Administering influenza vaccine to egg-allergic persons

Vaccines and allergy: Back to the right places

Hypersensitivity reactions represent one of the most common causes of hesitancy for adherence to national vaccination programs. The majority of hypersensitivity reactions after vaccination are mild, and anaphylaxis is reported to be rare, although it remains challenging to estimate the frequency attributed to each single vaccine, either because of the lower number of administered doses of less common vaccines, or the administration of simultaneous vaccine in most of the vaccination programs. Although literature remains scattered, international consensus guides clinicians in identifying patients who might need the administration of vaccines in protected environments due to demonstrated hypersensitivity to vaccine components or adjuvants. Here we provide the current guidance on hypersensitivity reactions to vaccines and on vaccination of children with allergy disorders.

Safe administration of yellow fever vaccine in patients with suspected egg allergy

Background

The evidence available in the literature on the administration and safety of the yellow fever vaccine in patients with egg allergy is limited.

Objective

We sought to describe the administration of yellow fever vaccine in children with suspected egg allergy using a simplified protocol.

Methods

Children referred to the service from February 2018 to January 2020 with a history of possible egg allergy were classified as probably egg-allergic or not on the basis of history and specific IgE testing. A vaccine prick test was performed only in those with a history of an anaphylactic reaction to egg ingestion and if the result was positive the vaccine was administered in a 2-step protocol (2 equal doses of 0.25 mL with an interval of 30 minutes between the 2 applications). All other children received the vaccine as a single dose.

Results

A total of 435 children were evaluated; 48.27% were probably not allergic, and 51.72% were probably allergic to egg, of which 32.88% were considered anaphylactic. A total of 414 (95.2%) children had no vaccine reactions. Of the 21 (4.8%) children who had some reaction, 10 experienced a local reaction, 9 a mild skin reaction distant from the vaccine site, 1 presented local cutaneous reaction distant to the vaccination site, and 1 patient developed possible anaphylaxis. The vaccine prick test did not predict a vaccine reaction (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.25-6.72; P = .67).

Conclusions

Yellow fever vaccine can be safely administered as a single dose in children with a confirmed or suspected egg allergy.

Evaluation and Management of Food Allergies in the Emergency Department

Food allergies are a common and serious cause of illness, accounting for an increasing number of emergency department visits annually. Although definite diagnosis lays outside of an emergency department visit, the clinical management of the most serious food allergies highlights emergency care. The staple of acute care remains epinephrine in association with antihistamines and steroids. The greatest threat remains undertreatment for this group of disorders and underutilization of epinephrine. Those who have been treated for a food allergy need a follow-up allergist evaluation, guidance of food avoidance, and avoidance of foods with cross-sensitivities as well as ready access to epinephrine.

Allergic Reactions to Vaccines in Children: From Constituents to Specific Vaccines

Vaccination is an essential public health measure that helps to reduce the burden of infectious diseases in children. Although vaccines have an excellent safety record and the association of severe allergic reactions is rare, public concerns about vaccine safety can lead to incomplete vaccination coverage in children with or without allergies. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms and implications of allergic reactions to vaccines and define strategies to manage them to provide the safest care for vaccine recipients. In this review, we provide an overview on the types of allergic reactions that can occur after vaccination, including those caused by various vaccine constituents. We also discuss the mechanisms underlying these allergic reactions and the recommended diagnosis and management strategies for children with a history of suspected allergic reactions to vaccines. An improved understanding of allergic reactions to vaccines can aid in the enhancement of the safety and effectiveness of vaccination.

Development of low-cost cage-like particles to formulate veterinary vaccines

Low-cost adjuvants are urgently needed for the development of veterinary vaccines able to trigger strong immune responses. In this work, we describe a method to obtain a low-cost cage-like particles (ISCOMATRIX-like) adjuvant useful to formulate veterinary vaccines candidates. The main components to form the particles are lipids and saponins, which were obtained from egg yolk by ethanolic extraction and by dialyzing a non-refined saponins extract, respectively. Lipids were fully characterized by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and gas-chromatography (GC) and enzymatic methods, and saponins were characterized by TLC, HPLC and MALDI-TOF. Cage-like particles were prepared with these components or with commercial inputs. Both particles and the traditional Alum used in veterinary vaccines were compared by immunizing mice with Ovalbumin (OVA) formulated with these adjuvants and assessing IgG1, IgG2a anti OVA antibodies and specific Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH). In the yolk extract, a mixture of phospholipids, cholesterol and minor components of the extract (e.g. lyso-phospholipids) with suitable proportions to generate cage-like particles was obtained. Also, semi-purified saponins with similar features to those of the QuilA® were obtained. Cage-like particles prepared with these components have 40-50 nm and triggers similar levels of Anti-OVA IgG1 and DTH than with commercial inputs but higher specific-IgG2a. Both adjuvants largely increased the levels of IgG1, IgG2a and DTH in relation to the formulation with Alum. The methods described to extract lipids from egg yolk and saponins from non-refined extract allowed us to obtain an inexpensive and highly effective adjuvant.

Anaphylaxis to additives in vaccines

Anaphylaxis in connection with the administration of vaccines occurs only very rarely. Triggers of immunoglobulin IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis—in addition to the active ingredient itself—may be excipients contained in the vaccine due to their special properties. Some of the excipients in medicinal products are the same compounds used as additives in food. Furthermore, residues from the manufacturing process (e.g., chicken egg white, casein, antibiotics, formaldehyde) or contaminants (e.g., from the primary packaging material) may be potential triggers of anaphylaxis in vaccines. This review article provides an overview of ingredients in vaccines that pose an allergenic risk potential. The components of COVID-19 vaccines approved and marketed in Germany are discussed with regard to their potential for triggering anaphylaxis and possible pathophysiological mechanisms involved.

The adverse reactions to vaccines practice parameter 10 years on-what have we learned?

OBJECTIVE

To provide updated information on the evaluation and management of adverse reactions to vaccines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed (MEDLINE) search since publication of a practice parameter in 2012.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Original articles and guidelines on adverse reactions to vaccines, including vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

RESULTS

Current guidelines conclude that patients with egg allergy are not at increased risk for reaction to egg-based influenza vaccines. Except for gelatin, most patients with allergy to vaccine constituents tolerate vaccines containing them. Most patients who have immediate reactions after receiving COVID-19 vaccines go on to receive a subsequent dose uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

The risk of reactions to vaccination should be weighed against the risk of having a vaccine-preventable disease if the vaccine is withheld. There is no need to ask about egg allergy before the administration of influenza vaccines, including on screening forms. In most cases, an allergy to a vaccine constituent is not a contraindication to the vaccine containing it. Patients who have had possible anaphylactic reactions to vaccines should be evaluated by an allergist rather than simply being labeled allergic, because most can go on to receive subsequent doses. Most immediate reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are not allergic, and care should be taken to not label such reactions as anaphylactic. The role, if any, of polyethylene glycol in these reactions has yet to be revealed.

Anaphylaxie auf Zusatzstoffe in Impfstoffen

Anaphylaxien im zeitlichen Zusammenhang mit der Verabreichung von Impfstoffen treten nur sehr selten auf. Auslöser von IgE-vermittelten und nicht IgE-vermittelten Anaphylaxien können neben dem Wirkstoff selbst Hilfsstoffe sein, die aufgrund spezieller Eigenschaften im Impfstoff enthalten sind. Bei den Hilfsstoffen in Arzneimitteln handelt es sich teilweise um dieselben Verbindungen, die als Zusatzstoffe in Lebensmitteln eingesetzt werden. Weiterhin kommen in Impfstoffen Rückstände aus dem Herstellungsprozess (z. B. Hühnereiweiß, Kasein, Antibiotika, Formaldehyd) oder Kontaminationen (z. B. aus dem Primärpackmittel) als potenzielle Auslöser von Anaphylaxien in Frage. Der vorliegende Review gibt einen Überblick über Bestandteile in Impfstoffen, von denen ein allergenes Risikopotenzial ausgeht. Die Bestandteile der in Deutschland zugelassenen COVID-19-Impfstoffe als potenzielle Auslöser von Anaphylaxien und mögliche pathophysiologische Mechanismen werden diskutiert.

Zitierweise: Mahler V, Junker AC. Anaphylaxis to additives in vaccines. Allergo J Int 2022;31: 123-36

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-022-00215-8

Evaluation and Management of Food Allergies in the Emergency Department

Food allergies are a common and serious cause of illness, accounting for an increasing number of emergency department visits annually. Although definite diagnosis lays outside of an emergency department visit, the clinical management of the most serious food allergies highlights emergency care. The staple of acute care remains epinephrine in association with antihistamines and steroids. The greatest threat remains undertreatment for this group of disorders and underutilization of epinephrine. Those who have been treated for a food allergy need a follow-up allergist evaluation, guidance of food avoidance, and avoidance of foods with cross-sensitivities as well as ready access to epinephrine.

Evaluation of Adverse Reactions to Vaccines

The development and widespread use of vaccination over the past centuries has been the single most impactful intervention in public health, by effectively preventing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. Vaccination is generally well tolerated in the vast majority of the population, and the benefits of vaccination largely outweigh the risk of severe adverse events in the majority of patients. Vaccine hesitancy can be a significant concern and lead to infectious disease outbreaks. All health care providers play an important role in maintaining public confidence in vaccines because their attitude and knowledge is often critical in facilitating acceptance of a vaccine. The purpose of this review is to first, provide an understanding of the basic concepts that are relevant to vaccine pharmacovigilance, and secondly, to provide an overview and discuss management of both immune and nonimmune adverse events after vaccination.

Update of the S2k guideline on the management of IgE-mediated food allergies

Not available.

Factors Affecting Influenza Vaccination Rate in Adults with Asthma

Asthma is considered one of the most common noncommunicable diseases worldwide, with an incidence of 5.4% in the Polish, adult population. Symptoms of the disease can be triggered or worsened by a variety of factors including viral infection such as influenza, affirming the necessity for prophylactic vaccination. However, there is concern among the general population of the possibility of anaphylactic response to vaccination, which can deter patients with allergic asthma for fear of triggering exacerbation of their condition. The objective of the study was to determine the extent to which patients with asthma adhere to a schedule of recommended vaccinations in Poland. Two hundred fourteen patients were recruited from specialist outpatient clinics in Warsaw to complete voluntarily an anonymous questionnaire created for the purpose of this study. Within the past year, 82% stated having at least one respiratory infection, and 72% of patients were aware of the recommendation for annual vaccination against the flu. Forty-three percent of patients reported receiving the flu vaccine at least once, and only 20% followed through with annual vaccination. The most common sources of information about the importance of annual flu vaccination were from their doctors (47%) and the media (26%). Relatively few asthmatic patients in Warsaw get annual flu vaccinations despite the recommendations. These results were mainly sourced due to uncorrected fears and a lack of information about the importance of prophylaxis in asthma. It is essential to create effective strategies to inform patients with asthma of the importance of annual vaccinations.

Food Allergy Management

The management of food allergies requires the cooperation of the food allergic person, physician, family, and social contacts. For children, school management of food allergies is a key component of the overall approach. Recognition of the signs and symptoms of allergic reactions and preparation to administer the appropriate treatment of mild and severe symptoms in the event of accidental exposure is necessary. Avoidance of food allergens is facilitated by label reading and dietary guidance is extremely important to minimize nutritional deficiencies. Medications and vaccines with food-derived excipients generally do not need to be avoided because, in most cases, they contain little food protein.

The safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in children and adolescents 2 through 17 years of age: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children 2 through 17 years of age.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 6 large integrated health care organizations participating in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). Trivalent LAIV safety was assessed in children who received LAIV between September 1, 2003 and March 31, 2013. Eighteen pre-specified adverse event groups were studied, including allergic, autoimmune, neurologic, respiratory, and infectious conditions. Incident rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for each adverse event, using self-controlled case series analyses. For adverse events with a statistically significant increase in risk, or an IRR > 2.0 regardless of statistical significance, manual medical record review was performed to confirm case status.

RESULTS

During the study period, 396 173 children received 590 018 doses of LAIV. For 13 adverse event groups, there was no significant increased risk of adverse events following LAIV. Five adverse event groups (anaphylaxis, syncope, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, adverse effect of drug, and respiratory failure) met criteria for manual medical record review. After review to confirm cases, 2 adverse event groups remained significantly associated with LAIV: anaphylaxis and syncope. One confirmed case of anaphylaxis was observed following LAIV, a rate of 1.7 per million LAIV doses. Five confirmed cases of syncope were observed, a rate of 8.5 per million doses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a study of trivalent LAIV safety in a large cohort of children, few serious adverse events were detected. Anaphylaxis and syncope occurred following LAIV, although rarely. These data provide reassurance regarding continued LAIV use.

The safety of influenza vaccines in children: An Institute for Vaccine Safety white paper

Most influenza vaccines are generally safe, but influenza vaccines can cause rare serious adverse events. Some adverse events, such as fever and febrile seizures, are more common in children than adults. There can be differences in the safety of vaccines in different populations due to underlying differences in genetic predisposition to the adverse event. Live attenuated vaccines have not been studied adequately in children under 2 years of age to determine the risks of adverse events; more studies are needed to address this and several other priority safety issues with all influenza vaccines in children. All vaccines intended for use in children require safety testing in the target age group, especially in young children. Safety of one influenza vaccine in children should not be extrapolated to assumed safety of all influenza vaccines in children. The low rates of adverse events from influenza vaccines should not be a deterrent to the use of influenza vaccines because of the overwhelming evidence of the burden of disease due to influenza in children.

International Consensus (ICON): allergic reactions to vaccines

BACKGROUND

Routine immunization, one of the most effective public health interventions, has effectively reduced death and morbidity due to a variety of infectious diseases. However, allergic reactions to vaccines occur very rarely and can be life threatening. Given the large numbers of vaccines administered worldwide, there is a need for an international consensus regarding the evaluation and management of allergic reactions to vaccines.

METHODS

Following a review of the literature, and with the active participation of representatives from the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI), and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI), the final committee was formed with the purpose of having members who represented a wide-range of countries, had previously worked on vaccine safety, and included both allergist/immunologists as well as vaccinologists.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on a variety of topics, including: definition of immediate allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, approaches to distinguish association from causality, approaches to patients with a history of an allergic reaction to a previous vaccine, and approaches to patients with a history of an allergic reaction to components of vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

This document provides comprehensive and internationally accepted guidelines and access to on-line documents to help practitioners around the world identify allergic reactions following immunization. It also provides a framework for the evaluation and further management of patients who present either following an allergic reaction to a vaccine or with a history of allergy to a component of vaccines.

Safety of influenza vaccination in children with allergic diseases

Global guidelines strongly recommend annual influenza vaccination in people age 6 months and older, particularly in asthmatic children. There is no doubt about the benefit of influenza vaccination in asthmatic children. However, some of the vaccine's components may elicit an IgE mediated hypersensitivity or disease exacerbation, including life-threatening events, in children with allergic diseases. As a result, concerns regarding the safety of the vaccine still continue today. The influenza vaccine is grown on hens' eggs and contains a trace of egg protein. Consequently, it can provoke an allergic reaction or anaphylaxis in children with an egg allergy or exacerbation in those with asthma. Therefore, we need to know the risks and benefits of the influenza vaccine and the best strategy for safe vaccination. Although most guidelines have consistently reported the safety of influenza vaccination in children with allergic disease, and have recommended annual administration, safety concerns impede guideline-based performance in practice. The safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination for allergic children are summarized in the present review.

Seasonal split influenza vaccine induced IgE sensitization against influenza vaccine

Although anaphylaxis is an extremely rare vaccine-associated adverse event, it occurred in young children following administration of the 2011/12 seasonal split influenza vaccine, which contained 2-phenoxyethanol as the preservative. These children had high levels of IgE antibodies against influenza vaccine components. We herein investigated why these children were sensitized. One hundred and seventeen series of serum samples were obtained immediately before, and one month after the first and second immunizations with the HA split vaccine of 2011/12. Forty-two sequential serum samples were collected in the acute and convalescent phases (2 and 4 weeks) after natural infection with H1N1 Pdm in 2009. IgE antibodies developed following the vaccination of young children with seasonal split vaccines, whereas no significant IgE response was observed following natural infection with H1N1 Pdm 2009. The prevalence of IgE antibodies was not influenced by outbreaks of H1N1 Pdm. Repeated immunization with the HA split vaccine induced IgE sensitization against the influenza vaccine irrespective of the H1N1, H3N2, or B influenza subtypes. The reasons why anaphylaxis only occurred in recipients of the influenza vaccine containing 2-phenoxyethanol are still being investigated, and the size distribution of antigen particles may have shifted to a slightly larger size. Since the fundamental reason was IgE sensitization, current split formulation for the seasonal influenza vaccine needs to be reconsidered to prevent the induction of IgE sensitization.