Correlation of Clinicopathological Factors with Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy in Glioma

Objectives. Glioma patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) have a complex profile due to the simultaneous presence of two pathologies, glioma and epilepsy; however, they have not traditionally received as much attention as those with more malignant brain tumors. The underlying pathophysiology of brain tumor-related epilepsy remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible correlation between molecular neuropathology and glioma with BTRE and a wide range of BTRE-associated molecular markers of glioma patients. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of 186 glioma patients was evaluated at our hospital, of which 64 had BTRE. The chi-square test, Spearman rank correlation, and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify clinicopathological factors associated with BTRE in glioma patients. Results. Of the 186 patients examined in this study, 64 (34.4%) had BTRE. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of these patients, the results showed that patient age (over 40 years; $P=0.007$ ), low WHO grade (grade I, II; $P=0.001$ ), IDH-1 positive mutation ( $P=0.027$ ), low ATR-X expression level ( $\text{OR}=0.44$ ; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.92), and low Ki-67 PI ( $\text{OR}=0.25$ ; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.68) were associated with the occurrence of BTRE. In our cohort, BTRE patients did not differ by sex, tumor location, or expression of olig-2 and CD34. The results of the matching study showed that low Ki-67 PI and negative ATR-X expression levels were independent factors for a higher incidence of preoperative seizures in glioma patients. Conclusion. The current study updates existing information on genetic markers in gliomas with BTRE and explores the correlation of a wide range of clinicopathological factors and glioma patients with BTRE and suggests three putative biomarkers for BTRE: positive IDH1 mutation, low Ki-67 PI, and negative ATR-X expression. These factors may provide insights for developing a more thorough understanding of the pathogenesis of epilepsy and effective treatment strategies aimed at seizure control.

Molecular Classification of Gliomas is Associated with Seizure Control: A Retrospective Analysis

Classically, histologic grading of gliomas has been used to predict seizure association, with low-grade gliomas associated with an increased incidence of seizures compared to high-grade gliomas. In 2016, WHO reclassified gliomas based on histology and molecular characteristics. We sought to determine whether molecular classification of gliomas is associated with preoperative seizure presentation and/or post-operative seizure control across multiple glioma subtypes. All gliomas operated at our institution from 2007 to 2017 were identified based on ICD 9 and 10 billing codes and were retrospectively assessed for molecular classification of the IDH1 mutation, and 1p/19q codeletion. Logistic regression models were performed to assess associations of seizures at presentation as well as post-operative seizures with IDH status and the new WHO integrated classification. Our study included 376 patients: 82 IDH mutant and 294 IDH wildtype. The presence of IDH mutation was associated with seizures at presentation [OR 3.135 (1.818-5.404), p < 0.001]. IDH-mutant glioblastomas presented with seizures less often than other IDH-mutant glioma subtypes grade II and III [OR 0.104 (0.032-0.340), p < 0.001]. IDH-mutant tumors were associated with worse post-operative seizure outcomes, demonstrated by Engel Class [OR 2.666 (1.592-4.464), p < 0.001]. IDH mutation in gliomas is associated with an increased risk of seizure development and worse post-operative seizure control, in all grades except for GBM.

Predictors of early, recurrent, and intractable seizures in low-grade glioma

Background

Seizures are common among patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) and can significantly affect morbidity. We sought to determine the association between the clinical and molecular factors with seizure incidence and refractoriness in LGG patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review at the University of Virginia in patients with LGG (World Health Organization, WHO Grade II) evaluated between 2002 and 2015. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables of interest, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival curves, which were compared with the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 291 patients were included; 254 had molecular testing performed for presence of an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and/or 1p/19q codeletion. Sixty-eight percent of patients developed seizures prior to LGG diagnosis; 41% of all patients had intractable seizures. Using WHO 2016 integrated classification, there was no significant difference in seizure frequency during preoperative and postoperative periods or in developing intractable seizures, though a trend toward increased preoperative seizure incidence among patients with the IDH mutation was identified (P = .09). Male sex was significantly associated with higher seizure incidence during preoperative (P < .001) and postoperative periods (P < .001); men were also more likely to develop intractable seizures (P = .01).

Conclusions

Seizures are common among patients with LGG. Differences in preoperative or postoperative and intractable seizure rates by WHO 2016 classification were not detected. Our data showed a trend toward higher seizure incidence preoperatively in patients with IDH-mutant LGG. We describe a unique association between male sex and seizure incidence and intractability that warrants further study.

Low-grade developmental and epilepsy associated brain tumors: a critical update 2020

Brain tumors represent the second most frequent etiology in patients with focal seizure onset before 18 years of age and submitted to epilepsy surgery. Hence, this category of brain tumors, herein defined as low-grade, developmental, epilepsy-associated brain tumors (LEAT) is different from those frequently encountered in adults as (A): 77% of LEAT occur in the temporal lobe; (B): the vast majority of LEAT are of low malignancy and classified as WHO I°; (C): LEAT are often composed of mixed glial and neuronal cell components and present with variable growth patterns including small cysts or nodules; (D): LEAT do not share common gene driving mutations, such as IDH1 or 1p/19q co-deletions. Characteristic entities comprise the ganglioglioma (GG), the dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), the angiocentric glioma (AG), the isomorphic diffuse glioma (IDG) and the papillary glio-neuronal tumor (PGNT), representing 73.2% of 1680 tumors collected in a large German series of 6747 patients submitted to epilepsy surgery. In the realm of exciting discoveries of genetic drivers of brain tumors new genes have been also reported for LEAT. BRAF V600E mutations were linked to GG with CD34 expression, FGFR1 mutations to DNT, MYB alterations to AG and also IDG and PRKCA fusions to PGNT, suggesting the possibility to also develop a genetically driven tumor classification scheme for LEAT. Rare availability of LEAT in a single center is a challenging obstacle, however, to systematically unravel the neurobiological nature and clinical behavior of LEAT. Other challenges in need of clarification include malignant tumor progression of LEAT entities, seizure relapse in patients following bulk tumor resection and the controversial issue of associated focal cortical dysplasia as additional pathomechanism. In order to advance our understanding and promote reliable diagnostic work-up of LEAT, we recommend, therefore, international collaboration to achieve our goals.

An overview of anti-epileptic therapy management of patients with malignant tumors of the brain undergoing radiation therapy

As our surgical, radiation, chemotherapeutic and supportive therapies for brain malignancies improve, and overall survival is prolonged, appropriate symptom management in this patient population becomes increasingly important. This review summarizes the published literature and current practice patterns regarding prophylactic and perioperative anti-epileptic drug use. As a wide range of anti-epileptic drugs is now available to providers, evidence guiding appropriate anticonvulsant choice is reviewed. A particular focus of this article is radiation therapy for brain malignancies. Toxicities and seizure risk associated with cranial irradiation will be discussed. Epilepsy management in patients undergoing radiation for gliomas, glioblastoma multiforme, and brain metastases will be addressed. An emerging but inconsistent body of evidence, reviewed here, indicates that anti-epileptic medications may increase radiosensitivity, and therefore improve clinical outcomes, specifically in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Outcome of lesional epilepsy surgery: Report of the first comprehensive epilepsy program in Iran

Background

We investigated the utility of epilepsy surgery and postoperative outcome in patients with lesional epilepsy in Iran, a relatively resource-poor setting.

Methods

This prospective longitudinal study was conducted during 2007-2017 in Kashani Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Isfahan, Iran. Patients with a diagnosis of intractable focal epilepsy, with MRI lesions, who underwent epilepsy surgery and were followed up ≥ 24 months, were included and evaluated for postoperative outcome.

Results

A total of 214 patients, with a mean age of 26.90 ± 9.82 years (59.8% men) were studied. Complex partial seizure was the most common type of seizure (85.9%), and 54.2% of the cases had auras. Temporal lobe lesions (75.2%) and mesial temporal sclerosis (48.1%) were the most frequent etiologies. With a mean follow-up of 62.17 ± 19.33 months, 81.8% of patients became seizure-free postoperatively. Anticonvulsants were reduced in 86% of the cases and discontinued in 40.7%. In keeping with previous studies, we found that seizure freedom rates were lower among patients with longer follow-up periods.

Conclusions

We found high rates of seizure freedom after surgery in lesional epilepsy patients despite limited facilities and infrastructure; antiepileptic medications were successfully tapered in almost half of the patients. Considering the favorable outcome of epilepsy surgery in our series, we believe that it is a major treatment option, even in less resource-intensive settings, and should be encouraged. Strategies to allow larger scale utility of epilepsy surgery in such settings in the developing world and dissemination of such knowledge may be considered an urgent clinical need, given the established mortality and morbidity in refractory epilepsy.

Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma-Related Epilepsy

The World Health Organization classifies diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGGs) are highly epileptogenic primary brain tumors; epileptic seizures occur in more than 90% of cases. Epileptic seizures and drug resistance progress during the course of DLGGs. The glioma-related epileptogenic mechanisms are multifactorial; epileptogenic foci lie within the infiltrated peritumoral neocortex. A short seizure duration before surgery and a large extent of resection are the main predictors of postoperative seizure control in DLGGs. A supratotal resection of a DLGG can improve postoperative seizure control. Epileptic seizure at diagnosis positively affects DLGGs malignant transformation and overall survival.

Awake craniotomy in glioma surgery: is it necessary?

INTRODUCTION

The awake craniotomy has evolved from its humble beginnings in ancient cultures to become one of the most eloquent modern neurosurgical procedures. The development of intraoperative mapping techniques like direct electrostimulation of the cortex and subcortical white matter have further argued for its place in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium. Yet the suitability of the awake craniotomy with intraoperative functional mapping (ACWM) to optimize oncofunctional balance after peri-eloquent glioma resection continues to be a topic of active investigation as new methods of intraoperative monitoring and some unfavorable outcome data question its necessity.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The neurosurgery and anesthesiology literatures were scoured for English-language studies that analyzed or reviewed the ACWM or its components as applied to glioma surgery via the PubMed, ClinicalKey, and OvidMEDLINE® databases or via direct online searches of journal archives.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Information on background, conceptualization, standard techniques, and outcomes of the ACWM were provided and compared. We parceled the procedure into its components and qualitatively described positive and negative outcome data for each. Findings were presented in the context of each study without attempt at quantitative analysis or reconciliation of heterogeneity between studies. Certain illustrative studies were highlighted throughout the review. Overarching conclusions were drawn based on level of evidence, expert opinion, and predominate concordance of data across studies in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Most investigators and studies agree that the ACWM is the best currently available approach to optimize oncofunctional balance in this difficult-to-treat patient population. This qualitative review synthesizes the most currently available data on the topic to provide contemporaneous insight into how and why the ACWM has become a favorite operation of neurosurgeons worldwide for the resection of gliomas from eloquent brain.

[Clinical characteristics of epileptic seizures in insular gliomas]

AIM

To study the characteristics of epileptic seizures in insular gliomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with insular gliomas were examined. The spread of a tumor was established by MRI results and intraoperational findings. A tumor within the insular only was found in 9 out of 45 patients (7 left-sided and 2 right-sided). In 36 patients, a tumor slightly spread into temporal lobe pole and medial-basal regions of the frontal lobe (27 left-sided and 18 right-sided). The control group consisted of 50 patients with tumors of temporal and frontal lobes.

RESULTS

Paroxysmal symptoms were similar in patients with tumors of the insular and patients with tumors of temporal lobes. Seizures in patients with frontal lobe tumors differed significantly from insular and temporal tumors, with the exception of a tumor localized in the opercula area. The following quantitative differences were identified: different forms of unconsciousness were significantly less frequent in symptomatic epilepsy in patients with insular tumor than in epilepsy caused by temporal lobe tumors (36% of patients vs 84% in temporal tumors (p<0.0001)). In patients with insular tumors, olfactory and taste hallucinations occur more often compared to temporal lobe tumors (51% vs 16% (p<0.003). The frequency of paroxysmal seizures of fear and anxiety in patients with those tumors was similar (20% with insular tumors and 14 with temporal tumors). An autonomic component of episeizures did not differ between tumors of both localizations. Olfactory and taste hallucinations were qualitatively similar in insular and temporal lobe tumors: smell and taste were unpleasant or associated with a danger: smell of burning, gas, something spoiled, sour, tart chemistry, taste of somethong metallic, chemical, sour. No pleasant smell or taste were reported.

CONCLUSION

Epileptic seizures in insular tumors had similarities and certain differences compared with temporal seizures that well reflect function of the insula and its links, in the first turn, with limbic system structures.

Anticonvulsant therapy in brain-tumor related epilepsy

Background. The lifetime risk of patients with brain tumors to have focal epileptic seizures is 10-100%; the risk depends on different histology. Specific guidelines for drug treatment of brain tumor-related seizures have not yet been established.

Aim. This review addresses the special aspects of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in brain tumor-related epilepsy.

Methods. We analyzed the literature up to December 2015.

Results. Based on current evidence the management of tumor-related seizures does not differ substantially from that applied to epilepsies from other etiologies. Therefore, the choice of an AED is based, above all, on tolerability and pharmacokinetic interactions with chemotherapeutic drugs. Levetiracetam is recommended by many authors as first-line therapy in brain tumor-related epilepsy. Due to the possibility of interactions, the combination of enzyme-inducing AEDs and chemotherapeutic drugs, is usually not recommended as a first choice. Currently there is no evidence that prophylactic prescription of long-term AEDs in brain tumor-patients who did not present with seizures is justified. Because of the high risk of recurrence, however, AED treatment should be strongly considered after a single brain tumor-related seizure. The decision to withdraw AEDs must carefully consider the risk of seizure recurrence.

Conclusion. At present levetiracetam is the preferred drug in brain tumor-related epilepsy, especially when drug interactions need to be avoided. In the future we hope to acquire more targeted drugs against this disorder by uncovering its pathogenesis.

Tumour associated epilepsy and glutamate excitotoxicity in patients with gliomas

Tumour associated epilepsy (TAE) is common, debilitating and often not successfully controlled by surgical resection of the tumour and administration of multiple anti-epileptic drugs. It represents a cause of significant lost quality of life in an incurable disease and is therefore an important subject for ongoing research. The pathogenesis of TAE is likely to be multifactorial and involve, on the microscopic level, the interaction of genetic factors, changes in the peritumoural microenvironment, alterations in synaptic neurotransmitter release and re-uptake, and the excitotoxic effects of glutamate. On a macroscopic level, the occurrence of TAE is likely to be influenced by tumour size, location and interaction with environmental factors. The optimal treatment of TAE requires a multi-disciplinary approach with input from neurosurgeons, neurologists, radiologists, pathologists and basic scientists. This article reviews the current literature regarding the incidence, treatment, and aetiology of TAE.

Invasive EEG studies in tumor-related epilepsy: when are they indicated and with what kind of electrodes?

Patients with tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) represent an important proportion of epilepsy surgery cases. Recently established independent negative predictors of postoperative seizure outcome are long duration of epilepsy, presence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and incomplete tumor resection. In temporal lobe cases, additional hippocampectomy or corticectomy may further improve outcome. Invasive electroencephalography (EEG) recordings (IEEG) may be indicated to guide the resection by defining eloquent cortex (EC) or to determine the extent of potentially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative epileptogenic tissue. In fact, invasive recordings are reportedly used in up to 10% of patients who are undergoing epilepsy surgery for TRE. Following careful consideration of the concepts underlying epilepsy surgery, the current use of IEEG, and the predictors of outcome in extratemporal and temporal tumors in TRE, we postulate the following> (1) In patients with extratemporal TRE, IEEG is necessary only if the MRI lesion (and if feasible a rim around it) cannot be completely resected because of adjacent or overlapping EC. In these cases, EC should be mapped to determine its relationships to the lesion, the irritative, and seizure-onset zones in order to maximize the extent of the lesionectomy. (2) In patients with nondominant temporal TRE, data suggest that if epileptogenic tumors (ETs) are encroaching on mesial temporal structures, if epilepsy duration is long, and seizures are frequent and disabling, these structures should be included in the resection. (3) In patients with dominant temporal TRE, we suggest leaving the mesial structures in place if they are functionally and structurally intact and to consider resecting these structures only if they are structurally and functionally abnormal. There is insufficient evidence justifying the use of IEEG to define the extent of the epileptogenic zone in such cases. This should be reserved for cases where an initial lesionectomy has failed.

Brain mapping in tumors: intraoperative or extraoperative?

In nontumoral epilepsy surgery, the main goal for all preoperative investigation is to first determine the epileptogenic zone, and then to analyze its relation to eloquent cortex, in order to control seizures while avoiding adverse postoperative neurologic outcome. To this end, in addition to neuropsychological assessment, functional neuroimaging and scalp electroencephalography, extraoperative recording, and electrical mapping, especially using subdural strip- or grid-electrodes, has been reported extensively. Nonetheless, in tumoral epilepsy surgery, the rationale is different. Indeed, the first aim is rather to maximize the extent of tumor resection while minimizing postsurgical morbidity, in order to increase the median survival as well as to preserve quality of life. As a consequence, as frequently seen in infiltrating tumors such as gliomas, where these lesions not only grow but also migrate along white matter tracts, the resection should be performed according to functional boundaries both at cortical and subcortical levels. With this in mind, extraoperative mapping by strips/grids is often not sufficient in tumoral surgery, since in essence, it allows study of the cortex but cannot map subcortical pathways. Therefore, intraoperative electrostimulation mapping, especially in awake patients, is more appropriate in tumor surgery, because this technique allows real-time detection of areas crucial for cerebral functions--eloquent cortex and fibers--throughout the resection. In summary, rather than choosing one or the other of different mapping techniques, methodology should be adapted to each pathology, that is, extraoperative mapping in nontumoral epilepsy surgery and intraoperative mapping in tumoral surgery.

The significance of IDH1 mutations in tumor-associated seizure in 60 Chinese patients with low-grade gliomas

Background. Seizure is a common clinical presentation in patients suffering from primary brain tumors, especially from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). However, the genetic factors of tumor-associated seizure, at present, are still very poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential correlation between tumor-associated epilepsy and IDH1 mutations in a Chinese population with LGGs. Materials and Methods. This study reviewed 60 patients with histologically confirmed low-grade gliomas, and the status of IDH1 was detected after the operation at our institution. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore the potential risk factors for tumor-related seizures. Results. IDH1 mutation was detected in 46 (76.7%) patients, among which 14 patients had no epilepsies and 32 patients had epilepsies (P = 0.023, chi-square test). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the mutation of IDH1 seems to be the strongest predictor for preoperative seizure (OR, 6.130; 95% CI, 1.523–24.669; P = 0.011). Conclusions. IDH1 mutation was frequently detected in LGGs, and it may result in tumor-related seizures.

Surgery for low-grade glioma infiltrating the central cerebral region: location as a predictive factor for neurological deficit, epileptological outcome, and quality of life

Object

A main concern with regard to surgery for low-grade glioma (LGG, WHO Grade II) is maintenance of the patient's functional integrity. This concern is particularly relevant for gliomas in the central region, where damage can have grave repercussions. The authors evaluated postsurgical outcomes with regard to neurological deficits, seizures, and quality of life.

Methods

Outcomes were compared for 33 patients with central LGG (central cohort) and a control cohort of 31 patients with frontal LGG (frontal cohort), all of whom had had medically intractable seizures before undergoing surgery with mapping while awake. All surgeries were performed in the period from February 2007 through April 2010 at the same institution.

Results

For the central cohort, the median extent of resection was 92% (range 80%–97%), and for the frontal cohort, the median extent of resection was 93% (range 83%–98%; p = 1.0). Although the rate of mild neurological deficits was similar for both groups, seizure freedom (Engel Class I) was achieved for only 4 (12.1%) of 33 patients in the central cohort compared with 26 (83.9%) of 31 patients in the frontal cohort (p < 0.0001). The rate of return to work was lower for patients in the central cohort (4 [12.1%] of 33) than for the patients in the frontal cohort (28 [90.3%] of 31; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Resection of central LGG is feasible and safe when appropriate intraoperative mapping is used. However, seizure control for these patients remains poor, a finding that contrasts markedly with seizure control for patients in the frontal cohort and with that reported in the literature. For patients with central LGG, poor seizure control ultimately determines quality of life because most will not be able to return to work.

MEG network differences between low- and high-grade glioma related to epilepsy and cognition

Objective

To reveal possible differences in whole brain topology of epileptic glioma patients, being low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. We studied functional networks in these patients and compared them to those in epilepsy patients with non-glial lesions (NGL) and healthy controls. Finally, we related network characteristics to seizure frequency and cognitive performance within patient groups.

Methods

We constructed functional networks from pre-surgical resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of 13 LGG patients, 12 HGG patients, 10 NGL patients, and 36 healthy controls. Normalized clustering coefficient and average shortest path length as well as modular structure and network synchronizability were computed for each group. Cognitive performance was assessed in a subset of 11 LGG and 10 HGG patients.

Results

LGG patients showed decreased network synchronizability and decreased global integration compared to healthy controls in the theta frequency range (4–8 Hz), similar to NGL patients. HGG patients’ networks did not significantly differ from those in controls. Network characteristics correlated with clinical presentation regarding seizure frequency in LGG patients, and with poorer cognitive performance in both LGG and HGG glioma patients.

Conclusion

Lesion histology partly determines differences in functional networks in glioma patients suffering from epilepsy. We suggest that differences between LGG and HGG patients’ networks are explained by differences in plasticity, guided by the particular lesional growth pattern. Interestingly, decreased synchronizability and decreased global integration in the theta band seem to make LGG and NGL patients more prone to the occurrence of seizures and cognitive decline.

Epilepsy in the end-of-life phase in patients with high-grade gliomas

Epilepsy is common in patients with brain tumors. Patients presenting seizures as the first sign of a malignant glioma are at increased risk of recurrent seizures despite treatment with antiepileptic drugs. However, little is known about the incidence of epilepsy in the last stage of disease and in the end-of-life phase of brain tumor patients. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of seizures in the last months of life in a series of patients affected by high-grade gliomas who were assisted at home during the whole course of the disease until death. A total of 157 patients were available for analysis. Of these patients, 58 (36.9 %) presented seizures in the last month before death. The risk of seizures in the end-of-life phase is higher in patients presenting previous history of epilepsy, particularly in patients with late-onset epilepsy. Out of the 58 patients presenting seizures in the last month of life, 86.2 % had previously had seizures and 13.8 % were seizure free. Most patients may encounter swallowing difficulties in taking anticonvulsants orally due to dysphagia and disturbances of consciousness, thus anticonvulsant treatment needs to be modified in advance. Loss of seizure control in the end-of-life phase may influence the quality of life of patients and their caregivers.

[Efficacy and safety of intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping for resection of WHO grade ii and iii gliomas within eloquent areas]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing use of intraoperative electrical stimulation (IES) mapping for the resection of WHO grade ii and iii gliomas (GGII and GGIII) in eloquent areas, few studies have compared 2 series with and without IES. The present study compares 2 series of patients operated with and without IES at the same institution, analyzing the extent of resection, neurological morbidity, epilepsy prognosis and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The surgical results in 2 series of patients with GGII and GGIII within eloquent were compared. Period A (2004-2009): 17 patients operated without IES. Period B (2009-2010): 19 patients operated with IES.

RESULTS

The extent of tumor resection was 54.7% in group A and 79.9% in group B (P=.006). Six months after surgery, neurological morbidity was present in 8 patients of group A and one patient of group B (P=.015; odds ratio [OR] 16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.7-148.3). Two patients of group A with refractory epilepsy, and 8 patients of group B improved epilepsy control (P=.05; OR 42, 95% CI 2.1-825.7). Nine patients of group A and 18 patients of group B returned to the same socio-professional situation as before surgery (P=.015; OR 16, 95% CI 1.7-148.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of IES mapping surgery to conventional surgery revealed that the former enables to: increase in 25.2% the extent of tumor resection, decrease in 48.1% the risk of permanent sequelae, improve epilepsy control and preserve quality of life.

Seizures and the natural history of World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a review

OBJECTIVE

The majority of adults with low-grade gliomas have seizures. Despite the frequency of seizures as initial symptoms and symptoms of later disease, seizures in relation to the natural course of low-grade gliomas have received little attention.

METHODS

In this review, we provide an update of the literature on the prognostic impact of preoperative seizures and discuss the tumor- and treatment-related factors affecting seizure control at later stages of the disease.

RESULTS

Seizures occur most frequently at disease presentation and predict a more favorable outcome. Initial seizures are correlated with tumor location and possibly indirectly to the molecular profile of the tumor. About 50% of all patients with seizures at presentation continue to have seizures before surgery. Maximal tumor resection, including resection of epileptic foci, is a valuable strategy for improving seizure control. In addition, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as single therapies or in combination with surgery, have shown beneficial effects in terms of seizure reduction. Recurrent seizures after macroscopically complete tumor resection may be a marker for accelerated tumor growth. Recurrent seizures after an initial transient stabilization after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy may be a marker for anaplastic tumor transformation.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative seizures likely reflect, apart from tumor location, intrinsic tumor properties as well. Change in seizure control in individual patients is frequently associated with altered tumor behavior. Including seizures and seizure control as clinical parameters is recommended in future trials of low-grade gliomas to further establish the prognostic value of these symptoms and to identify the factors affecting seizure control.

Intractable epilepsy in paralimbic Word Health Organization Grade II gliomas: should the hippocampus be resected when not invaded by the tumor?

OBJECT

Beyond its oncological benefit, surgery could improve seizure control in paralimbic frontotemporoinsular or temporoinsular WHO Grade II gliomas generating intractable seizures. However, no studies have examined the impact of hippocampal resection on chronic epilepsy when the hippocampus is not invaded by Grade II gliomas. Here, the authors compared the epileptological outcomes and return to work in 2 groups of patients who underwent surgery with or without hippocampectomy for paralimbic Grade II gliomas eliciting intractable epilepsy despite no tumoral involvement of the hippocampus.

METHODS

Surgery was performed in 15 consecutive patients who were unable to work (median Karnofsky Performance Scale [KPS] Score 70) because of refractory epilepsy due to paralimbic Grade II gliomas that were not invading the hippocampus. In Group A (8 patients), the hippocampus was preserved. In Group B (7 patients), glioma removal was associated with hippocampectomy.

RESULTS

No patient died or suffered a permanent deficit after surgery. Postoperatively, in Group A, no patients were seizure free (4 patients were in Engel Class II and 4 were in Class III). In Group B, all 7 patients were seizure free (Class I) (p = 0.02). Only 62.5% of patients returned to work in Group A, whereas all patients are working full time in Group B. The postsurgical median KPS score was 85 in Group A, that is, not significantly improved in comparison with the preoperative score, while the postsurgical median KPS was 95 in Group B, that is, significantly improved in comparison with the preoperative score (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' data support, for the first time, the significant impact of hippocampectomy in patients with intractable epilepsy generated by a paralimbic Grade II glioma, even if it does not invade the hippocampus. Hippocampal resection allowed seizure control in all patients, with an improvement in KPS scores, since all patients resumed their social and professional activities. Thus, the authors suggest performing a resection of the nontumoral hippocampus in addition to resection of the tumor in patients with refractory epilepsy due to paralimbic Grade II gliomas.

Postoperative seizures following the resection of convexity meningiomas: are prophylactic anticonvulsants indicated?

Object

Seizures in the perioperative period are a well-recognized clinical entity in the setting of brain tumor surgery. At present, the suitability of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients following brain tumor surgery is unclear, especially in those without prior seizures. Given the paucity of tumor-type and site-specific data, the authors evaluated the incidence of postoperative seizures in patients with convexity meningiomas and no prior seizures.

Methods

The authors identified 180 patients with no preoperative history of seizures who underwent resection of a convexity meningioma. Some patients received antiepileptic prophylaxis for 7 days postoperatively while others did not, based on the practice patterns of different attendings. The rates of clinically evident seizures in the first 3–4 weeks after surgery were compared.

Results

Patients who received antiepilepsy drugs (129 patients) did not significantly differ from those who did not (51 patients) in terms of age, sex, WHO tumor grade, extent of resection, rate of previous cranial surgery or radiation therapies, or use of preoperative embolization. There was a single new postoperative seizure in the entire cohort, yielding a new seizure rate of 1.9% in patients not on antiepileptic prophylaxis compared with 0% in patients on antiepileptics (p = not significant).

Conclusions

While it is thought that the routine use of prophylactic antiepileptics may prevent new seizures in patients undergoing surgery for a convexity meningioma, the rate of new seizures in untreated patients is probably very low. Data in this study call into question whether the cost and side effects of these medications are worth the small benefit their administration may confer.

Evidence for the genesis of WHO grade II glioma in an asymptomatic young adult using repeated MRIs

As the natural course of WHO grade II glioma (G2G) during their initial silent period is unknown, the G2G genesis and their "date of birth" are a matter of debate. Here, a left temporo-insular G2G was discovered incidentally in a 31-year-old man in 2009 (MRI performed for a Chiari malformation). The mean tumor diameter increased from 29 (April 2009) to 31 mm (October 2009) before surgery. Since we recently demonstrated that the growth rate is constant during the initial silent period in G2G, the extrapolation backward in time leads to date the glioma birth in 2002. This observation is in agreement with an MRI performed in 1997, where no signal abnormality was detected. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that the tumorigenesis of a G2G occurs during the young adult period. In addition, estimation of the date of birth may serve as a reproducible "starting point" when analyzing survivals in series of G2G.

Epilepsy and brain tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present an overview of the recent findings in pathophysiology and management of epileptic seizures in patients with brain tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low-grade gliomas are the most epileptogenic brain tumors. Regarding pathophysiology, the role of peritumoral changes [hypoxia and acidosis, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, increase or decrease of neurotransmitters and receptors] are of increasing importance. Tumor-associated epilepsy and tumor growth could have some common molecular pathways. Total/subtotal surgical resection (with or without epilepsy surgery) allows a seizure control in a high percentage of patients. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well have a role. New antiepileptic drugs are promising, both in terms of efficacy and tolerability. The resistance to antiepileptic drugs is still a major problem: new insights into pathogenesis are needed to develop strategies to manipulate the pharmakoresistance.

SUMMARY

Epileptic seizures in brain tumors have been definitely recognized as one of the major problems in patients with brain tumors, and need specific and multidisciplinary approaches.

Epilepsy and insular Grade II gliomas: an interdisciplinary point of view from a retrospective monocentric series of 46 cases

OBJECT

There are few data in the literature concerning a multimodal approach to insular WHO Grade II gliomas (GIIGs) and the control of epilepsy after treatment. In this paper, the authors describe a monocentric series of 46 cases in which patients underwent various sequential treatments for insular GIIGs. On the basis of global results with regard to epilepsy, the respective interests in the various treatments are discussed.

METHODS

Available data on 46 patients harboring insular GIIGs were extracted from a local database of 288 GIIGs. The various therapeutic sequences were analyzed in parallel with the course of seizure frequency.

RESULTS

Despite the usual difficulties with seizure quantification in retrospective studies, the authors showed that 1) the negative course of seizure frequency was mostly connected to tumor progression, 2) surgery almost always had a favorable effect on epilepsy, and 3) chemotherapy had a mostly favorable effect with acceptable tolerance. The authors were unable to draw conclusions about the role of radiotherapy given the too few cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive experience with insular GIIGs tends to confirm interest in their surgical removal and supports interest in chemotherapy from an epileptological point of view.