Epidemiology, Demographics, Triptan Contraindications, and Prescription Patterns of Patients with Migraine: A German Claims Database Study

Introduction

Migraine is a neurological disease with a considerable economic and societal burden that negatively impacts quality of life and productivity. Triptans are potent serotonin receptor agonists widely used to treat migraine attacks. Little is known about German patients with migraine diagnosed with triptan contraindications or those who discontinue triptans.

Methods

This retrospective observational study identifies adults with migraine from a German sickness fund database (2010–2018). Migraine prevalence was calculated for the database population and extrapolated to the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) population. Medication use, proportion and demographics of patients with triptan contraindications, prevalence of triptan discontinuation and use of triptans by patients with contraindications were analysed.

Results

In total 120,170 patients with migraine were identified in the database population, of whom 77.7% were female; migraine prevalence was 2.0% (male) and 7.3% (female), leading to an extrapolated 2,923,979 patients with migraine in the entire German SHI population (2019); of these, 14.5% had ≥ 1 triptan contraindication. The most frequent contraindication was a history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack. However, an extrapolated 25.9% of patients who had a triptan contraindication received a triptan prescription following diagnosis. We calculated that 975,698 patients in the entire German SHI population had ever received a triptan, of whom 596,364 did not receive a triptan prescription in the follow-up year. Of these 596,364 individuals, 96.6% continued to receive a migraine diagnosis after their last triptan prescription. These ‘triptan discontinuers’ were predominantly female (82.6%). Most patients utilized only one specific triptan, with a large majority of ongoing triptan users who had used this specific triptan receiving > 4 prescriptions.

Conclusion

We confirm the existence of German patients with migraine and unmet therapeutic needs. These are patients diagnosed with triptan contraindications or patients who have discontinued triptan use despite continued migraine attacks. More research is needed to ascertain reasons for triptan discontinuation and the risk of triptan use by patients with contraindications.

Administrative prevalence and incidence, characteristics and prescription patterns of patients with migraine in Germany: a retrospective claims data analysis

Background

Migraine is a frequent headache disorder with high disease burden. The aims of this study were to determine the administrative prevalence and incidence of migraine in Germany; and to elucidate disease characteristics, prescription patterns and the patient journey through the German healthcare system.

Methods

In this retrospective, observational study, adult patients with migraine (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, German modification G43) were identified in the anonymised German Company Sickness Fund database (CSFD) from 2008 through 2016. The administrative prevalence and incidence of migraine were calculated for the total CSFD study population and extrapolated to the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) population. Migraine subtypes, concurrent diagnoses, prescription patterns and visited healthcare professional groups were analysed.

Results

A total of 243,471 patients with migraine were identified in the CSFD (2008–2016); 78.0% were female and 45.3% were aged 35–54 years. The administrative prevalence of migraine, extrapolated to the SHI population, ranged between 2.89% in 2008 and 3.98% in 2016; administrative incidence ranged from 0.587% in 2009 to 0.267% in 2016, and varied between 0.399% and 0.442% during 2011 to 2015. Overall, 29.1% of patients received at least one prescription for any preventive medication listed in the German guideline. Only 7.9% received the same preventive medication for more than 1 year, with 82.9% of these patients discontinuing the medication before study end. Regarding acute medications, 74.2% of prescriptions were for analgesics/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 21.2% were for triptans. General practitioners most commonly diagnosed and treated migraine in the CSFD population. Patients with prescriptions for two or more different preventive therapy classes had higher use of acute and emergency medications, and visited healthcare professionals and hospitals more frequently than patients with no prescriptions or prescriptions for only one preventive therapy class.

Conclusions

The administrative prevalence of migraine in this claims database suggests many patients with migraine did not seek medical care. Of those who did, fewer than one-third received preventive medication, with most patients having been prescribed only one such medication and few having continued treatment beyond 1 year. These outcomes suggest there is scope for improvement in migraine management in Germany.

Sex, Gender, and Orofacial Pain

This review examines gender prevalence in orofacial pain to elucidate underlying factors that can explain such differences. This review highlights how gender affects (1) the association of hormonal factors and pain modulation; (2) the genetic aspects influencing pain sensitivity and pain perception; (3) the role of resting blood pressure and pain threshold; and (4) the impact of sociocultural, environmental, and psychological factors on pain.

Headaches in multiple sclerosis patients might imply an inflammatorial process

Recent studies on Multiple Sclerosis (MS) pathology mention the involvement of "tertiary B cell follicles" in MS pathogenesis. This inflammatory process, which occurs with interindividually great variance, might be a link between MS pathology and headaches. The aim of this study was to detect the prevalence of headaches and of subtypes of headaches (migraine, cluster, tension-type headache [TTH]) in an unselected MS collective and to compile possibly influencing factors. Unselected MS patients (n = 180) with and without headache were examined by a semi-structured interview using a questionnaire about headache, depression and the health status. Additionally clinical MS data (expanded disability state score [EDSS], MS course, medication, disease duration) were gathered. N = 98 MS patients (55.4%) reported headaches in the previous 4 weeks. We subsequently grouped headache patients according to the IHS criteria and detected 16 (16.3%) MS patients suffering from migraine (migraine with aura: 2 [2%]; migraine without aura: 14 [14.3%]), 23 (23.5%) suffering from TTH and none with a cluster headache. Thus, headaches of 59 (60.2%) MS patients remained unclassified. When comparing MS patients with and without headaches significant differences in age, gender, MS course, physical functioning, pain and social functioning occurred. MS patients with headaches were significantly younger of age (p = 0.001), female (p = 0.001) and reported more often of a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and relapsing/remitting MS (RRMS) instead of secondary chronic progressive MS (SCP). EDSS was significantly lower in MS patients suffering from headaches compared to the MS patients without headaches (p = 0.001). In conclusion headache in MS patients is a relevant symptom, especially in early stages of the MS disease. Especially unclassified headache seems to represent an important symptom in MS course and requires increased attention.

Primary headache disorders

Primary headache disorders include migraine, tension-type headaches, and the trigeminal autonomic cephalgias (TACs). "Primary" refers to a lack of clear underlying causative pathology, trauma, or systemic disease. The TACs include cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania, and short-lasting neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing; hemicrania continua, although classified separately by the International Headache Society, shares many features of both migraine and the TACs. This article describes the features and treatment of these disorders.

Influence of temperature changes on migraine occurrence in Germany

Many factors trigger migraine attacks. Weather is often reported to be one of the most common migraine triggers. However, there is little scientific evidence about the underlying mechanisms and causes. In our pilot study, we used smartphone apps and a web form to collect around 4,700 migraine messages in Germany between June 2011 and February 2012. Taking interdiurnal temperature changes as an indicator for changes in the prevailing meteorological conditions, our analyses were focused on the relationship between temperature changes and the frequency of occurrence of migraine attacks. Linear trends were fitted to the total number of migraine messages with respect to temperature changes. Statistical and systematic errors were estimated. Both increases and decreases in temperature lead to a significant increase in the number of migraine messages. A temperature increase (decrease) of 5 °C resulted in an increase of 19 ± 7 % (24 ± 8 %) in the number of migraine messages.

Diagnostic distribution of 100 unilateral, side-locked headaches consulting a specialized clinic

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the diagnoses of patients consulting due to strictly unilateral headaches.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 100 consecutive patients. Diagnosis followed the ICHD-II criteria.

RESULTS

They accounted for 18.9% of the 528 patients seen in the study period. They were more frequent in males (58%). Age ranged from 19 to 81 years. Diagnostic distribution was: cluster headache (38 cases), a variety of secondary headaches (14 cases), migraine (11 cases), cervicogenic headaches (9 cases), hemicrania continua (8 cases), nummular headache (6 cases), psychiatric headache (5 cases), paroxysmal hemicranias (4 cases), short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks syndrome (3 cases), stabbing headache (1 case), and hypnic headache (1 case). Mean ages at onset fell between 47 and 58 years for several diagnoses (cervicogenic, nummular, psychiatric, hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania headaches), and were 22 years for migraine, 32 for cluster and in general older than 55 years for secondary headaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Strictly unilateral headaches account for almost 20% of headaches in subjects attending a headache clinic. Trigeminal-autonomic cephalgias in general (52%) and cluster headache in particular (38%) are the most frequent diagnoses, but secondary headaches account for 1 of 5 cases. Age at onset can be of help in their presumptive diagnosis.

Diagnostic work-up of an elderly patient with unilateral head and neck pain. A case report

Headache patients frequently contact physiotherapists and manual therapists. In case of elderly patients with unilateral headache, neck and facial pain clinical practice guidelines recommend further referral for medical investigation to exclude red flags. The present patient was seen in a multidisciplinary headache clinic. He was referred by the neurologist (headache specialist) for physiotherapeutic assessment after screening for red flags, including giant cell arteritis (GCA). After first assessment, GCA was considered unlikely, since the sedimentation rate, as a marker for inflammation, was only slightly elevated. The purpose of the referral was to exclude cervicogenic headache (CEH) and to explore physical treatment as a therapeutic option. Physiotherapeutic assessment consisted of a history taking on CEH signs (Sjaastad criteria, 1998), followed by cervical spine assessment including tests for neck mobility, joint pain, and endurance of the short neck flexors. The patient's history revealed no specific signs of CEH and cervical spine assessment was negative. In consultation with the neurologist, the diagnosis of CEH was abandoned. Since palpation of the temporal artery proved to be painful, laboratory examination and biopsy of the temporal artery were thereafter performed, this time revealing GCA. Appropriate treatment (high dose steroids) was initiated promptly, with a good clinical evolution. The presented case shows the potential of a multidisciplinary collaboration in the clinical diagnostic work-up of patients with head and neck pain.

Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias

1. Trigeminal autonomic cephalgias (TACs) are headaches/facial pains classified together based on:a suspected common pathophysiology involving the trigeminovascular system, the trigeminoparasympathetic reflex and centres controlling circadian rhythms;a similar clinical presentation of trigeminal pain, and autonomic activation. 2. There is much overlap in the diagnostic features of individual TACs. 3. In contrast, treatment response is relatively specific and aids in establishing a definitive diagnosis. 4. TACs are often presentations of underlying pathology; all patients should be imaged. 5. The aim of the article is to provide the reader with a broad introduction to, and an overview of, TACs. The reading list is extensive for the interested reader.

Clinical features of unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache and their response to indomethacin

The majority of previous studies on unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache have focussed on certain disorders such as paroxysmal hemicrania, SUNCT and primary stabbing headache. We assessed headache characteristics, importance of neuroimaging and response to indomethacin in an unselected series of uncommon unilateral headaches. We investigated all consecutive patients presented with unilateral headaches not fulfilling ICHD-II criteria of migraine and cluster headache. Patients underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography as well as an indo-test, i.e. oral indomethacin 75 mg b.i.d. for 3 days. Among 63 patients we diagnosed primary stabbing headache in 12 patients, (probable) paroxysmal hemicrania in 6 and tension-type headache in 3 patients. One patient each had probable SUNCT, new daily persistent headache and nasociliary neuralgia. Eight patients had a secondary headache and 31 could not be classified according to ICDH-II. Imaging revealed lesions causally related to the headache in 8 patients. Indo-test achieved full remission of headache in 13 of 51 patients. At follow-up 11 ± 3 months after the first visit 29% of the patients were headache-free for ≥3 months. In conclusion, almost half of the patients presented with unilateral headaches beyond migraine and cluster headache cannot be classified according to ICHD-II. Among classifiable headaches primary stabbing headache was the most common. Imaging should be considered to rule out secondary headaches. The course is favourable in one third of the patients.