Ethnicity and coronary artery disease: the role of high-density lipoprotein - a change in paradigm

Absolute Quantitative Targeted Monitoring of Potential Plasma Protein Biomarkers: A Pilot Study on Healthy Individuals

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The development of blood tests for the early detection of individual predisposition to socially significant diseases remains a pressing issue.

METHODS

In this pilot study, multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) with a BAK-270 assay was applied for protein concentrations analysis in blood plasma from 21 healthy volunteers of the European cohort.

RESULTS

The levels of 138 plasma proteins were reliably and precisely quantified in no less than 50% of samples. The quantified proteins included 66 FDA-approved markers of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and other potential biomarkers of pathologies such as cancer, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. The analysis of individual variations of the plasma proteins revealed significant differences between the male (11) and female (10) groups. In total, fifteen proteins had a significantly different concentration in plasma; this included four proteins that exhibited changes greater than ±1.5-fold, three proteins (RBP4, APCS, and TTR) with higher levels in males, and one (SHBG) elevated in females. The obtained results demonstrated considerable agreement with the data collected from 20 samples of a North American cohort, which were analyzed with the similar MRM assay. The most significant differences between the cohorts of the two continents were observed in the level of 42 plasma proteins (including 24 FDA markers), of which 17 proteins showed a ≥1.5-fold change, and included proteins increased in North Americans (APOB, CRTAC1, C1QB, C1QC, C9, CRP, HP, IGHG1, IGKV4-1, SERPING1, RBP4, and AZGP1), as well as those elevated in Europeans (APOF, CD5L, HBG2, SELPLG, and TNA).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest a different contribution of specific (patho)physiological pathways (e.g., immune system and blood coagulation) to the development of socially significant diseases in Europeans and North Americans, and they should be taken into account when refining diagnostic panels.

Associations Between High-Density Lipoprotein Particles and Ischemic Events by Vascular Domain, Sex, and Ethnicity: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration (HDL-C) is an established atheroprotective marker, in particular for coronary artery disease; however, HDL particle concentration (HDL-P) may better predict risk. The associations of HDL-C and HDL-P with ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) among women and Blacks have not been well studied. We hypothesized that HDL-P would consistently be associated with MI and stroke among women and Blacks compared with HDL-C.

Methods:

We analyzed individual-level participant data in a pooled cohort of 4 large population studies without baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: DHS (Dallas Heart Study; n=2535), ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; n=1595), MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; n=6632), and PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease; n=5022). HDL markers were analyzed in adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for MI and ischemic stroke.

Results:

In the overall population (n=15 784), HDL-P was inversely associated with the combined outcome of MI and ischemic stroke, adjusted for cardiometabolic risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] for quartile 4 [Q4] versus quartile 1 [Q1], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.52–0.78]), as was HDL-C (HR for Q4 versus Q1, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61–0.94]). Adjustment for HDL-C did not attenuate the inverse relationship between HDL-P and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, whereas adjustment for HDL-P attenuated all associations between HDL-C and events. HDL-P was inversely associated with the individual end points of MI and ischemic stroke in the overall population, including in women. HDL-P was inversely associated with MI among White participants but not among Black participants (HR for Q4 versus Q1 for Whites, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.35–0.69]; for Blacks, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.76–1.98]; P_interaction=0.001). Similarly, HDL-C was inversely associated with MI among White participants (HR for Q4 versus Q1, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36–0.78]) but had a weak direct association with MI among Black participants (HR for Q4 versus Q1, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.08–2.83]; P_interaction<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Compared with HDL-C, HDL-P was consistently associated with MI and ischemic stroke in the overall population. Differential associations of both HDL-C and HDL-P for MI by Black ethnicity suggest that atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk may differ by vascular domain and ethnicity. Future studies should examine individual outcomes separately.