Clinical management of radicular pain

Manual traction is effective in alleviating lumbosacral spine pain: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial

Background

Manual traction, a therapeutic technique frequently employed in healthcare, involves applying controlled pulling force by hand, usually to the spine, to stretch muscles and decompress joints, thereby alleviating pain. This method can be particularly beneficial for addressing lumbosacral spine pain exacerbated by radicular symptoms, characterized by pain radiating from the lower back due to compression or irritation of spinal nerves.

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the effects of manual traction against control group in alleviating the lumbosacral spine pain caused by radicular symptoms.

Methods

A randomized controlled study design was utilized with a sample of 60 patients experiencing lumbosacral spine pain, evenly distributed between an experimental group (n = 30; receiving manual traction) and a control group (n = 30). Patients underwent assessments before and after six treatment sessions, which included the Straight Leg Raise test, modified Bragard's test, Kernig's test, and the visual analogue scale for pain perception.

Results

Between-group significant differences were found at post-intervention, favoring the experimental group on SLR - Left (°) (p = 0.004; medium effect size), SLR - Right (°) (p = 0.004; medium effect size), Modified Bragard test - Left (°) (p = 0.024; small effect size), Modified Bragard test - Right (°) (p = 0.003; medium effect size), Kernig's Test - Left (°) (p = 0.013; medium effect size) and Kernig's Test - Right (°) (p = 0.010; medium effect size). Additionally, between-group significant differences were found at post-intervention, favoring the experimental group on VAS scores at SLR left (p < 0.001; medium effect size), and right (p < 0.001); medium effect size, Modified Bragard test left (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and right (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and at Kernig's Test left (p < 0.001; medium effect size) and right (p < 0.001; medium effect size).

Conclusions

In conclusion, manual traction is recommended as an effective approach for alleviating lumbosacral spine pain in patients experiencing symptoms resulting from irritation or compression of a spinal nerve root.

Lumbar disc herniation: Epidemiology, clinical and radiologic diagnosis WFNS spine committee recommendations

Objective

To formulate the most current, evidence-based recommendations regarding the epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, and radiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated disk (LDH).

Methods

A systematic literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL was performed from 2012 to 2022 using the search terms "herniated lumbar disc", "epidemiology", "prevention" "clinical diagnosis", and "radiological diagnosis". Screening criteria resulted in 17, 16, and 90 studies respectively that were analyzed regarding epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, and radiographic diagnosis of LDH. Using the Delphi method and two rounds of voting at two separate international meetings, ten members of the WFNS (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) Spine Committee generated eleven final consensus statements.

Results

The lifetime risk for symptomatic LDH is 1-3%; of these, 60-90% resolve spontaneously. Risk factors for LDH include genetic and environmental factors, strenuous activity, and smoking. LDH is more common in males and in 30-50 year olds. A set of clinical tests, including manual muscle testing, sensory testing, Lasegue sign, and crossed Lasegue sign are recommended to diagnose LDH. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for confirming suspected LDH.

Conclusions

These eleven final consensus statements provide current, evidence-based guidelines on the epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, and radiographic diagnosis of LDH for practicing spine surgeons worldwide.

A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Triamcinolone vs Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants in Caudal Block in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common issue among older adults. Radicular pain syndromes are often managed with caudal epidural injections. Our study aimed to compare the effects of triamcinolone and magnesium sulfate, used as adjuvants to local anesthetics in caudal blocks, on pain levels and quality of life in patients with LBP.

Methods

A total of 40 patients undergoing caudal block were randomized to two groups,received 10 mL caudal epidural injection of either injection 9 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and 1 mL of triamcinolone; 40 mg (Group T, n = 20) or magnesium sulfate; 200 mg (group M, n = 20). Improvements in the pain score measured with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional ability measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were the primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Before, one month and three months after the caudl block, the VAS and ODI scores were evaluated.

Results

The VAS and ODI scores did not exhibit a significant difference between the 2 groups at all post-injection time points, except for the VAS score at 3 months, which showed a statistically lower value in group M compared to group T (P = 0.046). However, when comparing within the same group, both groups showed significantly improved VAS and ODI scores at all post-injection time points compared to the pre-injection scores (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The addition of magnesium or triamcinolone to a local anesthetic in caudal epidural injections does not result in any discernible difference. However, this combination may lead to improvements in pain levels and quality of life, and these improvements can be sustained for up to 3 months.

Radiation Exposure during Fluoroscopy-Guided Ozone Chemonucleolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Introduction: Radiation exposure is a frequent drawback of spinal surgery, even if X-ray guidance plays a pivotal role in improving the accuracy and safety of spinal procedures. Consequently, radiation protection is essential to reduce potential negative biological effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ radiation exposure, the radiation dose emission during fluoroscopy-guided ozone chemonucleolysis (OCN), and the potential role of patient characteristics. Methods: The radiation dose emission reports were retrospectively evaluated in patients who underwent single-level OCN for lumbar disc herniation. A generalized linear model (GLM) with a gamma distribution and log link function was used to assess the association between radiation emission and patients’ characteristics such as age, sex, BMI, level of disc herniation, disc height, and site of disc herniation. Results: Two hundred and forty OCN cases were analyzed. A safe and low level of radiation exposure was registered during OCN. The median fluoroscopy time for OCN was 26.3 (19.4−35.9) seconds, the median radiation emission dose was 19.3 (13.2−27.3) mGy, and he median kerma area product (KAP) was 0.46 (0.33−0.68) mGy ⋅ m2. The resulting KAP values were highly dependent on patient variables. In particular, sex, obesity, and residual disc height < 50% significantly increased the measured KAP, while levels of disc herniations other than L5-S1 reduced the KAP values. Conclusions: The radiation exposure during OCN is low and quite similar to a simple discography. However, patient characteristics are significantly related to radiation exposure and should be carefully evaluated before planning OCN.

Chinese Association for the Study of Pain: Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment for lumbar disc herniation

Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease in the clinical context and does great harm to either the physical or mental health of patients suffering from this disease. Many guidelines and consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation have been published domestically and internationally. According to the expert consensus, clinicians could adopt tailored and personalized diagnosis and treatment management strategies for lumbar disc herniation patients.

Factors Predicting Successful Outcome for Ozone Chemonucleolysis in Lumbar Disk Herniation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate factors predicting a successful outcome after ozone chemonucleolysis (OCN) in patients with radicular pain and poor response to conservative treatments.

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of good outcome after OCN. Good outcome was defined as 33% Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) reduction (model 1) or 13-point ODI improvement (model 2) at 1 month after OCN.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-three patients were analyzed. A significant pain reduction (pre-operative Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] 6.7 ± 1.5, postoperative NRS 2.6 ± 2.2, P < 0.0001) and ODI improvement (pre-operative ODI 39 ± 13.7, postoperative ODI 21.4 ± 13.8, P < 0.0001) was obtained 1 month after OCN. Pain duration (< 1 year), type of disk herniation based on Michigan State University classification (MSU), stages of disk degeneration revealed by discogram and absence of foraminal stenosis (bony or ligament flavum hypertrophy) appeared as predictors of successful outcome. Age, gender, previous spine surgery, level site of disk herniation, presence of uncontained lumbar disk herniation, and vertebral Modic changes were not statistically associated with the outcome. Both the models showed a good accuracy (model 1, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.84 ± 0.027, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.89; model 2, AUC = 0.86 ± 0.024, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

OCN is an effective treatment for radicular pain due to disk herniation. Pain duration (< 1 year), MSU disk herniation type (1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B), disk degeneration grade 2, and absence of foraminal stenosis are all associated with the successful outcome and should be carefully evaluated before OCN.

Efficacy of transforaminal epidural magnesium administration when combined with a local anaesthetic and steroid in the management of lower limb radicular pain

BACKGROUND

Lower limb radicular pain resulting from a herniated intervertebral disc is a cause of functional disability and could lead to increased consumption of opioids. We evaluated the efficacy of epidural magnesium combined with a local anaesthetic and steroid in the management of this pain.

METHODS

This was a prospective, case-control, randomized, double-blind study. Fifty patients each received 2 ml bupivacaine, 1 ml (40 mg) methylprednisolone and 1 ml saline (0.9%) (group C) or magnesium (200 mg) instead of saline (group M). The primary outcome measure was the improvement in the pain score (assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS)), and the secondary outcome was the improvement in the functional ability (assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ)). The VAS and MODQ scores were assessed before and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

The VAS and MODQ scores were significantly better in group M compared to those in group C at all times post-injection (p-value < 0.001). Comparisons within the same group showed that the VAS and MODQ scores were significantly better at all post-injection time points compared to the pre-injection scores in both group C and group M (p-values < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding magnesium to a local anaesthetic and steroid to be injected in the transforaminal epidural space could improve the pain and the quality of life in patients suffering from lower limb radicular pain due to lumbo-sacral disc herniation, and this improvement could last for up to 3 months.

SIGNIFICANCE

Magnesium is efficient when added to local anaesthetics and steroids for management of lower limb radicular pain.

Maresin 1 Attenuates Radicular Pain Through the Inhibition of NLRP3 Inflammasome-Induced Pyroptosis via NF-κB Signaling

Background

The exposure of the nucleus pulposus (NP) causes an immune and inflammatory response, which is intrinsically linked to the pathogenesis of radicular pain. As a newly discovered pro-resolving lipid mediator, maresin 1 (MaR1) could exert powerful inflammatory resolution, neuroprotection, and analgesic activities. In the present research, the analgesic effect of MaR1 was observed. Then, the potential mechanism by which MaR1 attenuated radicular pain was also analyzed in a rat model.

Methods

Intrathecal administration of MaR1 (10 or 100 ng) was successively performed in a rat with non-compressive lumbar disk herniation for three postoperative days. Mechanical and thermal thresholds were determined to assess pain-related behavior from days 1 to 7 (n = 8/group). On day 7, the tissues of spinal dorsal horns from different groups were gathered to evaluate expression levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-18, and TNF-α), the NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis indicators (GSDMD, ASC, NLRP3, and Caspase-1), together with NF-κB/p65 activation (n = 6/group). TUNEL and PI staining were performed to further examine the process of pyroptosis.

Results

After intrathecal administration in the rat model, MaR1 exhibited potent analgesic effect dose-dependently. MaR1 significantly prompted the resolution of the increased inflammatory cytokine levels, reversed the up-regulated expression of the inflammasome and pyroptosis indicators, and reduced the cell death and the positive activation of NF-κB/p65 resulting from the NP application on the L5 dorsal root ganglion.

Conclusion

This study indicated that the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis played a significant role in the inflammatory reaction of radicular pain. Also, MaR1 could effectively down-regulate the inflammatory response and attenuate pain by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-induced pyroptosis via NF-κB signaling.

Correlation between paravertebral spread of injectate and clinical efficacy in lumbar transforaminal block

The potential paravertebral space includes spinal nerves, dorsal rami, rami communicants, and sympathetic chains. This study evaluated correlations between paravertebral spread of injectate and clinical efficacy in lumbar transforaminal block. We retrospectively analysed the data of 88 patients who received transforaminal blocks for lumbar radicular pain. We categorized patients into two groups: patients with ≥ 50% pain reduction on a numeric rating scale at 30 min following a block (responder group), and patients with < 50% pain reduction (non-responder group). Paravertebral spread of injectate was graded as limited to the anterior, middle, and posterior 1/3 of the anterolateral aspect of vertebral bodies; spread between the posterolateral margins of bodies and the posterior epidural space was considered no spread. Clinical and fluoroscopic data, perfusion index, temperature, and cold sensation were compared between the groups. Among 54 patients analysed, 26 (48.1%) experienced ≥ 50% and 28 (51.9%) < 50% pain reduction. Paravertebral spread occurred in 33 (61.1%) patients; 19 (57.6%) responders and 14 (42.4%) non-responders. On analysis, paravertebral spread, epidural spread patterns, perfusion index change ratios, temperature changes, and cold sensation changes showed no differences between responder and non-responder groups. Paravertebral spread occurred in 61.1%, with no correlation with the clinical efficacy of lumbar transforaminal block.

Distribution and predictive value of initial presenting symptoms in spinal metastases from primary cancer patients

PURPOSE

Primary cancer patients may have some symptoms and develop spinal metastases in their disease progression. This study was to report the distribution and predictive value of specific initial presenting symptoms in patients with spine metastatic disease.

METHODS

The clinical information about patients with primary cancers was retrospectively collected and analyzed at their initial diagnosis from January 2008 to December 2017. The distribution and specific value of initial presenting symptoms were analyzed in predicting spinal metastases.

RESULTS

A total of 14,603 cancer patients were finally included, of whom 1665 (11.4%) cases were confirmed with spinal metastases. 41.55% (6067/14,603) patients had initial presenting symptoms, while 92.19% (1535/1665) patients with spinal metastases presented at least one initial presenting symptoms. Among 6269 patients with symptoms, 1535 (24.49%) were diagnosed with spinal metastases. Factors including primary tumor type, local pain, night-aggravating pain, limb numbness, limb weakness, unstable gait, claudication, loss of sphincter control, and weight loss are associated with the distribution of spinal metastases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.9% (89.4-92.2%), 64.9% (64.0-65.7%), 24.99% (23.91-26.11%), and 98.23% (97.92-98.50%), respectively. Positive likelihood ratio of "night-aggravating pain" was 33.25 (12.65-87.36) and 17.26 (12.25-24.32) in patients < 45 and 45-64 years old, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of spinal metastases is associated with primary tumor type and initial presenting symptoms. The predictive value of initial presenting symptoms differs in age groups, but resembles in cancer types. The presence of night-aggravating pain had relative high value in predicting metastases in cancer patients under 65 years old.

Effect of subcutaneous needling on visual analogue scale, IgG and IgM in patients with lumbar disc herniation: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant)

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a disease commonly seen in clinical practice. In the majority of such patients presenting in clinic, the symptoms can be relieved or even abolished after non-surgical treatment. Floating needle therapy has attracted considerable attention as a promising non-surgical technique to treat LDH, as demonstrated in previous studies. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated using this therapy in a single blind and randomized controlled trial by recording patient report questionnaires and objective test data, and to explore the feasibility and preliminary effects of floating needle therapy for patients with LDH.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a Fu's subcutaneous needling (FSN) group and an acupuncture group then treated in accordance with procedures appropriate for a single blind and randomized controlled trial. The FSN group received 12 FSN therapy sessions over a 3-week period, and the acupuncture group received acupuncture therapy at specified points using acupuncture needles. The principal measurements were scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before and 3 weeks after treatment. Secondary measurements included immune function IgG and IgM measurements performed at the same time and adverse reactions during treatment.

RESULTS

The results of this trial will be published on the website of China Clinical Trial Registration Center (http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojen.aspx) and in peer-reviewed journals or academic conferences.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will explore the feasibility and preliminary effects of floating needle therapy for the treatment of patients with LDH.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (registration number ChiCTR1900024045).

Effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency treatment on cervical radicular pain: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervical radicular pain is a challenging medical problem in terms of therapeutic management. Recently, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) stimulation on the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) has been used to control several types of chronic pain. However, its effect on cervical radicular pain is still not well studied. To conduct a meta-analysis of available clinical studies on PRF treatment in patients with cervical radicular pain induced by cervical spine disease that was not responsive to other conservative treatments.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS. We included studies published up to August 31, 2017, that fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pain degrees measured using visual analog scale (VAS) at pretreatment and after PRF on the DRG were collected for the meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration's Handbook and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used for the methodological quality assessments of included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients from one RCT study, 2 prospective observational studies, and one retrospective study were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled data of the 4 included studies showed that overall VAS after the PRF treatment was significantly reduced (P ≤ .001). In the subgroup analysis according to follow-up evaluation time points, the pain was significantly reduced at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure (2 weeks: P = .02; 1, 3, and 6 months: P < .001).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of the meta-analysis, the use of PRF on the DRG is effective for alleviating cervical radicular pain, which was unresponsive to oral medications, physical therapy, or epidural steroid injection.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effects of Diosmin in the Treatment of Radicular Pain

Diosmin has been widely used to treat patients with vascular pain for its potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. To evaluate the therapeutic effects of Diosmin in the treatment of radicular pain, we conducted an investigator-initiated, randomized, active-controlled noninferiority trial between January 1, 2009, and December 1, 2010. Diosmin (50 mg/kg/day) was orally administered to treat the radicular pain in 150 patients for one month. Another 150 patients with the same symptom were given 20% 250 ml mannitol (1 g/kg/day) for 7 days and dexamethasone (10 mg/day) for 3 days intravenously guttae. Short-term relief and long-term relief were measured. Secondary outcomes include improvement in functional and psychological status, return to work, and reduction in anti-inflammatory analgesic drugs intake. Patients treated with oral Diosmin achieved reduction in radicular pain. The total satisfaction rate of Diosmin group was 84.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.9%, 90.0%], and the complete satisfaction rate was 50.7% (95% CI: 42.4%, 58.9%). No statistically significant difference was found between the Diosmin group and the active-control group regarding patient satisfaction. No adverse effects were found during the study period. Our study suggests that clinical application of Diosmin with a dose of 50 mg/kg/day might reduce the radicular pain. This trial is registered with ISRCTN97157037.

Ten Important Tips in Treating a Patient with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar disc herniation is a common spinal disorder that usually responds favorably to conservative treatment. In a small percentage of the patients, surgical decompression is necessary. Even though lumbar discectomy constitutes the most common and easiest spine surgery globally, adverse or even catastrophic events can occur. Appropriate patient selection and effective neural decompression constitute the most important points for better surgical outcomes and avoidance of unpleasant complications. Other important tips include timely performance of magnetic resonance imaging, correct interpretation of scan data, preoperative detection of underlying instability, exclusion of non-discogenic sciatica, determination of the main cause of clinical pathology, avoidance of the wrong side or level, and being sure that the more detailed procedure does not necessarily mean the more effective procedure.

Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint interventions in managing chronic low back pain.

METHODS: The review process applied systematic evidence-based assessment methodology of controlled trials of diagnostic validity and randomized controlled trials of therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion criteria encompassed all facet joint interventions performed in a controlled fashion. The pain relief of greater than 50% was the outcome measure for diagnostic accuracy assessment of the controlled studies with ability to perform previously painful movements, whereas, for randomized controlled therapeutic efficacy studies, the primary outcome was significant pain relief and the secondary outcome was a positive change in functional status. For the inclusion of the diagnostic controlled studies, all studies must have utilized either placebo controlled facet joint blocks or comparative local anesthetic blocks. In assessing therapeutic interventions, short-term and long-term reliefs were defined as either up to 6 mo or greater than 6 mo of relief. The literature search was extensive utilizing various types of electronic search media including PubMed from 1966 onwards, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, clinicaltrials.gov, along with other sources including previous systematic reviews, non-indexed journals, and abstracts until March 2015. Each manuscript included in the assessment was assessed for methodologic quality or risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist for diagnostic interventions, and Cochrane review criteria and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for therapeutic interventions. Evidence based on the review of the systematic assessment of controlled studies was graded utilizing a modified schema of qualitative evidence with best evidence synthesis, variable from level I to level V.

RESULTS: Across all databases, 16 high quality diagnostic accuracy studies were identified. In addition, multiple studies assessed the influence of multiple factors on diagnostic validity. In contrast to diagnostic validity studies, therapeutic efficacy trials were limited to a total of 14 randomized controlled trials, assessing the efficacy of intraarticular injections, facet or zygapophysial joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of the innervation of the facet joints. The evidence for the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with at least 75% pain relief with ability to perform previously painful movements was level I, based on a range of level I to V derived from a best evidence synthesis. For therapeutic interventions, the evidence was variable from level II to III, with level II evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks and radiofrequency neurotomy for long-term improvement (greater than 6 mo), and level III evidence for lumbosacral zygapophysial joint injections for short-term improvement only.

CONCLUSION: This review provides significant evidence for the diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks, and moderate evidence for therapeutic radiofrequency neurotomy and therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain.