Ventricular-assist devices for the treatment of chronic heart failure

Intramyocardial Delivery of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells and Mechanical Assist Device Implantation in Patients with End-Stage Cardiomyopathy

In end-stage heart failure, mechanical ventricular assist devices (VAD) are being used as bridge-to-transplantation, as a bridge-to-recovery, or as the definitive therapy. We tested the hypothesis that myocardial implantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNC) increases the likelihood of successful weaning from left VAD (LVAD) support. Ten patients (aged 14–60 years) with deteriorating heart function underwent LVAD implantation and concomitant implantation of autologous BMNC. Bone marrow was harvested prior to VAD implantation and BMNC were prepared by density centrifugation. Two patients received a pulsatile, extracorporeal LVAD and eight a nonpulsatile implantable device. Between 52 and 164 × 107 BMNC containing between 1 and 12 × 106 CD34+ cells were injected into the LV myocardium. There was one early and one late death. The median time on LVAD support was 243 days (range 24–498 days). Repeated echocardiographic examinations under increased hemodynamic load revealed a significant improvement of LV function in one patient. Three patients underwent heart transplantation, and four patients remain on LVAD support >1 year without evidence of recovery. Only one patient was successfully weaned from LVAD support after 4 months, and LV function has remained stable ever since. In patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy, intramyocardial injection of BMNC at the time of LVAD implantation does not seem to increase the likelihood of successful weaning from VAD support. Other cell-based strategies should be pursued to harness the potential of cell therapy in LVAD patients.

Intermittent levosimendan improves mid-term survival in chronic heart failure patients: meta-analysis of randomised trials

AIMS

Standard inotropic treatment is often necessary in end-stage heart failure but may be harmful. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of repeated administration of levosimendan on survival in patients with chronic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four investigators independently searched in CENTRAL, Google Scholar MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials to identify any randomized study ever performed with intermittent levosimendan intravenous administration in adult patients with chronic heart failure with no restrictions on dose or time of administration. Data from a total of 326 patients from six randomized controlled studies using intermittent levosimendan in a cardiological setting were included in the analysis. Levosimendan was associated with a significant reduction in mortality at the longest follow-up available [32 of 168 (19 %) in the levosimendan group 46 of 133 (35 %) in the control arm, RR = 0.55 (95 % CI 0.37-0.84), p for effect = 0 0.005, p for heterogeneity = 0.3, I (2) = 23.4 %, NNT = 6 with 5 studies included]. Brain natriuretic peptide values, ejection fraction and number of patients with New York Heart Association ≥ III status were similar in survivors of both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A large randomized trial is necessary to confirm the promising beneficial effects of intermittent levosimendan administration on the mid-term survival of patients with chronic heart failure.

Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy

Heart failure (HF) is a global epidemic that continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality despite advances in medical therapy. Ventricular assist device technology has emerged as a therapeutic option to bridge patients with end-stage HF to heart transplantation or as an alternative to transplantation in selected patients. In some patients, mechanical unloading induced by ventricular assist devices leads to improvement of myocardial function and a possibility of device removal. The implementation of this advanced technology requires multiple pharmacological interventions, both in the perioperative and long-term periods, in order to minimize potential complications and improve patient outcomes. We herein review the latest available evidence supporting the use of specific pharmacological interventions and current practices in the care of these patients: anticoagulation, bleeding management, pump thrombosis, infections, arrhythmias, right ventricular failure, hypertension, desensitization protocols, among others. Areas of uncertainty and ground for future research are also highlighted.

Left ventricular assist device unloading effects on myocardial structure and function: current status of the field and call for action

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myocardial remodeling driven by excess pressure and volume load is believed to be responsible for the vicious cycle of progressive myocardial dysfunction in chronic heart failure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), by providing significant volume and pressure unloading, allow a reversal of stress-related compensatory responses of the overloaded myocardium. Herein, we summarize and integrate insights from studies which investigated how LVAD unloading influences the structure and function of the failing human heart.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent investigations have described the impact of LVAD unloading on key structural features of cardiac remodeling - cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, microvasculature changes, adrenergic pathways and sympathetic innervation. The effects of LVAD unloading on myocardial function, electrophysiologic properties and arrhythmias have also been generating significant interest. We also review information describing the extent and sustainability of the LVAD-induced myocardial recovery, the important advances in understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure derived from such studies, and the implications of these findings for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Special emphasis is given to the great variety of fundamental questions at the basic, translational and clinical levels that remain unanswered and to specific investigational strategies aimed at advancing the field.

SUMMARY

Structural and functional reverse remodeling associated with LVADs continues to inspire innovative research. The ultimate goal of these investigations is to achieve sustained recovery of the failing human heart.

Reverse electrophysiologic remodeling after cardiac mechanical unloading for end-stage nonischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD)-induced unloading appear to cause reverse cardiac remodeling. However, its effect on arrhythmogenicity is a controversial issue, and prospective data are lacking. We sought to investigate the impact of LVAD-induced unloading on the electrical properties of the failing heart.

METHODS

We prospectively studied the effects of LVAD therapy on QRS, QT, and QTc durations and ventricular arrhythmias from electrocardiograms and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms recorded before and during 6 months of mechanical support in 12 LVAD patients and 7 other patients with advanced nonischemic cardiomyopathy untreated with LVAD.

RESULTS

After 1 week of LVAD support, QTc duration had decreased from 479 ± 79 ms to 411 ± 57 ms (p = 0.037), and QRS duration from 150 ± 46 ms to 134 ± 32 ms (p = 0.029). At 6 months, QTc was found to be 372 ± 56 ms (p = 0.046 versus baseline, 15% shortening) and QRS 118 ± 25 ms (p = 0.028 versus baseline, 11% shortening). A strong correlation was found between QTc shortening and increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and decrease in left ventricular filling pressures. After 2 months of LVAD support, premature ventricular contractions had decreased from 3,507 ± 4,252 to 483 ± 417 in 24 hours (p = 0.043), ventricular couplets from 82 ± 99 to 29 ± 25 in 24 hours (p = 0.05), and ventricular runs from 9 ± 8 to 10 ± 9 (not significant). No patient died suddenly or suffered a symptomatic arrhythmic event during follow-up. No significant electrocardiographic, functional, or hemodynamic change was observed in the 7 patients untreated with LVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The LVAD support caused progressive shortening of QTc and QRS intervals, consistent with reverse remodeling of the failing heart's electrical properties, accompanied by a decrease in frequency of ventricular arrhythmias.

Risk factors predictive of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation

Right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation appears to be associated with increased mortality. However, the determination of which patients are at greater risk of developing postoperative RVF remains controversial and relatively unknown. We sought to determine the preoperative risk factors for the development of RVF after LVAD implantation. The data were obtained for 175 consecutive patients who had received an LVAD. RVF was defined by the need for inhaled nitric oxide for >/=48 hours or intravenous inotropes for >14 days and/or right ventricular assist device implantation. An RVF risk score was developed from the beta coefficients of the independent variables from a multivariate logistic regression model predicting RVF. Destination therapy (DT) was identified as the indication for LVAD implantation in 42% of our patients. RVF after LVAD occurred in 44% of patients (n = 77). The mortality rates for patients with RVF were significantly greater at 30, 180, and 365 days after implantation compared to patients with no RVF. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, 3 preoperative factors were significantly associated with RVF after LVAD implantation: (1) a preoperative need for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, (2) increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and (3) DT. The developed RVF risk score effectively stratified the risk of RV failure and death after LVAD implantation. In conclusion, given the progressively growing need for DT, the developed RVF risk score, derived from a population with a large percentage of DT patients, might lead to improved patient selection and help stratify patients who could potentially benefit from early right ventricular assist device implantation.

Assisting the failing heart

Anesthesiologists increasingly encounter patients who have a spectrum of heart failure ranging from stable chronic heart failure to acute heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Improved medical therapy has increased the survival of patients who have chronic heart failure but not of patients who have acute heart failure. New surgical techniques and mechanical devices may offer alternatives to certain patients who have refractory heart failure This article provides an overview of established and newer pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies and surgical interventions to manage patients who have heart failure, including the perioperative management of heart transplantation and ventricular assist devices.

Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy

The left ventricular assist device was originally designed to be surgically implanted as a bridge to transplantation for patients with chronic end-stage heart failure. On the basis of the REMATCH trial, the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services approved permanent implantation of the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy in Medicare beneficiaries who are not candidates for heart transplantation. The use of the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy raises certain ethical challenges. Left ventricular assist devices can prolong the survival of average recipients compared with optimal medical management of chronic end-stage heart failure. However, the overall quality of life can be adversely affected in some recipients because of serious infections, neurologic complications, and device malfunction. Left ventricular assist devices alter end-of-life trajectories. The caregivers of recipients may experience significant burden (e.g., poor physical health, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder) from destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices. There are also social and financial ramifications for recipients and their families. We advocate early utilization of a palliative care approach and outline prerequisite conditions so that consenting for the use of a left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy is a well informed process. These conditions include: (1) direct participation of a multidisciplinary care team, including palliative care specialists, (2) a concise plan of care for anticipated device-related complications, (3) careful surveillance and counseling for caregiver burden, (4) advance-care planning for anticipated end-of-life trajectories and timing of device deactivation, and (5) a plan to address the long-term financial burden on patients, families, and caregivers.Short-term mechanical circulatory devices (e.g. percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass, percutaneous ventricular assist devices, etc.) can be initiated in emergency situations as a bridge to permanent implantation of ventricular assist devices in chronic end-stage heart failure. In the absence of first-person (patient) consent, presumed consent or surrogate consent should be used cautiously for the initiation of short-term mechanical circulatory devices in emergency situations as a bridge to permanent implantation of left ventricular assist devices. Future clinical studies of destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices should include measures of recipients' quality of end-of-life care and caregivers' burden.

Destination nowhere: a potential dilemma with ventricular assist devices

Increasingly, ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used as destination therapy for those who are not candidates for heart transplantation. Although these devices can benefit patients by improving their functional status and quality of life, they can, in some cases, facilitate an end-point known as "destination nowhere." In such situations, patients and clinicians find themselves in medical limbo where the patient's net benefit is, in fact, a burden, or the continued use of the device has no utility in light of the goals of the technology. This article presents guidance for avoiding "destination nowhere," as well as guidance for ethical care when patients arrive at this juncture.