Management of Motor Symptoms for Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease without Safe Oral Access: A Scoping Review

Context: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Oral medications for control of motor symptoms are the mainstay of treatment. However, as the disease progresses, patients with PD may develop dysphagia that prohibits them from safely taking oral medications. Currently there are no clinical guidelines for managing distressing motor symptoms in patients with PD and severe dysphagia, which can therefore be quite challenging. Objectives: To provide an exhaustive summary of current literature on pharmacological interventions for patients with PD who do not have safe oral access in managing distressing motor symptoms. Indication, route, doses, frequency, outcome, and adverse effects will be discussed. Methods: A scoping review using Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, AgeLine, and PsycINFO databases (1946-2021) was conducted. Articles examining patients with PD and dysphagia who are eligible to receive palliative care or at end of life were included. Studies that included patients who were also on oral PD medications or received device-aided therapy were excluded from this review. Results: A total of 3821 articles were screened for title and abstract, 259 were selected for full-text review, and 20 articles were selected for data extraction. These included five case reports, one retrospective cohort study, one book chapter, and 13 narrative reviews. There are very few articles addressing the issue of treatment of patients with advanced PD who are unable to take oral medications. Although rotigotine patch and apormorphine injections are most frequently recommended, there are no clinical trials in this patient population to support those recommendations. Conclusion: This study highlights a need for further research examining the efficacy and dosing of nonoral medications in advanced PD with dysphagia.

Cognitive Influences in Parkinson's Disease Patients and Their Caregivers: Perspectives From an Australian Cohort

Objectives: Cognitive impairment impacts negatively on Parkinson's disease (PD) patient and caregiver quality of life (QoL). We examined cognitive impairment in PD patients and their caregivers to determine if caregiver cognition affected their PD relative. Methods: Validated cognition and clinical outcome measures were assessed in 103 PD patients and 81 caregivers. Results: PD patients showed more cognitive impairment than their carers, with 48.6% having possible Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 16.5% having PD dementia. Increasing age, male gender, lower education level, various non-motor symptoms and certain therapies, associated with poorer cognition in PD. Eighteen and a half percent of caregivers were found to have MCI, in association with a lower physical and mental QoL. This reflected in lower QoL and mood for the respective PD patients. Conclusion: Impaired cognition and QoL in caregivers was associated with decreased QoL and mood for respective PD patients, suggesting MCI in caregivers is an important consideration for the management of PD.

Translating Evidence to Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In the advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), patients frequently experience disabling motor complications. Treatment options include deep brain stimulation (DBS), levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI). Choosing among these treatments is influenced by scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. To foster patient engagement in decision‐making among the options, scientific evidence should be adjusted to their information needs. We conducted a systematic review from the patient perspective. First, patients selected outcomes for a treatment choice: quality of life, activities of daily living, ON and OFF time, and adverse events. Second, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis for each treatment versus best medical treatment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Finally, the evidence was transformed into comprehensible and comparable information. We converted the meta‐analysis results into the number of patients (per 100) who benefit clinically from an advanced treatment per outcome, based on the minimal clinically important difference and the cumulative distribution function. Although this approach allows for a comparison of outcomes across the three device‐aided therapies, they have never been compared directly. The interpretation is hindered by the relatively short follow‐up time in the included studies, usually less than 12 months. These limitations should be clarified to patients during the decision‐making process. This review can help patients integrate the evidence with their own preferences, and with their clinician's expertise, to reach an informed decision. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

The clinical meaning of levodopa equivalent daily dose in Parkinson's disease

Levodopa (L-dopa) remains the basis of pharmacological treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, L-dopa therapy is associated with the development of complications and presents major challenges in the long-term treatment. Thus, other medications may be suggested to delay and/or reduce the doses of L-dopa in order to prevent complications. The interpretation of treatment evolution reported in clinical trials on PD may be tricky, especially due to some variability in medications and dose regimens. Some authors have suggested a conversion factor to generate a total L-dopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), calculated as a sum of each parkinsonian medication. Therefore, LEDD provides an artificial summary of the total daily medication a patient is receiving, and to date, there is no report focusing on the clinical interpretation of this parameter. Thus, based on a 3-year, multi-center retrospective study assessing the impact of second-line therapy initiation on LEDD in PD patients, the aim of our article was to discuss LEDD as a quantitative outcome to estimate the impact of second-line therapies on medication regimens; and in the second part of the discussion, to provide a narrative review of the clinical outcomes associated with LEDD in the literature.

Is the subcutaneous route an alternative for administering ertapenem to older patients? PHACINERTA study

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic administration by subcutaneous (SC) injection is common practice in French geriatric wards as an alternative to the intravenous (IV) route, but few pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data are available. Ertapenem is useful for the treatment of infections with ESBL-producing enterobacteria.

OBJECTIVES

To report and compare ertapenem pharmacokinetic data between IV and SC routes in older persons.

METHODS

Patients >65 years of age receiving ertapenem (1 g once daily) for at least 48 h (IV or SC, steady-state) were prospectively enrolled. Total ertapenem concentrations [residual (C0), IV peak (C0.5) and SC peak (C2.5)] were determined by UV HPLC. Individual-predicted AUC0-24 values were calculated and population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed. Using the final model, a Monte Carlo simulation involving 10 000 patients evaluated the influence of SC or IV administration on the PTA. Tolerance to ertapenem and recovery were also monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02505386.

RESULTS

Ten (mean ± SD age=87±7 years) and 16 (age=88±5 years) patients were included in the IV and SC groups, respectively. The mean C0 and C2.5 values were not significantly different between the IV and SC groups (C0=12±5.9 versus 12±7.4 mg/L, P=0.97; C2.5=97±42 versus 67±41 mg/L, P=0.99). The mean C0.5 was higher in the IV group compared with the SC group (C0.5=184±90 versus 51±66 mg/L, P=0.001). The mean individual AUCs (1126.92±334.99 mg·h/L for IV versus 1005.3±266.0 mg·h/L for SC, P=0.38) and PTAs were not significantly different between groups. No severe antibiotic-related adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

SC administration of ertapenem is an alternative to IV administration in older patients.

Lipid-based nanodelivery approaches for dopamine-replacement therapies in Parkinson's disease: From preclinical to translational studies

The incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, has increased exponentially as the global population continues to age. Although the etiological factors contributing to PD remain uncertain, its average incidence rate is reported to be 1% of the global population older than 60 years. PD is primarily characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons and/or associated neuronal networks and the subsequent depletion of dopamine (DA) levels in the brain. Thus, DA or levodopa (l-dopa), a precursor of DA, represent cardinal targets for both idiopathic and symptomatic PD therapeutics. While several therapeutic strategies have been investigated over the past decade for their abilities to curb the progression of PD, an effective cure for PD is currently unavailable. Even DA replacement therapy, an effective PD therapeutic strategy that provides an exogenous supply of DA or l-dopa, has been hindered by severe challenges, such as a poor capacity to bypass the blood-brain barrier and inadequate bioavailability. Nevertheless, with recent advances in nanotechnology, several drug delivery systems have been developed to bypass the barriers associated with central nervous system therapeutics. In here, we sought to describe the adapted lipid-based nanodrug delivery systems used in the field of PD therapeutics and their recent advances, with a particular focus placed on DA replacement therapies. This work initially explores the background of PD; offers descriptions of the most recent molecular targets; currently available clinical medications/limitations; an overview of several lipid-based PD nanotherapeutics, functionalized nanoparticles, and technical aspects in brain delivery; and, finally, presents future perspectives to enhance the use of nanotherapeutics in PD treatment.

Apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a review

Optimizing idiopathic Parkinson's disease treatment is a challenging, multifaceted and continuous process with direct impact on patients' quality of life. The basic tenet of this task entails tailored therapy, allowing for optimal motor function with the fewest adverse effects. Apomorphine, a dopamine agonist used as rescue therapy for patients with motor fluctuations, with potential positive effects on nonmotor symptoms, is the only antiparkinsonian agent whose capacity to control motor symptoms is comparable to that of levodopa. Subcutaneous administration, either as an intermittent injection or as continuous infusion, appears to be the most effective and tolerable route. This review summarizes the historical background, structure, mechanism of action, indications, contraindications and side effects, compares apomorphine infusion therapy with other treatments, such as oral therapy, deep brain stimulation and continuous enteral infusion of levodopa/carbidopa gel, and gives practical instructions on how to initiate treatment.

Effects of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease without cognitive impairment on motor, cognitive, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life

INTRODUCTION

Treatment optimization using continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) improves the control of motor fluctuations of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Although CSAI seems to be cognitively and behaviorally safe and to improve the quality of life, very few studies have investigated its influence in these domains, especially in patients without cognitive impairment.

METHODS

We estimated the impact of CSAI on motor symptoms, cognition, psychiatric domains and quality of life in parkinsonian patients without cognitive impairment by comparing the scores of 22 patients assessed before and 6 months after the start of add-on CSAI.

RESULTS

Optimized treatment with CSAI was associated with i) reduced motor fluctuations, ii) unchanged cognition, iii) unchanged psychiatric domains, and iv) improved quality of life in physical and psychological aspects.

CONCLUSION

In PD patients without cognitive impairment, CSAI improves motor symptoms and quality of life and, as suggested by previous studies, alters neither cognition nor mental health.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Nocturnal Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion in Sleep Disorders in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: The APO-NIGHT Study

BACKGROUND

There are not many data about the beneficial effect of nocturnal continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (NCSAI) over sleep disturbances in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effect of the NCSAI in sleeping problems and insomnia due to nocturnal hypokinesia inadvanced PD.

METHODS

We assessed 17 advanced PD patients with several sleep disturbances measured by SCOPA-SLEEP and PDSS scales. All the patients were on apomorphine infusion during daytime. This therapy was extended to nighttime. We evaluated the patients before the onset and after six weeks with NCSAI.

RESULTS

NCSAI allowed highly significant improvements in SCOPA-SLEEP and PDSS scales (p<0.0001), and daytime somnolence. NCSAI was well tolerated with no major adverse effects were noticed.

CONCLUSION

This study shows and confirms the efficacy of NCSAI on the sleep disturbances related to advanced PD. We provide an easy protocol to start this therapy.

Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease patients with cognitive dysfunction: A retrospective long-term follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Continuous apomorphine infusion (CAI) is an advanced therapy in fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD). The use of CAI is controversial in PD patients with cognitive dysfunction including visual hallucinations (VHs), and orthostatic hypotension (OH). This study was set-up to analyze the effectiveness and safety of CAI in elderly PD patients with cognitive dysfunction.

METHODS

This new-user cohort study identified fluctuating PD patients who started CAI treatment at the rehabilitation unit of Parkinson Expertise Center (RU-PEC) Groningen, from November 2004 until 2016. Efficacy and safety data included motor function, cognitive status, OH and VHs, and was analyzed retrospectively. Pre-existent non-motor symptoms were treated optimally before starting CAI.

RESULTS

Forty-five fluctuating PD patients (age: 70.9 ± 8.1 yrs, disease duration: 10.8 ± 4.8 yrs) were identified, with pre-existing cognitive dysfunction, VHs (71%), and OH (26%). During the stay at RU-PEC (median 52 days) apomorphine was successfully titrated without worsening of pre-existing VHs and OH. The mean daily apomorphine dose was 66 ± 28 mg, accompanied by a reduction of levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD) with 17%. The duration of ON-time and OFF-time significantly improved with +2.36 h (25%) and -1.66 h (-45%), respectively, while dyskinesia duration did not change. During long-term follow-up (median of 26 months) VHs and OH worsened in 9 and 4 patients, which necessitated discontinuation in 4 cases.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that CAI is also an effective treatment in advanced PD patients with concomitant cognitive dysfunction including VHs and OH, provided that these comorbidities are treated adequately as well.

Liquid levodopa-carbidopa in advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications

While levodopa, carbidopa, ascorbic acid solution (LCAS) therapy has been used in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) for many years, long-term follow-up data is scarce. The present study aimed to determine the long-term retention rate for LCAS therapy, and to identify the causes of LCAS therapy withdrawal. Our study included a series of 38 patients with PD (14 men and 24 women) who underwent LCAS treatment between 2011 and 2013 to alleviate motor complications that were not satisfactorily controlled by optimized conventional anti-parkinsonian treatment at the Seoul National University Hospital. All patients were admitted to educate them about and initiate LCAS treatment for 2-5days, and were then followed up as outpatients. The mean follow-up duration was 12.8months, and three main reasons for LCAS treatment discontinuation were worsening of wearing-off symptoms (8 patients), persistent dyskinesia (4 patients), and poor drug adherence (4 patients). Fourteen patients (36.8%) maintained the LCAS treatment after 12months, and were categorized as the treatment-retention group. The mean percentage of on time without dyskinesia significantly increased from 33.6±17.6% to 57.0±27.7% after LCAS initiation (p=0.016) in the treatment-retention group. Twelve patients (31.6%) were still receiving LCAS treatment after 30months. LCAS treatment can be a non-device assisted therapeutic option for patients who have no access to advanced therapies such as deep brain stimulation and infusional treatments.

Expert Consensus Group report on the use of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease--Clinical practice recommendations

Extensive published evidence supports the use of subcutaneously-administered apomorphine as an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but to date no consensus recommendations have been available to guide healthcare professionals in the optimal application of apomorphine therapy in clinical practice. This document outlines best-practice recommendations for selecting appropriate candidates for apomorphine intermittent injection (the pen-injection formulation) or apomorphine continuous infusion (the pump formulation), for initiating patients onto therapy and for managing their ongoing treatment. Apomorphine is a suitable therapeutic option for PD patients who experience troublesome 'off' periods despite optimized treatment with oral PD medications. Due to its speed of onset, apomorphine injection is particularly suited to those patients requiring rapid, reliable relief of both unpredictable and predictable 'off' periods, those who require reliable and fast relief when anticipating an 'off', those with levodopa absorption or gastric emptying problems resulting in delayed or failed 'on', or for rapid relief of early morning dystonia or akinesia. Apomorphine infusion(1) is suited for patients whose 'off' periods can no longer be adequately controlled by standard oral PD treatment or for those in whom rescue doses of apomorphine injection are effective but either needed too frequently (more than 4-6 times per day), or are associated with increasing dyskinesia. In addition to treating motor fluctuations, there is evidence that apomorphine infusion may be effective for the management of specific non-motor symptoms of PD associated with 'off' periods. Apomorphine infusion is less invasive than other non-oral treatment options for advancing disease, intrajejunal levodopa infusion and deep-brain stimulation.

Long-term response to continuous duodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa gel in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: The Barcelona registry

INTRODUCTION

Continuous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is an effective treatment for patients with advanced Parkinson Disease (PD) that cannot be further improved by oral therapy.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, prospective, and multicenter study to collect, in a large sample of PD treated with LCIG, long-term information about the outcome and safety of the treatment. The assessments were performed before LCIG, 1, 3, 6 months after, and ever since, every 6 months.

RESULTS

We studied 72 patients with a mean observation time of 22 months and a maximum of 48 months. During follow-up 28 patients discontinued the treatment, especially for lack of efficacy or adverse events related to the drug. We obtained a significant improvement of motor and non-motor fluctuations, mean off time and some non-motor symptoms. A significant increase in the percentage of time with dyskinesias was found in patients having less than 50% of the day with dyskinesias before LCIG. However, patients having already many dyskinesias before LCIG experienced a significant decrease of the troublesome dyskinesias, meaning that outcomes might be different depending on specific clinical characteristics. Adverse effects were in general minor but one case of intestinal perforation and one of abdominal cellulite were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that LCIG is a very effective treatment option for advanced PD; however considering the findings that dyskinesia can increase and the potential for serious side effects, we suggest the necessity for development of guidelines that better define the profile of responders.