolactin-induced Protein

Noninvasive breast lesions encompass a heterogeneous group of risk indicators and nonobligate precursors of breast cancer, such as apocrine hyperplasia (AH) and columnar cell lesions (CCLs). Given the different expression of ER and ER-regulated genes in AH and CCL, these two alterations are currently considered discrete conditions. However, whether they share early biologic changes is not clear to date. Here, we sought to define the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of a prospective series of combined lesions made up by CCLs and AH forming a continuum within single terminal duct-lobular units. The study group included 19 cases, whereas 25 cases of synchronous contiguous CCLs and AH served as control group. The different components of each case were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for ER, PR, AR, HER2, BCL2, CCND1, MUC1, and PIP. Although CCLs and AHs arising in continuity showed opposite patterns of ER expression, the PIP-positive apocrine signature was consistently present in both components. In conclusion, apocrine changes are highly recurrent in CCLs growing within foci of AH, regardless of the ER activation. Our results suggest that PIP-positive and PIP-negative CCLs are likely to represent biologically distinct conditions and that apocrine changes might occur earlier than ER activation in the natural history of breast precursor lesions.

All Benign and Malignant Apocrine Breast Lesions Over-Express Claudin 1 and 3 and Are Negative for Claudin 4

Invasive apocrine carcinoma of the breast is an uncommon triple negative tumour that lacks a specific therapeutic target. Apocrine metaplasia of the breast shares common morphological features with apocrine carcinoma, and was previously found to consistently over-express claudin 1 and to lack claudin 4. This study was aimed at finding whether apocrine carcinoma, and other related apocrine breast lesions, have similar claudin profile. The immunohistochemical expression of claudin 1, 3 and 4 was studied in 11 cases of in situ and invasive apocrine breast carcinoma, 7 benign apocrine lesions and 45 consecutive morphologically non-apocrine triple negative breast carcinomas. All cases were also immunostained for Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein-15 (GCDFP-15), a marker for apocrine differentiation. Apocrine breast lesions maintained their expression pattern from benign through DCIS to invasive carcinoma; all showing strong expression of claudin 1 and 3 and absence of claudin 4. The same pattern of expression was seen in 2 out of the 45 morphologically non-apocrine tumours, but both showed strong positive staining for GCDFP-15. It is concluded that all benign and malignant apocrine lesions of the breast have a consistent pattern of claudin 1, 3 and 4 expression, suggesting the presence of a specific pathway for the development of invasive apocrine carcinoma. The over-expression of claudin 1 and 3 may have therapeutic implications as targets for managing apocrine cancers.

Atypical Apocrine Adenosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Pitfalls

Apocrine change in the breast is an extremely common finding. In most cases, the benign or malignant nature of the lesion is easily recognized. Apocrine adenosis is used to describe sclerosing adenosis with apocrine change. The term apocrine atypia is used when there is significant cytologic atypia in apocrine cells, characterized by a 3-fold nuclear enlargement, prominent/multiple nucleoli, and hyperchromasia. Atypical apocrine adenosis is diagnosed when apocrine adenosis and apocrine atypia are superimposed. However, there are no definite criteria to distinguish atypical apocrine adenosis from apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ. Immunohistochemical markers can be confounding and may lead to erroneous diagnoses. Atypical apocrine features in sclerosing lesions may be misinterpreted as invasive carcinoma if the underlying lesion is not recognized. In the absence of definite features of malignancy, the diagnosis of apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ may be extremely difficult. In the present article, we review atypical apocrine adenosis focusing on diagnostic challenges and their implications on clinical management.