Tools for assessing quality of life in epilepsy patients

Quality of life predictors among Moroccan adults with epilepsy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the factors associated with quality of life (QOL) in adult patients living with epilepsy in Morocco.

METHODS

110 patients with epilepsy aging 18 years old were interviewed using the standard and validated Moroccan version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy inventory with 31 items (QOLIE-31). Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and multivariate regression were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 35.70 years old (standard deviation (SD)12.2). The mean total score of QOLIE-31 was 43.6±10.2. The highest mean±SD score was the medication effects subscale 52.3±12.1, and the lowest was the overall quality of life subscale 39.2±13.2. Patients with no seizure episode during the last month had a better mean total score of QOLIE-31 (47.6±10.5) than the study participants having a seizure in the last month (40.6±8.9, p≤0.001). These data supported that presence of seizure in the past 4 weeks (β=4.626, CI95 % 1.123; 8.130), memory disorders (β=10.025, IC 95 % 2.811; 17.239), seizure trigger factors such as forgetting to take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (β=5.205, IC 95 % 1.769; 8.641), personal problems (β=4.957, IC 95 % 0.604; 9.310), low monthly income (<2000MAD, 194.94$: β= -9.937, IC 95 % -18.536; -1.338), (2000-5000MAD, 194.94$- 487.35$: β= -24.804, IC 95 % -43.171; -6.437), and employment (β= -4.291, IC 95 % -7.976; -0.605) were the factors associated with QOL.

SIGNIFICANCE

The overall QOL of patients with epilepsy was low. This study showed that the presence of seizures, memory disorders, monthly income, trigger factors, and employment status were QOL predictors for epileptic patients.

Determinants of quality of life in adults with epilepsy: a multicenter, cross-sectional study from Germany

BACKGROUND

Assessment of quality of life (QoL) has become an important indicator for chronic neurological diseases. While these conditions often limit personal independence and autonomy, they are also associated with treatment-related problems and reduced life expectancy. Epilepsy has a tremendous impact on the QoL of patients and their families, which is often underestimated by practitioners. The aim of this work was to identify relevant factors affecting QoL in adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at four specialized epilepsy centers in Germany. Patients diagnosed with epilepsy completed a standardized questionnaire focusing on QoL and aspects of healthcare in epilepsy. Univariate regression analyses and pairwise comparisons were performed to identify variables of decreased QoL represented by the overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) score. The variables were then considered in a multivariate regression analysis after multicollinearity analysis.

RESULTS

Complete datasets for the QOLIE-31 were available for 476 patients (279 [58.6%] female, 197 [41.4%] male, mean age 40.3 years [range 18-83 years]). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant associations between low QoL and a high score on the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP; beta=-0.28, p < 0.001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression subscale (HADS-D; beta=-0.27, p < 0.001), Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E; beta=-0.19, p < 0.001), revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale (beta=-0.09, p = 0.027), or Seizure Worry Scale (beta=-0.18, p < 0.001) and high seizure frequency (beta = 0.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy patients had reduced QoL, with a variety of associated factors. In addition to disease severity, as measured by seizure frequency, the patient's tolerability of anti-seizure medications and the presence of depression, stigma, and worry about new seizures were strongly associated with poor QoL. Diagnosed comorbid depression was underrepresented in the cohort; therefore, therapeutic decisions should always consider individual psychobehavioral and disease-specific aspects. Signs of drug-related adverse events, depression, fear, or stigmatization should be actively sought to ensure that patients receive personalized and optimized treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022024; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1252-5331).

EuroQOL-5D-3L does not adequately map quality-of-life deterioration in severely affected patients with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

The steadily increasing impact of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) on reasonable diagnostic and therapeutic decisions makes the correct mapping of HRQOL indispensable in modern epileptology. The aim of this study was to address the reliability of the often-used generic HRQOL screening questionnaire EuroQOL 5-dimension, 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) by comparing its normalized index value (calculated via the time trade-off method) and visual analog scale (VAS) to the gold standard of the extensive Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31). QOLIE-10 scores were compared with the extensive QOLIE-31 and EQ-5D-3L TTO.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a monocentric study of 184 patients with epilepsy. Bivariate Spearman correlation analysis and Fisher's r-to-z transformation were used to compare the strengths of correlations of EQ-5D-3L, QOLIE-10 and QOLIE-31 with different epilepsy-specific domains (disease severity, drug interactions, emotional well-being, stigmatization, seizure-related anxiety, cognitive impairment).

RESULTS

The different metrics of EQ-5D-3L, QOLIE-10 and QOLIE-31 showed moderate to very strong intra- and inter-metric correlations for overall HRQOL. Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 VAS and EQ-5D-3L VAS did not show any significantly different strengths of correlations with respect to the domains studied. In contrast, the correlation strength of the normalized EQ-5D-3L index value differed significantly from the QOLIE-31 T-score for several domains, for example, for drug-related adverse events, neuropsychological deficits, symptoms of depression and seizure worry. In seizure-free patients, EQ-5D-3L VAS and EQ-5D-3L index values correlated significantly less with the domain of "cognitive impairment" than the QOLIE-31 T-score. In patients without relevant neuropsychological deficits, the strengths of correlations with the assessed domains did not differ significantly between EQ-5D-3L metrics and the QOLIE-31 T-score. The HRQOL mapping probability of QOLIE-10 was inferior to QOLIE-31 and comparable to EQ-5D-3L regarding the analyzed domains.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the EQ-5D-3L VAS, EQ-5D-3L index values do not adequately map health-related quality of life in severely affected patients with epilepsy and therefore should not be used as screening tools. The QOLIE-31 T-score remains the gold standard for HRQOL assessment in patients with epilepsy.

Epidemiology of Epilepsy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Experience of a Standardized Questionnaire over the Past Two Decades

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy affects >50 million people worldwide, with 80% of them living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies with a standardized methodology are required to obtain comparable data on epilepsy and implement health policies in order to reduce the treatment gap and improve the diagnosis and management of epilepsy. In 2000, following the guidelines of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), the "questionnaire for investigation of epilepsy in tropical countries" (IENT questionnaire) was developed to promote epidemiological surveys on epilepsy using a standard methodology. This study aims to describe how, when, where, and why the IENT questionnaire has been used through epidemiological studies on epilepsy over the last 2 decades and to acquire users' opinions about the tool.

METHODS

Studies that used the IENT questionnaire were searched through international and local bibliographic databases, including the gray literature. An online survey was carried out, including a snowball effect. Original research studies were included. Characteristics of the studies and populations and general information on the instrument and its use were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-two documents were selected referring to 61 studies that were mostly carried out on the African continent (n = 54). Most of them aimed to determine the prevalence (n = 31) and associated factors (n = 28) of epilepsy in LMICs. Among the 61 studies, 35 were population-based, and 30 included both adults and children. A methodological heterogeneity was found between studies, and in cases where the IENT questionnaire alone did not ensure complete data collection, other tools were used concomitantly (n = 40).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Over the last 2 decades, the IENT questionnaire has been continuously used in different LMICs. This result favors its promotion and updating, with the inclusion of new topics related to epilepsy (e.g., comorbidities, quality of life, and stigma), current ILAE guidelines, and digital versions.

Measuring the impact of epilepsy on families

OBJECTIVE

Caring for a child with illness or a child with disability impacts family in various ways. The ability to assess the impact of this care on families is one way to proactively provide the necessary support and resources for impacted families. Accordingly, the goal of the current study was to assess the impact of pediatric epilepsy on individual families in a comprehensive epilepsy clinic using a slightly modified version of the Impact on Families Scale (IFS).

METHODS

Families of patients with epilepsy completed the IFS up to three times. The IFS score and the six categories (i.e., total impact, financial impact, general impact, family/social impact, coping, and sibling impact) were assessed using Student's two sample t-test to determine the differences between binary groups and Pearson's correlation to assess the associations with continuous variables. Linear regression modeling was used to develop a model to predict IFS score.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-one patients completed the scale at one time point, 314 at two time points, and 61 at three time points. The overall impact of epilepsy on families was 109 (95% confidence interval (CI): 106-112) at time point 1, 111 (95% CI: 108-114) at time point 2, and 112 (95% CI: 105-119) at time point 3. There was no statistical difference in IFS score among the three time points. There were no associations with age or gender. Multivariable modeling using stepwise regression indicated that treatment resistance and seizure-free status were associated with IFS score. No interaction effects were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the current study suggest that the impact of epilepsy is highest for families that have children with active seizures at the time of their clinical visit and for those with children having treatment-resistant epilepsy. Although intuitive, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that has empirically verified these findings.

Enhancing quality of life among epilepsy surgery patients: Interlinking multiple social and relational determinants

BACKGROUND

Achieving seizure control through resective brain surgery is a major predictor of improved quality of life (QOL) among people with refractory (drug-resistant) epilepsy. Nevertheless, QOL is a comprehensive and dynamic construct, consisting of broad dimensions such as physical health, psychosocial well-being, level of independence, social relationships, and beyond. This study highlights the interlinkage and complementarity of these diverse dimensions, and how in practice, patients, clinicians, and others in a social support system can actively promote QOL among surgery patients.

METHOD

Twenty-one qualitative in-depth interviews with patients with refractory epilepsy who are either undergoing presurgical assessment or postsurgery follow-up were conducted, to consider their perspective on QOL in relation to their experience of illness and surgical treatment. Data were thematically analyzed, resulting in three key thematic findings.

RESULTS

(1) A myriad of QOL dimensions are highly interrelated and interdependent with mutual 'spin-off' effects: Uncontrolled seizures impacted beyond physical and cognitive health, disrupting important social identities such as being successful parents, spouses, and career professionals. The desire for good clinical outcomes from surgery was justified against the need to mitigate these social and personal concerns. (2) In postsurgery care, there were complementary effects of clinical interventions and social factors on patients' QOL. Psychosocial well-being was supported by a combination of improved physical health, self-confidence, psychological interventions, and social support from employers and educators who were sensitive to patients' specialized needs. (3) Engaging in education, employment, and government services influenced not only socioeconomic well-being, but also a sense of social inclusion. Advocacy made on behalf of patients by clinicians and family members has helped to better manage patients' eligibility for social services provision.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life is achieved through a comprehensive and interactive social process, and not simply an outcome measure of clinical treatment. The responses and interactions of many others within the patients' life and treatment process, including family members, clinicians, and social service workers, can culminate to influence QOL, highlighting the importance of a relational and social determinants perspective in patient care.

A feasibility assessment of functioning and quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measures in adult epilepsy clinics: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to identify functioning and quality-of-life (QOL) patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) feasible for use in the waiting room of adult epilepsy clinics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched PubMed and Web of Science for articles on in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and French published by the end of February 15th, 2019. We screened retrieved titles and abstracts looking for publications that reported the use of PROMs to measure functioning and QOL in epilepsy. The authors, clinical experts, and patient advocates from the Epilepsy Foundation of America conceptualized a set of desirable feasibility attributes for PROMs implementation in the waiting room of adult epilepsy clinics. These attributes included brief time for completion (i.e., ≤3 min), free cost, coverage of four minimum QOL domains and respective facets, and good evidence of psychometric properties. We defined QOL domains according to the World Health Organization's classification and created psychometric appraisal criteria based on the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Guidance.

RESULTS

Eighteen candidate instruments were identified and compared with respect to desirable attributes for use in adult epilepsy clinics. We found that the Quality-of-life in epilepsy (QOLIE)-10 and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10) were the most feasible PROMs for implementation in adult epilepsy clinics based on our criteria. The QOLIE-10 and PROMIS-10 still lack ideal evidence of responsiveness in people with epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review that aimed to assess feasibility properties of available functioning and QOL PROMs. The QOLIE-10 and PROMIS-10 are potentially feasible instruments for implementation in the waiting room of adult epilepsy clinics. Further studies assessing the responsiveness of these PROMs are needed and will contribute to the selection of the most appropriate instrument for longitudinal use in adult epilepsy clinical practice.

The impact of old versus new antiepileptic drugs on costs and patient reported outcomes among older adults

The aim of this prospective questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was to examine whether the new generation of Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with higher acquisition cost generate lower adverse effects than the old AEDs among a sample of 102 Arabic-speaking older adults (60 years of age or older) with seizure disorders. The mean scores of the Arabic version of the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP), which assessed the adverse effects of the AEDs, did not differ between patients taking the old and new generations of AEDs. Despite their 4-fold higher cost, the new generation of AEDs were not characterized by lower LAEP scores of adverse effects. However, higher LAEP scores were associated with better health literacy. In conclusion, the use of new AEDs was not associated with lower self-reported adverse effects scores among Arabic-speaking older adults with seizure disorders despite their higher acquisition costs.

Development of an Epilepsy Nursing Communication Tool: Improving the Quality of Interactions Between Nurses and Patients With Seizures

Background: Nurses have become increasingly involved in overseeing the management of patients with complex medical conditions, including those with epilepsy. Nurses who are not specialists in epilepsy can play a central role in providing optimal care, education, and support to their patients with epilepsy, given the proper tools. Objective: Our objective was to create a tool that can be used by nurses in the clinic setting to help facilitate discussion of topics relevant to enhancing medical care and management of patients with epilepsy. To address this need, a panel of epilepsy nursing experts used a patient-centered care approach to develop an Epilepsy Nursing Communication Tool (ENCT). Methods: An initial set of topics and questions was created based on findings from a literature review. Eight nurse experts reviewed and revised the ENCT using focus groups and discussion forums. The revised ENCT was provided to nurses who care for patients with epilepsy but had not been involved in ENCT development. Nurses were asked to rate the usability and feasibility on a 5-point scale to assess whether the tool captured important topics and was easy to use. Results: Ten nurses provided usability and feasibility assessments. Results indicated strong tool utility, with median scores of 4.5, 4, and 4 for usefulness, ease of use, and acceptability, respectively. Conclusions: The preliminary ENCT shows promise in providing a tool that nurses can use in their interactions with patients with epilepsy to help address the complexity of disease management, which may help improve overall patient care.

Single-item measure for assessing quality of life in children with drug-resistant epilepsy

Objective

The current study investigated the psychometric properties of a single-item quality of life (QOL) measure, the Global Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy question (G-QOLCE), in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Method

Data came from the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery on Health-Related Quality of Life Study (PESQOL), a multicenter prospective cohort study (n = 118) with observations collected at baseline and at 6 months of follow-up on children aged 4-18 years. QOL was measured with the QOLCE-76 and KIDSCREEN-27. The G-QOLCE was an overall QOL question derived from the QOLCE-76. Construct validity and reliability were assessed with Spearman's correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Responsiveness was examined through distribution-based and anchor-based methods.

Results

The G-QOLCE showed moderate (r ≥ 0.30) to strong (r ≥ 0.50) correlations with composite scores, and most subscales of the QOLCE-76 and KIDSCREEN-27 at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The G-QOLCE had moderate test-retest reliability (ICC range: 0.49-0.72) and was able to detect clinically important change in patients' QOL (standardized response mean: 0.38; probability of change: 0.65; Guyatt's responsiveness statistics: 0.62 and 0.78). Caregiver anxiety and family functioning contributed most strongly to G-QOLCE scores over time.

Significance

Results offer promising preliminary evidence regarding the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the proposed single-item QOL measure. The G-QOLCE is a potentially useful tool that can be feasibly administered in a busy clinical setting to evaluate clinical status and impact of treatment outcomes in pediatric epilepsy.

Assessment of Treatment Side Effects and Quality of Life in People with Epilepsy

Epilepsy impairs quality of life in physical, psychological, cognitive, social, and occupational domains. In people who are not seizure free, depression and adverse medication effects have a predominant role in determining quality of life. The assessment of these factors and other comorbidities is essential for maximizing quality of life in epilepsy. There are multiple tools available to assess medication effects and quality of life in a structured format. Such tools can provide superior assessments and allow clinicians to have a greater impact on their patients' quality of life.

Social determinants of health in epilepsy

Social factors have been identified as key drivers of epilepsy care, outcomes, and disparities, but there is a limited understanding of what these factors are and how they translate into disparities. This targeted review provides an overview of the social determinants of health framework and applies this perspective to the literature about social and psychosocial factors in epilepsy; a social determinants of health--epilepsy model is proposed. The key social determinants of health in epilepsy include socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, age, and gender. For example, low socioeconomic status and minority status have been associated with a higher risk of epilepsy, more hospitalizations and emergency room visits (versus neurology services), antiepileptic drug nonadherence, and a lower rate of epilepsy surgery. Such differences in care/treatment and outcomes translate into health disparities, many of which are considered unjust (inequitable) and modifiable through social action. Other social determinants of health include structural and sociocultural contextual conditions (e.g., health economy, policy, and social stigma/discrimination) and mediating mechanisms including material (e.g., housing), behavioral/biological (e.g., adherence), psychosocial (e.g., perceived stigma), and health system (e.g., access) factors. There are complex relationships among social determinants of health in epilepsy, which remain poorly understood and hamper efforts to address and eliminate disparities in epilepsy care and outcomes. Further empirical work grounded in sound theory and robust methodologies is needed to identify points of intervention and design effective and socially acceptable solutions to any pervasive disparities in epilepsy.